Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of the study is to determine the irritation potential of repeat applications of abametapir lotion on normal skin.
This will be a randomized, evaluator-blind, single-center, controlled, within-subject comparison study of the investigational products (abametapir lotion) and its vehicle lotion and positive and negative controls under occlusive conditions in healthy volunteers. All subjects will have the investigational product (abametapir lotion), the vehicle product, the positive control patch, and negative control patch applied to 4 randomly assigned, adjacent skin sites on the infrascapular area of their back, for the purpose of determining irritation potential.
The investigational products, vehicle, and controls will be applied to one side of the infrascapular area of the back. Evaluation of dermal reactions at the application sites will be assessed clinically using a visual scale that rates the degree of erythema, edema, and other signs of cutaneous irritation (see Section 3.5.5).
A total of 21 applications of each product will be made.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abametapir lotion 0.74% w/w | Experimental | Applied 0.2 mL topically under occlusive condition |
|
| Vehicle lotion | Placebo Comparator | Applied 0.2 mL topically under occlusive condition |
|
| Sodium Lauryl Sulfate | Other | Positive control applied 0.2 mL topically under occlusive condition |
|
| Saline 0.9% | Other | Negative control applied 0.2 mL topically under occlusive condition |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abametapir Lotion 0.74% w/w | Drug | applied 0.2 mL topically under occlusive condition |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Potential of Abametapir Lotion to Cause Irritation After Repeated Topical Application to the Healthy Skin of Humans. | The evaluation of irritation is based on Modified Berger procedure and is accepted as standard methodology for assessment of cumulative irritation potential. The assessment of all patch sites for irritation symptoms will be visually assessed by a trained evaluator using the numerical equivalents (0-7) where 0 is the least irritation potential and 7 is the maximum irritation potential. The scoring will be done on daily basis from baseline through Day 21 visit. The final reported outcome is a mean of the scores over 21 days. | 21 days |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jonathan Dosik | TKL Research, Inc. | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TKL Reserach Inc | Paramus | New Jersey | 07652 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | All Randomized Subjects | All Randomized Subjects included all subjects who were enrolled into the study. All subjects had the investigational product (abametapir lotion), the vehicle product, the positive control patch, and negative control patch applied to 4 randomly assigned, adjacent skin sites on the infrascapular area of their back, for the purpose of determining irritation potential. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | All Randomized Subjects | All Randomized Subjects included all subjects who were enrolled into the study. All subjects had the investigational product (abametapir lotion), the vehicle product, the positive control patch, and negative control patch applied to 4 randomly assigned, adjacent skin sites on the infrascapular area of their back, for the purpose of determining irritation potential. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Customized | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Potential of Abametapir Lotion to Cause Irritation After Repeated Topical Application to the Healthy Skin of Humans. | The evaluation of irritation is based on Modified Berger procedure and is accepted as standard methodology for assessment of cumulative irritation potential. The assessment of all patch sites for irritation symptoms will be visually assessed by a trained evaluator using the numerical equivalents (0-7) where 0 is the least irritation potential and 7 is the maximum irritation potential. The scoring will be done on daily basis from baseline through Day 21 visit. The final reported outcome is a mean of the scores over 21 days. | All Randomized Subjects | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 21 days | Skin Sites | Skin Sites |
|
All Adverse events were systematically recorded from the time of signing informed consent until the last assessment i.e. 21 days.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | All Randomized Subjects | All Randomized Subjects included all subjects who were enrolled into the study. All subjects received application of all four interventions. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr Srinivas Sidgiddi | Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Inc. | 9084585362 | srinivassidgiddi@drreddys.com |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012967 | Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate |
| D012965 | Sodium Chloride |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007851 | Dodecanol |
| D005233 | Fatty Alcohols |
| D000438 | Alcohols |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Sodium Lauryl Sulfate | Drug | Sodium Lauryl Sulfate is prepared as a 0.2% aqueous solution by the site for topical administration, and applied 21 times over consecutive days under occlusive conditions, will serve as a positive control. |
|
| Saline 0.9% | Drug | A solution of 0.9% saline for topical administration, applied 21 times over consecutive days under occlusive conditions, will serve as a negative control |
|
| Placebo | Drug |
|
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Fitzpatrick Skin Type | The Fitzpatrick (FP) Scale is a numerical classification schema for human skin color. FP 1 is for white skin type and progressively becoming darker until FP 6 which is for black skin type. FP 1 = Always burns easily, never tans; FP 2 = Always burns easily, tans minimally; FP 3 = Burns moderately, tans gradually (light brown); FP 4 = Burns minimally, always tans well (moderate brown); FP 5 = Rarely burns, tans very well (moderate brown); FP 6 = Never burns, deeply pigmented | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| OG001 | Vehicle Lotion | All Subjects in the study received all treatments simultaneously on a daily basis, as it was an intra-subject comparison design |
| OG002 | Saline 0.9% | All Subjects in the study received all treatments simultaneously on a daily basis, as it was an intra-subject comparison design |
| OG003 | Sodium Lauryl Sulphate (SLS) | All Subjects in the study received all treatments simultaneously on a daily basis, as it was an intra-subject comparison design |
|
|
| 0 |
| 40 |
| 0 |
| 40 |
| 0 |
| 40 |
Not provided
Not provided
| D000476 |
| Alkanesulfonates |
| D017738 | Alkanesulfonic Acids |
| D013451 | Sulfonic Acids |
| D013456 | Sulfur Acids |
| D013457 | Sulfur Compounds |
| D008055 | Lipids |
| D002712 | Chlorides |
| D006851 | Hydrochloric Acid |
| D017606 | Chlorine Compounds |
| D007287 | Inorganic Chemicals |
| D017670 | Sodium Compounds |