Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1R01MH099322-01A1 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Columbia University | OTHER |
| Research Foundation for Mental Hygiene, Inc. | OTHER |
| Mclean Hospital | OTHER |
| Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study aims to determine whether ventral striatal dopamine release is a mechanism of reward motivation in major depression, whether dopamine release is low in depression, and whether DA release and reward motivation predict response to dopamine-targeted treatment with pramipexole.
Better understanding of the basic neurobiology of mood dysfunction appears necessary to enable further progress in the treatment of depression. Reward motivation (and the closely related construct of "reward learning") is a core neurobehavioral domain.(1,2) In major depressive disorder (MDD), low reward motivation is a key aspect of anhedonia, a cardinal symptom of MDD, and is related to resistance to treatment.(2,3) Although much has been learned about reward motivation's neurobiology and relevance to psychopathology, important gaps in our knowledge have impeded the application of basic science findings to improving treatment of MDD. Reward motivation in healthy subjects involves ventrostriatal (VST) dopamine (DA)(4,5), and reduced reward motivation is linked to MDD and anhedonia.(3,6) These data suggest that VST DA dysfunction might be present in MDD and manifested clinically by anhedonia. While DA neuroreceptor imaging studies have failed to verify this, they have been methodologically compromised. Limitations include imaging methods with poor resolution of functional striatal subregions, MDD samples heterogeneous for antidepressant use, and use of self-report measures of anhedonia, rather than objective behavioral testing of the specific domain of reward motivation. This will be the first study of both VST DA release (by PET imaging) and reward motivation, and will include patients with MDD and healthy volunteers. Reward motivation will be captured and operationalized as reward learning in a probabilistic reward task (prior to imaging). This will clarify if VST DA dysfunction is linked to impaired motivation in MDD. To test clinical implications in MDD patients, we will assess the relationship of VST DA release, reward motivation, and anhedonia to outcome of subsequent open label treatment with the DA D2 receptor agonist pramipexole.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pramipexole | Experimental | Six weeks of treatment with oral pramipexole, initiated at 0.25 mg/day and titrated to a maximum daily dose of 2.5 mg. |
|
| Healthy Control | No Intervention | Healthy volunteers were matched to MDD group subjects by age, gender, and ethnicity, and will have no lifetime psychiatric disorders. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pramipexole | Drug | Dose will be started at 0.125 mg bid, and increased by 0.25 mg/day every 3-4 days to a target range of 1.0 - 2.5 mg/day. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression | Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD), 17-item version. This standard scale will be used to assess severity of depression, looking at change in total score from baseline to week 6, rating severity of depression on a scale from 0 (least depression) to 50 (greatest depression) | Baseline and 6 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Snaith Hamilton Pleasure Scale | Fourteen-item self-rated anhedonia scale. Items were comprised of statements that participants rated as "strongly disagree" (1), "disagree" (2), "agree" (3), or "strongly agree" (4). The lowest possible score was 14, the highest possible score was 56. | Baseline and 6 weeks |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Franklin Schneier, MD | NYSPI | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New York State Psychiatric Institute | New York | New York | 10032 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20939653 | Background | Sanislow CA, Pine DS, Quinn KJ, Kozak MJ, Garvey MA, Heinssen RK, Wang PS, Cuthbert BN. Developing constructs for psychopathology research: research domain criteria. J Abnorm Psychol. 2010 Nov;119(4):631-9. doi: 10.1037/a0020909. | |
| 20603146 | Background | Treadway MT, Zald DH. Reconsidering anhedonia in depression: lessons from translational neuroscience. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011 Jan;35(3):537-55. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.06.006. Epub 2010 Jul 11. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | MDD Patients | Six weeks of treatment with oral pramipexole, initiated at 0.25 mg/day and titrated to a maximum daily dose of 2.5 mg. Pramipexole: Dose will be started at 0.125 mg bid, and increased by 0.25 mg/day every 3-4 days to a target range of 1.0 - 2.5 mg/day |
| FG001 | Healthy Controls | Individuals without depression |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Baseline information was collected for 26 patients with MDD and 25 HC control subjects. One HC subject signed consent but was withdrawn from the study before completing any assessments due to not matching well.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | MDD Patients | Six weeks of treatment with oral pramipexole, initiated at 0.25 mg/day and titrated to a maximum daily dose of 2.5 mg. Pramipexole: Dose will be started at 0.125 mg bid, and increased by 0.25 mg/day every 3-4 days to a target range of 1.0 - 2.5 mg/day |
| BG001 | Healthy Control Patients |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression | Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD), 17-item version. This standard scale will be used to assess severity of depression, looking at change in total score from baseline to week 6, rating severity of depression on a scale from 0 (least depression) to 50 (greatest depression) | Healthy control subjects were not assessed for outcome measures because by study design they received no therapeutic intervention. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline and 6 weeks |
|
6 weeks
Information was collected on a side effect checklist, with each adverse event rated from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe). A subject was considered to have experienced a side effect during the study if the rating for that adverse event increased in severity at any point during the treatment.
Adverse events were not assessed for Healthy Controls, because by study design they did not receive any therapeutic intervention.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | MDD Patients | Only patients with MDD received treatment. There was only one arm. |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| headache | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Franklin Schneier, MD | NYSPI | 646-774-8041 | fschneier@nyspi.columbia.edu |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003865 | Depressive Disorder, Major |
| D003863 | Depression |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003866 | Depressive Disorder |
| D019964 | Mood Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
| D001526 | Behavioral Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000077487 | Pramipexole |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D052160 | Benzothiazoles |
| D013844 | Thiazoles |
| D001393 | Azoles |
| D006573 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring |
Not provided
Not provided
| OTHER |
| National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Change in Temporal Experience of Pleasure Scale - Anticipatory Subscale |
A validated self-rated scale shown to assess anticipatory pleasure. It will be used for exploratory analyses of anhedonia. 18 items were measured on a scale of 1 (very false for me) to 6 (very true for me). Higher scores indicate higher pleasure. Item scores were added for a lowest possible score of 18 and highest possible score of 108. |
| Baseline and 6 weeks |
| Change in Mood and Anxiety Symptom Questionnaire, Short Form | Change in Mood and Anxiety Symptom Questionnaire, Short Form. A 62-item scale assessing anxiety and depression. Items were measured on a scale of 1-5, higher number indicating higher levels of symptoms.The lowest possible score was 62, and the highest 310. | Baseline and 6 weeks |
| Change in the Apathy Evaluation Rating Scale | A validated self-rated 18 item scale assessing apathy. Items were rated from 1 (not at all true) to 4 (very true). Higher scores indicate lower apathy, lower scores indicate higher apathy. Lowest possible score is 18, highest possible score is 72. | Baseline and 6 weeks |
| Change in Clinical Global Improvement - Severity Scale | Seven-point Likert scale rating clinical severity of mental illness from 1 (least severe) to 7 ( most severe). Physician-rated scale. One item. | 6 weeks |
| Change in Temporal Experiences of Pleasure Scale -- Consummatory Subscale | A validated self-rated scale shown to assess consummatory pleasure. It will be used for exploratory analyses of anhedonia. 18 items were measured on a scale of 1 (very false for me) to 6 (very true for me). Higher scores indicate higher pleasure. Item scores were added for a lowest possible score of 18 and highest possible score of 108. | Baseline and 6 weeks |
| 23228328 | Background | Vrieze E, Pizzagalli DA, Demyttenaere K, Hompes T, Sienaert P, de Boer P, Schmidt M, Claes S. Reduced reward learning predicts outcome in major depressive disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 2013 Apr 1;73(7):639-45. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.10.014. Epub 2012 Dec 8. |
| 19047324 | Background | Forbes EE, Hariri AR, Martin SL, Silk JS, Moyles DL, Fisher PM, Brown SM, Ryan ND, Birmaher B, Axelson DA, Dahl RE. Altered striatal activation predicting real-world positive affect in adolescent major depressive disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2009 Jan;166(1):64-73. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.07081336. Epub 2008 Dec 1. |
| 18579575 | Background | Kumar P, Waiter G, Ahearn T, Milders M, Reid I, Steele JD. Abnormal temporal difference reward-learning signals in major depression. Brain. 2008 Aug;131(Pt 8):2084-93. doi: 10.1093/brain/awn136. Epub 2008 Jun 25. |
| 18433774 | Background | Pizzagalli DA, Iosifescu D, Hallett LA, Ratner KG, Fava M. Reduced hedonic capacity in major depressive disorder: evidence from a probabilistic reward task. J Psychiatr Res. 2008 Nov;43(1):76-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2008.03.001. Epub 2008 Apr 22. |
| 32040562 | Derived | Whitton AE, Reinen JM, Slifstein M, Ang YS, McGrath PJ, Iosifescu DV, Abi-Dargham A, Pizzagalli DA, Schneier FR. Baseline reward processing and ventrostriatal dopamine function are associated with pramipexole response in depression. Brain. 2020 Feb 1;143(2):701-710. doi: 10.1093/brain/awaa002. |
| 30041971 | Derived | Schneier FR, Slifstein M, Whitton AE, Pizzagalli DA, Reinen J, McGrath PJ, Iosifescu DV, Abi-Dargham A. Dopamine Release in Antidepressant-Naive Major Depressive Disorder: A Multimodal [11C]-(+)-PHNO Positron Emission Tomography and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study. Biol Psychiatry. 2018 Oct 15;84(8):563-573. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.05.014. Epub 2018 May 25. |
| Withdrawal by Subject |
|
| Lost to Follow-up |
|
| Protocol Violation |
|
Healthy control patients did not receive study medication and only have baseline measures. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression | Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD), 17-item version. This standard scale will be used to assess severity of depression, looking at change in total score from baseline to week 6, rating severity of depression on a scale from 0 (least depression) to 50 (greatest depression) | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Snaith Hamilton Pleasure Scale | Fourteen-item self-rated anhedonia scale. Items were comprised of statements that participants rated as "strongly disagree" (1), "disagree" (2), "agree" (3), or "strongly agree" (4). The lowest possible score was 14, the highest possible score was 56. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Temporal Experience of Pleasure Scale - Anticipatory Subscale | A validated self-rated subscale assessing anticipatory pleasure. It will be used for exploratory analyses of anhedonia. 18 items were measured on a scale of 1 (very false for me) to 6 (very true for me). Higher scores indicate higher pleasure. Item scores were added for a lowest possible score of 18 and highest possible score of 108. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Mood and Anxiety Symptom Questionnaire | Change in Mood and Anxiety Symptom Questionnaire, Short Form. A 62-item scale assessing anxiety and depression. Items were measured on a scale of 1-5, higher number indicating higher levels of symptoms.The lowest possible score was 62, and the highest 310. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Apathy Evaluation Rating Scale | A validated self-rated 18 item scale assessing apathy. Items were rated from 1 (not at all true) to 4 (very true). Higher scores indicate lower apathy, lower scores indicate higher apathy. Lowest possible score is 18, highest possible score is 72. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Clinical Global Impression Severity | Clinical Global Impression - severity. Seven-point likert scale rating clinical severity of mental illness from 1 (least severe) to 7 ( most severe). Physician-rated scale. One item | Only 22 MDD patients started treatment. Healthy controls, as per study design, did not receive treatment. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Temporal Experience of Pleasure Scale - Consummatory Subscale | A validated self-rated subscale assessing consummatory pleasure. It will be used for exploratory analyses of anhedonia. 18 items were measured on a scale of 1 (very false for me) to 6 (very true for me). Higher scores indicate higher pleasure. Item scores were added for a lowest possible score of 18 and highest possible score of 108. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Snaith Hamilton Pleasure Scale | Fourteen-item self-rated anhedonia scale. Items were comprised of statements that participants rated as "strongly disagree" (1), "disagree" (2), "agree" (3), or "strongly agree" (4). The lowest possible score was 14, the highest possible score was 56. | Healthy control subjects were not assessed for outcome measures because by study design they received no therapeutic intervention. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline and 6 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Temporal Experience of Pleasure Scale - Anticipatory Subscale | A validated self-rated scale shown to assess anticipatory pleasure. It will be used for exploratory analyses of anhedonia. 18 items were measured on a scale of 1 (very false for me) to 6 (very true for me). Higher scores indicate higher pleasure. Item scores were added for a lowest possible score of 18 and highest possible score of 108. | Healthy control subjects were not assessed for outcome measures because by study design they received no therapeutic intervention. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline and 6 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Mood and Anxiety Symptom Questionnaire, Short Form | Change in Mood and Anxiety Symptom Questionnaire, Short Form. A 62-item scale assessing anxiety and depression. Items were measured on a scale of 1-5, higher number indicating higher levels of symptoms.The lowest possible score was 62, and the highest 310. | Healthy control subjects were not assessed for outcome measures because by study design they received no therapeutic intervention. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline and 6 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in the Apathy Evaluation Rating Scale | A validated self-rated 18 item scale assessing apathy. Items were rated from 1 (not at all true) to 4 (very true). Higher scores indicate lower apathy, lower scores indicate higher apathy. Lowest possible score is 18, highest possible score is 72. | Healthy control subjects were not assessed for outcome measures because by study design they received no therapeutic intervention. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline and 6 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Clinical Global Improvement - Severity Scale | Seven-point Likert scale rating clinical severity of mental illness from 1 (least severe) to 7 ( most severe). Physician-rated scale. One item. | Healthy control subjects were not assessed for outcome measures because by study design they received no therapeutic intervention. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 6 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Temporal Experiences of Pleasure Scale -- Consummatory Subscale | A validated self-rated scale shown to assess consummatory pleasure. It will be used for exploratory analyses of anhedonia. 18 items were measured on a scale of 1 (very false for me) to 6 (very true for me). Higher scores indicate higher pleasure. Item scores were added for a lowest possible score of 18 and highest possible score of 108. | Healthy control subjects were not assessed for outcome measures because by study design they received no therapeutic intervention. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline and 6 weeks |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 22 |
| 0 |
| 22 |
| 22 |
| 22 |
| nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Heartburn | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Decreased Appetite | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Increased Appetite | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dry Mouth | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Diarrhea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Sweating | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Skin Problems | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Bruising | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Restlessness | Psychiatric disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| tremor | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Impaired Coordination | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Insomnia | Psychiatric disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| fatigue | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| somnolence | Psychiatric disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Sleep Attacks | Psychiatric disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| decreased libido | Reproductive system and breast disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Sexual Dysfunction | Reproductive system and breast disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Blurry Vision | Eye disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Lightheadedness | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Forgetfulness | Psychiatric disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Impaired Concentration | Psychiatric disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| compulsive behaviorws | Psychiatric disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D001519 |
| Behavior |
| D006571 |
| Heterocyclic Compounds |
| D006574 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring |
| D000072471 | Heterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring |