Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Celleration, Inc. | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Wound healing rate is higher when contact ultrasound therapy is followed by noncontact ultrasound therapy on sub-acute and chronic lower extremity ulcers of various etiologies requiring selective debridement, as compared to either Sonoca-180 or MIST Therapy alone.
This prospective pilot study is designed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of a wound care ultrasound treatment protocol for sub-acute or chronic wounds of the lower extremity and of any etiology. The Viana-Pompeo (VIP) ultrasound protocol consists of high intensity, low frequency, contact ultrasound therapy (with Sonoca-180) followed by low intensity, low-frequency, noncontact ultrasound therapy (with MIST Therapy). Previously published healing rates for each of the ultrasonic therapy modalities will be used as a comparison.
The Physical Therapist will perform the initial assessment and treatment, and devise an individualized plan of care that involves contact ultrasound followed by noncontact ultrasound. Subjects may remain in the study for up to 12 weeks, or up to when end of study criteria is met.
Transition from contact mode to noncontact mode will happen when:
- Wound is sufficiently clean with ≤ 20% of necrotic tissue or adherent slough.
OR
- >= 80% of soft slough is easily removed from the wound bed with mechanical or selective debridement before or after treatment
OR
- Wound bed quality has failed to progress after 3 consecutive contact ultrasound treatments
For the purposes of this study, treatments will be performed 3 times a week. Treatment time will be dependent on the wound area, at least 20 sec/cm2, per standard protocol.
Only the wounds present during Physical Therapy (PT) initial assessment will be included in the research. If the patient develops new wounds during the course of the research, the patient will receive appropriate treatment, but such wounds will not be part of the study.
Patients in the wound clinic setting are allowed to perform home dressing changes as ordered by the physician in addition to the dressing changes performed by the therapist or wound clinic nurse on clinic visit days. Patients and/or caregivers will be trained in dressing changes techniques and must understand the procedure prior to performing dressing changes on their own.
In addition to ultrasonic treatment and dressing changes, wound debridement may be performed each visit as needed. Digital photography and wound measurements will also be performed weekly and as needed.
End of PT wound therapy may be before, at, or after the end of the study period. The beginning of the MIST therapy will depend on the individual characteristics and wound needs.
A minimum of 4 MIST treatments must be completed for a patient's data to be included the data analysis in the acute care setting.
A minimum of 2 treatments per week (goal of 3 per week) must be reached for the 12 week period for a patient's data to be included in the data analysis.
Study Endpoints
Primary endpoint:
Secondary endpoint:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ambulatory Wound Clinic | Experimental | Intervention with contact ultrasound therapy and noncontact ultrasound therapy following the study protocol on subjects receiving care at the wound clinic. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contact Ultrasound Therapy | Device | Following our protocol, the ultrasound wound therapy will start with contact ultrasound until it meets criteria to switch to noncontact ultrasound therapy. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Total Wound Area | Mean and Standard Deviation of the group's total wound area at day one and last treatment day. Wound area was measured as Length x Width. This is to assess the change in area, in order to assess wound progress towards closure. | Initial measurement at day 1 and measurement at the subject's last visit at 12 weeks or sooner if the wound closed before then. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Total Wound Volume | Mean and Standard Deviation of the group's total wound volume at day one and last treatment day. Wound volume was measured as Length x Width X Depth (when able to determine depth). This is to assess the change in volume, in order to assess wound progress towards closure. | Initial measurement at day 1 and measurement at the subject's last visit at 12 weeks or sooner if the wound closed before then. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Wounds With Granulation Present on Visit 1 and Wounds With Granulation Present at Last Visit | Mean and Standard Deviation of the group's total percent of granulation tissue present in the wound bed at day one and last treatment day. This is to assess the change in granulation, in order to assess progress of wound bed quality. | Initial measurement at day 1 and measurement at the subject's last visit at 12 weeks or sooner if the wound closed before then. |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Lisley Viana, PTMS | Texas Health Resources - Presbyterian Hospital of Dallas | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Texas Health Resources - Presbyterian Hospital of Dallas | Dallas | Texas | 75231 | United States |
The wound care doctor wrote orders for ultrasound therapy performed by Physical Therapist (PT). Throughout the open enrollment phase, the PT screened referred patients to check if they met study criteria.
This study enrolled subjects who had sub-acute or chronic lower leg wound requiring debridement, who were coming to the outpatient wound care clinic for follow up with wound care doctor.
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Ambulatory Wound Clinic - Wound Age Between 4 and 21 Weeks | Intervention with contact ultrasound therapy and noncontact ultrasound therapy following the study protocol on subjects receiving care at the wound clinic. Contact Ultrasound Therapy: Following our protocol, the ultrasound wound therapy will start with contact ultrasound until it meets criteria to switch to noncontact ultrasound therapy. Noncontact Ultrasound Therapy: Transition from contact to noncontact ultrasound when criteria for transition is met per our protocol. Wound age between 4 and 21 weeks |
| FG001 | Ambulatory Wound Clinic - Wound Age Between 22 and 46 Weeks | Intervention with contact ultrasound therapy and noncontact ultrasound therapy following the study protocol on subjects receiving care at the wound clinic. Contact Ultrasound Therapy: Following our protocol, the ultrasound wound therapy will start with contact ultrasound until it meets criteria to switch to noncontact ultrasound therapy. Noncontact Ultrasound Therapy: Transition from contact to noncontact ultrasound when criteria for transition is met per our protocol. Wound age between 22 and 46 weeks |
| FG002 | Ambulatory Wound Clinic - Wound Age >= 47 Weeks | Intervention with contact ultrasound therapy and noncontact ultrasound therapy following the study protocol on subjects receiving care at the wound clinic. Contact Ultrasound Therapy: Following our protocol, the ultrasound wound therapy will start with contact ultrasound until it meets criteria to switch to noncontact ultrasound therapy. Noncontact Ultrasound Therapy: Transition from contact to noncontact ultrasound when criteria for transition is met per our protocol. Wound age >= 47 weeks |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Wound Age Between 4 and 21 Weeks | Both groups underwent the same protocol of contact ultrasound followed by non-contact ultrasound therapy, with the goal of 3x/week treatment frequency. Study data for this group was collected over a period of 12 weeks or up to the time of wound closure. |
| BG001 |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Total Wound Area | Mean and Standard Deviation of the group's total wound area at day one and last treatment day. Wound area was measured as Length x Width. This is to assess the change in area, in order to assess wound progress towards closure. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Squared centimiters | Initial measurement at day 1 and measurement at the subject's last visit at 12 weeks or sooner if the wound closed before then. | Wounds | Wounds |
|
Therapist was monitoring for adverse effects on subjects on both study arms throughout the study duration (12 weeks) and for the duration of the therapy (if the subject continued therapy passed the 12 weeks), but no adverse events were observed, therefore no data was collected.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Wound Age Between 4 and 21 Weeks | Wounds age between 4 and 21 weeks |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lisley Viana, Physical Therapist | Texas Health Resources Presbyterian Hospital of Dallas | 214-345-4334 | lisleyviana@texashealth.org |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Noncontact Ultrasound Therapy | Device | Transition from contact to noncontact ultrasound when criteria for transition is met per our protocol. |
|
|
| Wounds With Slough/Eschar Reduction on Visit 2 and Wounds With Slough/Eschar Reduction at Last Visit | Mean and Standard Deviation of the group's percent adherent and/or non-adherent slough present in the wound bed at day one and last treatment day. This is to assess the change in slough/eschar. This is to determine progression from contact to noncontact ultrasound therapy, as well as to determine progress of wound bed quality. | Day 2 and measurement at the subject's last visit at 12 weeks or sooner if the wound closed before then. |
| Wound Age >=47 Weeks |
Both groups underwent the same protocol of contact ultrasound followed by non-contact ultrasound therapy, with the goal of 3x/week treatment frequency. Study data for this group was collected over a period of 12 weeks. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Wounds |
|
| Participants |
| Participants |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants | Participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants | Participants |
|
| Wound Location | Count of Units | Wounds | Wounds |
|
| Initial Wound Area | Mean | Full Range | cm^2 | Wounds |
|
| Associated Diagnosis | Count of Units | Wounds | Wounds |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Total Wound Volume | Mean and Standard Deviation of the group's total wound volume at day one and last treatment day. Wound volume was measured as Length x Width X Depth (when able to determine depth). This is to assess the change in volume, in order to assess wound progress towards closure. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | cubic centimeter | Initial measurement at day 1 and measurement at the subject's last visit at 12 weeks or sooner if the wound closed before then. | Wounds | Wounds |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Wounds With Slough/Eschar Reduction on Visit 2 and Wounds With Slough/Eschar Reduction at Last Visit | Mean and Standard Deviation of the group's percent adherent and/or non-adherent slough present in the wound bed at day one and last treatment day. This is to assess the change in slough/eschar. This is to determine progression from contact to noncontact ultrasound therapy, as well as to determine progress of wound bed quality. | Posted | Count of Units | Wounds | Day 2 and measurement at the subject's last visit at 12 weeks or sooner if the wound closed before then. | Wounds | Wounds |
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Wounds With Granulation Present on Visit 1 and Wounds With Granulation Present at Last Visit | Mean and Standard Deviation of the group's total percent of granulation tissue present in the wound bed at day one and last treatment day. This is to assess the change in granulation, in order to assess progress of wound bed quality. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | % Granulation | Initial measurement at day 1 and measurement at the subject's last visit at 12 weeks or sooner if the wound closed before then. | Wounds | Wounds |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 4 |
| 0 |
| 4 |
| EG001 | Wound Age >=47 Weeks | Wounds age equal to or greater than 47 weeks | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided