Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-001707-36 | EudraCT Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
To evaluate the effect of erenumab compared to placebo on the change from baseline in the number of monthly migraine days in adults with chronic migraine.
This study consisted of the following phases: screening, 4-week baseline phase, 12-week double-blind treatment, and 12-week follow-up. Participants may have elected to participate in the optional pharmacokinetic substudy and the optional, novel patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessment substudy.
Participants who completed the 12-week double-blind treatment phase of Study 20120295 were eligible to enroll in an open-label extension study (Study 20130255; NCT02174861).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | Participants received placebo on day 1 and at weeks 4 and 8 by subcutaneous injection. |
|
| Erenumab 70 mg | Experimental | Participants received 70 mg erenumab on day 1 and at weeks 4 and 8 by subcutaneous injection. |
|
| Erenumab 140 mg | Placebo Comparator | Participants received 140 mg erenumab on day 1 and at weeks 4 and 8 by subcutaneous injection. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Erenumab | Biological | Administered once a month subcutaneously by authorized investigational site study staff. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Monthly Migraine Days | A migraine day was any calendar day in which the participant experienced a qualified migraine headache (onset, continuation, or recurrence of the migraine headache). A qualified migraine headache was defined either as a migraine with or without aura. The change from baseline in monthly migraine days was calculated as the number of migraine days during the last 4 weeks of the 12-week treatment phase - the number of migraine days during the 4-week baseline phase. | 4-week baseline phase and the last 4 weeks of the 12-week treatment phase |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With at Least a 50% Reduction in Monthly Migraine Days From Baseline | A migraine day was any calendar day in which the participant experienced a qualified migraine headache (onset, continuation, or recurrence of the migraine headache). A qualified migraine headache was defined either as a migraine without aura or a migraine with aura. Monthly migraine days were calculated as the number of migraine days in the 4-week baseline phase and during the last 4 weeks of treatment. At least a 50% reduction from baseline in monthly migraine days was determined if the change in monthly migraine days from the 4-week baseline phase to the last 4 weeks of the 12-week treatment phase * 100 / baseline monthly migraine days was less than or equal to -50%. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| MD | Amgen | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Research Site | La Jolla | California | 92037 | United States | ||
| Research Site |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28460892 | Background | Tepper S, Ashina M, Reuter U, Brandes JL, Dolezil D, Silberstein S, Winner P, Leonardi D, Mikol D, Lenz R. Safety and efficacy of erenumab for preventive treatment of chronic migraine: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2017 Jun;16(6):425-434. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30083-2. Epub 2017 Apr 28. | |
| Background | Cheng S, Picard H, Zhang F, Eisele O, Mikol DD. Efficacy and safety of erenumab for migraine prevention: an overview. Japanese Journal of Headache. 2019; 45 : 493-505. | ||
| 35272533 |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| AmgenTrials clinical trials website | View source |
Not provided
Participants were randomized in a 3:2:2 ratio to receive placebo, erenumab 70 mg, or erenumab 140 mg. Randomization was stratified by region (North America vs Other) and medication overuse status at baseline (Yes vs No).
This study was conducted at 69 centers in Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, Finland, Norway, Poland, Sweden, United Kingdom, and the United States of America (USA).
The first participant was enrolled on 05 March 2014 and the last participant enrolled on 05 November 2015.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Placebo | Participants received placebo on day 1 and at weeks 4 and 8 by subcutaneous injection. |
| FG001 | Erenumab 70 mg | Participants received 70 mg erenumab on day 1 and at weeks 4 and 8 by subcutaneous injection. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Placebo | Drug | Administered once a month subcutaneously by authorized investigational site study staff. |
|
| 4-week baseline phase and the last 4 weeks of the 12-week treatment phase |
| Change From Baseline in Monthly Acute Migraine-specific Medication Treatment Days | Monthly acute migraine-specific medication treatment days is the number of days on which migraine specific medications were used between monthly doses of study drug. Migraine-specific medications includes two categories of medications: triptan-based migraine medications and ergotamine-based migraine medications. | 4-week baseline phase and the last 4 weeks of the 12-week treatment phase |
| Change From Baseline in Cumulative Monthly Headache Hours | The cumulative duration of any qualified headache between monthly doses of study drug regardless of acute treatment use. A qualified headache was defined as follows:
| 4-week baseline phase and the last 4 weeks of the 12-week treatment phase |
| Number of Participants With Adverse Events | Adverse events (AEs) were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4, where: Grade 1 = Mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated; Grade 2 = Moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living (ADL); Grade 3 = Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self care ADL; Grade 4 = Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Grade 5 = Death related to AE. | From the first dose of study drug up to 16 weeks after the last dose (24 weeks) |
| Number of Participants Who Developed Antibodies to Erenumab | Blood samples were first tested in an electrochemiluminescence (ECL)-based bridging immunoassay to detect anti-drug antibodies (ADA) against erenumab. Samples confirmed to be positive for binding antibodies were subsequently tested in a cell-based bioassay to determine neutralizing activity against erenumab (Neutralizing Antibody Assay). Developing antibody incidence indicates participants with a negative or no result at baseline and a positive result at any time post-baseline. If a sample was positive for binding antibodies and demonstrated neutralizing activity at the same time point, the sample was defined as positive for neutralizing antibodies. | Baseline and weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 |
| Newport Beach |
| California |
| 92663 |
| United States |
| Research Site | San Francisco | California | 94109 | United States |
| Research Site | Santa Monica | California | 90404 | United States |
| Research Site | Sherman Oaks | California | 91403 | United States |
| Research Site | Stanford | California | 94305 | United States |
| Research Site | Stamford | Connecticut | 06905 | United States |
| Research Site | Jacksonville | Florida | 32256 | United States |
| Research Site | Orlando | Florida | 32801 | United States |
| Research Site | Palm Beach Gardens | Florida | 33410 | United States |
| Research Site | West Palm Beach | Florida | 33407 | United States |
| Research Site | Atlanta | Georgia | 30342 | United States |
| Research Site | Decatur | Georgia | 30033 | United States |
| Research Site | Indianapolis | Indiana | 46256 | United States |
| Research Site | Pikesville | Maryland | 21208 | United States |
| Research Site | Watertown | Massachusetts | 02472 | United States |
| Research Site | Worcester | Massachusetts | 01605 | United States |
| Research Site | Ann Arbor | Michigan | 48104 | United States |
| Research Site | Kalamazoo | Michigan | 49009 | United States |
| Research Site | Springfield | Missouri | 65807 | United States |
| Research Site | St Louis | Missouri | 63141 | United States |
| Research Site | Reno | Nevada | 89502 | United States |
| Research Site | Amherst | New York | 14226 | United States |
| Research Site | Greensboro | North Carolina | 27405 | United States |
| Research Site | Cleveland | Ohio | 44195 | United States |
| Research Site | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19107 | United States |
| Research Site | Nashville | Tennessee | 37203 | United States |
| Research Site | Austin | Texas | 78731 | United States |
| Research Site | Dallas | Texas | 75214 | United States |
| Research Site | Dallas | Texas | 75231 | United States |
| Research Site | Temple | Texas | 76508 | United States |
| Research Site | Virginia Beach | Virginia | 23454 | United States |
| Research Site | Seattle | Washington | 98195-6169 | United States |
| Research Site | Milwaukee | Wisconsin | 53226 | United States |
| Research Site | Calgary | Alberta | T3M 1M4 | Canada |
| Research Site | Montreal | Quebec | H2L 4M1 | Canada |
| Research Site | Brno | 611 00 | Czechia |
| Research Site | Brno | 656 91 | Czechia |
| Research Site | Prague | 120 00 | Czechia |
| Research Site | Prague | 140 59 | Czechia |
| Research Site | Glostrup Municipality | 2600 | Denmark |
| Research Site | Helsinki | 00100 | Finland |
| Research Site | Jyväskylä | 40100 | Finland |
| Research Site | Oulu | 90101 | Finland |
| Research Site | Tampere | 33100 | Finland |
| Research Site | Turku | 20100 | Finland |
| Research Site | Berlin | 10117 | Germany |
| Research Site | Berlin | 10435 | Germany |
| Research Site | Bochum | 44787 | Germany |
| Research Site | Essen | 45147 | Germany |
| Research Site | Hamburg | 20251 | Germany |
| Research Site | Kiel | 24149 | Germany |
| Research Site | Königstein im Taunus | 61462 | Germany |
| Research Site | Ålesund | 6003 | Norway |
| Research Site | Lillehammar | 2629 | Norway |
| Research Site | Sandvika | 1337 | Norway |
| Research Site | Stavanger | 4005 | Norway |
| Research Site | Krakow | 31-209 | Poland |
| Research Site | Lodz | 90-338 | Poland |
| Research Site | Lublin | 20-016 | Poland |
| Research Site | Poznan | 60-355 | Poland |
| Research Site | Świdnik | 21-040 | Poland |
| Research Site | Warsaw | 00-669 | Poland |
| Research Site | Warsaw | 01-192 | Poland |
| Research Site | Warsaw | 04-052 | Poland |
| Research Site | Falköping | 521 37 | Sweden |
| Research Site | Stockholm | 112 45 | Sweden |
| Research Site | Stockholm | 114 33 | Sweden |
| Research Site | Stockholm | 141 86 | Sweden |
| Research Site | Vällingby | 162 68 | Sweden |
| Research Site | Glasgow | G51 4TF | United Kingdom |
| Research Site | Hull | HU3 2JZ | United Kingdom |
| Research Site | London | SE5 9RS | United Kingdom |
| Research Site | Stoke-on-Trent | ST4 6QG | United Kingdom |
| Background |
| Zhou Y, Zhang F, Starcevic Manning M, Hu Z, Hsu CP, Chen PW, Peng C, Loop B, Mytych DT, Paiva da Silva Lima G. Immunogenicity of erenumab: A pooled analysis of six placebo-controlled trials with long-term extensions. Cephalalgia. 2022 Jul;42(8):749-760. doi: 10.1177/03331024221075621. Epub 2022 Mar 10. |
| 31707815 | Background | Ashina M, Kudrow D, Reuter U, Dolezil D, Silberstein S, Tepper SJ, Xue F, Picard H, Zhang F, Wang A, Zhou Y, Hong F, Klatt J, Mikol DD. Long-term tolerability and nonvascular safety of erenumab, a novel calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist for prevention of migraine: A pooled analysis of four placebo-controlled trials with long-term extensions. Cephalalgia. 2019 Dec;39(14):1798-1808. doi: 10.1177/0333102419888222. Epub 2019 Nov 10. |
| 31852816 | Background | Kudrow D, Pascual J, Winner PK, Dodick DW, Tepper SJ, Reuter U, Hong F, Klatt J, Zhang F, Cheng S, Picard H, Eisele O, Wang J, Latham JN, Mikol DD. Vascular safety of erenumab for migraine prevention. Neurology. 2020 Feb 4;94(5):e497-e510. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000008743. Epub 2019 Dec 18. |
| 33982623 | Background | Lipton RB, Burstein R, Buse DC, Dodick DW, Koukakis R, Klatt J, Cheng S, Chou DE. Efficacy of erenumab in chronic migraine patients with and without ictal allodynia. Cephalalgia. 2021 Oct;41(11-12):1152-1160. doi: 10.1177/03331024211010305. Epub 2021 May 13. |
| 34407654 | Background | Lipton RB, Dodick DW, Kudrow D, Reuter U, Tenenbaum N, Zhang F, Lima GPDS, Chou DE, Mikol DD. Reduction in migraine pain intensity in patients treated with erenumab: A post hoc analysis of two pivotal randomized studies. Cephalalgia. 2021 Dec;41(14):1458-1466. doi: 10.1177/03331024211028966. Epub 2021 Aug 18. |
| 30996060 | Background | Lipton RB, Tepper SJ, Reuter U, Silberstein S, Stewart WF, Nilsen J, Leonardi DK, Desai P, Cheng S, Mikol DD, Lenz R. Erenumab in chronic migraine: Patient-reported outcomes in a randomized double-blind study. Neurology. 2019 May 7;92(19):e2250-e2260. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007452. Epub 2019 Apr 17. |
| 33269951 | Background | Lipton RB, Tepper SJ, Silberstein SD, Kudrow D, Ashina M, Reuter U, Dodick DW, Zhang F, Rippon GA, Cheng S, Mikol DD. Reversion from chronic migraine to episodic migraine following treatment with erenumab: Results of a post-hoc analysis of a randomized, 12-week, double-blind study and a 52-week, open-label extension. Cephalalgia. 2021 Jan;41(1):6-16. doi: 10.1177/0333102420973994. Epub 2020 Dec 3. |
| 30996056 | Background | Tepper SJ, Diener HC, Ashina M, Brandes JL, Friedman DI, Reuter U, Cheng S, Nilsen J, Leonardi DK, Lenz RA, Mikol DD. Erenumab in chronic migraine with medication overuse: Subgroup analysis of a randomized trial. Neurology. 2019 May 14;92(20):e2309-e2320. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007497. Epub 2019 Apr 17. |
| 35978286 | Derived | Lampl C, Kraus V, Lehner K, Loop B, Chehrenama M, Maczynska Z, Ritter S, Klatt J, Snellman J. Safety and tolerability of erenumab in individuals with episodic or chronic migraine across age groups: a pooled analysis of placebo-controlled trials. J Headache Pain. 2022 Aug 18;23(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s10194-022-01470-4. |
| 34928306 | Derived | Ashina M, Goadsby PJ, Dodick DW, Tepper SJ, Xue F, Zhang F, Brennan F, Paiva da Silva Lima G. Assessment of Erenumab Safety and Efficacy in Patients With Migraine With and Without Aura: A Secondary Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Neurol. 2022 Feb 1;79(2):159-168. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.4678. |
| 34301173 | Derived | Tepper SJ, Ashina M, Reuter U, Hallstrom Y, Broessner G, Bonner JH, Picard H, Cheng S, Chou DE, Zhang F, Klatt J, Mikol DD. Reduction in acute migraine-specific and non-specific medication use in patients treated with erenumab: post-hoc analyses of episodic and chronic migraine clinical trials. J Headache Pain. 2021 Jul 23;22(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s10194-021-01292-w. |
| 31816249 | Derived | Brandes JL, Diener HC, Dolezil D, Freeman MC, McAllister PJ, Winner P, Klatt J, Cheng S, Zhang F, Wen S, Ritter S, Lenz RA, Mikol DD. The spectrum of response to erenumab in patients with chronic migraine and subgroup analysis of patients achieving >/=50%, >/=75%, and 100% response. Cephalalgia. 2020 Jan;40(1):28-38. doi: 10.1177/0333102419894559. Epub 2019 Dec 9. |
| FG002 | Erenumab 140 mg | Participants received 140 mg erenumab on day 1 and at weeks 4 and 8 by subcutaneous injection. |
| Received Study Drug |
|
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Placebo | Participants received placebo on day 1 and at weeks 4 and 8 by subcutaneous injection. |
| BG001 | Erenumab 70 mg | Participants received 70 mg erenumab on day 1 and at weeks 4 and 8 by subcutaneous injection. |
| BG002 | Erenumab 140 mg | Participants received 140 mg erenumab on day 1 and at weeks 4 and 8 by subcutaneous injection. |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| ||||||||||
| Age, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||
| Prior Migraine Prophylactic Medication | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||
| Prior Migraine Prophylactic Treatment Failure | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||
| Region | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||
| Medication Overuse Status | Medication overuse was defined as any of the following criteria being met during the baseline (BL) phase:
| Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||
| Monthly Migraine Days | A migraine day was any calendar day in which the participant experienced a qualified migraine headache (onset, continuation, or recurrence of the migraine headache). A qualified migraine headache was defined either as a migraine without aura or a migraine with aura. Monthly migraine days were calculated as the number of migraine days in the 4-week baseline phase. | Mean | Standard Deviation | days |
| |||||||||
| Disease Duration of Migraine With or Without Aura | Participants with available data | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change From Baseline in Monthly Migraine Days | A migraine day was any calendar day in which the participant experienced a qualified migraine headache (onset, continuation, or recurrence of the migraine headache). A qualified migraine headache was defined either as a migraine with or without aura. The change from baseline in monthly migraine days was calculated as the number of migraine days during the last 4 weeks of the 12-week treatment phase - the number of migraine days during the 4-week baseline phase. | The efficacy analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and completed at least 1 post-baseline monthly eDiary measurement. The number of participants analyzed includes those with observed data at week 12. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | migraine days / month | 4-week baseline phase and the last 4 weeks of the 12-week treatment phase |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With at Least a 50% Reduction in Monthly Migraine Days From Baseline | A migraine day was any calendar day in which the participant experienced a qualified migraine headache (onset, continuation, or recurrence of the migraine headache). A qualified migraine headache was defined either as a migraine without aura or a migraine with aura. Monthly migraine days were calculated as the number of migraine days in the 4-week baseline phase and during the last 4 weeks of treatment. At least a 50% reduction from baseline in monthly migraine days was determined if the change in monthly migraine days from the 4-week baseline phase to the last 4 weeks of the 12-week treatment phase * 100 / baseline monthly migraine days was less than or equal to -50%. | The efficacy analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and completed at least 1 post-baseline monthly eDiary measurement. Participants with missing post-baseline data were counted as non-responders. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 4-week baseline phase and the last 4 weeks of the 12-week treatment phase |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Monthly Acute Migraine-specific Medication Treatment Days | Monthly acute migraine-specific medication treatment days is the number of days on which migraine specific medications were used between monthly doses of study drug. Migraine-specific medications includes two categories of medications: triptan-based migraine medications and ergotamine-based migraine medications. | The efficacy analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and completed at least 1 post-baseline monthly eDiary measurement. The number of participants analyzed includes those with observed data at week 12. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | acute migraine treatment days / month | 4-week baseline phase and the last 4 weeks of the 12-week treatment phase |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Cumulative Monthly Headache Hours | The cumulative duration of any qualified headache between monthly doses of study drug regardless of acute treatment use. A qualified headache was defined as follows:
| The efficacy analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and completed at least 1 post-baseline monthly eDiary measurement. The number of participants analyzed includes those with observed data at week 12. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | hours / month | 4-week baseline phase and the last 4 weeks of the 12-week treatment phase |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Adverse Events | Adverse events (AEs) were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4, where: Grade 1 = Mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated; Grade 2 = Moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living (ADL); Grade 3 = Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self care ADL; Grade 4 = Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Grade 5 = Death related to AE. | All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | From the first dose of study drug up to 16 weeks after the last dose (24 weeks) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants Who Developed Antibodies to Erenumab | Blood samples were first tested in an electrochemiluminescence (ECL)-based bridging immunoassay to detect anti-drug antibodies (ADA) against erenumab. Samples confirmed to be positive for binding antibodies were subsequently tested in a cell-based bioassay to determine neutralizing activity against erenumab (Neutralizing Antibody Assay). Developing antibody incidence indicates participants with a negative or no result at baseline and a positive result at any time post-baseline. If a sample was positive for binding antibodies and demonstrated neutralizing activity at the same time point, the sample was defined as positive for neutralizing antibodies. | Randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and with available post-baseline antibody data. This endpoint was analyzed in the erenumab treatment groups only. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Baseline and weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 |
|
From the first dose of study drug up to 16 weeks after the last dose (a total of 24 weeks)
Other Adverse Events summarizes the non-serious occurrences of adverse events that exceed the indicated frequency threshold.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Placebo | Participants received placebo on day 1 and at weeks 4 and 8 by subcutaneous injection. | 7 | 282 | 16 | 282 | ||
| EG001 | Erenumab 70 mg | Participants received 70 mg erenumab on day 1 and at weeks 4 and 8 by subcutaneous injection. | 6 | 190 | 6 | 190 | ||
| EG002 | Erenumab 140 mg | Participants received 140 mg erenumab on day 1 and at weeks 4 and 8 by subcutaneous injection. | 2 | 188 | 3 | 188 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abdominal adhesions | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pancreatitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Non-cardiac chest pain | General disorders | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cholecystitis | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Appendicitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Parotitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cartilage injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Radius fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Costochondritis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Intervertebral disc protrusion | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fibroma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Migraine | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
The Clinical Trial Agreement generally does not restrict an investigator's discussion of trial results after completion. The Agreement permits Amgen a limited period of time to review material discussing trial results (typically up to 45 days and possible extension). Amgen may remove confidential information, but authors have final control and approval of publication content. For multicenter studies, the investigator agrees not to publish any results before the first multi-center publication.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study Director | Amgen Inc. | 866-572-6436 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C000605816 | erenumab |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| The primary endpoint was analyzed using a linear mixed effects model including treatment group, baseline value, stratification factors (region and medication overuse status), scheduled visit, and the interaction of treatment group with scheduled visit. | Generalized linear mixed model | <0.001 | Difference in LS Means | -2.45 | 2-Sided | 95 | -3.51 | -1.38 | Superiority | A sequential testing procedure, specifically, the hierarchical gate-keeping procedures and Hochberg method, was used to maintain the 2-sided study-wise type I error at 0.05 between the 2 erenumab doses and the primary and secondary endpoints. This comparison was tested at a 2-sided significance level of 0.01. |
| OG002 |
| Erenumab 140 mg |
Participants received 140 mg erenumab on day 1 and at weeks 4 and 8 by subcutaneous injection. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Participants received 140 mg erenumab on day 1 and at weeks 4 and 8 by subcutaneous injection.
|
|
|
|
|
Participants received 140 mg erenumab on day 1 and at weeks 4 and 8 by subcutaneous injection. |
|
|