Prospective, Randomized and Double Blind Study of Parallels Groups for Evaluating the Effectiveness Between Two Surgical Techniques for Reconstruction of Humeral Proximal Extremity Fractures in Three or Four Fragments
Prospective, Randomized and Double Blind Study of Parallels Groups for Evaluating the Effectiveness Between Two Surgical Techniques for Reconstruction of Humeral Proximal Extremity Fractures in Three or Four Fragments
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of two surgical techniques for the treatments of proximal extremity humeral fractures and fractures luxation in three o four fragments of Neer's classification.
Proximal extremity humeral fractures present high prevalence. It's estimated about 10% of all fractures. Their incidence is 6,6/1000 people-year and this amount increases from 40 years old. The majority are successfully treated with immobilization and rehabilitation. The surgical treatment is recommended in case of displacement. In elderly population with fractures types three or four of Neer's classification there is no consensus on which technique is the best surgical option. Classically hemiarthroplasty has been widely performed as a reconstruction method but its outcomes in old patients are unclear due to the bad bone quality and joint features. Recently some authors recommend the reverse arthroplasty in patients over 70 years old . The aim of this study is to compare the results between Hemiarthroplasty and reverse arthroplasty in patients over 70 years old. As far as the investigators are concerned there's no published studies like this.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Any condition to make worse the functional recovery or avoid the patient collaboration with the rehabilitation program ( cognitive disability, neurological pathology…)