Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Change in technology
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Medical Companion LLC | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
In this study, the goal is to find out if the clinicCompanion™ is effective in measuring range of motion when compared to the goniometer. Currently, the goniometer is an approved device to measure range of motion by the FDA, but the clinicCompanion™ is not.
The study procedure will test the range of motion of the subjects shoulders two different ways: using a goniometer and using the clinicCompanion™. Both tools are designed to measure the degree of movement subjects are able to do. Researchers will take 12 measurements on each arm for each device, for a total of 24 measurements per device. That is a total of 48 measurements for both devices.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Control cost and enhance accuracy of measurement | By freeing the doctor from data collection, he or she will be able to spend more time with patient discussing medical conditions and providing pertinent information | The goal is to recruit 75 subjects in 18 months |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
New or established clinic patients from Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center. The subjects will be recruited from the principal investigator's medical practice. Any patient may be included in the study, regardless of his/her diagnosis and must be 18 years of age and older.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Maharaj m Singh, PHD | Wake Forest University Health Sciences | Principal Investigator |
| Navjot m Kohli, MD | Wake Forest University Health Sciences | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aurora St Lukes Medical Center | Milwaukee | Wisconsin | 53215 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20557263 | Background | Mullaney MJ, McHugh MP, Johnson CP, Tyler TF. Reliability of shoulder range of motion comparing a goniometer to a digital level. Physiother Theory Pract. 2010 Jul;26(5):327-33. doi: 10.3109/09593980903094230. | |
| 20500132 | Background | van de Pol RJ, van Trijffel E, Lucas C. Inter-rater reliability for measurement of passive physiological range of motion of upper extremity joints is better if instruments are used: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2010;56(1):7-17. doi: 10.1016/s1836-9553(10)70049-7. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019534 | Shoulder Impingement Syndrome |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D000070599 | Shoulder Injuries |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 10459526 | Background | MacDermid JC, Chesworth BM, Patterson S, Roth JH. Intratester and intertester reliability of goniometric measurement of passive lateral shoulder rotation. J Hand Ther. 1999 Jul-Sep;12(3):187-92. doi: 10.1016/s0894-1130(99)80045-3. |
| 3575423 | Background | Riddle DL, Rothstein JM, Lamb RL. Goniometric reliability in a clinical setting. Shoulder measurements. Phys Ther. 1987 May;67(5):668-73. doi: 10.1093/ptj/67.5.668. |
| 22438718 | Background | Khoshelham K, Elberink SO. Accuracy and resolution of Kinect depth data for indoor mapping applications. Sensors (Basel). 2012;12(2):1437-54. doi: 10.3390/s120201437. Epub 2012 Feb 1. |
| 22018839 | Background | Dutta T. Evaluation of the Kinect sensor for 3-D kinematic measurement in the workplace. Appl Ergon. 2012 Jul;43(4):645-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.09.011. Epub 2011 Oct 20. |