Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of two surgical techniques for the treatments of proximal extremity humeral fractures and fractures luxation in three o four fragments of Neer's classification.
Proximal extremity humeral fractures present high prevalence. It's estimated about 10% of all fractures. Their incidence is 6,6/1000 people-year and this amount increases from 40 years old. The majority are successfully treated with immobilization and rehabilitation. The surgical treatment is recommended in case of displacement. In elderly population with fractures types three or four of Neer's classification there is no consensus on which technique is the best surgical option. Classically hemiarthroplasty has been widely performed as a reconstruction method but its outcomes in old patients are unclear due to the bad bone quality and joint features. Recently some authors recommend the reverse arthroplasty in patients over 70 years old . The aim of this study is to compare the results between Hemiarthroplasty and reverse arthroplasty in patients over 70 years old. As far as the investigators are concerned there's no published studies like this.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hemiarthroplasty Global Fx(DePuy) | Active Comparator | in this technique the prosthesis is implanted in similar approach to shoulder anatomy |
|
| reverse arthroplasty Delta Xtent(DePuy) | Experimental | In this technique the prosthesis is implanted in the inverse mode of shoulder anatomy |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hemiarthroplasty | Procedure |
| ||
| reverse arthroplasty |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Effectiveness Will be Measured for AMERICAN SHOULDER AND ELBOW (ASES) Score | changes en ASES (AMERICAN SHOULDER AND ELBOW) score will be measured. The ASES questionnaire is composed of both a physician-rated component and a patient-reported component. The patient questions focus on joint pain, instability, and activities of daily living. This questionary includes a section on pain (7 items) and a section on activities of daily living (10 items). Scores range from 0 to 100 with a score of 0 indicating a worse shoulder condition and 100 indicating a better shoulder condition. | 36 months |
| Effectiveness Will be Measured for Constant Score | changes in Constant score will be measured. The Constant-Murley score (CMS) is a 100-points scale composed of a number of individual parameters. These parameters define the level of pain and the ability to carry out the normal daily activities of the patient. The Constant-Murley score was introduced to determine the functionality after the treatment of a shoulder injury. The test is divided into four subscales: pain (15 points), activities of daily living (20 points), strength (25 points) and range of motion: forward elevation, external rotation, abduction and internal rotation of the shoulder (40 points). The higher the score, the higher the quality of the function. | 36 months |
| Effectiveness Will be Measured for DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) Score | changes in DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) score will be measured. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) outcome measure is a 30-item, self-report questionnaire designed to assess the patient's health status during the previous week. The items enquire about the degree of difficulty in performing different physical activities because of arm, shoulder and hand problems (21 items), the severity of each of the symptoms of pain, activity-related pain, tingling, weakness and stiffness (five items) and the impact of the problem on social functioning, work, sleep and self-image (four items). Each item has five response options. The scores are then used to calculate a scale score ranging from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability) | 36 months |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Any condition to make worse the functional recovery or avoid the patient collaboration with the rehabilitation program ( cognitive disability, neurological pathology…)
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Carlos Alvarez, MD | Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon | Madrid | 28007 | Spain |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35727196 | Derived | Handoll HH, Elliott J, Thillemann TM, Aluko P, Brorson S. Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 21;6(6):CD000434. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000434.pub5. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Hemiarthroplasty Global Fx(DePuy) | in this technique the prosthesis is implanted in similar approach to shoulder anatomy Hemiarthroplasty |
| FG001 | Reverse Arthroplasty Delta Xtent(DePuy) | In this technique the prosthesis is implanted in the inverse mode of shoulder anatomy reverse arthroplasty |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
All patients 70 years of age or older with 3- or 4-part shoulder fractures were included in the study
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Hemiarthroplasty Global Fx(DePuy) | in this technique the prosthesis is implanted in similar approach to shoulder anatomy Hemiarthroplasty |
| BG001 | Reverse Arthroplasty Delta Xtent(DePuy) |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Effectiveness Will be Measured for AMERICAN SHOULDER AND ELBOW (ASES) Score | changes en ASES (AMERICAN SHOULDER AND ELBOW) score will be measured. The ASES questionnaire is composed of both a physician-rated component and a patient-reported component. The patient questions focus on joint pain, instability, and activities of daily living. This questionary includes a section on pain (7 items) and a section on activities of daily living (10 items). Scores range from 0 to 100 with a score of 0 indicating a worse shoulder condition and 100 indicating a better shoulder condition. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | 36 months |
|
36 months
Patient follow-up was done in consultations through five successive visits, at 6 weeks, at 3 months, at 6 months, a year, and the final review (minimum 40 months). These reviews were carried out by a specialist who was unaware of the prosthetic model that patients were wearing. (Masking technique).
As an adverse event we have collected the appearance of infections, instability or prosthetic loosening.
No infections, instability or prosthetic loosening were reported in any patient.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Hemiarthroplasty Global Fx(DePuy) | in this technique the prosthesis is implanted in similar approach to shoulder anatomy Hemiarthroplasty |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Carlos Álvarez | Hospital Gregorio Marañón | 0034915868000 | calvargon@gmail.com |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D062785 | Hemiarthroplasty |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019643 | Arthroplasty, Replacement |
| D001178 | Arthroplasty |
| D019637 | Orthopedic Procedures |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Procedure |
|
In this technique the prosthesis is implanted in the inverse mode of shoulder anatomy
reverse arthroplasty
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Reverse Arthroplasty Delta Xtent(DePuy) |
In this technique the prosthesis is implanted in the inverse mode of shoulder anatomy reverse arthroplasty |
|
|
|
| Primary | Effectiveness Will be Measured for Constant Score | changes in Constant score will be measured. The Constant-Murley score (CMS) is a 100-points scale composed of a number of individual parameters. These parameters define the level of pain and the ability to carry out the normal daily activities of the patient. The Constant-Murley score was introduced to determine the functionality after the treatment of a shoulder injury. The test is divided into four subscales: pain (15 points), activities of daily living (20 points), strength (25 points) and range of motion: forward elevation, external rotation, abduction and internal rotation of the shoulder (40 points). The higher the score, the higher the quality of the function. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | 36 months |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Effectiveness Will be Measured for DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) Score | changes in DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) score will be measured. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) outcome measure is a 30-item, self-report questionnaire designed to assess the patient's health status during the previous week. The items enquire about the degree of difficulty in performing different physical activities because of arm, shoulder and hand problems (21 items), the severity of each of the symptoms of pain, activity-related pain, tingling, weakness and stiffness (five items) and the impact of the problem on social functioning, work, sleep and self-image (four items). Each item has five response options. The scores are then used to calculate a scale score ranging from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability) | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | 36 months |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 19 |
| 0 |
| 19 |
| 0 |
| 19 |
| EG001 | Reverse Arthroplasty Delta Xtent(DePuy) | In this technique the prosthesis is implanted in the inverse mode of shoulder anatomy reverse arthroplasty | 0 | 20 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 20 |
Not provided
Not provided
| D019651 | Plastic Surgery Procedures |
| D019919 | Prosthesis Implantation |