Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-001191-38 | EudraCT Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Assuming greater efficacy in the prevention of acute rejection in the EVR arm with minimisation of TAC levels, the hypothesis of the present trial was that the introduction of EVR in combination with the minimisation of TAC (rTAC) may offer improved kidney function compared with standard therapy with TAC-MMF.
A multicentre, randomized, open-label, controlled, exploratory clinical trial with 12-months (52 weeks) of follow-up.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimisation of TAC | Experimental | Treatment with rTAC+EVR+corticosteroids |
|
| TAC + MMF + corticosteroids | Active Comparator | Treatment with TAC + MMF + corticosteroids |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minimisation of TAC | Drug | •EVR: Treatment started at a total daily dose of 2 mg within 24 hours after randomisation. The dose of EVR was adjusted upon reaching trough levels (C-0h) in whole blood of 3-8 ng/mL. The daily dose (in two administrations) of EVR may have been modified to maintain trough levels (C-0h) in whole blood of 3-8 ng/mL until Week 52 post-transplant. •TAC: Once confirmation was obtained, beginning in Week 5, that trough levels (C-0h) in whole blood of EVR were between 3-8 ng/mL, minimisation of TAC began, in order to reach trough levels (C-0h) of TAC in whole blood of ≤5 ng/mL no later than four weeks after randomisation (Week 8), which were levels that should have been maintained until Week 52 post-transplant. •MMF was withdrawn at the same time that EVR was introduced. •oral corticosteroids was administered in accordance with local clinical practice, although a therapeutic strategy free of corticosteroids was permitted |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentages of Participants Showing Clinical Benefit by Renal Function Stratification | Clinical benefit is defined as: • an improvement in 1 or 2 ranges of the eGFR, according to MDRD-4 at Week 52 post-transplant in patients with values of 30-<45 or 45-<60 mL/min/1.73 m2 in Week 4. or • stabilisation of eGFR in patients with values ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at Week 4 and maintained at Week 52 post-transplant. | week 4, week 52. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Changes in Creatinine Clearance - Cockcroft-Gault Formula | Kidney function was assessed over time by creatine clearance based on the Cockcroft-Gault formula. Estimated creatinine clearance (mL/min) = [(140 - age) x (weight) x (0.85 if female)] / (72 x serum creatinine). Units: age (years); weight (kg); serum creatinine (mg/dL). The values of the eGFR according to the creatinine clearance (Cockcroft-Gault formula) for the ITT population were ml/min/1.73 m^2. |
Not provided
Screening Visit - Inclusion Criteria
Recipients age 18 or over receiving a first liver transplant from a cadaver donor.
Patients diagnosed with HCC must meet the Milan radiological criteria at the time of transplant (1 nodule ≤5 cm in diameter, or 2-3 nodules, all <3 cm in diameter) - at time of patient's inclusion on the waiting list.
Anh: done.
Patients who have signed the informed consent to participate in the study.
Patients who by medical criteria are capable of complying with the study regimen.
Screening Visit - Exclusion Criteria
Randomisation Visit - Inclusion Criteria
Functioning allograft at the time of randomisation. A functioning allograft is defined as:
Glomerular filtrate ≥30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (calculated using the MDRD-4 equation).
Randomisation Visit - Exclusion Criteria
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Novartis Pharmaceuticals | Novartis Pharmaceuticals | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Novartis Investigative Site | Córdoba | Andalusia | 14004 | Spain | ||
| Novartis Investigative Site |
Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations.
This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The intention-to-treat population (ITT) that was used for all efficacy analyses included all randomised patients who had received at least one dose of the study medication (safety population) and had at least one assessment subsequent to the randomisation visit for determining the primary efficacy endpoint.
Patients enrolled were 217, patients in the safety population were 215, and patients in the ITT population were 211.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Experimental Group | Minimisation of TAC: Treatment with rTAC+EVR+corticosteroids |
| FG001 | Control Group | Treatment with TAC + MMF + corticosteroids |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
A multicentre, randomized, open-label, controlled, exploratory clinical trial with 12-months (52 weeks) of follow-up".
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| TAC + MMF + corticosteroids | Drug | •Dose of TAC: Trough levels (C-0h) of TAC in whole blood should have been maintained between 6-10 ng/mL until Week 52 post-transplant. •Dose of MMF: Doses of 500-1000 mg/12 hrs was maintained until Week 52. •Corticosteroids: During the study, oral corticosteroids was administered in accordance with local clinical practice, although a therapeutic strategy free of corticosteroids was permitted (e.g. in patients with a history of HCV). It was recommended in any case that corticosteroids not be administered beyond Week 24 post-transplant except in cases of hepatopathy of autoimmune origin. At each centre all patients should have followed the same administration protocol for corticosteroids based on history of HCV. |
|
| Screening visit (transplant), weeks 1,4,12,24,36 and 52 post-transplant |
| Changes in eGFR Based on the MDRD-4 Formula | Kidney function was assessed over time by changes in eGFR according to the MDRD-4 formula. The MDRD-4 formula (Levey et al., 2000) was used based on serum concentration of creatinine (conventional units): eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) = 186 x (serum creatinine)-1.154 x (age)-0.203 x (0.742 if female) x (1.210 if of African descent). Units: serum creatinine (mg/dL); age (years). | Screening visit (transplant), weeks 1,4,12,24,36 and 52 post-transplant |
| eGFR Values(MDRD-4 Formula) According to the MELD Score | Model for End Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score: ≤14, 15-19, 20-24, 25-29, ≥30. The higher the number indicates the urgency for transplant. | Screening visit (transplant), weeks 1,4,12,24,36 and 52 post-transplant |
| Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratio | The urine protein/creatinine ratio was assessed throughout follow-up in both treatment groups. | Screening visit, week 1,4,18,24, and 52 |
| Percentage of Participants With Incidence of Proteinuria | The incidence of proteinuria (≥0.5-0.9 g/day, ≥1.0-2.9 g/day and ≥3.0 g/day) was assessed throughout follow-up in both treatment groups. Proteinuria was defined as protein/creatinine ratio ≥ 0.5. | Screening visit, week 1,4,18,24, and 52 |
| Percentage of Participants With Acute Rejection, BPAR, and Treated BPAR | Liver biopsy had to be performed in all cases where acute rejection was suspected. Results of the biopsy were interpreted by the local pathologist (who did not known the treatment given to the patient) according to the Banff classification (1997). Biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) defined as clinical suspicion of acute rejection confirmed in biopsy. Treated BPAR was deemed to be an episode of acute rejection in which the interpretation of the local pathologist showed that it reached any grade of acute rejection under the Banff classification, and for which anti-rejection therapy was administered. Loss of the liver allograft was deemed to have occurred the day that the patient was again included on the waiting list for liver transplant, the day he or she received another allograft or upon the death of the patient. All suspected hepatic allograft rejections were considered acute rejection | Throughout the study period, approximately 2 years and 2 months |
| Time to Rejection | Time to acute rejection was calculated from the date of transplantation. Acute rejection date was taken from biopsy date, as the date of rejection was not collected. Time to treated BPAR was calculated from the date of transplantation. | Throughout study period, approximately 2 years and 2 months |
| Severity of Rejection | Severity of acute rejection and treated BPAR was graded according to Banff criteria. Grade of acute rejection according to Banff criteria: mild, moderate, severe. | Throughout study period, approximately 2 years and 2 months |
| Percentages of Participants With HCV-positive and HCV Genotype | The viral load of HCV-RNA and HCV genotype was assessed in HCV-positive patients. The term "genotype" was used to describe strains of HCV that vary but were related to the virus. Worldwide, there were 11 primary groups of HCV genotypes designated by the numbers from 1-11, with the most common in our setting being subtypes 1a, 1b, 2 and 3, which were identified in the local laboratory according to their usual testing methods. | approximately 2 years and 2 months |
| Concentration of p-P70S6K | the biomarker of personal response to everolimus, monitoring of the activity of the target, kinase P70 S6, in its phosphorylated form at Thr389. EVR=everolimus Cmin=minimum concentration | weeks 6,8,12,18,24,36,52 at 0 (Cmin), and 1 (C1h) hrs post-dose. |
| Málaga |
| Andalusia |
| 29010 |
| Spain |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Seville | Andalusia | 41013 | Spain |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Barakaldo | Basque Country | 48903 | Spain |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Valladolid | Castille and León | 47012 | Spain |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Barcelona | Catalonia | 08035 | Spain |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Barcelona | Catalonia | 08036 | Spain |
| Novartis Investigative Site | L'Hospitalet de Llobregat | Catalonia | 08907 | Spain |
| Novartis Investigative Site | A Coruña | Galicia | 15006 | Spain |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Santiago de Compostela | Galicia | 15706 | Spain |
| Novartis Investigative Site | El Palmar | Murcia | 30120 | Spain |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Pamplona | Navarre | 31008 | Spain |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Oviedo | Principality of Asturias | 33011 | Spain |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Valencia | Valencia | 46026 | Spain |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Madrid | 28007 | Spain |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Madrid | 28034 | Spain |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Madrid | 28041 | Spain |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Madrid | 28222 | Spain |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Santa Cruz de Tenerife | 38009 | Spain |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Zaragoza | 50009 | Spain |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Intent to treat (ITT) population included all randomised patients who had received at least one dose of the study medication and had at least one assessment subsequent to the randomization visit for determining the primary efficacy endpoint. Patients were analysed according to the treatment to which they were assigned at randomisation.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Experimental Group | Minimisation of TAC: Treatment with rTAC+EVR+corticosteroids |
| BG001 | Control Group | Treatment with TAC + MMF + corticosteroids |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentages of Participants Showing Clinical Benefit by Renal Function Stratification | Clinical benefit is defined as: • an improvement in 1 or 2 ranges of the eGFR, according to MDRD-4 at Week 52 post-transplant in patients with values of 30-<45 or 45-<60 mL/min/1.73 m2 in Week 4. or • stabilisation of eGFR in patients with values ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at Week 4 and maintained at Week 52 post-transplant. | ITT | Posted | Number | Percentages of partcipants | week 4, week 52. |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Changes in Creatinine Clearance - Cockcroft-Gault Formula | Kidney function was assessed over time by creatine clearance based on the Cockcroft-Gault formula. Estimated creatinine clearance (mL/min) = [(140 - age) x (weight) x (0.85 if female)] / (72 x serum creatinine). Units: age (years); weight (kg); serum creatinine (mg/dL). The values of the eGFR according to the creatinine clearance (Cockcroft-Gault formula) for the ITT population were ml/min/1.73 m^2. | ITT | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | ml/min/1.73m^2 | Screening visit (transplant), weeks 1,4,12,24,36 and 52 post-transplant |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Changes in eGFR Based on the MDRD-4 Formula | Kidney function was assessed over time by changes in eGFR according to the MDRD-4 formula. The MDRD-4 formula (Levey et al., 2000) was used based on serum concentration of creatinine (conventional units): eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) = 186 x (serum creatinine)-1.154 x (age)-0.203 x (0.742 if female) x (1.210 if of African descent). Units: serum creatinine (mg/dL); age (years). | ITT | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | ml/min/1.73m2 | Screening visit (transplant), weeks 1,4,12,24,36 and 52 post-transplant |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | eGFR Values(MDRD-4 Formula) According to the MELD Score | Model for End Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score: ≤14, 15-19, 20-24, 25-29, ≥30. The higher the number indicates the urgency for transplant. | ITT population (patients with MDRD-4 values). | Posted | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | ml/min/1.73m^2 | Screening visit (transplant), weeks 1,4,12,24,36 and 52 post-transplant |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratio | The urine protein/creatinine ratio was assessed throughout follow-up in both treatment groups. | ITT | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | mg/g | Screening visit, week 1,4,18,24, and 52 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Incidence of Proteinuria | The incidence of proteinuria (≥0.5-0.9 g/day, ≥1.0-2.9 g/day and ≥3.0 g/day) was assessed throughout follow-up in both treatment groups. Proteinuria was defined as protein/creatinine ratio ≥ 0.5. | ITT | Posted | Number | Percentages of participants | Screening visit, week 1,4,18,24, and 52 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Acute Rejection, BPAR, and Treated BPAR | Liver biopsy had to be performed in all cases where acute rejection was suspected. Results of the biopsy were interpreted by the local pathologist (who did not known the treatment given to the patient) according to the Banff classification (1997). Biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) defined as clinical suspicion of acute rejection confirmed in biopsy. Treated BPAR was deemed to be an episode of acute rejection in which the interpretation of the local pathologist showed that it reached any grade of acute rejection under the Banff classification, and for which anti-rejection therapy was administered. Loss of the liver allograft was deemed to have occurred the day that the patient was again included on the waiting list for liver transplant, the day he or she received another allograft or upon the death of the patient. All suspected hepatic allograft rejections were considered acute rejection | ITT | Posted | Number | Percentages of participants | Throughout the study period, approximately 2 years and 2 months |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Time to Rejection | Time to acute rejection was calculated from the date of transplantation. Acute rejection date was taken from biopsy date, as the date of rejection was not collected. Time to treated BPAR was calculated from the date of transplantation. | ITT | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | months | Throughout study period, approximately 2 years and 2 months |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Severity of Rejection | Severity of acute rejection and treated BPAR was graded according to Banff criteria. Grade of acute rejection according to Banff criteria: mild, moderate, severe. | ITT | Posted | Number | Percentages of participants | Throughout study period, approximately 2 years and 2 months |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentages of Participants With HCV-positive and HCV Genotype | The viral load of HCV-RNA and HCV genotype was assessed in HCV-positive patients. The term "genotype" was used to describe strains of HCV that vary but were related to the virus. Worldwide, there were 11 primary groups of HCV genotypes designated by the numbers from 1-11, with the most common in our setting being subtypes 1a, 1b, 2 and 3, which were identified in the local laboratory according to their usual testing methods. | ITT | Posted | Number | Percentages of participants | approximately 2 years and 2 months |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Concentration of p-P70S6K | the biomarker of personal response to everolimus, monitoring of the activity of the target, kinase P70 S6, in its phosphorylated form at Thr389. EVR=everolimus Cmin=minimum concentration | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | ng/ml | weeks 6,8,12,18,24,36,52 at 0 (Cmin), and 1 (C1h) hrs post-dose. |
|
|
Adverse Events (AEs) are collected from First Patient First Visit (FPFV) until Last Patient Last Visit (LPLV). All AEs reported in this record are from date of First Patient First Treatment until Last Patient Last Visit) up to approximately 2 years and 2 month.
AE and SAE analyses were done on the safety population (N=215). The safety population included all randomised patients who had received at least one dose of the study medication. Patients were analysed according to the treatment received. All safety analyses were based on the safety population.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Experimental Group | Minimisation of TAC: Treatment with rTAC+EVR+corticosteroids | 55 | 106 | 97 | 106 | ||
| EG001 | Control Group | Treatment with TAC + MMF + corticosteroids. | 48 | 109 | 105 | 109 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Leukopenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Neutropenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pancytopenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Thrombocytopenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Atrial fibrillation | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Atrial flutter | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cardiac failure | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Right ventricular failure | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ventricular fibrillation | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Retinal detachment | Eye disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal distension | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain upper | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal strangulated hernia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Acute abdomen | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ascites | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dieulafoy's vascular malformation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Duodenal perforation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Duodenal ulcer | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Duodenal ulcer haemorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastric ulcer haemorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastrointestinal haemorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastrointestinal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Incarcerated umbilical hernia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Inguinal hernia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Inguinal hernia strangulated | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Intestinal ischaemia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Intestinal obstruction | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Localised intraabdominal fluid collection | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Peritoneal haemorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Umbilical hernia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Asthenia | General disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chest pain | General disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chills | General disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gait disturbance | General disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome | General disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oedema | General disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oedema peripheral | General disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain | General disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Strangulated hernia | General disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bile duct stenosis | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bile duct stone | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Biliary tract disorder | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Budd-Chiari syndrome | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cholangitis | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cholangitis acute | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cholestasis | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dilatation intrahepatic duct acquired | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hepatic artery stenosis | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hepatic artery thrombosis | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hepatic failure | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hepatic function abnormal | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hepatic ischaemia | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hepatitis cholestatic | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Jaundice | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Jaundice cholestatic | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Liver injury | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Portal hypertension | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Liver transplant rejection | Immune system disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal sepsis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Biliary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Clostridium difficile colitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Clostridium difficile infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cytomegalovirus colitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cytomegalovirus hepatitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cytomegalovirus oesophagitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cytomegalovirus viraemia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Escherichia urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fungaemia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastroenteritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hepatitis C | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Herpes virus infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Herpes zoster | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Herpes zoster disseminated | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Klebsiella infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Liver abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lymphangitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Peritonitis bacterial | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pseudomembranous colitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pseudomonas bronchitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sepsis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Septic shock | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Staphylococcal bacteraemia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tooth abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection pseudomonal | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anastomotic stenosis | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Biliary anastomosis complication | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Complications of transplanted liver | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Incisional hernia | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Joint dislocation | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Liver graft loss | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Post procedural bile leak | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Post procedural haemorrhage | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Transplant dysfunction | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Biopsy liver | Investigations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood pressure increased | Investigations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography | Investigations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Laboratory test | Investigations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Liver function test abnormal | Investigations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Liver function test increased | Investigations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Transaminases increased | Investigations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyperglycaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyperkalaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypomagnesaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Musculoskeletal pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cholangiocarcinoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hepatocellular carcinoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Laryngeal cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Malignant neoplasm of thorax | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Renal cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Salivary gland neoplasm | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyskinesia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Haemorrhagic stroke | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ischaemic stroke | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Leukoencephalopathy | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Neurotoxicity | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Seizure | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Device ineffective | Product Issues | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Agitation | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Disorientation | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Suicide attempt | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Acute kidney injury | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Renal failure | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Renal impairment | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Renal tubular disorder | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary bladder polyp | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Testicular cyst | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Testicular disorder | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bronchiectasis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diaphragmatic paralysis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pleural effusion | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumothorax | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Respiratory arrest | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pruritus generalised | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bile duct stent removal | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hospitalisation | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arterial stenosis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arterial thrombosis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Deep vein thrombosis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Shock haemorrhagic | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Steal syndrome | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Leukocytosis | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Leukopenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Neutropenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Thrombocytopenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain upper | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ascites | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ileus paralytic | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Asthenia | General disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oedema | General disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oedema peripheral | General disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cholestasis | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Jaundice | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hepatitis C | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Transaminases increased | Investigations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cell death | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Decreased appetite | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diabetes mellitus | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyslipidaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypercholesterolaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyperglycaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyperkalaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypertriglyceridaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypomagnesaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tremor | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anxiety | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Insomnia | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Acute kidney injury | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Proteinuria | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Renal failure | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Renal impairment | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pleural effusion | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pruritus | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypertension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
The terms and conditions of Novartis' agreements with its investigators may vary. However, Novartis does not prohibit any investigator from publishing. Any publications from a single-site are postponed until the publication of the pooled data (ie, data from all sites) in the clinical trial.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study Director | Novartis Pharmaceuticals | 862-778-8300 | Novartis.email@novartis.com |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006086 | Graft vs Host Disease |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000305 | Adrenal Cortex Hormones |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006728 | Hormones |
| D006730 | Hormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone Antagonists |
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| > = 60 ml/min/1.73m^2 at Week 52 |
|
|
|
| OG004 | > = 30 | Experimental group (Minimisation of TAC: Treatment with rTAC+EVR+corticosteroids) with MELD score > = 30 |
| OG005 | <= 14 Control Group | Control group (Treatment with TAC + MMF + corticosteroids) with MELD score <= 14 |
| OG006 | 15 to 19 Control Group | Control group (Treatment with TAC + MMF + corticosteroids) with MELD score 15 to 19 |
| OG007 | 20 to 24 Control Group | Control group (Treatment with TAC + MMF + corticosteroids) with MELD score 20 to 24 |
| OG008 | 25 to 29 Control Group | Control group (Treatment with TAC + MMF + corticosteroids) with MELD score 25 to 29 |
| OG009 | > = 30 Control Group | Control group (Treatment with TAC + MMF + corticosteroids) with MELD score > = 30 |
|
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
| Title | Denominators | Categories |
|---|
| Cmin EVR week 6 |
| |||||
| C1h EVR week 6 |
| |||||
| Cmin EVR week 8 |
| |||||
| C1h EVR week 8 |
| |||||
| Cmin EVR week 12 |
| |||||
| C1h EVR week 12 |
| |||||
| Cmin EVR week 18 |
| |||||
| C1h EVR week 18 |
| |||||
| Cmin EVR week 24 |
| |||||
| C1h EVR week 24 |
| |||||
| Cmin EVR week 36 |
| |||||
| C1h EVR week 36 |
| |||||
| Cmin EVR week 52 |
| |||||
| C1h EVR week 52 |
|