Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| DUSA Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory disorder that is characterized by severe flushing (transient erythema), non-transient erythema, papules, pustules, and telangiectasia. Topical therapy is not always effective in treating symptoms of rosacea. Furthermore, rapid recurrence is common following the use of systemic antibiotics, resulting in the chronic use of these medications to control the disease. Although the exact pathogenesis of rosacea is unknown, treatment for this condition has been investigated based on its similarity to acne and photodamaged skin. Case reports have shown promising results in rosacea patients treated with methyl aminolevulinate photodynamic therapy (MAL - PDT). Other than a case report which observed significant improvement of papules, pustules, erythema, and flushing following 5 - aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy (ALA-PDT) treatment of a patient with rosacea, the role of ALA-PDT in the treatment of rosacea has not been reported.
We have designed a pilot study investigating the efficacy of ALA-PDT in treating papulopustular rosacea. The objectives of the study are as follows:
Primary objective:
To evaluate improvement of the inflammatory lesions (papules, pustules, nodules), erythema, and telangiectasia of rosacea as assessed by the Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA).
To evaluate improvement of the inflammatory lesions (papules, pustules, nodules) of rosacea as assessed by the Inflammatory Lesion Investigator's Global Assessment (ILIGA).
Secondary objectives:
To evaluate improvement of rosacea associated erythema as assessed by the Clinical Erythema Assessment (CEA) scale.
To evaluate improvement of the inflammatory lesions (papules, pustules, nodules) of rosacea as measured by a difference in inflammatory lesion count.
To evaluate improvement of rosacea as assessed by the Patient Overall Assessment Scale.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Levulan and Blu-U Light | Experimental | Entire face treated with 20% Aminolevulinic Acid (Levulan) and Blu-U light |
|
| Vehicle and Blu-U Light | Sham Comparator | Entire face treated with vehicle substance only and Blu-U light |
|
| Vehicle Only | Placebo Comparator | Entire face treated with vehicle substance only |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aminolevulinic acid topical solution 20% | Drug | Intervention used in the experimental arm only |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Improvement of the Inflammatory Lesions (Papules, Pustules, Nodules), Erythema, and Telangiectasia of Rosacea as Assessed by the Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) | The Investigator's global assessment (IGA) of rosacea is a subjective 7-point, static scoring system. Scores range from 0 to 6: 0 (clear), 1 (minimal), 2 (mild), 3 (mild to moderate), 4 (moderate), 5 (moderate to severe), 6 (severe). | 17 weeks |
| Improvement of the Inflammatory Lesions (Papules, Pustules, Nodules) of Rosacea as Assessed by the Inflammatory Lesion Investigator's Global Assessment (ILIGA) | The Inflammatory Lesion Investigator's Global Assessment (ILIGA) is a subjective 5-point measure of the overall disease severity. Scores range from 0 to 4: 0 (clear), 1 (almost clear), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), 4 (severe). | 17 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluate Improvement of Rosacea Associated Erythema as Assessed by the Clinical Erythema Assessment (CEA) Scale | The Clinical Erythema Assessment (CEA) scale is an assessment of erythema. It has a score range from 0 to 4: 0 (none), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), 3 (significant), 4 (severe). The total score is based on the evaluation of all areas of the face (forehead, chin, right cheek, left cheek, and nose). Each of these areas were scored from 0-4, giving a maximum total score of 20. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Alison Ehrlich, MD, MHS | George Washington University Department of Dermatology | Principal Investigator |
| Kamaria Nelson, MD | George Washington University Department of Dermatology | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medical Faculty Associates - George Washington University | Washington D.C. | District of Columbia | 20037 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Levulan and Blu-U Light | Entire face treated with 20% Aminolevulinic Acid (Levulan) and Blu-U light Aminolevulinic acid topical solution 20%: Intervention used in the experimental arm only Blu-U Light Therapy: Intervention used in experimental and sham arms |
| FG001 | Vehicle and Blu-U Light | Entire face treated with vehicle substance only and Blu-U light Blu-U Light Therapy: Intervention used in experimental and sham arms |
| FG002 | Vehicle Only | Entire face treated with vehicle substance only Placebo vehicle only: Intervention only includes the placebo vehicle solution |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Levulan and Blu-U Light | Entire face treated with 20% Aminolevulinic Acid (Levulan) and Blu-U light Aminolevulinic acid topical solution 20%: Intervention used in the experimental arm only Blu-U Light Therapy: Intervention used in experimental and sham arms |
| BG001 | Vehicle and Blu-U Light |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Improvement of the Inflammatory Lesions (Papules, Pustules, Nodules), Erythema, and Telangiectasia of Rosacea as Assessed by the Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) | The Investigator's global assessment (IGA) of rosacea is a subjective 7-point, static scoring system. Scores range from 0 to 6: 0 (clear), 1 (minimal), 2 (mild), 3 (mild to moderate), 4 (moderate), 5 (moderate to severe), 6 (severe). | Group A = Levulan and Blu-U Light; Group B = Vehicle and Blu-U Light; Group C = Vehicle Only. Of the 30 randomized patients, 24 (80%) completed the entire study. 8 (80%) patients completed from Group A, 10 (100%) from Group B, and 6 (60%) from Group C. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 17 weeks |
|
Adverse events were assessed for each patient from the baseline visit to up to 2 months following the final treatment, which averages from 17 to 19 weeks per patient.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Levulan and Blu-U Light | Entire face treated with 20% Aminolevulinic Acid (Levulan) and Blu-U light Aminolevulinic acid topical solution 20%: Intervention used in the experimental arm only Blu-U Light Therapy: Intervention used in experimental and sham arms |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hyperpigmentation | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dermatology Research Fellow | The George Washington University, Medical Faculty Associates | 202-741-2632 | knelson@mfa.gwu.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Mar 14, 2017 | Nov 20, 2019 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012393 | Rosacea |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000622 | Aminolevulinic Acid |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007982 | Levulinic Acids |
| D007651 | Keto Acids |
| D002264 | Carboxylic Acids |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Blu-U Light Therapy | Device | Intervention used in experimental and sham arms |
|
| Placebo vehicle only | Other | Intervention only includes the placebo vehicle solution |
|
| 17 weeks |
| Evaluate Improvement of the Inflammatory Lesions (Papules, Pustules, Nodules) of Rosacea as Measured by a Difference in Inflammatory Lesion Count (ILC) | The Inflammatory Lesion Count (ILC) is calculated by the number of inflammatory lesions (papules, pustules, nodules) as recorded by the investigator. | 17 weeks |
| Evaluate Improvement of Rosacea as Assessed by the Patient Overall Assessment (POA) Scale | For the Patient Overall Assessments (POA) scale, patients assessed the overall improvement of their rosacea using a 4-point scale, where 1 = excellent improvement, 2 = good/moderate improvement, 3 = no change, 4 = worsening. | 17 weeks |
Entire face treated with vehicle substance only and Blu-U light Blu-U Light Therapy: Intervention used in experimental and sham arms |
| BG002 | Vehicle Only | Entire face treated with vehicle substance only Placebo vehicle only: Intervention only includes the placebo vehicle solution |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Participants |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Fitzpatrick Skin Type | The Fitzpatrick classification is a method of skin phototyping based on a person's tendency to sunburn and ability to tan. I: Always burn, never tan II: Usually burn, tan less than average (with difficulty) III: Sometimes mild burn, tan about average IV: Rarely burn, tan more than average (with ease) V: Brown skin VI: Black skin | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| OG001 | Vehicle and Blu-U Light | Entire face treated with vehicle substance only and Blu-U light Blu-U Light Therapy: Intervention used in experimental and sham arms |
| OG002 | Vehicle Only | Entire face treated with vehicle substance only Placebo vehicle only: Intervention only includes the placebo vehicle solution |
|
|
| Primary | Improvement of the Inflammatory Lesions (Papules, Pustules, Nodules) of Rosacea as Assessed by the Inflammatory Lesion Investigator's Global Assessment (ILIGA) | The Inflammatory Lesion Investigator's Global Assessment (ILIGA) is a subjective 5-point measure of the overall disease severity. Scores range from 0 to 4: 0 (clear), 1 (almost clear), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), 4 (severe). | Group A = Levulan and Blu-U Light; Group B = Vehicle and Blu-U Light; Group C = Vehicle Only. Of the 30 randomized patients, 24 (80%) completed the entire study. 8 (80%) patients completed from Group A, 10 (100%) from Group B, and 6 (60%) from Group C. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 17 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Evaluate Improvement of Rosacea Associated Erythema as Assessed by the Clinical Erythema Assessment (CEA) Scale | The Clinical Erythema Assessment (CEA) scale is an assessment of erythema. It has a score range from 0 to 4: 0 (none), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), 3 (significant), 4 (severe). The total score is based on the evaluation of all areas of the face (forehead, chin, right cheek, left cheek, and nose). Each of these areas were scored from 0-4, giving a maximum total score of 20. | Group A = Levulan and Blu-U Light; Group B = Vehicle and Blu-U Light; Group C = Vehicle Only. Of the 30 randomized patients, 24 (80%) completed the entire study. 8 (80%) patients completed from Group A, 10 (100%) from Group B, and 6 (60%) from Group C. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 17 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Evaluate Improvement of the Inflammatory Lesions (Papules, Pustules, Nodules) of Rosacea as Measured by a Difference in Inflammatory Lesion Count (ILC) | The Inflammatory Lesion Count (ILC) is calculated by the number of inflammatory lesions (papules, pustules, nodules) as recorded by the investigator. | Group A = Levulan and Blu-U Light; Group B = Vehicle and Blu-U Light; Group C = Vehicle Only. Of the 30 randomized patients, 24 (80%) completed the entire study. 8 (80%) patients completed from Group A, 10 (100%) from Group B, and 6 (60%) from Group C. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Inflammatory Lesion Count | 17 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Evaluate Improvement of Rosacea as Assessed by the Patient Overall Assessment (POA) Scale | For the Patient Overall Assessments (POA) scale, patients assessed the overall improvement of their rosacea using a 4-point scale, where 1 = excellent improvement, 2 = good/moderate improvement, 3 = no change, 4 = worsening. | Group A = Levulan and Blu-U Light; Group B = Vehicle and Blu-U Light; Group C = Vehicle Only. 8 (80%) patients completed from Group A, 10 (100%) from Group B, and 6 (60%) from Group C. One participant in Group B did not complete the POA scale at the last follow-up visit; therefore only 9 participants are included in the analysis for Group B. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 17 weeks |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 10 |
| 0 |
| 10 |
| 3 |
| 10 |
| EG001 | Vehicle and Blu-U Light | Entire face treated with vehicle substance only and Blu-U light Blu-U Light Therapy: Intervention used in experimental and sham arms | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| EG002 | Vehicle Only | Entire face treated with vehicle substance only Placebo vehicle only: Intervention only includes the placebo vehicle solution | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Contact Dermatitis | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Post-Treatment Erythema | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D000596 |
| Amino Acids |
| D000602 | Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins |