A Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized Controlled Double-Blind Trial Evaluating the VertiFlex® Totalis™ Direct Decompression System Versus a Sham Comparator Surgical Procedure in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
A Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized Controlled Double-Blind Trial Evaluating the VertiFlex® Totalis™ Direct Decompression System Versus a Sham Comparator Surgical Procedure in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
The purpose of this study is to determine safety and effectiveness, as measured by changes in pain, disability, patient satisfaction, and claudicatory symptoms, at 6 months following treatment with the Totalis™ Direct Decompression System or Sham Comparator Surgical Procedure in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis
Subjects suffering from symptoms of neurogenic intermittent claudication secondary to a radiographically-confirmed diagnosis of central canal stenosis, with or without mild or moderate lateral recess stenosis, at one or two levels from L1 to L5 who meet all inclusion/exclusion criteria, including ≥6 months of non-operative management.
Patients included in the clinical investigation will return for follow-up visits at 1 week for safety evaluation, and at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months post-treatment to collect data for evaluation of safety and effectiveness.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: