Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| FDA | Other Grant/Funding Number | HHSF223201310224C |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University of Colorado, Denver | OTHER |
| Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The prospective study will compare the relative bioavailability at steady-state pharmacokinetics of 6 tacrolimus formulations in a prospective, 6-way cross-over study including CYP3A5 expressors (n=30) and non-expressor (n=30) transplant patients.
Comparison of the relative bioavailability and steady-state pharmacokinetics of 6 tacrolimus formulations in a prospective, 6-way cross-over study including CYP3A5 expressors (n=30) and non-expressor (n=30) transplant patients. Six tacrolimus formulations will be tested and each patient will receive each formulation once. As we proposed to test bioequivalence in the steady-state, patients will receive the test formulations for one week prior to pharmacokinetic evaluation. The pharmacokinetic evaluation will incorporate limited sampling strategies with a focus on fully characterizing the Cmax out to hour 4 post dose. Subsequent PK sampling and trough blood concentrations will be monitored on a daily basis using dried blood spots that the study subjects will collect by themselves at home. It will be critical that the patients are adherent to their test medication to ensure that they have reached steady state. This will be monitored using test diaries, pill counts and MEMS caps (Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS), AARDEX Corp, Palo Alto, CA. Bioequivalence will be tested using average bioequivalence metrics. A combination of limited sampling strategy and dry spot analysis in combination with population pharmacokinetic modeling will be utilized to fully characterize the PK profile of these formulations.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sequence 1 | Active Comparator | Patients will be randomized to a sequence of administration of the various 6 tacrolimus formulations. Sequence 1: Formulation Sandoz, Panacea, Accord, Mylan, Dr. Reddy's, Astellas Patients will be receiving the same tacrolimus dose identified at baseline for each formulation. |
|
| Sequence 2 | Active Comparator | Patients will be randomized to a sequence of administration of the various 6 tacrolimus formulations. Sequence 2: Formulation Accord, Sandoz, Dr. Reddy's, Panacea, Astellas, Mylan Patients will be receiving the same tacrolimus dose identified at baseline for each formulation. |
|
| Sequence 3 | Active Comparator | Patients will be randomized to a sequence of administration of the various 6 tacrolimus formulations. Sequence 3: Formulation Dr. Reddys, Accord, Astellas, Sandoz, Mylan, Panacea Patients will be receiving the same tacrolimus dose identified at baseline for each formulation. |
|
| Sequence 4 |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prograf | Drug | Administration of each formulation will be determined by sequence. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Compare AUC 0-12hr of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Expressor and Non Expressor Transplant Recipients | Report the geometric mean and 95% confidence interval for AUC 0-12hr (ng*hr/ml) for each formulation in expressor and non expressor transplant recipients | Whole blood samples were collected immediately prior to dosing, at 1, 1.5, 1.75, 2, 2.5, 3 and 4 hours following dosing. Subjects were then instructed to performed fingersticks using dried blood spot cards at 8 and 12 hours post dose. |
| Compare Cmax of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Expressor and Non Expressor Transplant Recipients | Report the geometric mean and 95% confidence interval for Cmax (ng/ml) for each formulation in expressor and non expressor transplant recipients | Whole blood samples were collected immediately prior to dosing, at 1, 1.5, 1.75, 2, 2.5, 3 and 4 hours following dosing. Subjects were then instructed to performed fingersticks using dried blood spot cards at 8 and 12 hours post dose. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| To Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Stable Transplant Subjects | Conduct safety lab testing specific to transplanted organ function and clinical assessments for adverse events. | Assessed at baseline and weekly for 6 weeks at each pharmacokinetic profile |
Not provided
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Rita R Alloway, PharmD | University of Cincinnati | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Cincinnati Medical Center | Cincinnati | Ohio | 45267 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Expressors | Subjects with at least one *1 allele of CYP3A5 |
| FG001 | Non-expressors | Subjects homozygous for the *3 CYP3A5 allele |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Expressors | Subjects with at least one *1 allele of CYP3A5 |
| BG001 | Non-expressors | Subjects homozygous for the *3 CYP3A5 allele |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Median |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Compare AUC 0-12hr of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Expressor and Non Expressor Transplant Recipients | Report the geometric mean and 95% confidence interval for AUC 0-12hr (ng*hr/ml) for each formulation in expressor and non expressor transplant recipients | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | ng*hr/ml | Whole blood samples were collected immediately prior to dosing, at 1, 1.5, 1.75, 2, 2.5, 3 and 4 hours following dosing. Subjects were then instructed to performed fingersticks using dried blood spot cards at 8 and 12 hours post dose. |
|
Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Accord | Subjects receiving the Accord formulation | 0 |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anxiety, tremor | Nervous system disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rita Alloway | University of Cincinnati | 513.558.1568 | rita.alloway@uc.edu |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D016559 | Tacrolimus |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D018942 | Macrolides |
| D007783 | Lactones |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Active Comparator |
Patients will be randomized to a sequence of administration of the various 6 tacrolimus formulations. Sequence 4: Formulation Astellas, Dr. Reddy's, Mylan, Accord, Panacea, Sandoz Patients will be receiving the same tacrolimus dose identified at baseline for each formulation. |
|
| Sequence 5 | Active Comparator | Patients will be randomized to a sequence of administration of the various 6 tacrolimus formulations. Sequence 5: Formulation Mylan, Astellas, Panacea, Dr. Reddy's, Sandoz, Accord Patients will be receiving the same tacrolimus dose identified at baseline for each formulation. |
|
| Sequence 6 | Active Comparator | Patients will be randomized to a sequence of administration of the various 6 tacrolimus formulations. Sequence 6: Formulation Panacea, Mylan, Sandoz, Astellas, Accord, Dr. Reddy's Patients will be receiving the same tacrolimus dose identified at baseline for each formulation. |
|
| Tacrolimus, Sandoz | Drug | Administration of each formulation will be determined by sequence. |
|
|
| Tacrolimus, Reddy Laboratory | Drug | Administration of each formulation will be determined by sequence. |
|
|
| Tacrolimus, Mylan | Drug | Administration of each formulation will be determined by sequence. |
|
|
| Tacrolimus, Accord | Drug | Administration of each formulation will be determined by sequence. |
|
|
| Tacrolimus, Pancea Biotech Limited | Drug | Administration of each formulation will be determined by sequence. |
|
|
| Lost venous access |
|
| Withdrawal by Subject |
|
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants | No |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants | No |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Compare Cmax of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Expressor and Non Expressor Transplant Recipients | Report the geometric mean and 95% confidence interval for Cmax (ng/ml) for each formulation in expressor and non expressor transplant recipients | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | ng/ml | Whole blood samples were collected immediately prior to dosing, at 1, 1.5, 1.75, 2, 2.5, 3 and 4 hours following dosing. Subjects were then instructed to performed fingersticks using dried blood spot cards at 8 and 12 hours post dose. |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | To Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Stable Transplant Subjects | Conduct safety lab testing specific to transplanted organ function and clinical assessments for adverse events. | Participants in the PK population with available data | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Assessed at baseline and weekly for 6 weeks at each pharmacokinetic profile |
|
|
|
| 53 |
| 0 |
| 53 |
| 22 |
| 53 |
| EG001 | Astellas | Subjects receiving the Astellas formulation | 0 | 53 | 0 | 53 | 14 | 53 |
| EG002 | Dr. Reddys | Subjects receiving the Dr Reddy formulation | 0 | 53 | 0 | 53 | 20 | 53 |
| EG003 | Mylan | Subjects receiving the Mylan formulation | 0 | 53 | 0 | 53 | 22 | 53 |
| EG004 | Panacea | Subjects receiving the Panacea formulation | 0 | 53 | 0 | 53 | 23 | 53 |
| EG005 | Sandoz | Subjects receiving the Sandoz formulation | 0 | 53 | 0 | 53 | 13 | 53 |
| leukopenia, thrombocytopenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| hypertension, tachycardia | Cardiac disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| ear erythemia | Ear and labyrinth disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| dehydration, hyperkalemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| nausea, vomitting, diarhea | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| nasal congestion | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| muscle aches | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| respiratory tract infections | Infections and infestations | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| rash | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| depression | Psychiatric disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| lost venous access | Vascular disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| study related issues | Investigations | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| difficult urinating | Renal and urinary disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| allergies | General disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| eye redness, itching | Eye disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| hyperglycemia | Endocrine disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| administrative issues | General disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Dr. Reddys |
|
| Mylan |
|
| Panacea |
|
| Sandoz |
|
|
Analysis of variance (PROC MIXED) was performed on log transformed Cmax parameters |
| Geometric Dr Reddys/Astellas Ratio X 100 |
| 104.13 |
| 2-Sided |
| 90 |
| 92.33 |
| 117.45 |
Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 |
| Non-Inferiority or Equivalence (legacy) |
Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 |
| Analysis of variance (PROC MIXED) was performed on log transformed Cmax parameters | Geometric Mylan/Astellas Ratio X 100 | 116.02 | 2-Sided | 90 | 102.87 | 130.87 | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 | Non-Inferiority or Equivalence (legacy) | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 |
| Analysis of variance (PROC MIXED) was performed on log transformed Cmax parameters | Geometric Panacea/Astellas Ratio X 100 | 108.92 | 2-Sided | 90 | 96.51 | 122.94 | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 | Non-Inferiority or Equivalence (legacy) | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 |
| Analysis of variance (PROC MIXED) was performed on log transformed Cmax parameters | Geometric Sandoz/Astellas Ratio X 100 | 94.06 | 2-Sided | 90 | 83.33 | 106.16 | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 | Non-Inferiority or Equivalence (legacy) | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 |
| Analysis of variance (PROC MIXED) was performed on log transformed Cmax parameters | Geometric Accord/Dr. Reddys Ratio X 100 | 136.27 | 2-Sided | 90 | 120.82 | 153.70 | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 | Non-Inferiority or Equivalence (legacy) | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 |
| Analysis of variance (PROC MIXED) was performed on log transformed Cmax parameters | Geometric Accord/Mylan Ratio X 100 | 122.31 | 2-Sided | 90 | 108.37 | 138.04 | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 | Non-Inferiority or Equivalence (legacy) | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 |
| Analysis of variance (PROC MIXED) was performed on log transformed Cmax parameters | Geometric Accord/Panacea Ratio X 100 | 130.28 | 2-Sided | 90 | 115.43 | 147.04 | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 | Non-Inferiority or Equivalence (legacy) | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 |
| Analysis of variance (PROC MIXED) was performed on log transformed Cmax parameters | Geometric Accord/Sandoz Ratio X 100 | 150.88 | 2-Sided | 90 | 133.77 | 170.18 | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 | Non-Inferiority or Equivalence (legacy) | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 |
| Analysis of variance (PROC MIXED) was performed on log transformed Cmax parameters | Geometric Dr. Reddys/Mylan Ratio X 100 | 89.75 | 2-Sided | 90 | 79.52 | 101.30 | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 | Non-Inferiority or Equivalence (legacy) | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 |
| Analysis of variance (PROC MIXED) was performed on log transformed Cmax parameters | Geometric Dr Reddys/Panacea Ratio X 100 | 95.60 | 2-Sided | 90 | 84.71 | 107.90 | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 | Non-Inferiority or Equivalence (legacy) | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 |
| Geometric Dr Reddys/Sandoz Ratio X 100 | 110.72 | 2-Sided | 90 | 98.10 | 124.96 | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 | Non-Inferiority or Equivalence (legacy) | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 |
| Analysis of variance (PROC MIXED) was performed on log transformed Cmax parameters | Geometric Mylan/Panacea Ratio X 100 | 106.52 | 2-Sided | 90 | 94.44 | 120.15 | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 | Non-Inferiority or Equivalence (legacy) | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 |
| Analysis of variance (PROC MIXED) was performed on log transformed Cmax parameters | Geometric Mylan/Sandoz Ratio X 100 | 123.36 | 2-Sided | 90 | 109.30 | 139.23 | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 | Non-Inferiority or Equivalence (legacy) | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 |
| Analysis of variance (PROC MIXED) was performed on log transformed Cmax parameters | Geometric Panacea/Sandoz Ratio X 100 | 115.81 | 2-Sided | 90 | 102.68 | 130.62 | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 | Non-Inferiority or Equivalence (legacy) | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 |
| Analysis of variance (PROC MIXED) was performed on log transformed Cmax parameters | Geometric Accord/Astellas Ratio X 100 | 112.96 | 2-Sided | 90 | 100.32 | 127.20 | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 | Non-Inferiority or Equivalence (legacy) | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 |
| Geometric Dr Reddys/Astellas Ratio X 100 | 101.75 | 2-Sided | 90 | 90.37 | 114.57 | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 | Non-Inferiority or Equivalence (legacy) | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 |
| Analysis of variance (PROC MIXED) was performed on log transformed Cmax parameters | Geometric Mylan/Astella Ratio X 100 | 113.52 | 2-Sided | 90 | 100.82 | 127.83 | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 | Non-Inferiority or Equivalence (legacy) | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 |
| Analysis of variance (PROC MIXED) was performed on log transformed Cmax parameters | Geometric Panacea/Astellas Ratio X 100 | 99.16 | 2-Sided | 90 | 88.06 | 111.64 | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 | Non-Inferiority or Equivalence (legacy) | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 |
| Analysis of variance (PROC MIXED) was performed on log transformed Cmax parameters | Geometric Sandoz/Astellas Ratio X 100 | 95.57 | 2-Sided | 90 | 84.89 | 107.61 | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 | Non-Inferiority or Equivalence (legacy) | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 |
| Analysis of variance (PROC MIXED) was performed on log transformed Cmax parameters | Geometric Accord/Dr Reddy Ratio X 100 | 111.01 | 2-Sided | 90 | 98.59 | 125.00 | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 | Non-Inferiority or Equivalence (legacy) | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 |
| Analysis of variance (PROC MIXED) was performed on log transformed Cmax parameters | Geometric Accord/Mylan Ratio X 100 | 99.51 | 2-Sided | 90 | 88.38 | 112.04 | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 | Non-Inferiority or Equivalence (legacy) | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 |
| Analysis of variance (PROC MIXED) was performed on log transformed Cmax parameters | Geometric Accord/Panacea Ratio X 100 | 113.93 | 2-Sided | 90 | 101.18 | 128.28 | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 | Non-Inferiority or Equivalence (legacy) | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 |
| Analysis of variance (PROC MIXED) was performed on log transformed Cmax parameters | Geometric Accord/Sandoz Ratio X 100 | 118.19 | 2-Sided | 90 | 104.96 | 133.08 | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 | Non-Inferiority or Equivalence (legacy) | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 |
| Analysis of variance (PROC MIXED) was performed on log transformed Cmax parameters | Geometric Dr Reddys/Mylan | 89.64 | 2-Sided | 90 | 79.61 | 100.93 | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 | Non-Inferiority or Equivalence (legacy) | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 |
| Analysis of variance (PROC MIXED) was performed on log transformed Cmax parameters | Geometric Dr. Reddys/Panacea Ratio X 100 | 102.63 | 2-Sided | 90 | 91.15 | 115.55 | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 | Non-Inferiority or Equivalence (legacy) | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 |
| Analysis of variance (PROC MIXED) was performed on log transformed Cmax parameters | Geometric Dr. Reddys/Sandoz Ratio X 100 | 106.46 | 2-Sided | 90 | 94.55 | 119.88 | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 | Non-Inferiority or Equivalence (legacy) | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 |
| Analysis of variance (PROC MIXED) was performed on log transformed Cmax parameters | Geometric Mylan/Panacea Ratio X 100 | 114.49 | 2-Sided | 90 | 110.68 | 128.92 | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 | Non-Inferiority or Equivalence (legacy) | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 |
| Analysis of variance (PROC MIXED) was performed on log transformed Cmax parameters | Geometric Mylan/Sandoz Ratio X 100 | 118.77 | 2-Sided | 90 | 105.48 | 133.74 | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 | Non-Inferiority or Equivalence (legacy) | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 |
| Analysis of variance (PROC MIXED) was performed on log transformed Cmax parameters | Geometric Panacea/Sandoz Ratio X 100 | 103.74 | 2-Sided | 90 | 92.13 | 116.81 | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 | Non-Inferiority or Equivalence (legacy) | Bioequivalence is established when 90% confidence interval falls within 80-125 |
| Serious Adverse Events |
|
| Total Other Adverse Events (not including Serious) |
|
| Nervous system |
|
| Blood and Lymphatic system |
|
| Cardiac |
|
| Ear and labyrinth |
|
| Metabolism and Nutrition |
|
| Gastrointestinal |
|
| Respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal |
|
| Musculoskeletal and connective tissue |
|
| Reproductive system and breast disorders |
|
| Infections and infestations |
|
| Skin and subcutaneous tissue |
|
| Psychiatric |
|
| Vascular |
|
| Investigations |
|
| Renal and urinary |
|
| Allergies |
|
| Eye Disorder |
|
| Endocrine |
|
| General disorders and administrative site conditions |
|