Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University of Toronto | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Mechanical ventilation (MV) is a cornerstone of management of acute respiratory failure, but MV per se can provoke ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI), especially in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Lung protective ventilation strategy has been proved to prevent VILI by using low tidal volume of 6-8 ml/kg of ideal body weight and limiting plateau pressure to less than 30 cmH2O. However, heavy sedation or even paralysis are frequently used to ensure the protective ventilation strategy, both of which are associated with respiratory muscles weakness. Maintaining of spontaneous breathing may decrease the need of sedative drug and improve gas exchange by promoting lung recruitment.
Pressure-targeted mode is the most frequent way of delivering after 48 hours of initiating MV. Three types of pressure-controlled mode are available in intubated patients: Biphasic Intermittent Positive Airway Pressure (BIPAP), Airway Pressure Release Ventilation (APRV), and Pressure-Assist Controlled Ventilation (also called BIPAPassist). They are based on pressure regulation but have the difference in terms of synchronization between the patient and the ventilator. The different working principle of these modes may result in different breathing pattern and consequently different in tidal volume and transpulmonary pressure, which may be potentially harmful. The investigators bench study with a lung model demonstrated higher tidal volume and transpulmonary pressure with the BIPAPassist over APRV despite similar pressure settings and patient's simulated effort. However, the impact of each mode on the delivered tidal volume and the transpulmonary pressure in spontaneously breathing mechanically ventilated patients is currently unknown. Their hypothesis is that when the investigators compare the three pressure-controlled modes, the asynchronous mode (APRV) will result in more protective ventilation strategy over the two other modes (BIPAP and BIPAPassist).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pressure targeted modes | Experimental |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pressure targeted modes | Other | Intervention involving three different pressure-targeted modes (APRV, BIPAP, and BIPAPassist) each in a random order generated by a computer on one ventilator. Each mode will be studied for 20 minutes. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Tidal volume in each mode of ventilation | 20 minutes |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Inspiratory transpulmonary pressure in each mode of ventilation | 20 minutes | |
| Patient work of breathing | Patient work of breathing will be measured by using pressure-time product and pressure generated 100 ms after the onset of an occluded inspiratory effort (P0.1) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria: Patients who admitted in the intensive care unit (ICU) and mechanically ventilated (through an endotracheal or a tracheostomy tube) and meet the following criteria are eligible for study participation:
Exclusion Criteria: Patients who fulfill any of the following exclusion criteria are not eligible for study participation:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Laurent Brochard, Dr. | Unity Health Toronto | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| St. Michael's Hospital | Toronto | Ontario | M5B 1W8 | Canada | ||
| Mount Sinai Hospital |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23928898 | Background | Richard JC, Lyazidi A, Akoumianaki E, Mortaza S, Cordioli RL, Lefebvre JC, Rey N, Piquilloud L, Sferrazza Papa GF, Mercat A, Brochard L. Potentially harmful effects of inspiratory synchronization during pressure preset ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 2013 Nov;39(11):2003-10. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-3032-7. Epub 2013 Aug 9. | |
| 28986852 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012131 | Respiratory Insufficiency |
| D055397 | Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012120 | Respiration Disorders |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
| D055370 | Lung Injury |
| D008171 | Lung Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 20 minutes |
| The frequency of each breath-type according to the mode | Type A: spontaneous breaths occurring during Tlow, Type B: spontaneous breaths occurring during Thigh, Type C: quasi-assisted breaths synchronized with the ventilator cycling to Thigh, Type D: completely passive breaths, Type E: spontaneous breaths occurring as the ventilator cycles to Tlow | 20 minutes |
| Toronto |
| Ontario |
| M5G1X5 |
| Canada |
| Rittayamai N, Beloncle F, Goligher EC, Chen L, Mancebo J, Richard JM, Brochard L. Effect of inspiratory synchronization during pressure-controlled ventilation on lung distension and inspiratory effort. Ann Intensive Care. 2017 Oct 6;7(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s13613-017-0324-z. |