ZEPHYR: Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Open-label Study in Consecutive Patients Hospitalized for Acute Respiratory Failure Requiring Mechanical Ventilation With Endotracheal Tube. This Study Compared Two Ventilation Modes: NAVA Mode and Spontaneous Breathing With Inspiratory Pressure Support (the Latter is Considered as the Reference Ventilation Mode).
ZEPHYR: Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Open-label Study in Consecutive Patients Hospitalized for Acute Respiratory Failure Requiring Mechanical Ventilation With Endotracheal Tube. This Study Compared Two Ventilation Modes: NAVA Mode and Spontaneous Breathing With Inspiratory Pressure Support (the Latter is Considered as the Reference Ventilation Mode).
This is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label study which compared two ventilation modes: spontaneous NAVA mode and spontaneous breathing with IPS mode (the latter is considered as the reference ventilatory mode) in patients admitted to the ICU for acute respiratory failure and ventilated with an endotracheal tube. NAVA mode allows to minimize patient-ventilator disharmony with acceptable tolerance and to preserve spontaneous ventilation.
Inclusion Criteria:
Patient ventilated with endotracheal tube for more than 24 hours
Return for at least 30 minutes to spontaneous ventilation allowing IPS with a level of pressure support <30 cm H2O;
Level of sedation =< 4 on the Ramsay scale in the absence of medical decision to increase the level of sedation;
Fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO 2) =< 50% with a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) =< 8 cm H2O;
Absence of administration of high-dose vasopressor therapy defined by:
Estimated duration of mechanical ventilation > 48h00
Exclusion Criteria:
Contraindication to the implementation of the NAVA endotracheal tube, ie any contraindication to the implementation of a gastric tube or to the repositioning of a tube already in place:
Therapeutic limitation or active treatment discontinuation;
Pregnant women;
Minors;
Protected adults;
Patient already included in the study;