Efficacy and Safety of Adalimumab in Pediatric Subjects W... | NCT02065557 | Trialant
NCT02065557
Sponsor
AbbVie
Status
Completed
Last Update Posted
Oct 5, 2020Actual
Enrollment
101Actual
Phase
Phase 3
Conditions
Ulcerative Colitis
Interventions
Adalimumab
Placebo
Countries
United States
Australia
Austria
Belgium
Canada
Czechia
Hungary
Israel
Japan
New Zealand
Poland
Slovakia
Spain
United Kingdom
Protocol Section
Identification Module
NCT ID
NCT02065557
Obsolete or Duplicate NCT IDs
Not provided
Organization Study
M11-290
Secondary IDs
ID
Type
Description
Link
2013-003032-77
EudraCT Number
Brief Title
Efficacy and Safety of Adalimumab in Pediatric Subjects With Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis
Official Title
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of the Human Anti-TNF Monoclonal Antibody Adalimumab in Pediatric Subjects With Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis
Acronym
Not provided
Organization
AbbVieINDUSTRY
Status Module
Record Verification Date
Sep 2020
Overall Recruitment Status or Expanded Access Status
Completed
Last Known Status
Not provided
Delayed Posting
Not provided
Why Stopped
Not provided
Expanded Access Info
No
Start Date
Oct 13, 2014Actual
Primary Completion Date
Feb 7, 2020Actual
Completion Date
Feb 7, 2020Actual
First Submitted Date
Feb 17, 2014
First Submission Date that Met QC Criteria
Feb 17, 2014
First Posted Date
Feb 19, 2014Estimated
Results Waived
Not provided
Results First Submitted Date
Sep 10, 2020
Results First Submitted that Met QC Criteria
Sep 10, 2020
Results First Posted Date
Oct 5, 2020Actual
Certification/Extension (aka Delayed Results) First Submitted Date
Not provided
Certification/Extension First Submitted that Passed QC Review
Not provided
Certification/Extension First Posted Date
Not provided
Last Update Submitted Date
Sep 10, 2020
Last Update Posted Date
Oct 5, 2020Actual
Sponsor/Collaborators Module
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Lead Sponsor
AbbVieINDUSTRY
Collaborators
Not provided
Oversight Module
Has Data Monitoring Committee (DMC)
Yes
Is FDA Regulated Drug
Yes
Is FDA Regulated Device
No
Is Unapproved Device
Not provided
Pediatric Postmarket Surveillance of a Device Product
Not provided
Product Exported from US
No
FDAAA801 Violation
Not provided
Description Module
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to demonstrate the efficacy and safety, and to assess the pharmacokinetics of adalimumab administered subcutaneously (SC) in pediatric subjects with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC).
Detailed Description
Not provided
Conditions Module
Conditions
Ulcerative Colitis
Keywords
Ulcerative Colitis
adalimumab
Design Module
Study Type
Interventional
Number of References to an Expanded Access Study
Not provided
Expanded Access Types
Not provided
Patient Registry
Not provided
Target Follow-Up Duration
Not provided
Phases
Phase 3
Interventional Study Design
Allocation
Biospecimen
No data available
No data is available for this block.
Enrollment
101Actual
Arms/Interventions Module
Arm Groups
Label
Type
Description
Intervention Names
Adalimumab Induction Standard Dose
Experimental
Participants randomized to receive adalimumab 2.4 mg/kg (maximum dose of 160 mg) at Baseline and matching placebo at Week 1, 1.2 mg/kg (maximum dose of 80 mg) at Week 2, followed by 0.6 mg/kg (maximum dose of 40 mg) at Week 4 and Week 6.
Biological: Adalimumab
Biological: Placebo
Adalimumab Induction High Dose
Experimental
Participants randomized to receive adalimumab 2.4 mg/kg (maximum dose of 160 mg) at Baseline and at Week 1, 1.2 mg/kg (maximum dose of 80 mg) at Week 2, followed by 0.6 mg/kg (maximum dose of 40 mg) at Week 4 and Week 6.
Biological: Adalimumab
Adalimumab Induction High Dose - Open Label
Experimental
(After Amendment 4) participants assigned to open-label adalimumab 2.4 mg/kg (maximum dose of 160 mg) at Baseline and at Week 1, 1.2 mg/kg (maximum dose of 80 mg) at Week 2, followed by 0.6 mg/kg (maximum dose of 40 mg) at Week 4 and Week 6.
Biological: Adalimumab
Maintenance Placebo
Placebo Comparator
(Prior to Amendment 4) participants demonstrating a clinical response per PMS (defined as a decrease in PMS ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline) at Week 8 randomized to maintenance placebo. Participants were to continue their blinded treatment during the maintenance period until Week 52 unless they had ≥ 2 flares and got open label rescue therapy after the second flare.
Interventions
Name
Type
Description
Arm Group Labels
Other Names
Adalimumab
Biological
Subcutaneous (SC) injection
Adalimumab Induction High Dose
Adalimumab Induction High Dose - Open Label
Adalimumab Induction Standard Dose
Outcomes Module
Primary Outcomes
Measure
Description
Time Frame
Co-Primary Endpoint 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission as Measured by Partial Mayo Score (PMS) at Week 8 - Induction Period
The Mayo score is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis. The PMS (Mayo score without endoscopy) ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 9 (severe disease) and is calculated as the sum of 3 sub scores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding and physician's global assessment), each of which ranges from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). A negative change in PMS indicates improvement. Clinical remission was defined as a PMS ≤ 2 and no individual subscore > 1.
Week 8
Co-Primary Endpoint 2: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission Per Full Mayo Score (FMS) at Week 52 in Week 8 Responders Per PMS - Maintenance Period
The FMS ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 12 (severe disease) and is calculated as the sum of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy, and physician's global assessment), each of which ranges from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). The PMS (Mayo score without endoscopy) ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 9 (severe disease) and is calculated as the sum of 3 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding and physician's global assessment). Negative changes indicate improvement. PMS responders are defined as those with a decrease in PMS ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline. Clinical remission per FMS is defined as Mayo Score ≤ 2 and no individual subscore > 1.
Week 52
Secondary Outcomes
Measure
Description
Time Frame
Ranked Secondary Endpoint 1: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response Per FMS at Week 52 in Week 8 Responders Per PMS - Maintenance Period
The FMS ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 12 (severe disease) and is calculated as the sum of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy, and physician's global assessment), each of which ranges from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). The PMS (Mayo score without endoscopy) ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 9 (severe disease) and is calculated as the sum of 3 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding and physician's global assessment). Negative changes indicate improvement. PMS responders are defined as those with a decrease in PMS ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline. Clinical response per FMS is defined as a decrease in FMS ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline.
Other Outcomes
Not provided
Eligibility Module
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Diagnosis of UC for at least 12 weeks prior to screening, confirmed by endoscopy with biopsy.
Active ulcerative colitis with a Mayo Score of 6 - 12 points and endoscopy subscore of 2 - 3 despite concurrent treatment with oral corticosteroids or immunosuppressants or both.
Exclusion Criteria:
Subject with Crohn's disease (CD) or indeterminate colitis (IC).
Current diagnosis of fulminant colitis and/or toxic megacolon.
Subjects with disease limited to the rectum (ulcerative proctitis) during the screening endoscopy.
Chronic recurring infections or active tuberculosis (TB).
Croft NM, Faubion WA Jr, Kugathasan S, Kierkus J, Ruemmele FM, Shimizu T, Mostafa NM, Venetucci M, Finney-Hayward T, Sanchez Gonzalez Y, Bereswill M, Lazar A, Turner D. Efficacy and safety of adalimumab in paediatric patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (ENVISION I): a randomised, controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Aug;6(8):616-627. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00142-4. Epub 2021 Jun 19.
AbbVie is committed to responsible data sharing regarding the clinical trials we sponsor. This includes access to anonymized, individual and trial-level data (analysis data sets), as well as other information (e.g., protocols and clinical study reports), as long as the trials are not part of an ongoing or planned regulatory submission. This includes requests for clinical trial data for unlicensed products and indications.
Types
Study Protocol
Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
Clinical Study Report (CSR)
Time Frame
Data requests can be submitted at any time and the data will be accessible for 12 months, with possible extensions considered.
Access Criteria
Access to this clinical trial data can be requested by any qualified researchers who engage in rigorous, independent scientific research, and will be provided following review and approval of a research proposal and Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) and execution of a Data Sharing Agreement (DSA). For more information on the process, or to submit a request, visit the following link.
After Protocol Amendment 4, participants received adalimumab induction high dose open-label. At Week 8, those demonstrating a clinical response per PMS were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to adalimumab maintenance standard dose or adalimumab maintenance high dose. "Integrated Study" data includes data from both the Main Study and the Japan Sub-Study.
Recruitment Details
Prior to Protocol Amendment 4, participants were randomized 3:2 at baseline to adalimumab induction high dose or adalimumab induction standard dose. At Week 8, those demonstrating a clinical response per Partial Mayo Score (PMS) were randomized 2:2:1 to adalimumab maintenance standard dose, adalimumab maintenance high dose, or maintenance placebo.
Type of Units Analyzed
Not provided
Arm/Group Information
ID
Title
Description
FG000
Integrated Study: Induction Standard Dose (I-SD)
Participants randomized to receive adalimumab 2.4 mg/kg (maximum dose of 160 mg) at Baseline and matching placebo at Week 1, 1.2 mg/kg (maximum dose of 80 mg) at Week 2, followed by 0.6 mg/kg (maximum dose of 40 mg) at Week 4 and Week 6.
Participants demonstrating a clinical response per PMS (defined as a decrease in PMS ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline) at Week 8 randomized to adalimumab maintenance standard dose (0.6 mg/kg [maximum dose of 40 mg] every other week). Participants were to continue their blinded treatment during the maintenance period until Week 52 unless they had ≥ 2 flares and got open label rescue therapy after second flare.
Biological: Adalimumab
Adalimumab Maintenance High Dose
Experimental
Participants demonstrating a clinical response per PMS (defined as a decrease in PMS ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline) at Week 8 randomized to adalimumab maintenance high dose (0.6 mg/kg [maximum dose of 40 mg] every week). Participants were to continue their blinded treatment during the maintenance period until Week 52 unless they had ≥ 2 flares and got open label rescue therapy after second flare.
Biological: Adalimumab
Adalimumab Maintenance High Dose
Adalimumab Maintenance Standard Dose
Maintenance Placebo
Humira
Placebo
Biological
Subcutaneous (SC) injection
Adalimumab Induction Standard Dose
Maintenance Placebo
Week 52
Ranked Secondary Endpoint 2: Percentage of Participants With Mucosal Healing at Week 52 in Week 8 Responders Per PMS - Maintenance Period
The FMS ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 12 (severe disease) and is calculated as the sum of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy, and physician's global assessment), each of which ranges from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). The PMS (Mayo score without endoscopy) ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 9 (severe disease) and is calculated as the sum of 3 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding and physician's global assessment). Negative changes indicate improvement. PMS responders are defined as those participants with a decrease in PMS ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline. Mucosal healing per Mayo endoscopy subscore is defined as a subscore of ≤ 1.
Week 52
Ranked Secondary Endpoint 3: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission Per FMS at Week 52 in Week 8 Remitters Per PMS - Maintenance Period
The FMS ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 12 (severe disease) and is calculated as the sum of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy, and physician's global assessment), each of which ranges from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). The PMS (Mayo score without endoscopy) ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 9 (severe disease) and is calculated as the sum of 3 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding and physician's global assessment). Negative changes indicate improvement. PMS remitters are defined as those participants with a PMS ≤ 2 and no individual subscore > 1. Clinical remission per FMS is defined as Mayo Score ≤ 2 and no individual subscore > 1.
Week 52
Ranked Secondary Endpoint 4: Percentage of Participants With Corticosteroid-Free Clinical Remission Per FMS at Week 52 in Week 8 Responders Per PMS - Maintenance Period
The FMS ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 12 (severe disease) and is calculated as the sum of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy, and physician's global assessment), each of which ranges from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). The PMS (Mayo score without endoscopy) ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 9 (severe disease) and is calculated as the sum of 3 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding and physician's global assessment). Negative changes indicate improvement. PMS responders are defined as those with a decrease in PMS ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30% from baseline. Among participants receiving systemic corticosteroids at Baseline, corticosteroid-free clinical remission per FMS at Week 52 is defined as having discontinued systemic corticosteroids prior to Week 52 and being in FMS clinical remission at Week 52 (defined as Mayo Score ≤ 2 and no individual subscore > 1).
Week 52
San Francisco
California
94143-2204
United States
Arnold Palmer Hosp Children /ID# 120898
Orlando
Florida
32806
United States
Emory University Hospital /ID# 121858
Atlanta
Georgia
30322
United States
Children's Ctr Digestive, US /ID# 121855
Atlanta
Georgia
30342
United States
University of Chicago /ID# 120904
Chicago
Illinois
60637-1443
United States
Loyola University Medical Ctr /ID# 120900
Maywood
Illinois
60153
United States
Indiana University /ID# 120908
Indianapolis
Indiana
46202
United States
Massachusetts General Hospital /ID# 124551
Boston
Massachusetts
02114
United States
Boston Childrens Hospital /ID# 147714
Boston
Massachusetts
02115
United States
Mayo Clinic - Rochester /ID# 121056
Rochester
Minnesota
55905-0001
United States
Minnesota Gastroenterology P.A /ID# 120895
Saint Paul
Minnesota
55114
United States
Goryeb Chidlren's Hospital /ID# 121860
Morristown
New Jersey
07960
United States
North Shore University Hospital /ID# 120905
New Hyde Park
New York
11040
United States
Univ Rochester Med Ctr /ID# 127776
Rochester
New York
14642
United States
Multicare Institute for Research and Innovation /ID# 147716
Tacoma
Washington
98405
United States
Womens and Childrens Hospital /ID# 127538
Adelaide
South Australia
5006
Australia
Medizinische Universitat Wien /ID# 120802
Vienna
State of Vienna
1090
Austria
LKH Salzburg and Paracelsus /ID# 123457
Salzburg
5020
Austria
UZ Brussel /ID# 120798
Jette
Brussels Capital
1090
Belgium
Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc /ID# 120797
Woluwe-Saint-Lambert
Brussels Capital
1200
Belgium
Hosp Univ Enfants Reine Fabiol /ID# 120795
Brussels
1020
Belgium
London Health Sciences Centre /ID# 127777
London
Ontario
N6A 5A5
Canada
Palacky University /ID# 131388
Olomouc
779 00
Czechia
Univ Hosp, Plzen, CZ /ID# 120813
Pilsen
305 99
Czechia
Petz Aladar Megyei Oktato Korh /ID# 124323
Győr
9023
Hungary
Balassa Janos County Hospital /ID# 128474
Szekszárd
7100
Hungary
Soroka Medical Ctr /ID# 147338
Beersheba
84101
Israel
Assaf Harofeh Medical Center /ID# 147791
Be’er Ya‘aqov
70300
Israel
Rambam Health Care Campus /ID# 120827
Haifa
3109601
Israel
Shaare Zedek Medical Center /ID# 120830
Jerusalem
91031
Israel
Schneider Childrens Med Ctr /ID# 120821
Petah Tikva
4920235
Israel
Sheba Medical Center /ID# 124324
Ramat Gan
5262100
Israel
Kaplan Medical Center /ID# 150245
Rehovot
76100
Israel
Kurume University Hospital /ID# 125476
Kurume-shi
Fukuoka
830-0011
Japan
Gunma University Hospital /ID# 126345
Maebashi
Gunma
371-8511
Japan
Hokkaido P.W.F.A.C. Sapporo-Kosei General Hospital /ID# 124482
Sapporo
Hokkaido
060-0033
Japan
The Hospital of Hyogo College of Medicine /ID# 131665
Nishinomiya-shi
Hyōgo
663-8501
Japan
Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu /ID# 124486
Yokohama
Kanagawa
230-0012
Japan
Yokohama City Univ Medical Ctr /ID# 147763
Yokohama
Kanagawa
232-0024
Japan
Miyagi Children's Hospital /ID# 125475
Sendai
Miyagi
989-3126
Japan
Saitama Children's Medical Center /ID# 124485
Saitama-shi
Saitama
330-8777
Japan
Juntendo University Hospital /ID# 124536
Bunkyo-ku
Tokyo
113-8431
Japan
National Center for Child Health and Development /ID# 125203
Setagaya-ku
Tokyo
157-8535
Japan
Osaka General Medical Center /ID# 124535
Osaka
558-8558
Japan
Canterbury District Health Boa /ID# 120837
Christchurch
8011
New Zealand
Uni Szpital Dzieciecy w Krakowie /ID# 120915
Cracow
Lesser Poland Voivodeship
30-663
Poland
Centrum Zdrowia MDM /ID# 120910
Warsaw
Masovian Voivodeship
00-635
Poland
Gabinet Lekarski Bartosz Korcz /ID# 120916
Rzeszów
35-210
Poland
Samodzielny Publiczny Szpital /ID# 120839
Wroclaw
50-369
Poland
Polish Mothers Memorial Hosp /ID# 148497
Lodz
Łódź Voivodeship
93-338
Poland
FN s poliklinikou F.D. Rooseve /ID# 120847
Banská Bystrica
974 09
Slovakia
Univerzitna Nemocnica Bratislava /ID# 120842
Bratislava
821 01
Slovakia
Univerzitna nemocnica Martin /ID# 120844
Martin
Žilina Region
036 01
Slovakia
Hospital Univ Vall d'Hebron /ID# 120856
Barcelona
08035
Spain
Hospital Infantil Universitario Nino Jesus /ID# 121862
Madrid
28009
Spain
The Royal London Hospital /ID# 120861
London
London, City of
E1 1BB
United Kingdom
The Royal Free Hospital /ID# 123142
London
London, City of
NW3 2QG
United Kingdom
Royal Hosp for Sick Children /ID# 120864
Glasgow
G3 8SJ
United Kingdom
Manchester Royal Infirmary, Ma /ID# 120862
Manchester
M13 9WL
United Kingdom
Integrated Study: Induction High Dose (I-HD)
Participants randomized to receive adalimumab 2.4 mg/kg (maximum dose of 160 mg) at Baseline and at Week 1, 1.2 mg/kg (maximum dose of 80 mg) at Week 2, followed by 0.6 mg/kg (maximum dose of 40 mg) at Week 4 and Week 6.
FG002
Integrated Study: Induction High Dose Open Label (I-HD-OL)
(After Amendment 4) participants assigned to open-label adalimumab 2.4 mg/kg (maximum dose of 160 mg) at Baseline and at Week 1, 1.2 mg/kg (maximum dose of 80 mg) at Week 2, followed by 0.6 mg/kg (maximum dose of 40 mg) at Week 4 and Week 6.
FG003
Integrated Study: Maintenance Placebo (M-PL)
(Prior to Amendment 4) participants demonstrating a clinical response per PMS (defined as a decrease in PMS ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline) at Week 8 randomized to maintenance placebo. Participants were to continue their blinded treatment during the maintenance period until Week 52 unless they had ≥ 2 flares and got open label rescue therapy after the second flare.
FG004
Integrated Study: Maintenance Standard Dose (M-SD)
Participants demonstrating a clinical response per PMS (defined as a decrease in PMS ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline) at Week 8 randomized to adalimumab maintenance standard dose (0.6 mg/kg [maximum dose of 40 mg] every other week [eow]). Participants were to continue their blinded treatment during the maintenance period until Week 52 unless they had ≥ 2 flares and got open label rescue therapy after the second flare.
FG005
Integrated Study: Maintenance High Dose (M-HD)
Participants demonstrating a clinical response per PMS (defined as a decrease in PMS ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline) at Week 8 randomized to adalimumab maintenance high dose (0.6 mg/kg [maximum dose of 40 mg] every week [ew]). Participants were to continue their blinded treatment during the maintenance period until Week 52 unless they had ≥ 2 flares and got open label rescue therapy after the second flare.
FG00032 subjects
FG00151 subjects
FG00218 subjects
FG0030 subjects
FG0040 subjects
FG0050 subjects
Enrolled in Main Study
FG00030 subjects
FG00147 subjects
FG00216 subjects
FG0030 subjects
FG0040 subjects
FG0050 subjects
Enrolled in Japan Sub-study
FG0002 subjects
FG0014 subjects
FG0022 subjects
FG0030 subjects
FG0040 subjects
FG0050 subjects
COMPLETED
FG00022 subjects
FG00143 subjects
FG00216 subjects
FG0030 subjects
FG0040 subjects
FG0050 subjects
NOT COMPLETED
FG00010 subjects
FG0018 subjects
FG0022 subjects
FG0030 subjects
FG0040 subjects
FG0050 subjects
Type
Comment
Reasons
Withdrawal by Subject
FG0002 subjects
FG0011 subjects
FG0020 subjects
FG0030 subjects
FG0040 subjects
FG0050 subjects
Lack of Efficacy
FG0002 subjects
FG0011 subjects
FG0021 subjects
FG0030 subjects
FG004
Requires Alternative/Prohibited Therapy
FG0001 subjects
FG0011 subjects
FG0021 subjects
FG0030 subjects
FG004
Non-Responder at Week 8
FG0004 subjects
FG0014 subjects
FG0020 subjects
FG0030 subjects
FG004
Adverse Event
FG0001 subjects
FG0011 subjects
FG0020 subjects
FG0030 subjects
FG004
Maintenance Period
Type
Comment
Milestone Data
STARTED
FG0000 subjects
FG0010 subjects
FG0020 subjects
FG00312 subjects
FG00433 subjects
FG00536 subjects
COMPLETED
Completed Week 52
FG0000 subjects
FG0010 subjects
FG0020 subjects
FG00311 subjects
NOT COMPLETED
FG0000 subjects
FG0010 subjects
FG0020 subjects
FG0031 subjects
FG004
Type
Comment
Reasons
Requires Alternative/Prohibited Therapy
FG0000 subjects
FG0010 subjects
FG0020 subjects
FG003
Type of Units Analyzed
Not provided
Arm/Group Information
ID
Title
Description
BG000
Integrated Study (Main + Japan Sub- Study): I-SD
Participants randomized to receive adalimumab 2.4 mg/kg (maximum dose of 160 mg) at Baseline and matching placebo at Week 1, 1.2 mg/kg (maximum dose of 80 mg) at Week 2, followed by 0.6 mg/kg (maximum dose of 40 mg) at Week 4 and Week 6.
BG001
Integrated Study (Main + Japan Sub- Study): I-HD
Participants randomized to receive adalimumab 2.4 mg/kg (maximum dose of 160 mg) at Baseline and at Week 1, 1.2 mg/kg (maximum dose of 80 mg) at Week 2, followed by 0.6 mg/kg (maximum dose of 40 mg) at Week 4 and Week 6.
BG002
Integrated Study (Main + Japan Sub- Study): I-HD-OL
(After Amendment 4) participants assigned to open-label adalimumab 2.4 mg/kg (maximum dose of 160 mg) at Baseline and at Week 1, 1.2 mg/kg (maximum dose of 80 mg) at Week 2, followed by 0.6 mg/kg (maximum dose of 40 mg) at Week 4 and Week 6.
BG003
Total
Total of all reporting groups
Denominators
Units
Counts
Participants
BG00032
BG00151
BG00218
BG003101
Baseline Measures
Title
Description
Population Description
Parameter Type
Dispersion Type
Unit of Measure
Calculate Percentage
Denominator Units Selected
Denominators
Classes
Age, Continuous
Mean
Standard Deviation
years
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
BG00014.7± 2.66
BG00113.8± 3.06
BG00213.8± 2.82
BG003
Sex: Female, Male
Count of Participants
Participants
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
Female
BG00015
BG00123
BG002
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Count of Participants
Participants
Title
Denominators
Categories
White
Title
Measurements
BG00028
BG00145
BG002
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Count of Participants
Participants
Title
Denominators
Categories
Hispanic or Latino
Title
Measurements
BG0001
BG0012
BG002
Full Mayo Score (FMS)
The Mayo score is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis. The FMS ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 12 (severe disease) and is calculated as the sum of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy, and physician's global assessment), each of which ranges from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease).
Mean
Standard Deviation
score on a scale
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
BG0007.8± 1.22
BG001
Partial Mayo Score (PMS)
The PMS (Mayo score without endoscopy) ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 9 (severe disease) and is calculated as the sum of 3 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding and physician's global assessment), each of which ranges from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease).
Mean
Standard Deviation
score on a scale
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
BG0005.7± 1.14
BG001
Endoscopy Subscore
The endoscopy subscore of the FMS ranges from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease).
Mean
Standard Deviation
score on a scale
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
BG0002.1± 0.34
BG0012.2± 0.40
Rectal Bleeding Subscore
The rectal bleeding subscore of the FMS ranges from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease).
Mean
Standard Deviation
score on a scale
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
BG0001.4± 0.93
BG0011.5± 0.88
Physicians Global Assessment Subscore
The physicians global assessment subscore of the FMS ranges from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease).
Mean
Standard Deviation
score on a scale
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
BG0002.2± 0.40
BG0012.2± 0.43
Stool Frequency Subscore
The stool frequency subscore of the FMS ranges from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease).
Mean
Standard Deviation
score on a scale
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
BG0002.1± 0.78
BG0011.8± 0.88
Type
Title
Description
Population Description
Reporting Status
Anticipated Posting Date
Parameter Type
Dispersion Type
Unit of Measure
Calculate Percentage
Time Frame
Units Analyzed
Denominator Units Selected
Arm/Group Information
Denominators
Classes
Analyses
Primary
Co-Primary Endpoint 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission as Measured by Partial Mayo Score (PMS) at Week 8 - Induction Period
The Mayo score is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis. The PMS (Mayo score without endoscopy) ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 9 (severe disease) and is calculated as the sum of 3 sub scores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding and physician's global assessment), each of which ranges from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). A negative change in PMS indicates improvement. Clinical remission was defined as a PMS ≤ 2 and no individual subscore > 1.
Intent-to-Treat (ITT): all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the Induction period; analyzed as enrolled/randomized. Non-responder imputation (NRI): missing data is imputed as not having met the endpoint.
Posted
Number
95% Confidence Interval
percentage of participants
Week 8
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Main Study: I-SD
Participants randomized to receive adalimumab 2.4 mg/kg (maximum dose of 160 mg) at Baseline and matching placebo at Week 1, 1.2 mg/kg (maximum dose of 80 mg) at Week 2, followed by 0.6 mg/kg (maximum dose of 40 mg) at Week 4 and Week 6.
OG001
Main Study: I-HD
Participants randomized to receive adalimumab 2.4 mg/kg (maximum dose of 160 mg) at Baseline and at Week 1, 1.2 mg/kg (maximum dose of 80 mg) at Week 2, followed by 0.6 mg/kg (maximum dose of 40 mg) at Week 4 and Week 6.
OG002
Main Study: I-SD + I-HD
Combined I-SD + I-HD arms (see above).
OG003
Main Study: I-HD-OL
(After Amendment 4) participants assigned to open-label adalimumab 2.4 mg/kg (maximum dose of 160 mg) at Baseline and at Week 1, 1.2 mg/kg (maximum dose of 80 mg) at Week 2, followed by 0.6 mg/kg (maximum dose of 40 mg) at Week 4 and Week 6.
OG004
Integrated Study (Main + Japan Sub-Study): I-SD
Participants randomized to receive adalimumab 2.4 mg/kg (maximum dose of 160 mg) at Baseline and matching placebo at Week 1, 1.2 mg/kg (maximum dose of 80 mg) at Week 2, followed by 0.6 mg/kg (maximum dose of 40 mg) at Week 4 and Week 6.
OG005
Integrated Study (Main + Japan Sub-Study): I-HD
Participants randomized to receive adalimumab 2.4 mg/kg (maximum dose of 160 mg) at Baseline and at Week 1, 1.2 mg/kg (maximum dose of 80 mg) at Week 2, followed by 0.6 mg/kg (maximum dose of 40 mg) at Week 4 and Week 6.
OG006
Integrated Study (Main + Japan Sub-Study): I-SD + I-HD
Combined I-SD + I-HD arms (see above).
OG007
Integrated Study (Main + Japan Sub-Study): I-HD-OL
(After Amendment 4) participants assigned to open-label adalimumab 2.4 mg/kg (maximum dose of 160 mg) at Baseline and at Week 1, 1.2 mg/kg (maximum dose of 80 mg) at Week 2, followed by 0.6 mg/kg (maximum dose of 40 mg) at Week 4 and Week 6.
Units
Counts
Participants
OG00030
OG00147
OG00277
OG003
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG00043.3(25.46 to 62.57)
OG00159.6(44.27 to 73.63)
OG00253.2(41.52 to 64.71)
OG003
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG002
Efficacy analysis was based on the Intent-To-Treat-Efficacy (ITT-E) population for the induction period. The ITT-E population was a subpopulation of the ITT population, which consisted of all participants who received at least one SC injection of the study medication during the induction period. Participants who received open-label high induction dose, because they enrolled after Protocol Amendment 4 was released, were excluded from the ITT-E population.
rejective multiple test procedure
controlling familywise Type I error of 5% in a strong sense
< 0.001
Adjusted p-value from a sequentially rejective multiple test procedure, testing co-primary and ranked secondary endpoints 1st for I-SD+I-HD, then for individual adalimumab dose groups (I-HD, I-SD) against the respective external placebo rate (19.83%)
Primary
Co-Primary Endpoint 2: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission Per Full Mayo Score (FMS) at Week 52 in Week 8 Responders Per PMS - Maintenance Period
The FMS ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 12 (severe disease) and is calculated as the sum of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy, and physician's global assessment), each of which ranges from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). The PMS (Mayo score without endoscopy) ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 9 (severe disease) and is calculated as the sum of 3 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding and physician's global assessment). Negative changes indicate improvement. PMS responders are defined as those with a decrease in PMS ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline. Clinical remission per FMS is defined as Mayo Score ≤ 2 and no individual subscore > 1.
Modified intent-to-treat (mITT): all Week 8 PMS responders who were re-randomized at Week 8 and received at least 1 dose of study drug during the Maintenance period; analyzed as randomized at the beginning of the Maintenance phase. NRI: missing data is imputed as not having met the endpoint.
Posted
Number
95% Confidence Interval
percentage of participants
Week 52
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Main Study: M-PL
(Prior to Amendment 4) participants demonstrating a clinical response per PMS (defined as a decrease in PMS ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline) at Week 8 randomized to maintenance placebo. Participants were to continue their blinded treatment during the maintenance period until Week 52 unless they had ≥ 2 flares and got open label adalimumab rescue therapy after the second flare.
Secondary
Ranked Secondary Endpoint 1: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response Per FMS at Week 52 in Week 8 Responders Per PMS - Maintenance Period
The FMS ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 12 (severe disease) and is calculated as the sum of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy, and physician's global assessment), each of which ranges from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). The PMS (Mayo score without endoscopy) ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 9 (severe disease) and is calculated as the sum of 3 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding and physician's global assessment). Negative changes indicate improvement. PMS responders are defined as those with a decrease in PMS ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline. Clinical response per FMS is defined as a decrease in FMS ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline.
Modified intent-to-treat (mITT): all Week 8 PMS responders who were re-randomized at Week 8 and received at least 1 dose of study drug during the Maintenance period; analyzed as randomized at the beginning of the Maintenance phase. NRI: missing data is imputed as not having met the endpoint.
Posted
Number
95% Confidence Interval
percentage of participants
Week 52
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Main Study: M-PL
(Prior to Amendment 4) participants demonstrating a clinical response per PMS (defined as a decrease in PMS ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline) at Week 8 randomized to maintenance placebo. Participants were to continue their blinded treatment during the maintenance period until Week 52 unless they had ≥ 2 flares and got open label adalimumab rescue therapy after the second flare.
Secondary
Ranked Secondary Endpoint 2: Percentage of Participants With Mucosal Healing at Week 52 in Week 8 Responders Per PMS - Maintenance Period
The FMS ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 12 (severe disease) and is calculated as the sum of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy, and physician's global assessment), each of which ranges from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). The PMS (Mayo score without endoscopy) ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 9 (severe disease) and is calculated as the sum of 3 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding and physician's global assessment). Negative changes indicate improvement. PMS responders are defined as those participants with a decrease in PMS ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline. Mucosal healing per Mayo endoscopy subscore is defined as a subscore of ≤ 1.
Modified intent-to-treat (mITT): all Week 8 PMS responders who were re-randomized at Week 8 and received at least 1 dose of study drug during the Maintenance period; analyzed as randomized at the beginning of the Maintenance phase. NRI: missing data is imputed as not having met the endpoint.
Posted
Number
95% Confidence Interval
percentage of participants
Week 52
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Main Study: M-PL
(Prior to Amendment 4) participants demonstrating a clinical response per PMS (defined as a decrease in PMS ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline) at Week 8 randomized to maintenance placebo. Participants were to continue their blinded treatment during the maintenance period until Week 52 unless they had ≥ 2 flares and got open label adalimumab rescue therapy after the second flare.
Secondary
Ranked Secondary Endpoint 3: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission Per FMS at Week 52 in Week 8 Remitters Per PMS - Maintenance Period
The FMS ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 12 (severe disease) and is calculated as the sum of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy, and physician's global assessment), each of which ranges from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). The PMS (Mayo score without endoscopy) ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 9 (severe disease) and is calculated as the sum of 3 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding and physician's global assessment). Negative changes indicate improvement. PMS remitters are defined as those participants with a PMS ≤ 2 and no individual subscore > 1. Clinical remission per FMS is defined as Mayo Score ≤ 2 and no individual subscore > 1.
Modified intent-to-treat (mITT): all Week 8 PMS responders who were re-randomized at Week 8 and received at least 1 dose of study drug during the Maintenance period; analyzed as randomized at the beginning of the Maintenance phase. Participants who were also Week 8 remitters. NRI: missing data is imputed as not having met the endpoint.
Posted
Number
95% Confidence Interval
percentage of participants
Week 52
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Main Study: M-PL
(Prior to Amendment 4) participants demonstrating a clinical response per PMS (defined as a decrease in PMS ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline) at Week 8 randomized to maintenance placebo. Participants were to continue their blinded treatment during the maintenance period until Week 52 unless they had ≥ 2 flares and got open label adalimumab rescue therapy after the second flare.
Secondary
Ranked Secondary Endpoint 4: Percentage of Participants With Corticosteroid-Free Clinical Remission Per FMS at Week 52 in Week 8 Responders Per PMS - Maintenance Period
The FMS ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 12 (severe disease) and is calculated as the sum of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy, and physician's global assessment), each of which ranges from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). The PMS (Mayo score without endoscopy) ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 9 (severe disease) and is calculated as the sum of 3 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding and physician's global assessment). Negative changes indicate improvement. PMS responders are defined as those with a decrease in PMS ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30% from baseline. Among participants receiving systemic corticosteroids at Baseline, corticosteroid-free clinical remission per FMS at Week 52 is defined as having discontinued systemic corticosteroids prior to Week 52 and being in FMS clinical remission at Week 52 (defined as Mayo Score ≤ 2 and no individual subscore > 1).
mITT: all Week 8 PMS responders who were re-randomized at Week 8 and received at least 1 dose of study drug during the Maintenance period; analyzed as randomized at the beginning of the Maintenance phase. Participants receiving systemic corticosteroids at baseline. NRI: missing data is imputed as not having met the endpoint.
Posted
Number
95% Confidence Interval
percentage of participants
Week 52
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Main Study: M-PL
(Prior to Amendment 4) participants demonstrating a clinical response per PMS (defined as a decrease in PMS ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline) at Week 8 randomized to maintenance placebo. Participants were to continue their blinded treatment during the maintenance period until Week 52 unless they had ≥ 2 flares and got open label adalimumab rescue therapy after the second flare.
Time Frame
See time frame specifics detailed for each reporting group in their respective descriptions below.
Description
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are presented.
All-Cause Mortality Comment
Not provided
Arm/Groups
ID
Title
Description
Deaths (Affected)
Deaths (At Risk)
Serious Events (Affected)
Serious Events (At Risk)
Other Events (Affected)
Other Events (At Risk)
EG000
Integrated Study (Main + Japan Sub- Study): I-SD
Participants randomized to receive adalimumab 2.4 mg/kg (maximum dose of 160 mg) at Baseline and matching placebo at Week 1, 1.2 mg/kg (maximum dose of 80 mg) at Week 2, followed by 0.6 mg/kg (maximum dose of 40 mg) at Week 4 and Week 6.
TEAEs during induction period: events with an onset date on or after first dose date of study drug in induction period and up to 70 days after last dose date of the study drug in induction period and prior to first dose date of study drug in maintenance period. Mean duration of treatment was 52.8 days.
0
32
5
32
13
32
EG001
Integrated Study (Main + Japan Sub- Study): I-HD
Participants randomized to receive adalimumab 2.4 mg/kg (maximum dose of 160 mg) at Baseline and at Week 1, 1.2 mg/kg (maximum dose of 80 mg) at Week 2, followed by 0.6 mg/kg (maximum dose of 40 mg) at Week 4 and Week 6.
TEAEs during induction period: events with an onset date on or after first dose date of study drug in induction period and up to 70 days after last dose date of the study drug in induction period and prior to first dose date of study drug in maintenance period. Mean duration of treatment was 55.4 days.
0
51
4
51
16
51
EG002
Integrated Study (Main + Japan Sub- Study): I-HD-OL
(After Amendment 4) participants assigned to open-label adalimumab 2.4 mg/kg (maximum dose of 160 mg) at Baseline and at Week 1, 1.2 mg/kg (maximum dose of 80 mg) at Week 2, followed by 0.6 mg/kg (maximum dose of 40 mg) at Week 4 and Week 6.
TEAEs during induction period: events with an onset date on or after first dose date of study drug in induction period and up to 70 days after last dose date of the study drug in induction period and prior to first dose date of study drug in maintenance period. Mean duration of treatment was 53.8 days.
0
18
1
18
14
18
EG003
Integrated Study (Main + Japan Sub- Study): M-SD
Participants demonstrating a clinical response per PMS (defined as a decrease in PMS ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline) at Week 8 randomized to adalimumab maintenance standard dose (0.6 mg/kg [maximum dose of 40 mg] eow). Participants were to continue their blinded treatment during the maintenance period until Week 52 unless they had ≥ 2 flares and got open label adalimumab rescue therapy after the second flare.
TEAEs during maintenance period: events with an onset date on or after first dose date of study drug in maintenance period and prior to re-randomization due to first disease flare if applicable and up to 70 days after the last dose date of the study drug in maintenance period. Events with an onset date on or after the first dose date in long-term follow-up study M10-870 (NCT02632175) are excluded. Mean duration of treatment was 226.8 days.
0
33
5
33
15
33
EG004
Integrated Study (Main + Japan Sub- Study): M-HD
Participants demonstrating a clinical response per PMS (defined as a decrease in PMS ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline) at Week 8 randomized to adalimumab maintenance high dose (0.6 mg/kg [maximum dose of 40 mg] ew). Participants were to continue their blinded treatment during the maintenance period until Week 52 unless they had ≥ 2 flares and got open label adalimumab rescue therapy after the second flare.
TEAEs during maintenance period: events with an onset date on or after first dose date of study drug in maintenance period and prior to re-randomization due to first disease flare if applicable and up to 70 days after the last dose date of the study drug in maintenance period. Events with an onset date on or after the first dose date in long-term follow-up study M10-870 (NCT02632175) are excluded. Mean duration of treatment was 241.0 days.
0
36
5
36
20
36
EG005
Integrated Study (Main + Japan Sub- Study): M-PL
(Prior to Amendment 4) participants demonstrating a clinical response per PMS (defined as a decrease in PMS ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline) at Week 8 randomized to maintenance placebo. Participants were to continue their blinded treatment during the maintenance period until Week 52 unless they had ≥ 2 flares and got open label adalimumab rescue therapy after the second flare.
TEAEs during maintenance period: events with an onset date on or after first dose date of study drug in maintenance period and prior to re-randomization due to first disease flare if applicable and up to 70 days after the last dose date of the study drug in maintenance period. Events with an onset date on or after the first dose date in long-term follow-up study M10-870 (NCT02632175) are excluded. Mean duration of treatment was 184.2 days.
0
12
1
12
10
12
EG006
Integrated Study (Main + Japan Sub- Study): Any Adalimumab
Participants receiving any adalimumab during Induction or Maintenance Phase.
Any Adalimumab TEAEs: events with an onset date on or after first dose date of adalimumab and up to 70 days after the last dose date of adalimumab and prior to the first dose date in M10-870 if applicable, whichever comes first. For participants who received placebo during the maintenance period, TEAE collection period ends 70 days after last induction dose of adalimumab and re-starts with their next adalimumab dose, if applicable. Mean duration of treatment was 256.3 days.
0
101
22
101
65
101
Serious Adverse Events
Term
Organ System
Source Vocabulary
Assessment Type
Notes
Statistical Information
ANAEMIA
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0002 events2 affected32 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected51 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected18 at risk
EG0032 events1 affected33 at risk
EG0040 events0 affected36 at risk
EG0050 events0 affected12 at risk
EG0064 events3 affected101 at risk
PERICARDITIS
Cardiac disorders
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected32 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected51 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected18 at risk
EG003
COLITIS ULCERATIVE
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0002 events2 affected32 at risk
EG0012 events2 affected51 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected18 at risk
EG003
DYSPEPSIA
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected32 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected51 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected18 at risk
EG003
ENTERITIS
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected32 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected51 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected18 at risk
EG003
PANCREATITIS
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected32 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected51 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected18 at risk
EG003
ENTERITIS INFECTIOUS
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected32 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected51 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected18 at risk
EG003
GASTROENTERITIS
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected32 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected51 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected18 at risk
EG003
MENINGITIS ASEPTIC
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected32 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected51 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected18 at risk
EG003
PHARYNGITIS
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected32 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected51 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected18 at risk
EG003
URINARY TRACT INFECTION
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected32 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected51 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected18 at risk
EG003
HAND FRACTURE
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected32 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected51 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected18 at risk
EG003
WRIST FRACTURE
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected32 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected51 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected18 at risk
EG003
HEADACHE
Nervous system disorders
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected32 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected51 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected18 at risk
EG003
LOSS OF CONSCIOUSNESS
Nervous system disorders
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected32 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected51 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected18 at risk
EG003
ERYTHEMA NODOSUM
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected32 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected51 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected18 at risk
EG003
PSORIASIS
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected32 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected51 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected18 at risk
EG003
Other Adverse Events
Term
Organ System
Source Vocabulary
Assessment Type
Notes
Statistical Information
ANAEMIA
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected32 at risk
EG0013 events3 affected51 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected18 at risk
EG0032 events2 affected33 at risk
EG0041 events1 affected36 at risk
EG0051 events1 affected12 at risk
EG0069 events9 affected101 at risk
NEUTROPENIA
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected32 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected51 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected18 at risk
EG003
THROMBOCYTOSIS
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected32 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected51 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected18 at risk
EG003
NONINFECTIVE CONJUNCTIVITIS
Eye disorders
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected32 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected51 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected18 at risk
EG003
ABDOMINAL PAIN
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected32 at risk
EG0012 events2 affected51 at risk
EG0022 events2 affected18 at risk
EG003
ABDOMINAL PAIN UPPER
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected32 at risk
EG0012 events2 affected51 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected18 at risk
EG003
COLITIS ULCERATIVE
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0002 events2 affected32 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected51 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected18 at risk
EG003
CONSTIPATION
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected32 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected51 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected18 at risk
EG003
DIARRHOEA
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected32 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected51 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected18 at risk
EG003
GASTROOESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected32 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected51 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected18 at risk
EG003
NAUSEA
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected32 at risk
EG0013 events3 affected51 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected18 at risk
EG003
VOMITING
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected32 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected51 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected18 at risk
EG003
FATIGUE
General disorders
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected32 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected51 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected18 at risk
EG003
INFLAMMATION
General disorders
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected32 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected51 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected18 at risk
EG003
PERIPHERAL SWELLING
General disorders
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected32 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected51 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected18 at risk
EG003
PYREXIA
General disorders
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0002 events2 affected32 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected51 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected18 at risk
EG003
BRONCHITIS
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected32 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected51 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected18 at risk
EG003
GASTROENTERITIS
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected32 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected51 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected18 at risk
EG003
INFLUENZA
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected32 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected51 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected18 at risk
EG003
NASOPHARYNGITIS
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0002 events2 affected32 at risk
EG0012 events2 affected51 at risk
EG0022 events1 affected18 at risk
EG003
PHARYNGITIS
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0002 events2 affected32 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected51 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected18 at risk
EG003
RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTION VIRAL
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected32 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected51 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected18 at risk
EG003
STREPTOCOCCAL INFECTION
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected32 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected51 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected18 at risk
EG003
TOOTH ABSCESS
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected32 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected51 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected18 at risk
EG003
UPPER RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTION
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected32 at risk
EG0014 events3 affected51 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected18 at risk
EG003
VIRAL INFECTION
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected32 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected51 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected18 at risk
EG003
VULVOVAGINAL MYCOTIC INFECTION
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected32 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected51 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected18 at risk
EG003
JOINT INJURY
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected32 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected51 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected18 at risk
EG003
C-REACTIVE PROTEIN INCREASED
Investigations
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected32 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected51 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected18 at risk
EG003
HEPATIC ENZYME INCREASED
Investigations
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected32 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected51 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected18 at risk
EG003
MONOCYTE COUNT DECREASED
Investigations
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected32 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected51 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected18 at risk
EG003
NEUTROPHIL COUNT DECREASED
Investigations
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected32 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected51 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected18 at risk
EG003
WHITE BLOOD CELL COUNT DECREASED
Investigations
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected32 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected51 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected18 at risk
EG003
ARTHRALGIA
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected32 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected51 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected18 at risk
EG003
MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected32 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected51 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected18 at risk
EG003
HEADACHE
Nervous system disorders
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0004 events4 affected32 at risk
EG0017 events5 affected51 at risk
EG0026 events4 affected18 at risk
EG003
TREMOR
Nervous system disorders
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected32 at risk
EG0012 events1 affected51 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected18 at risk
EG003
GLYCOSURIA
Renal and urinary disorders
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected32 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected51 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected18 at risk
EG003
COUGH
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected32 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected51 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected18 at risk
EG003
EPISTAXIS
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected32 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected51 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected18 at risk
EG003
OROPHARYNGEAL PAIN
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected32 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected51 at risk
EG0022 events2 affected18 at risk
EG003
RHINITIS ALLERGIC
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected32 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected51 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected18 at risk
EG003
RHINORRHOEA
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected32 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected51 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected18 at risk
EG003
WHEEZING
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected32 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected51 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected18 at risk
EG003
DERMATITIS
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected32 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected51 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected18 at risk
EG003
HANGNAIL
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected32 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected51 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected18 at risk
EG003
RASH
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
MedDRA 22.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected32 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected51 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected18 at risk
EG003
Certain Agreements
Are all PI(s) employees of the sponsor?
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Results Disclosure Restriction on PI(s)?
Yes
Other Details
AbbVie requests that any investigator or institution that plans on presenting/publishing results disclosure, provide written notification of their request 60 days prior to their presentation/publication. AbbVie requests that no presentation/publication will be instituted until 12 months after a study is completed, or after the first presentation/publication whichever occurs first. A delay may be proposed of a presentation/publication if AbbVie needs to secure patent or proprietary protection.
Efficacy analysis was based on the Intent-To-Treat-Efficacy (ITT-E) population for the induction period. The ITT-E population was a subpopulation of the ITT population, which consisted of all participants who received at least one SC injection of the study medication during the induction period. Participants who received open-label high induction dose, because they enrolled after Protocol Amendment 4 was released, were excluded from the ITT-E population.
rejective multiple test procedure
controlling familywise Type I error of 5% in a strong sense
< 0.001
Adjusted p-value from a sequentially rejective multiple test procedure, testing co-primary and ranked secondary endpoints 1st for I-SD+I-HD, then for individual adalimumab dose groups (I-HD, I-SD) against the respective external placebo rate (19.83%)
Superiority
one-sample two-sided Chi-square test
OG000
Efficacy analysis was based on the Intent-To-Treat-Efficacy (ITT-E) population for the induction period. The ITT-E population was a subpopulation of the ITT population, which consisted of all participants who received at least one SC injection of the study medication during the induction period. Participants who received open-label high induction dose, because they enrolled after Protocol Amendment 4 was released, were excluded from the ITT-E population.
rejective multiple test procedure
controlling familywise Type I error of 5% in a strong sense
0.382
Adjusted p-value from a sequentially rejective multiple test procedure, testing co-primary and ranked secondary endpoints 1st for I-SD+I-HD, then for individual adalimumab dose groups (I-HD, I-SD) against the respective external placebo rate (19.83%)
Superiority
one-sample two-sided Chi-square test
OG006
Efficacy analysis was based on the Intent-To-Treat-Efficacy (ITT-E) population for the induction period. The ITT-E population was a subpopulation of the ITT population, which consisted of all participants who received at least one SC injection of the study medication during the induction period. Participants who received open-label high induction dose, because they enrolled after Protocol Amendment 4 was released, were excluded from the ITT-E population.
rejective multiple test procedure
controlling familywise Type I error of 5% in a strong sense
< 0.001
Adjusted p-value from a sequentially rejective multiple test procedure, testing co-primary and ranked secondary endpoints 1st for I-SD+I-HD, then for individual adalimumab dose groups (I-HD, I-SD) against the respective external placebo rate (19.83%)
Superiority
one-sample two-sided Chi-square test
OG005
Efficacy analysis was based on the Intent-To-Treat-Efficacy (ITT-E) population for the induction period. The ITT-E population was a subpopulation of the ITT population, which consisted of all participants who received at least one SC injection of the study medication during the induction period. Participants who received open-label high induction dose, because they enrolled after Protocol Amendment 4 was released, were excluded from the ITT-E population.
rejective multiple test procedure
controlling familywise Type I error of 5% in a strong sense
< 0.001
Adjusted p-value from a sequentially rejective multiple test procedure, testing co-primary and ranked secondary endpoints 1st for I-SD+I-HD, then for individual adalimumab dose groups (I-HD, I-SD) against the respective external placebo rate (19.83%)
Superiority
one-sample two-sided Chi-square test
OG004
Efficacy analysis was based on the Intent-To-Treat-Efficacy (ITT-E) population for the induction period. The ITT-E population was a subpopulation of the ITT population, which consisted of all participants who received at least one SC injection of the study medication during the induction period. Participants who received open-label high induction dose, because they enrolled after Protocol Amendment 4 was released, were excluded from the ITT-E population.
rejective multiple test procedure
controlling familywise Type I error of 5% in a strong sense
0.344
Adjusted p-value from a sequentially rejective multiple test procedure, testing co-primary and ranked secondary endpoints 1st for I-SD+I-HD, then for individual adalimumab dose groups (I-HD, I-SD) against the respective external placebo rate (19.83%)
Superiority
one-sample two-sided Chi-square test
OG001
Main Study: M-SD
Participants demonstrating a clinical response per PMS (defined as a decrease in PMS ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline) at Week 8 randomized to adalimumab maintenance standard dose (0.6 mg/kg [maximum dose of 40 mg] eow). Participants were to continue their blinded treatment during the maintenance period until Week 52 unless they had ≥ 2 flares and got open label rescue therapy after the second flare.
OG002
Main Study: M-HD
Participants demonstrating a clinical response per PMS (defined as a decrease in PMS ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline) at Week 8 randomized to adalimumab maintenance high dose (0.6 mg/kg [maximum dose of 40 mg] ew). Participants were to continue their blinded treatment during the maintenance period until Week 52 unless they had ≥ 2 flares and got open label rescue therapy after the second flare.
OG003
Main Study: M-SD + M-HD
Combined M-SD + M-HD arms (see above).
OG004
Integrated Study (Main + Japan Sub-Study): M-PL
(Prior to Amendment 4) participants demonstrating a clinical response per PMS (defined as a decrease in PMS ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline) at Week 8 randomized to maintenance placebo. Participants were to continue their blinded treatment during the maintenance period until Week 52 unless they had ≥ 2 flares and got open label adalimumab rescue therapy after the second flare.
OG005
Integrated Study (Main + Japan Sub-Study): M-SD
Participants demonstrating a clinical response per PMS (defined as a decrease in PMS ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline) at Week 8 randomized to adalimumab maintenance standard dose (0.6 mg/kg [maximum dose of 40 mg] eow). Participants were to continue their blinded treatment during the maintenance period until Week 52 unless they had ≥ 2 flares and got open label rescue therapy after the second flare.
OG006
Integrated Study (Main + Japan Sub-Study): M-HD
Participants demonstrating a clinical response per PMS (defined as a decrease in PMS ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline) at Week 8 randomized to adalimumab maintenance high dose (0.6 mg/kg [maximum dose of 40 mg] ew). Participants were to continue their blinded treatment during the maintenance period until Week 52 unless they had ≥ 2 flares and got open label rescue therapy after the second flare.
OG007
Integrated Study (Main + Japan Sub-Study): M-SD + M-HD
Combined M-SD + M-HD arms (see above).
Units
Counts
Participants
OG00012
OG00131
OG00231
OG00362
OG00412
OG00533
OG00635
OG00768
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG00033.3(9.92 to 65.11)
OG00129.0(14.22 to 48.04)
OG00245.2(27.32 to 63.97)
OG00337.1(25.16 to 50.31)
OG00433.3(9.92 to 65.11)
OG00527.3(13.30 to 45.52)
OG00642.9(26.32 to 60.65)
OG00735.3(24.08 to 47.83)
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG003
Efficacy analysis was based on the modified Intent-To-Treat-Efficacy (mITT-E) population for the maintenance period. The mITT-E population was a subpopulation of the mITT population, where participants in M-PL arm were excluded.
rejective multiple test procedure
controlling familywise Type I error of 5% in a strong sense
< 0.001
Adjusted p-value from a sequentially rejective multiple test procedure, testing co-primary and ranked secondary endpoints 1st for M-SD+M-HD, then for individual adalimumab dose groups (M-HD, M-SD) against the respective external placebo rate (18.37%)
Superiority
one-sample two-sided Chi-square test
OG002
Efficacy analysis was based on the modified Intent-To-Treat-Efficacy (mITT-E) population for the maintenance period. The mITT-E population was a subpopulation of the mITT population, where participants in M-PL arm were excluded.
rejective multiple test procedure
controlling familywise Type I error of 5% in a strong sense
< 0.001
Adjusted p-value from a sequentially rejective multiple test procedure, testing co-primary and ranked secondary endpoints 1st for M-SD+M-HD, then for individual adalimumab dose groups (M-HD, M-SD) against the respective external placebo rate (18.37%)
Superiority
one-sample two-sided Chi-square test
OG001
Efficacy analysis was based on the modified Intent-To-Treat-Efficacy (mITT-E) population for the maintenance period. The mITT-E population was a subpopulation of the mITT population, where participants in M-PL arm were excluded.
rejective multiple test procedure
controlling familywise Type I error of 5% in a strong sense
0.382
Adjusted p-value from a sequentially rejective multiple test procedure, testing co-primary and ranked secondary endpoints 1st for M-SD+M-HD, then for individual adalimumab dose groups (M-HD, M-SD) against the respective external placebo rate (18.37%)
Superiority
one-sample two-sided Chi-square test
OG007
Efficacy analysis was based on the modified Intent-To-Treat-Efficacy (mITT-E) population for the maintenance period. The mITT-E population was a subpopulation of the mITT population, where participants in M-PL arm were excluded.
rejective multiple test procedure
controlling familywise Type I error of 5% in a strong sense
< 0.001
Adjusted p-value from a sequentially rejective multiple test procedure, testing co-primary and ranked secondary endpoints 1st for M-SD+M-HD, then for individual adalimumab dose groups (M-HD, M-SD) against the respective external placebo rate (18.37%)
Superiority
one-sample two-sided Chi-square test
OG006
Efficacy analysis was based on the modified Intent-To-Treat-Efficacy (mITT-E) population for the maintenance period. The mITT-E population was a subpopulation of the mITT population, where participants in M-PL arm were excluded.
rejective multiple test procedure
controlling familywise Type I error of 5% in a strong sense
< 0.001
Adjusted p-value from a sequentially rejective multiple test procedure, testing co-primary and ranked secondary endpoints 1st for M-SD+M-HD, then for individual adalimumab dose groups (M-HD, M-SD) against the respective external placebo rate (18.37%)
Superiority
one-sample two-sided Chi-square test
OG005
Efficacy analysis was based on the modified Intent-To-Treat-Efficacy (mITT-E) population for the maintenance period. The mITT-E population was a subpopulation of the mITT population, where participants in M-PL arm were excluded.
rejective multiple test procedure
controlling familywise Type I error of 5% in a strong sense
0.344
Adjusted p-value from a sequentially rejective multiple test procedure, testing co-primary and ranked secondary endpoints 1st for M-SD+M-HD, then for individual adalimumab dose groups (M-HD, M-SD) against the respective external placebo rate (18.37%)
Superiority
one-sample two-sided Chi-square test
OG001
Main Study: M-SD
Participants demonstrating a clinical response per PMS (defined as a decrease in PMS ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline) at Week 8 randomized to adalimumab maintenance standard dose (0.6 mg/kg [maximum dose of 40 mg] eow). Participants were to continue their blinded treatment during the maintenance period until Week 52 unless they had ≥ 2 flares and got open label rescue therapy after the second flare.
OG002
Main Study: M-HD
Participants demonstrating a clinical response per PMS (defined as a decrease in PMS ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline) at Week 8 randomized to adalimumab maintenance high dose (0.6 mg/kg [maximum dose of 40 mg] ew). Participants were to continue their blinded treatment during the maintenance period until Week 52 unless they had ≥ 2 flares and got open label rescue therapy after the second flare.
OG003
Main Study: M-SD + M-HD
Combined M-SD + M-HD arms (see above).
OG004
Integrated Study (Main + Japan Sub-Study): M-PL
(Prior to Amendment 4) participants demonstrating a clinical response per PMS (defined as a decrease in PMS ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline) at Week 8 randomized to maintenance placebo. Participants were to continue their blinded treatment during the maintenance period until Week 52 unless they had ≥ 2 flares and got open label adalimumab rescue therapy after the second flare.
OG005
Integrated Study (Main + Japan Sub-Study): M-SD
Participants demonstrating a clinical response per PMS (defined as a decrease in PMS ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline) at Week 8 randomized to adalimumab maintenance standard dose (0.6 mg/kg [maximum dose of 40 mg] eow). Participants were to continue their blinded treatment during the maintenance period until Week 52 unless they had ≥ 2 flares and got open label rescue therapy after the second flare.
OG006
Integrated Study (Main + Japan Sub-Study): M-HD
Participants demonstrating a clinical response per PMS (defined as a decrease in PMS ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline) at Week 8 randomized to adalimumab maintenance high dose (0.6 mg/kg [maximum dose of 40 mg] ew). Participants were to continue their blinded treatment during the maintenance period until Week 52 unless they had ≥ 2 flares and got open label rescue therapy after the second flare.
OG007
Integrated Study (Main + Japan Sub-Study): M-SD + M-HD
Combined M-SD + M-HD arms (see above).
Units
Counts
Participants
OG00012
OG00131
OG00231
OG00362
OG00412
OG00533
OG00635
OG00768
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG00033.3(9.92 to 65.11)
OG00161.3(42.19 to 78.15)
OG00267.7(48.63 to 83.32)
OG00364.5(51.34 to 76.26)
OG00433.3(9.92 to 65.11)
OG00557.6(39.22 to 74.52)
OG00665.7(47.79 to 80.87)
OG00761.8(49.18 to 73.29)
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG003
Efficacy analysis was based on the modified Intent-To-Treat-Efficacy (mITT-E) population for the maintenance period. The mITT-E population was a subpopulation of the mITT population, where participants in M-PL arm were excluded.
rejective multiple test procedure
controlling familywise Type I error of 5% in a strong sense
< 0.001
Adjusted p-value from a sequentially rejective multiple test procedure, testing co-primary and ranked secondary endpoints 1st for M-SD+M-HD, then for individual adalimumab dose groups (M-HD, M-SD) against the respective external placebo rate (26.10%)
Superiority
one-sample two-sided Chi-square test
OG002
Efficacy analysis was based on the modified Intent-To-Treat-Efficacy (mITT-E) population for the maintenance period. The mITT-E population was a subpopulation of the mITT population, where participants in M-PL arm were excluded.
Chi-squared
controlling familywise Type I error of 5% in a strong sense
< 0.001
Adjusted p-value from a sequentially rejective multiple test procedure, testing co-primary and ranked secondary endpoints 1st for M-SD+M-HD, then for individual adalimumab dose groups (M-HD, M-SD) against the respective external placebo rate (26.10%)
Superiority
one-sample two-sided Chi-square test
OG001
Efficacy analysis was based on the modified Intent-To-Treat-Efficacy (mITT-E) population for the maintenance period. The mITT-E population was a subpopulation of the mITT population, where participants in M-PL arm were excluded.
Chi-squared
controlling familywise Type I error of 5% in a strong sense
0.008
Adjusted p-value from a sequentially rejective multiple test procedure, testing co-primary and ranked secondary endpoints 1st for M-SD+M-HD, then for individual adalimumab dose groups (M-HD, M-SD) against the respective external placebo rate (26.10%)
Superiority
one-sample two-sided Chi-square test
OG007
Efficacy analysis was based on the modified Intent-To-Treat-Efficacy (mITT-E) population for the maintenance period. The mITT-E population was a subpopulation of the mITT population, where participants in M-PL arm were excluded.
rejective multiple test procedure
controlling familywise Type I error of 5% in a strong sense
< 0.001
Adjusted p-value from a sequentially rejective multiple test procedure, testing co-primary and ranked secondary endpoints 1st for M-SD+M-HD, then for individual adalimumab dose groups (M-HD, M-SD) against the respective external placebo rate (26.10%)
Superiority
one-sample two-sided Chi-square test
OG006
Efficacy analysis was based on the modified Intent-To-Treat-Efficacy (mITT-E) population for the maintenance period. The mITT-E population was a subpopulation of the mITT population, where participants in M-PL arm were excluded.
rejective multiple test procedure
controlling familywise Type I error of 5% in a strong sense
< 0.001
Adjusted p-value from a sequentially rejective multiple test procedure, testing co-primary and ranked secondary endpoints 1st for M-SD+M-HD, then for individual adalimumab dose groups (M-HD, M-SD) against the respective external placebo rate (26.10%)
Superiority
one-sample two-sided Chi-square test
OG005
Efficacy analysis was based on the modified Intent-To-Treat-Efficacy (mITT-E) population for the maintenance period. The mITT-E population was a subpopulation of the mITT population, where participants in M-PL arm were excluded.
rejective multiple test procedure
controlling familywise Type I error of 5% in a strong sense
0.038
Adjusted p-value from a sequentially rejective multiple test procedure, testing co-primary and ranked secondary endpoints 1st for M-SD+M-HD, then for individual adalimumab dose groups (M-HD, M-SD) against the respective external placebo rate (26.10%)
Superiority
one-sample two-sided Chi-square test
OG001
Main Study: M-SD
Participants demonstrating a clinical response per PMS (defined as a decrease in PMS ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline) at Week 8 randomized to adalimumab maintenance standard dose (0.6 mg/kg [maximum dose of 40 mg] eow). Participants were to continue their blinded treatment during the maintenance period until Week 52 unless they had ≥ 2 flares and got open label rescue therapy after the second flare.
OG002
Main Study: M-HD
Participants demonstrating a clinical response per PMS (defined as a decrease in PMS ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline) at Week 8 randomized to adalimumab maintenance high dose (0.6 mg/kg [maximum dose of 40 mg] ew). Participants were to continue their blinded treatment during the maintenance period until Week 52 unless they had ≥ 2 flares and got open label rescue therapy after the second flare.
OG003
Main Study: M-SD + M-HD
Combined M-SD + M-HD arms (see above).
OG004
Integrated Study (Main + Japan Sub-Study): M-PL
(Prior to Amendment 4) participants demonstrating a clinical response per PMS (defined as a decrease in PMS ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline) at Week 8 randomized to maintenance placebo. Participants were to continue their blinded treatment during the maintenance period until Week 52 unless they had ≥ 2 flares and got open label adalimumab rescue therapy after the second flare.
OG005
Integrated Study (Main + Japan Sub-Study): M-SD
Participants demonstrating a clinical response per PMS (defined as a decrease in PMS ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline) at Week 8 randomized to adalimumab maintenance standard dose (0.6 mg/kg [maximum dose of 40 mg] eow). Participants were to continue their blinded treatment during the maintenance period until Week 52 unless they had ≥ 2 flares and got open label rescue therapy after the second flare.
OG006
Integrated Study (Main + Japan Sub-Study): M-HD
Participants demonstrating a clinical response per PMS (defined as a decrease in PMS ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline) at Week 8 randomized to adalimumab maintenance high dose (0.6 mg/kg [maximum dose of 40 mg] ew). Participants were to continue their blinded treatment during the maintenance period until Week 52 unless they had ≥ 2 flares and got open label rescue therapy after the second flare.
OG007
Integrated Study (Main + Japan Sub-Study): M-SD + M-HD
Combined M-SD + M-HD arms (see above).
Units
Counts
Participants
OG00012
OG00131
OG00231
OG00362
OG00412
OG00533
OG00635
OG00768
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG00033.3(9.92 to 65.11)
OG00138.7(21.85 to 57.81)
OG00251.6(33.06 to 69.85)
OG00345.2(32.48 to 58.32)
OG00433.3(9.92 to 65.11)
OG00536.4(20.40 to 54.88)
OG00648.6(31.38 to 66.01)
OG00742.6(30.72 to 55.23)
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG003
Efficacy analysis was based on the modified Intent-To-Treat-Efficacy (mITT-E) population for the maintenance period. The mITT-E population was a subpopulation of the mITT population, where participants in M-PL arm were excluded.
rejective multiple test procedure
controlling familywise Type I error of 5% in a strong sense
< 0.001
Adjusted p-value from a sequentially rejective multiple test procedure, testing co-primary and ranked secondary endpoints 1st for M-SD+M-HD, then for individual adalimumab dose groups (M-HD, M-SD) against the respective external placebo rate (22.03%)
Superiority
one-sample two-sided Chi-square test
OG002
Efficacy analysis was based on the modified Intent-To-Treat-Efficacy (mITT-E) population for the maintenance period. The mITT-E population was a subpopulation of the mITT population, where participants in M-PL arm were excluded.
rejective multiple test procedure
controlling familywise Type I error of 5% in a strong sense
< 0.001
Adjusted p-value from a sequentially rejective multiple test procedure, testing co-primary and ranked secondary endpoints 1st for M-SD+M-HD, then for individual adalimumab dose groups (M-HD, M-SD) against the respective external placebo rate (22.03%)
Superiority
one-sample two-sided Chi-square test
OG001
Efficacy analysis was based on the modified Intent-To-Treat-Efficacy (mITT-E) population for the maintenance period. The mITT-E population was a subpopulation of the mITT population, where participants in M-PL arm were excluded.
rejective multiple test procedure
controlling familywise Type I error of 5% in a strong sense
0.382
Adjusted p-value from a sequentially rejective multiple test procedure, testing co-primary and ranked secondary endpoints 1st for M-SD+M-HD, then for individual adalimumab dose groups (M-HD, M-SD) against the respective external placebo rate (22.03%)
Superiority
one-sample two-sided Chi-square test
OG007
Efficacy analysis was based on the modified Intent-To-Treat-Efficacy (mITT-E) population for the maintenance period. The mITT-E population was a subpopulation of the mITT population, where participants in M-PL arm were excluded.
rejective multiple test procedure
controlling familywise Type I error of 5% in a strong sense
< 0.001
Adjusted p-value from a sequentially rejective multiple test procedure, testing co-primary and ranked secondary endpoints 1st for M-SD+M-HD, then for individual adalimumab dose groups (M-HD, M-SD) against the respective external placebo rate (22.03%)
Superiority
one-sample two-sided Chi-square test
OG006
Efficacy analysis was based on the modified Intent-To-Treat-Efficacy (mITT-E) population for the maintenance period. The mITT-E population was a subpopulation of the mITT population, where participants in M-PL arm were excluded.
rejective multiple test procedure
controlling familywise Type I error of 5% in a strong sense
< 0.001
Adjusted p-value from a sequentially rejective multiple test procedure, testing co-primary and ranked secondary endpoints 1st for M-SD+M-HD, then for individual adalimumab dose groups (M-HD, M-SD) against the respective external placebo rate (22.03%)
Superiority
one-sample two-sided Chi-square test
OG005
Efficacy analysis was based on the modified Intent-To-Treat-Efficacy (mITT-E) population for the maintenance period. The mITT-E population was a subpopulation of the mITT population, where participants in M-PL arm were excluded.
rejective multiple test procedure
controlling familywise Type I error of 5% in a strong sense
0.344
Adjusted p-value from a sequentially rejective multiple test procedure, testing co-primary and ranked secondary endpoints 1st for M-SD+M-HD, then for individual adalimumab dose groups (M-HD, M-SD) against the respective external placebo rate (22.03%)
Superiority
one-sample two-sided Chi-square test
OG001
Main Study: M-SD
Participants demonstrating a clinical response per PMS (defined as a decrease in PMS ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline) at Week 8 randomized to adalimumab maintenance standard dose (0.6 mg/kg [maximum dose of 40 mg] eow). Participants were to continue their blinded treatment during the maintenance period until Week 52 unless they had ≥ 2 flares and got open label rescue therapy after the second flare.
OG002
Main Study: M-HD
Participants demonstrating a clinical response per PMS (defined as a decrease in PMS ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline) at Week 8 randomized to adalimumab maintenance high dose (0.6 mg/kg [maximum dose of 40 mg] ew). Participants were to continue their blinded treatment during the maintenance period until Week 52 unless they had ≥ 2 flares and got open label rescue therapy after the second flare.
OG003
Main Study: M-SD + M-HD
Combined M-SD + M-HD arms (see above).
OG004
Integrated Study (Main + Japan Sub-Study): M-PL
(Prior to Amendment 4) participants demonstrating a clinical response per PMS (defined as a decrease in PMS ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline) at Week 8 randomized to maintenance placebo. Participants were to continue their blinded treatment during the maintenance period until Week 52 unless they had ≥ 2 flares and got open label adalimumab rescue therapy after the second flare.
OG005
Integrated Study (Main + Japan Sub-Study): M-SD
Participants demonstrating a clinical response per PMS (defined as a decrease in PMS ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline) at Week 8 randomized to adalimumab maintenance standard dose (0.6 mg/kg [maximum dose of 40 mg] eow). Participants were to continue their blinded treatment during the maintenance period until Week 52 unless they had ≥ 2 flares and got open label rescue therapy after the second flare.
OG006
Integrated Study (Main + Japan Sub-Study): M-HD
Participants demonstrating a clinical response per PMS (defined as a decrease in PMS ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline) at Week 8 randomized to adalimumab maintenance high dose (0.6 mg/kg [maximum dose of 40 mg] ew). Participants were to continue their blinded treatment during the maintenance period until Week 52 unless they had ≥ 2 flares and got open label rescue therapy after the second flare.
OG007
Integrated Study (Main + Japan Sub-Study): M-SD + M-HD
Combined M-SD + M-HD arms (see above).
Units
Counts
Participants
OG0008
OG00121
OG00222
OG00343
OG0048
OG00521
OG00625
OG00746
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG00037.5(8.52 to 75.51)
OG00142.9(21.82 to 65.98)
OG00245.5(24.39 to 67.79)
OG00344.2(29.08 to 60.12)
OG00437.5(8.52 to 75.51)
OG00542.9(21.82 to 65.98)
OG00644.0(24.40 to 65.07)
OG00743.5(28.93 to 58.89)
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG003
Efficacy analysis was based on the modified Intent-To-Treat-Efficacy (mITT-E) population for the maintenance period. The mITT-E population was a subpopulation of the mITT population, where participants in M-PL arm were excluded.
rejective multiple test procedure
controlling familywise Type I error of 5% in a strong sense
< 0.001
Adjusted p-value from a sequentially rejective multiple test procedure, testing co-primary and ranked secondary endpoints 1st for M-SD+M-HD, then for individual adalimumab dose groups (M-HD, M-SD) against the respective external placebo rate (14.79%)
Superiority
one-sample two-sided Chi-square test
OG002
Efficacy analysis was based on the modified Intent-To-Treat-Efficacy (mITT-E) population for the maintenance period. The mITT-E population was a subpopulation of the mITT population, where participants in M-PL arm were excluded.
rejective multiple test procedure
controlling familywise Type I error of 5% in a strong sense
< 0.001
Adjusted p-value from a sequentially rejective multiple test procedure, testing co-primary and ranked secondary endpoints 1st for M-SD+M-HD, then for individual adalimumab dose groups (M-HD, M-SD) against the respective external placebo rate (14.79%)
Superiority
one-sample two-sided Chi-square test
OG001
Efficacy analysis was based on the modified Intent-To-Treat-Efficacy (mITT-E) population for the maintenance period. The mITT-E population was a subpopulation of the mITT population, where participants in M-PL arm were excluded.
rejective multiple test procedure
controlling familywise Type I error of 5% in a strong sense
0.292
Adjusted p-value from a sequentially rejective multiple test procedure, testing co-primary and ranked secondary endpoints 1st for M-SD+M-HD, then for individual adalimumab dose groups (M-HD, M-SD) against the respective external placebo rate (14.79%)
Superiority
one-sample two-sided Chi-square test
OG007
Efficacy analysis was based on the modified Intent-To-Treat-Efficacy (mITT-E) population for the maintenance period. The mITT-E population was a subpopulation of the mITT population, where participants in M-PL arm were excluded.
rejective multiple test procedure
controlling familywise Type I error of 5% in a strong sense
< 0.001
Adjusted p-value from a sequentially rejective multiple test procedure, testing co-primary and ranked secondary endpoints 1st for M-SD+M-HD, then for individual adalimumab dose groups (M-HD, M-SD) against the respective external placebo rate (14.79%)
Superiority
one-sample two-sided Chi-square test
OG006
Efficacy analysis was based on the modified Intent-To-Treat-Efficacy (mITT-E) population for the maintenance period. The mITT-E population was a subpopulation of the mITT population, where participants in M-PL arm were excluded.
rejective multiple test procedure
controlling familywise Type I error of 5% in a strong sense
< 0.001
Adjusted p-value from a sequentially rejective multiple test procedure, testing co-primary and ranked secondary endpoints 1st for M-SD+M-HD, then for individual adalimumab dose groups (M-HD, M-SD) against the respective external placebo rate (14.79%)
Superiority
one-sample two-sided Chi-square test
OG005
Efficacy analysis was based on the modified Intent-To-Treat-Efficacy (mITT-E) population for the maintenance period. The mITT-E population was a subpopulation of the mITT population, where participants in M-PL arm were excluded.
rejective multiple test procedure
controlling familywise Type I error of 5% in a strong sense
0.292
Adjusted p-value from a sequentially rejective multiple test procedure, testing co-primary and ranked secondary endpoints 1st for M-SD+M-HD, then for individual adalimumab dose groups (M-HD, M-SD) against the respective external placebo rate (14.79%)
Superiority
one-sample two-sided Chi-square test
OG001
Main Study: M-SD
Participants demonstrating a clinical response per PMS (defined as a decrease in PMS ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline) at Week 8 randomized to adalimumab maintenance standard dose (0.6 mg/kg [maximum dose of 40 mg] eow). Participants were to continue their blinded treatment during the maintenance period until Week 52 unless they had ≥ 2 flares and got open label rescue therapy after the second flare.
OG002
Main Study: M-HD
Participants demonstrating a clinical response per PMS (defined as a decrease in PMS ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline) at Week 8 randomized to adalimumab maintenance high dose (0.6 mg/kg [maximum dose of 40 mg] ew). Participants were to continue their blinded treatment during the maintenance period until Week 52 unless they had ≥ 2 flares and got open label rescue therapy after the second flare.
OG003
Main Study: M-SD + M-HD
Combined M-SD + M-HD arms (see above).
OG004
Integrated Study (Main + Japan Sub-Study): M-PL
(Prior to Amendment 4) participants demonstrating a clinical response per PMS (defined as a decrease in PMS ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline) at Week 8 randomized to maintenance placebo. Participants were to continue their blinded treatment during the maintenance period until Week 52 unless they had ≥ 2 flares and got open label adalimumab rescue therapy after the second flare.
OG005
Integrated Study (Main + Japan Sub-Study): M-SD
Participants demonstrating a clinical response per PMS (defined as a decrease in PMS ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline) at Week 8 randomized to adalimumab maintenance standard dose (0.6 mg/kg [maximum dose of 40 mg] eow). Participants were to continue their blinded treatment during the maintenance period until Week 52 unless they had ≥ 2 flares and got open label rescue therapy after the second flare.
OG006
Integrated Study (Main + Japan Sub-Study): M-HD
Participants demonstrating a clinical response per PMS (defined as a decrease in PMS ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline) at Week 8 randomized to adalimumab maintenance high dose (0.6 mg/kg [maximum dose of 40 mg] ew). Participants were to continue their blinded treatment during the maintenance period until Week 52 unless they had ≥ 2 flares and got open label rescue therapy after the second flare.
OG007
Integrated Study (Main + Japan Sub-Study): M-SD + M-HD
Combined M-SD + M-HD arms (see above).
Units
Counts
Participants
OG0005
OG00113
OG00216
OG00329
OG0045
OG00515
OG00617
OG00732
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG00040.0(5.27 to 85.34)
OG00130.8(9.09 to 61.43)
OG00231.3(11.02 to 58.66)
OG00331.0(15.28 to 50.83)
OG00440.0(5.27 to 85.34)
OG00526.7(7.79 to 55.10)
OG00635.3(14.21 to 61.67)
OG00731.3(16.12 to 50.01)
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG003
Efficacy analysis was based on the modified Intent-To-Treat-Efficacy (mITT-E) population for the maintenance period. The mITT-E population was a subpopulation of the mITT population, where participants in M-PL arm were excluded.
rejective multiple test procedure
controlling familywise Type I error of 5% in a strong sense
0.382
Adjusted p-value from a sequentially rejective multiple test procedure, testing co-primary and ranked secondary endpoints 1st for M-SD+M-HD, then for individual adalimumab dose groups (M-HD, M-SD) against the respective external placebo rate (24.08%)
Superiority
one-sample two-sided Chi-square test
OG002
Efficacy analysis was based on the modified Intent-To-Treat-Efficacy (mITT-E) population for the maintenance period. The mITT-E population was a subpopulation of the mITT population, where participants in M-PL arm were excluded.
rejective multiple test procedure
controlling familywise Type I error of 5% in a strong sense
1.000
Adjusted p-value from a sequentially rejective multiple test procedure, testing co-primary and ranked secondary endpoints 1st for M-SD+M-HD, then for individual adalimumab dose groups (M-HD, M-SD) against the respective external placebo rate (24.08%)
Superiority
one-sample two-sided Chi-square test
OG001
Efficacy analysis was based on the modified Intent-To-Treat-Efficacy (mITT-E) population for the maintenance period. The mITT-E population was a subpopulation of the mITT population, where participants in M-PL arm were excluded.
rejective multiple test procedure
controlling familywise Type I error of 5% in a strong sense
1.000
Adjusted p-value from a sequentially rejective multiple test procedure, testing co-primary and ranked secondary endpoints 1st for M-SD+M-HD, then for individual adalimumab dose groups (M-HD, M-SD) against the respective external placebo rate (24.08%)
Superiority
one-sample two-sided Chi-square test
OG007
Efficacy analysis was based on the modified Intent-To-Treat-Efficacy (mITT-E) population for the maintenance period. The mITT-E population was a subpopulation of the mITT population, where participants in M-PL arm were excluded.
rejective multiple test procedure
controlling familywise Type I error of 5% in a strong sense
0.344
Adjusted p-value from a sequentially rejective multiple test procedure, testing co-primary and ranked secondary endpoints 1st for M-SD+M-HD, then for individual adalimumab dose groups (M-HD, M-SD) against the respective external placebo rate (24.08%)
Superiority
one-sample two-sided Chi-square test
OG006
Efficacy analysis was based on the modified Intent-To-Treat-Efficacy (mITT-E) population for the maintenance period. The mITT-E population was a subpopulation of the mITT population, where participants in M-PL arm were excluded.
rejective multiple test procedure
controlling familywise Type I error of 5% in a strong sense
0.559
Adjusted p-value from a sequentially rejective multiple test procedure, testing co-primary and ranked secondary endpoints 1st for M-SD+M-HD, then for individual adalimumab dose groups (M-HD, M-SD) against the respective external placebo rate (24.08%)
Superiority
one-sample two-sided Chi-square test
OG005
Efficacy analysis was based on the modified Intent-To-Treat-Efficacy (mITT-E) population for the maintenance period. The mITT-E population was a subpopulation of the mITT population, where participants in M-PL arm were excluded.
rejective multiple test procedure
controlling familywise Type I error of 5% in a strong sense
0.815
Adjusted p-value from a sequentially rejective multiple test procedure, testing co-primary and ranked secondary endpoints 1st for M-SD+M-HD, then for individual adalimumab dose groups (M-HD, M-SD) against the respective external placebo rate (24.08%)