Safety and Effectiveness of the UV-X System for Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking in Eyes With Refractory Corneal Infection

Safety and Effectiveness of the UV-X System for Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking in Eyes With Refractory Corneal Infection

This study will evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the UV-X System for Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking in Eyes with Corneal Infection. The treatment of UV-X system is to use the eyedrops of the riboflavin, also known as vitamin B2, and ultraviolet A (UVA) light. The eye drops are placed in affected eye and then affected cornea is exposed to UVA.

UVA/riboflavin corneal collagen cross-linking was first used to treat patients in 1998 in Dresden, Germany. Data to date obtained mostly by physicians outside the United States has strongly suggested this treatment as an acceptable alternative, and many subjects have had a lasting effect (no progression) 3-5 years after their initial treatment.

This study is designed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of using the UV-X™ system for treating corneal ulcers that have proven refractory to conventional antibiotic treatment.

The UV-X™ system is a combination product consisting of a UVA 365 nm wavelength light source (UV-X™ Illumination System) and riboflavin (Medio-Cross® Riboflavin 0.1%) ophthalmic solution. The therapeutic effect is mediated by the photochemical interaction of the ultraviolet (UV) light with the riboflavin that has been saturated into the infected corneal stromal tissues.

The photochemical interaction of UVA light with riboflavin has been used to sterilize pathogens in blood and blood products. Pathogens including viruses, bacteria, fungi, and protozoa have shown to be sterilized using this photochemical process. Presumably singlet oxygen is produced by the interaction of the UVA with the riboflavin. It is this singlet oxygen that interacts with the pathogen's Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) in a sufficiently disruptive manner to render the exposed field sterile.

The cross-linking improves mechanical properties in the anterior stroma and has been shown to stabilize corneal structure in patients with progressive keratoconus and ectasias following refractive surgery. The same technology has been applied to a handful of patients with corneal ulcers and a single small series with bullous keratopathy. In no case was the patient worsened by this treatment. In the majority of the cases, considerable clinical reversal of a deteriorating clinical course was obtained. There has been debate about the mechanism of action of this beneficial effect. It has been speculated that a proteolytic collagenase enzyme was destroyed by the photochemical process. As an alternate, it has been suggested that the corneal collagen is strengthened by the cross linking and becomes more resistant to the infectious process. Finally a direct sterilization effect of the UVA light, the riboflavin, or the combination has been postulated. Recent laboratory work has shown that staphylococci cultures on an agar plate will be killed when exposed to the combination of UVA and riboflavin as used in these experiments. Neither the UVA nor the riboflavin alone had any bactericidal effect.

The procedure that has been used and that the investigators propose to study to treats corneal infections and ulcerations is identical to the procedure used to strengthen the cornea. It is performed by saturating the cornea with riboflavin 0.1% riboflavin solution and then exposing the riboflavin soaked cornea to UVA light. After the corneal stroma saturation is achieved, the infected tissues are exposed to UVA light at 365 nm and an irradiance of 3 mW/cm2 for 30 minutes. Exposure of the cornea to this combination of UVA light (365 nm; 3 mW/cm2 irradiation; 30 minutes duration) after topical administration of riboflavin appears to have a broad sterilization effect based on the photochemical interaction of the UVA and the riboflavin.

Inclusion Criteria:

• Subjects who have one eye that meets the following criteria:

  • 18 years of age or older
  • Having a diagnosis of a corneal ulcer.
  • Corneal scraping sent for cultures and sensitivities.
  • Having been treated for at least three days with conventional broad spectrum anti infective therapy without improvement

• Showing no response to the therapy by one or more of the following criteria:

  • Progressive thinning of cornea
  • Increasing diameter of corneal ulcer
  • Increasing diameter of corneal infiltrate
  • Persistent epithelial defect
  • Persistent inflammatory signs as iritis and hypopyon
  • Persistent pain

Exclusion Criteria:

• All subjects meeting any of the following criteria will be excluded from this study:
• A corneal ulcer that has perforated
• A corneal ulcer that has produced a descemetocele.
• Women who may be breast-feeding and pregnant women.
• Herpetic infection suggested by history or clinical evaluation.