Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study compared the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib to Best Available Therapy (BAT) in patients with polycythemia vera (PV) who were hydroxyurea (HU) resistant or intolerant and did not have a palpable spleen.
This was a prospective, multi-center, open-label, randomized, Phase IIIb study evaluating efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib versus BAT as selected by the Investigator in patients with PV who are resistant to, or intolerant of HU.
The study comprised of the following periods:
Screening Period (up to 5 weeks: Day -35 to Day -1): Screening evaluations were performed at one or more clinic visits, and reviewed to determine eligibility before the patient was randomized in the study.
Core Treatment Period (Day 1 to Week 80):
Patients were randomized in 1:1 ratio to either treatment group (ruxolitinib or BAT) and were to be treated with their randomized treatment.
Crossover Treatment Period (Week 28 or after) for BAT patients only:
Patients randomized to BAT who did not respond by Week 28 were eligible to crossover and start treatment with ruxolitinib. Patients crossing over on or after Week 28 had to complete all assessments for the End of Treatment (EoT) visit of the Core Treatment Period followed by the assessments in Cross-over visit evaluation schedule.
Extended Treatment Period (Week 80 to Week 260):
Patients receiving ruxolitinib at Week 80 (including patients who have crossed over from BAT) were eligible to continue up to Week 260 in the Extended Treatment Period. Patients continued the ruxolitinib dose that they received at Week 80. Patients who received BAT at Week 80 were not eligible to enter the Extended Treatment Period and had to have the EoT visit at Week 80 and an End of study (EoS) visit 30 days after the EoT visit.
Follow-up Period:
Patients were followed for safety during 30 days after the last dose of study drug and EoS visit assessments were performed post 30 days after the last dose of study drug. Patients who completed EoT (Week 80 for patients who received BAT, Week 260 for patients who received ruxolitinib or from the time of premature discontinuation) were to be followed-up for every 3 months for survival till the end of the study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ruxolitinib | Experimental | Ruxolitinib was administered at a starting dose of 10 mg twice a day (bid). Dose was adjusted based on efficacy and safety parameters up to a maximum dose of 25 mg bid. |
|
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Active Comparator | Best Available Therapy as selected by the investigator from: Hydroxyurea, Pegylated-Interferon (IFN/PEG-IFN), pipobroman, anagrelide, IMIDs, or observation. Participants randomized to BAT who did not respond by Week 28 were eligible to crossover and start treatment with ruxolitinib. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best Available Therapy | Drug | Best Available Therapy as selected by the investigator from: Hydroxyurea, Pegylated-Interferon (IFN/PEG-IFN), pipobroman, anagrelide, IMIDs, or observation. Participants randomized to BAT who did not respond by Week 28 were eligible to crossover and start treatment with ruxolitinib. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants Achieving Hematocrit (Hct) Control at Week 28 | Proportion of patients achieving Hct control at Week 28 was defined by the absence of phlebotomy eligibility starting at Week 8 and continuing through Week 28, with no more than one phlebotomy eligibility occurring post randomization and prior to Week 8. Phlebotomy eligibility was defined by:
| Week 28 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants Achieving a Complete Hematological Remission at Week 28 | Proportion of patients achieving a complete hematological remission at Week 28 was defined by:
|
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Confirmed diagnosis of PV according to the 2008 World Health Organization criteria, Non-palpable spleen, Phlebotomy dependent, Resistant to or intolerant of hydroxyurea, ECOG performance status of 0, 1 or 2.
Exclusion Criteria:
Inadequate liver or renal function, Significant bacterial, fungal, parasitic, or viral infection requiring treatment, Active malignancy within the past 5 years, excluding specific skin cancers, Previously received treatment with a JAK inhibitor, Being treated with any investigational agent, Women who are pregnant or nursing.
Other inclusion/exclusion criteria apply.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Novartis Pharmaceuticals | Novartis Pharmaceuticals | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Novartis Investigative Site | Herston | Queensland | 4029 | Australia | ||
| Novartis Investigative Site |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41890273 | Derived | Harrison CN, Kiladjian JJ, Hamer-Maansson JE, Naim A, Palandri F, Passamonti F. Ruxolitinib treatment in patients with polycythemia vera reduces JAK2 variant allele frequency and improves symptom burden and hematocrit control. Ther Adv Hematol. 2026 Mar 24;17:20406207261425083. doi: 10.1177/20406207261425083. eCollection 2026. | |
| 35597252 |
Not provided
Not provided
Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations.
This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio either to Ruxolitinib or Best available Therapy (BAT). Randomization was stratified by patients who were resistant to or intolerant of Hydroxyurea (HU).
Participants were randomized in 48 centers across 12 countries: Australia (1), Belgium (2), Canada (1), France (7), Germany (9), Hungary (3), India (2), Israel (3), Italy (7), South Korea (2), Spain (9) and Turkey (2)
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Ruxolitinib | Ruxolitinib at a starting dose of 10 mg twice a day (bid). Dose was adjusted based on efficacy and safety parameters up to a maximum dose of 25 mg bid |
| FG001 | Best Available Therapy (BAT) |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Core Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| Ruxolitinib | Drug | Ruxolitinib was administered at a starting dose of 10 mg twice a day (bid). Dose was adjusted based on efficacy and safety parameters up to a maximum dose of 25 mg bid. |
|
|
| Week 28 |
| Number of Participants Achieving a Hematocrit (Hct) Control at Week 52 and Week 80 | Proportion of patients achieving a Hct control at Week 52 was defined by the absence of phlebotomy eligibility starting at Week 8 and continuing through Week 52, and no more than one phlebotomy eligibility occurring post randomization and prior to Week 8 - Endpoint for Week 80 was defined, similarly. | Week 52 and 80 |
| Number of Participants Achieving a Complete Hematological Remission at Week 52 and Week 80 | Proportion of patients achieving a complete hematological remission at Week 52, was defined by:
| Week 52 and 80 |
| Number of Participants With Phlebotomies Over Time | Phlebotomy eligibility was defined by Confirmed Hct > 45% that is at least 3 percentage points higher than the Hct obtained at Baseline Or Confirmed Hct > 48%. The confirmation occurred 2 to 14 days subsequent to the initial observation. | Baseline to Week 260 |
| Change From Baseline in Hematocrit (Hct) at Each Visit | Hematocrit is the volume percentage of red blood cells (RBC) in the blood. | Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 40, 52, 66, 80, 92, 104, 117, 130, 143, 156, 169, 182, 195, 208, 221, 234, 247 and 260 |
| Change From Baseline in Hematocrit (Hct) at Each Scheduled Visit After Crossover in Participants Randomized to BAT Who Cross Over to Ruxolitinib | Hematocrit is the percentage of red blood cells (RBC) in the blood. | Baseline (last assessment before cross over), Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 40, 52, 64, 76, 89, 102, 115, 128, 141, 154, 167, 180, 193, 206, 219 and 232 after cross-over |
| Spleen Length by Visit | Spleen length was assessed by manual palpation at every study visit. | Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 40, 52, 66, 80, 92, 104, 117, 130, 143, 156, 169, 182, 195, 208, 221, 234, 247 and 260 |
| Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status to Week 28 | The ECOG scale of performance status described the level of functioning of participants in terms of their ability to care for themselves, daily activity, and physical ability. The ECOG performance was recorded as per ECOG performance status grades ranging from 0 (fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction) to 5 (dead). | Baseline and Week 28 |
| Number of Participants Achieving a Partial Remission Based on the European Leukemia Net (ELN) and International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) Criteria at Week 28 | Proportion of patients achieving a partial remission at Week 28, based on the ELN and IWG-MRT criteria, as defined by:
| Week 28 |
| Number of Participants Who Achieved Partial Remission Based on the European Leukemia Net (ELN) and International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) Criteria at Week 52 and Week 80 | Proportion of patients who achieved partial remission at Week 52 based on the ELN and IWG-MRT criteria, as defined by:
| Week 52 and 80 |
| Number of Participants Achieving a Hematocrit (Hct) Control at Week 104, Week 156, Week 208 and Week 260. | Proportion of patients achieving a Hct control at Week 104 as defined by the absence of phlebotomy eligibility starting at Week 8 and continuing through Week 104 and with no more than one phlebotomy eligibility occurring post randomization and prior to Week 8 Endpoint for Week 156, Week 208 and Week 260 were defined, similarly. | From Week 8 to Week 104, 156, 208 and 260 |
| Number of Participants Achieving a Complete Hematological Remission at Week 104, Week 156, Week 208 and Week 260 | Proportion of patients achieving a complete hematological remission at Week 104 as defined by Hct control defined by the absence of phlebotomy eligibility starting at Week 8 and continuing through Week 104, with no more than one phlebotomy eligibility occurring post randomization and prior to Week 8, and
| From Week 8 to Week 104, 156, 208 and 260 |
| Number of Participants Who Achieved Partial Remission Based on the European Leukemia Net (ELN) and International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) Criteria at Week 104, Week 156, Week 208 and Week 260. | Proportion of patients who achieved partial remission at Week 104, based on the ELN and IWG-MRT criteria, as defined by:
| From Week 8 to Week 104, 156, 208 and 260 |
| Number of Participants With Transformation Free Survival Events | Transformation-free survival is defined as one of the following:
| Week 260 (ruxolitinib arm) and Week 80 (BAT arm) |
| Number of Participants With Overall Survival (OS) Events | Overall survival (OS) event is defined as death due to any cause. OS events were counted in the BAT arm, irrespective of whether participants crossed over to receive ruxolitinib when the event occurred. | up to Week 260 |
| Change From Baseline in Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form Total Symptom Score (MPN-SAF TSS) | The MPN-SAF TSS is a disease specific questionnaire comprised of 10 items that measures fatigue related to MPN disease and the severity of nine of the most prevalent associated symptoms. Each item is scored on a scale ranging from 0 (no fatigue/absent) to 10 (As bad as you can imagine/worst imaginable).The MPN-SAF TSS is computed as the average of the observed items multiplied by 10 to achieve a 0-to-100 scale. The MPN-SAF TSS thus has a possible score range of 0 to 100 where a decrease indicates improvement. | Baseline, Week 4, 8, 16, 28, 40, 52, 80, 92, 104, 117, 130, 143, 156, 169, 182, 195, 208, 221, 234 and 247 |
| Change From Baseline in Total Scores of MPN-SAF by Visit in Patients From BAT Group Who Cross Over to Ruxolitinib After Crossover | The MPN-SAF TSS is a disease specific questionnaire comprised of 10 items that measures fatigue related to MPN disease and the severity of nine of the most prevalent associated symptoms. Each item is scored on a scale ranging from 0 (no fatigue/absent) to 10 (As bad as you can imagine/worst imaginable).The MPN-SAF TSS is computed as the average of the observed items multiplied by 10 to achieve a 0-to-100 scale. The MPN-SAF TSS thus has a possible score range of 0 to 100 where a decrease indicates improvement. | Baseline (last assessment before cross over), Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, 40, 52, 92, 104, 117, 130, 143, 156, 169, 182, 195, 208, 221, 234 and 247 after cross-over |
| Change From Baseline in Score as Per European Quality of Life 5-Dimension 5-level (EQ-5D-5L) Questionnaire | EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for measuring health outcomes in a wide range of health conditions and treatments. It consists of visual analogue scale (EQ VAS) which records the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical, visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labeled 'Best imaginable health state' and 'worst imaginable health state'. The EQ VAS scores were anchored on 100 = the best health you can imagine and 0 = worst health you can imagine. | Baseline, Week 4, 8, 16, 28, 52, 80, 92, 104, 117, 130, 143, 156, 169, 182, 195, 208, 221, 234 and 247 |
| Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L VAS, by Visit in Patients From BAT Group Who Cross Over to Ruxolitinib After Crossover | EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for measuring health outcomes in a wide range of health conditions and treatments. It consists of visual analogue scale (EQ VAS) which records the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical, visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labeled 'Best imaginable health state' and 'worst imaginable health state'. The EQ VAS scores were anchored on 100 = the best health you can imagine and 0 = worst health you can imagine. | Baseline (last assessment before cross over), Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, 52, 92, 104, 117, 130, 143, 156, 169, 182, 195, 208, 221, 234 and 247 after cross-over |
| Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire | The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) is a six item questionnaire which intended to measure work and activity impairment associated with polycythemia vera. WPAI consisted of 6 questions (Q1=Employment status; Q2=Hours absent from work due to the polycythemia vera; Q3=Hours absent from work due to other reasons; Q4=Hours actually worked; Q5=Impact of the polycythemia vera on productivity while working; Q6=Impact of the polycythemia vera on productivity while doing regular daily activities other than work). Higher WPAI scores indicated greater activity impairment. Scores were multiplied by 100 to express in percentages. Percent work time missed due to problem (past 7 days) =Q2/(Q2+Q4) Percent impairment while working due to problem (past 7 days): Q5/10 Percent overall work impairment due to problem (past 7 says): Q2/(Q2+Q4)+[(1 Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)] Percent activity impairment due to problem (past 7 says): Q6/10 | Baseline, Week 4, 8, 16, 28, 52 and 80 |
| Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI), by Visit in Patients From BAT Group Who Cross Over to Ruxolitinib After Crossover | The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) is a six item questionnaire which intended to measure work and activity impairment associated with polycythemia vera. WPAI consisted of 6 questions (Q1=Employment status; Q2=Hours absent from work due to the polycythemia vera; Q3=Hours absent from work due to other reasons; Q4=Hours actually worked; Q5=Impact of the polycythemia vera on productivity while working; Q6=Impact of the polycythemia vera on productivity while doing regular daily activities other than work). Higher WPAI scores indicated greater activity impairment. Scores were multiplied by 100 to express in percentages. Percent work time missed due to problem (past 7 days) =Q2/(Q2+Q4) Percent impairment while working due to problem (past 7 days): Q5/10 Percent overall work impairment due to problem (past 7 says): Q2/(Q2+Q4)+[(1 Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)] Percent activity impairment due to problem (past 7 says): Q6/10 | Baseline (last assessment before cross over), Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 28 and 52 after cross-over |
| Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) | The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) is comprised of a single question intended to measure a patient's perspective of improvement or deterioration over time relative to treatment. The PGIC uses a seven-point scale where one (1) equals very much improved and seven (7) equals very much worse. | Week 4, 8, 16, 28, 40, 52 and 80 |
| Summary of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), by Visit in Patients From BAT Group Who Cross Over to Ruxolitinib After Crossover | The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) is comprised of a single question intended to measure a patient's perspective of improvement or deterioration over time relative to treatment. The PGIC uses a seven-point scale where one (1) equals very much improved and seven (7) equals very much worse. | Baseline (last assessment before cross over), Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, 40, and 52 after cross-over |
| Number of Participants Developing Thrombosis | Proportion of participants developing any arterial or venous thromboembolic event | From randomization to Week 80 for BAT and Week 260 for Ruxolitinib |
| Antwerp |
| 2060 |
| Belgium |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Leuven | 3000 | Belgium |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Toronto | Ontario | M4N 3M5 | Canada |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Bayonne | Bayonne Cedex | 64109 | France |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Bordeaux | 33076 | France |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Brest | 29200 | France |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Lille | 59020 | France |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Nice | 06202 | France |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Paris | 75010 | France |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Toulouse | 31059 | France |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Mannheim | Baden-Wurttemberg | 68305 | Germany |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Augsburg | 86150 | Germany |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Dresden | 01307 | Germany |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Jena | 07740 | Germany |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Leipzig | 04103 | Germany |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Magdeburg | 39120 | Germany |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Mainz | 55131 | Germany |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Minden | 32429 | Germany |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Ulm | 89081 | Germany |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Budapest | 1085 | Hungary |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Debrecen | 4032 | Hungary |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Kaposvár | 7400 | Hungary |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Mumbai | Maharashtra | 400012 | India |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Vellore | Tamil Nadu | 632 004 | India |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Nahariya | 22100 | Israel |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Netanya | 42150 | Israel |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Tel Aviv | 6423906 | Israel |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Bologna | BO | 40138 | Italy |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Florence | FI | 50134 | Italy |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Rome | Lazio | 00168 | Italy |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Milan | MI | 20122 | Italy |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Pavia | PV | 27100 | Italy |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Torino | TO | 10126 | Italy |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Varese | VA | 21100 | Italy |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Seoul | 03080 | South Korea |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Seoul | 03722 | South Korea |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Málaga | Andalusia | 29010 | Spain |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Salamanca | Castille and León | 37007 | Spain |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Barcelona | Catalonia | 08035 | Spain |
| Novartis Investigative Site | A Coruña | Galicia | 15006 | Spain |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Las Palmas de Gran Canaria | Las Palmas de G.C | 35010 | Spain |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Pamplona | Navarre | 31008 | Spain |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Alicante | Valencia | 03010 | Spain |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Madrid | 28034 | Spain |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Madrid | 28046 | Spain |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Izmir | 35040 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Talas / Kayseri | 38039 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| Passamonti F, Palandri F, Saydam G, Callum J, Devos T, Guglielmelli P, Vannucchi AM, Zor E, Zuurman M, Gilotti G, Zhang Y, Griesshammer M. Ruxolitinib versus best available therapy in inadequately controlled polycythaemia vera without splenomegaly (RESPONSE-2): 5-year follow up of a randomised, phase 3b study. Lancet Haematol. 2022 Jul;9(7):e480-e492. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(22)00102-8. Epub 2022 May 18. |
| 29396713 | Derived | Kiladjian JJ, Guglielmelli P, Griesshammer M, Saydam G, Masszi T, Durrant S, Passamonti F, Jones M, Zhen H, Li J, Gadbaw B, Perez Ronco J, Khan M, Verstovsek S. Efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib after and versus interferon use in the RESPONSE studies. Ann Hematol. 2018 Apr;97(4):617-627. doi: 10.1007/s00277-017-3225-1. Epub 2018 Feb 2. |
| 27916398 | Derived | Passamonti F, Griesshammer M, Palandri F, Egyed M, Benevolo G, Devos T, Callum J, Vannucchi AM, Sivgin S, Bensasson C, Khan M, Mounedji N, Saydam G. Ruxolitinib for the treatment of inadequately controlled polycythaemia vera without splenomegaly (RESPONSE-2): a randomised, open-label, phase 3b study. Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jan;18(1):88-99. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30558-7. Epub 2016 Dec 2. |
Best Available Therapy as selected by the investigator from: Hydroxyurea, Pegylated-Interferon (IFN/PEG-IFN), pipobroman, anagrelide, IMIDs, or observation. Participants randomized to BAT who did not respond by Week 28 were eligible to crossover and start treatment with ruxolitinib
| Full Analysis Set | comprised of all patients to whom study treatment was assigned by randomization. |
|
| Crossover Set | consisted of all patients randomized to the BAT arm, who crossed over and received at least one dose of ruxolitinib. |
|
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
| Crossover Period |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Ruxolitinib | Ruxolitinib at a starting dose of 10 mg twice a day (bid). Dose was adjusted based on efficacy and safety parameters up to a maximum dose of 25 mg bid |
| BG001 | Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Best Available Therapy as selected by the investigator from: Hydroxyurea, Pegylated-Interferon (IFN/PEG-IFN), pipobroman, anagrelide, IMIDs, or observation. Participants randomized to BAT who did not respond by Week 28 were eligible to crossover and start treatment with ruxolitinib |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Participants Achieving Hematocrit (Hct) Control at Week 28 | Proportion of patients achieving Hct control at Week 28 was defined by the absence of phlebotomy eligibility starting at Week 8 and continuing through Week 28, with no more than one phlebotomy eligibility occurring post randomization and prior to Week 8. Phlebotomy eligibility was defined by:
| Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants to whom study treatment was assigned by randomization and had valid measurements for the outcome measure. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Week 28 |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants Achieving a Complete Hematological Remission at Week 28 | Proportion of patients achieving a complete hematological remission at Week 28 was defined by:
| Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants to whom study treatment was assigned by randomization and had valid measurements for the outcome measure. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Week 28 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants Achieving a Hematocrit (Hct) Control at Week 52 and Week 80 | Proportion of patients achieving a Hct control at Week 52 was defined by the absence of phlebotomy eligibility starting at Week 8 and continuing through Week 52, and no more than one phlebotomy eligibility occurring post randomization and prior to Week 8 - Endpoint for Week 80 was defined, similarly. | Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants to whom study treatment was assigned by randomization and had valid measurements for the outcome measure. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Week 52 and 80 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants Achieving a Complete Hematological Remission at Week 52 and Week 80 | Proportion of patients achieving a complete hematological remission at Week 52, was defined by:
| Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants to whom study treatment was assigned by randomization and had valid measurements for the outcome measure. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Week 52 and 80 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Phlebotomies Over Time | Phlebotomy eligibility was defined by Confirmed Hct > 45% that is at least 3 percentage points higher than the Hct obtained at Baseline Or Confirmed Hct > 48%. The confirmation occurred 2 to 14 days subsequent to the initial observation. | Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants to whom study treatment was assigned by randomization and had valid measurements for the outcome measure. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Baseline to Week 260 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Hematocrit (Hct) at Each Visit | Hematocrit is the volume percentage of red blood cells (RBC) in the blood. | Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants to whom study treatment was assigned by randomization and had valid measurements for the outcome measure. Data after crossover for participants randomized to BAT are reported as separate outcome measure. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | volume percentage of RBC in blood | Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 40, 52, 66, 80, 92, 104, 117, 130, 143, 156, 169, 182, 195, 208, 221, 234, 247 and 260 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Hematocrit (Hct) at Each Scheduled Visit After Crossover in Participants Randomized to BAT Who Cross Over to Ruxolitinib | Hematocrit is the percentage of red blood cells (RBC) in the blood. | Cross-over set consisted of all participants randomized to the BAT arm, who crossed over and received at least one dose of ruxolitinib. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Volume percentage of RBC in blood | Baseline (last assessment before cross over), Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 40, 52, 64, 76, 89, 102, 115, 128, 141, 154, 167, 180, 193, 206, 219 and 232 after cross-over |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Spleen Length by Visit | Spleen length was assessed by manual palpation at every study visit. | Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants to whom study treatment was assigned by randomization and had valid measurements for the outcome measure. Data after crossover for participants randomized to BAT were not collected. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | cm | Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 40, 52, 66, 80, 92, 104, 117, 130, 143, 156, 169, 182, 195, 208, 221, 234, 247 and 260 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status to Week 28 | The ECOG scale of performance status described the level of functioning of participants in terms of their ability to care for themselves, daily activity, and physical ability. The ECOG performance was recorded as per ECOG performance status grades ranging from 0 (fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction) to 5 (dead). | Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants to whom study treatment was assigned by randomization and had valid measurements for the outcome measure. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Baseline and Week 28 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants Achieving a Partial Remission Based on the European Leukemia Net (ELN) and International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) Criteria at Week 28 | Proportion of patients achieving a partial remission at Week 28, based on the ELN and IWG-MRT criteria, as defined by:
| Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants to whom study treatment was assigned by randomization and had valid measurements for the outcome measure. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Week 28 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants Who Achieved Partial Remission Based on the European Leukemia Net (ELN) and International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) Criteria at Week 52 and Week 80 | Proportion of patients who achieved partial remission at Week 52 based on the ELN and IWG-MRT criteria, as defined by:
| Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants to whom study treatment was assigned by randomization and had valid measurements for the outcome measure. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Week 52 and 80 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants Achieving a Hematocrit (Hct) Control at Week 104, Week 156, Week 208 and Week 260. | Proportion of patients achieving a Hct control at Week 104 as defined by the absence of phlebotomy eligibility starting at Week 8 and continuing through Week 104 and with no more than one phlebotomy eligibility occurring post randomization and prior to Week 8 Endpoint for Week 156, Week 208 and Week 260 were defined, similarly. | Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants to whom study treatment was assigned by randomization and had valid measurements for the outcome measure. Data after crossover for participants randomized to BAT were not collected. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | From Week 8 to Week 104, 156, 208 and 260 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants Achieving a Complete Hematological Remission at Week 104, Week 156, Week 208 and Week 260 | Proportion of patients achieving a complete hematological remission at Week 104 as defined by Hct control defined by the absence of phlebotomy eligibility starting at Week 8 and continuing through Week 104, with no more than one phlebotomy eligibility occurring post randomization and prior to Week 8, and
| Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants to whom study treatment was assigned by randomization and had valid measurements for the outcome measure. Data after crossover for participants randomized to BAT were not collected. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | From Week 8 to Week 104, 156, 208 and 260 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants Who Achieved Partial Remission Based on the European Leukemia Net (ELN) and International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) Criteria at Week 104, Week 156, Week 208 and Week 260. | Proportion of patients who achieved partial remission at Week 104, based on the ELN and IWG-MRT criteria, as defined by:
| Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants to whom study treatment was assigned by randomization and had valid measurements for the outcome measure. Data after crossover for participants randomized to BAT were not collected. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | From Week 8 to Week 104, 156, 208 and 260 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Transformation Free Survival Events | Transformation-free survival is defined as one of the following:
| Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants to whom study treatment was assigned by randomization and had valid measurements for the outcome measure. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Week 260 (ruxolitinib arm) and Week 80 (BAT arm) |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Overall Survival (OS) Events | Overall survival (OS) event is defined as death due to any cause. OS events were counted in the BAT arm, irrespective of whether participants crossed over to receive ruxolitinib when the event occurred. | Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants to whom study treatment was assigned by randomization and had valid measurements for the outcome measure. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | up to Week 260 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form Total Symptom Score (MPN-SAF TSS) | The MPN-SAF TSS is a disease specific questionnaire comprised of 10 items that measures fatigue related to MPN disease and the severity of nine of the most prevalent associated symptoms. Each item is scored on a scale ranging from 0 (no fatigue/absent) to 10 (As bad as you can imagine/worst imaginable).The MPN-SAF TSS is computed as the average of the observed items multiplied by 10 to achieve a 0-to-100 scale. The MPN-SAF TSS thus has a possible score range of 0 to 100 where a decrease indicates improvement. | Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants to whom study treatment was assigned by randomization and had valid measurements for the outcome measure. Data after crossover for participants randomized to BAT are reported as separate outcome measure. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Score on a scale | Baseline, Week 4, 8, 16, 28, 40, 52, 80, 92, 104, 117, 130, 143, 156, 169, 182, 195, 208, 221, 234 and 247 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Total Scores of MPN-SAF by Visit in Patients From BAT Group Who Cross Over to Ruxolitinib After Crossover | The MPN-SAF TSS is a disease specific questionnaire comprised of 10 items that measures fatigue related to MPN disease and the severity of nine of the most prevalent associated symptoms. Each item is scored on a scale ranging from 0 (no fatigue/absent) to 10 (As bad as you can imagine/worst imaginable).The MPN-SAF TSS is computed as the average of the observed items multiplied by 10 to achieve a 0-to-100 scale. The MPN-SAF TSS thus has a possible score range of 0 to 100 where a decrease indicates improvement. | Cross-over set consisted of all participants randomized to the BAT arm, who crossed over and received at least one dose of ruxolitinib. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Score on a scale | Baseline (last assessment before cross over), Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, 40, 52, 92, 104, 117, 130, 143, 156, 169, 182, 195, 208, 221, 234 and 247 after cross-over |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Score as Per European Quality of Life 5-Dimension 5-level (EQ-5D-5L) Questionnaire | EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for measuring health outcomes in a wide range of health conditions and treatments. It consists of visual analogue scale (EQ VAS) which records the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical, visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labeled 'Best imaginable health state' and 'worst imaginable health state'. The EQ VAS scores were anchored on 100 = the best health you can imagine and 0 = worst health you can imagine. | Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants to whom study treatment was assigned by randomization and had valid measurements for the outcome measure. Data after crossover for participants randomized to BAT are reported as separate outcome measure. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Score on a scale | Baseline, Week 4, 8, 16, 28, 52, 80, 92, 104, 117, 130, 143, 156, 169, 182, 195, 208, 221, 234 and 247 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L VAS, by Visit in Patients From BAT Group Who Cross Over to Ruxolitinib After Crossover | EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for measuring health outcomes in a wide range of health conditions and treatments. It consists of visual analogue scale (EQ VAS) which records the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical, visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labeled 'Best imaginable health state' and 'worst imaginable health state'. The EQ VAS scores were anchored on 100 = the best health you can imagine and 0 = worst health you can imagine. | Cross-over set consisted of all participants randomized to the BAT arm, who crossed over and received at least one dose of ruxolitinib. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Score on a scale | Baseline (last assessment before cross over), Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, 52, 92, 104, 117, 130, 143, 156, 169, 182, 195, 208, 221, 234 and 247 after cross-over |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire | The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) is a six item questionnaire which intended to measure work and activity impairment associated with polycythemia vera. WPAI consisted of 6 questions (Q1=Employment status; Q2=Hours absent from work due to the polycythemia vera; Q3=Hours absent from work due to other reasons; Q4=Hours actually worked; Q5=Impact of the polycythemia vera on productivity while working; Q6=Impact of the polycythemia vera on productivity while doing regular daily activities other than work). Higher WPAI scores indicated greater activity impairment. Scores were multiplied by 100 to express in percentages. Percent work time missed due to problem (past 7 days) =Q2/(Q2+Q4) Percent impairment while working due to problem (past 7 days): Q5/10 Percent overall work impairment due to problem (past 7 says): Q2/(Q2+Q4)+[(1 Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)] Percent activity impairment due to problem (past 7 says): Q6/10 | Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants to whom study treatment was assigned by randomization and had valid measurements for the outcome measure. Data after crossover for participants randomized to BAT are reported as separate outcome measure. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Percent | Baseline, Week 4, 8, 16, 28, 52 and 80 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI), by Visit in Patients From BAT Group Who Cross Over to Ruxolitinib After Crossover | The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) is a six item questionnaire which intended to measure work and activity impairment associated with polycythemia vera. WPAI consisted of 6 questions (Q1=Employment status; Q2=Hours absent from work due to the polycythemia vera; Q3=Hours absent from work due to other reasons; Q4=Hours actually worked; Q5=Impact of the polycythemia vera on productivity while working; Q6=Impact of the polycythemia vera on productivity while doing regular daily activities other than work). Higher WPAI scores indicated greater activity impairment. Scores were multiplied by 100 to express in percentages. Percent work time missed due to problem (past 7 days) =Q2/(Q2+Q4) Percent impairment while working due to problem (past 7 days): Q5/10 Percent overall work impairment due to problem (past 7 says): Q2/(Q2+Q4)+[(1 Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)] Percent activity impairment due to problem (past 7 says): Q6/10 | Cross-over set consisted of all participants randomized to the BAT arm, who crossed over and received at least one dose of ruxolitinib. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Percent | Baseline (last assessment before cross over), Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 28 and 52 after cross-over |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) | The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) is comprised of a single question intended to measure a patient's perspective of improvement or deterioration over time relative to treatment. The PGIC uses a seven-point scale where one (1) equals very much improved and seven (7) equals very much worse. | Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants to whom study treatment was assigned by randomization and had valid measurements for the outcome measure. Data after crossover for participants randomized to BAT are reported as separate outcome measure. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Week 4, 8, 16, 28, 40, 52 and 80 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Summary of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), by Visit in Patients From BAT Group Who Cross Over to Ruxolitinib After Crossover | The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) is comprised of a single question intended to measure a patient's perspective of improvement or deterioration over time relative to treatment. The PGIC uses a seven-point scale where one (1) equals very much improved and seven (7) equals very much worse. | Cross-over set consisted of all participants randomized to the BAT arm, who crossed over and received at least one dose of ruxolitinib. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Baseline (last assessment before cross over), Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, 40, and 52 after cross-over |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants Developing Thrombosis | Proportion of participants developing any arterial or venous thromboembolic event | Safety Set comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of ruxolitinib or BAT. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | From randomization to Week 80 for BAT and Week 260 for Ruxolitinib |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Post-Hoc | Total Number of Deaths | On-treatment deaths were reported from the day of first dose of study medication to the End of study (End of Treatment +30 days) visit which was Week 260 or prior (+30 days for Rux + crossover) and Week 80 or prior (+30 days for BAT only). Post-treatment deaths were reported following completion study treatment (Week 80 for patients receiving BAT, or Week 260 for patients receiving ruxolitinib) or from the time of premature discontinuation. Patients were followed for survival every three months up to end of study. | Safety Set comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of ruxolitinib or BAT. | Posted | Number | Participants | Up to Week 260 |
|
Adverse events were collected from the day of first dose of study medication to the End of study (End of Treatment +30 days) visit which was Week 260 or prior (+30 days for Rux + crossover) and Week 80 or prior (+30 days for BAT only).
Any signs or symptoms that occured from the day of first dose of study medication to the End of study (End of Treatment +30 days) visit which was Week 260 or prior (+30 days for Rux + crossover) and Week 80 or prior (+30 days for BAT only).
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Ruxolitinib | Ruxolitinib at a starting dose of 10 mg twice a day (bid). Dose was adjusted based on efficacy and safety parameters up to a maximum dose of 25 mg bid | 1 | 74 | 34 | 74 | 73 | 74 |
| EG001 | Best Available Therapy | Best Available Therapy as selected by the investigator from: Hydroxyurea, Pegylated-Interferon (IFN/PEG-IFN), pipobroman, anagrelide, IMIDs, or observation. Participants randomized to BAT who did not respond by Week 28 were eligible to crossover and start treatment with ruxolitinib | 1 | 75 | 9 | 75 | 56 | 75 |
| EG002 | All Crossover Patients | Participants randomized to the BAT arm, who crossed over and received at least one dose of ruxolitinib | 3 | 58 | 23 | 58 | 56 | 58 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyperleukocytosis | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Neutropenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Thrombocytopenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Thrombocytosis | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Acute myocardial infarction | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Angina pectoris | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Aortic valve incompetence | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Atrial fibrillation | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cardiac disorder | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cardiac failure | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Coronary artery disease | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Mitral valve incompetence | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Myocardial infarction | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pericardial effusion | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vertigo positional | Ear and labyrinth disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Glaucoma | Eye disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Retinal artery occlusion | Eye disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vision blurred | Eye disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Visual acuity reduced | Eye disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal discomfort | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastrointestinal haemorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastrointestinal inflammation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastrooesophageal reflux disease | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Inguinal hernia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oesophageal varices haemorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rectal haemorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Small intestinal obstruction | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Asthenia | General disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| General physical health deterioration | General disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Non-cardiac chest pain | General disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cholelithiasis | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bronchitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cellulitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cystitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Influenza | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Localised infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lower respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Meningitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ophthalmic herpes zoster | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyelonephritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyonephrosis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sepsis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Septic shock | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sinusitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urosepsis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hip fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lumbar vertebral fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Muscle rupture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Post procedural haemorrhage | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Radius fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Spinal fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tendon rupture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ulna fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood creatinine increased | Investigations | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood lactate dehydrogenase increased | Investigations | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood uric acid increased | Investigations | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Weight decreased | Investigations | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Decreased appetite | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dehydration | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diabetes mellitus | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyperuricaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyponatraemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Foot deformity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Haemarthrosis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Intervertebral disc protrusion | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Musculoskeletal pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Osteoarthritis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain in extremity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Acute myeloid leukaemia | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Basal cell carcinoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Basosquamous carcinoma of skin | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bladder transitional cell carcinoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blast cell crisis | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bone marrow tumour cell infiltration | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bowen's disease | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Breast cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Carcinoma in situ | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Juvenile melanoma benign | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lung adenocarcinoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Metastases to spine | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Metastatic malignant melanoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Myelofibrosis | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Non-small cell lung cancer metastatic | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Parathyroid tumour benign | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Prostate cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Prostatic adenoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Renal cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Skin cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Squamous cell carcinoma of skin | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Uterine neoplasm | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vaginal cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cerebrovascular accident | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cognitive disorder | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Epilepsy | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Facial neuralgia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ischaemic stroke | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Syncope | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Haematuria | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nephrolithiasis | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Renal failure | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ureterolithiasis | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urethral stenosis | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Acute pulmonary oedema | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyspnoea exertional | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypoxia | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pulmonary embolism | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Respiratory failure | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Actinic keratosis | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blue toe syndrome | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Extremity necrosis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Peripheral arterial occlusive disease | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Peripheral artery occlusion | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Peripheral artery thrombosis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Venous haemorrhage | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Leukocytosis | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Thrombocytopenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Thrombocytosis | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tinnitus | Ear and labyrinth disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vertigo | Ear and labyrinth disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal discomfort | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal distension | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain upper | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyspepsia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Flatulence | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Asthenia | General disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oedema peripheral | General disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bronchitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cystitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Herpes zoster | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Influenza | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sinusitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood creatine phosphokinase increased | Investigations | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood lactate dehydrogenase increased | Investigations | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased | Investigations | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Haematocrit increased | Investigations | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Weight decreased | Investigations | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Weight increased | Investigations | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Decreased appetite | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyslipidaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypercholesterolaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypertriglyceridaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyperuricaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bone pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Intervertebral disc protrusion | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Muscle spasms | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Musculoskeletal pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Myalgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Osteoarthritis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Osteoporosis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain in extremity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Basal cell carcinoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Memory impairment | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Neuropathy peripheral | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Paraesthesia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Depression | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyspnoea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Epistaxis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Erythema | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Night sweats | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pruritus | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Skin ulcer | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Haematoma | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypertension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (22.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
The terms and conditions of Novartis' agreements with its investigators may vary. However, Novartis does not prohibit any investigator from publishing. Any publications from a single-site are postponed until the publication of the pooled data (ie, data from all sites) in the clinical trial.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study Director | Novartis Pharmaceuticals | 862-778-8300 | Novartis.email@novartis.com |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011087 | Polycythemia Vera |
| D006402 | Hematologic Diseases |
| D009196 | Myeloproliferative Disorders |
| D001855 | Bone Marrow Diseases |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019046 | Bone Marrow Neoplasms |
| D019337 | Hematologic Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D006425 | Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C540383 | ruxolitinib |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Death |
|
| Disease progression |
|
| Lost to Follow-up |
|
| Physician Decision |
|
| Male |
|
| Asian |
|
| Other |
|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) |
Best Available Therapy as selected by the investigator from: Hydroxyurea, Pegylated-Interferon (IFN/PEG-IFN), pipobroman, anagrelide, IMIDs, or observation. Participants randomized to BAT who did not respond by Week 28 were eligible to crossover and start treatment with ruxolitinib |
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| 1: Restricted in physically strenuous activity and able to carry out light or sedentary work |
|
| 2: Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities |
|
| 3: Capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours |
|
| 4: Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any self-care. Totally confined to bed or chair |
|
| Missing |
|
| Much improved |
|
| Minimally improved |
|
| No change |
|
| Minimally worse |
|
| Much worse |
|
| Very much worse |
|
| Much improved |
|
| Minimally improved |
|
| No change |
|
| Minimally worse |
|
| Much worse |
|
| Very much worse |
|
| Much improved |
|
| Minimally improved |
|
| No change |
|
| Minimally worse |
|
| Much worse |
|
| Very much worse |
|
| Much improved |
|
| Minimally improved |
|
| No change |
|
| Minimally worse |
|
| Much worse |
|
| Very much worse |
|
| Much improved |
|
| Minimally improved |
|
| No change |
|
| Minimally worse |
|
| Much worse |
|
| Very much worse |
|
| Much improved |
|
| Minimally improved |
|
| No change |
|
| Minimally worse |
|
| Much worse |
|
| Very much worse |
|
| Much improved |
|
| Minimally improved |
|
| No change |
|
| Minimally worse |
|
| Much worse |
|
| Very much worse |
|
| No change |
|
| Minimally worse |
|
| Much worse |
|
| No change |
|
| Minimally worse |
|
| Much worse |
|
| No change |
|
| Minimally worse |
|
| Much worse |
|
| No change |
|
| Minimally worse |
|
| Much worse |
|
| No change |
|
| Minimally worse |
|
| Much worse |
|
| No change |
|
| Minimally worse |
|
| Much worse |
|