Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Background: Persistent nonspecific low back pain (PNSLBP) is one of the most common low back pains worldwide. Many interventions were tried including wet cupping which is commonly used for pain conditions in Saudi Arabia and other parts in the world but without solid scientific evidence.
Aims: This study aims at determining safety and efficacy of wet cupping for treating PNSLBP.
Methods: This is a randomized wait-listed controlled clinical trial. Eligible patients with history of at least 3 months of PNSLBP will be randomized in to two groups, 45 patients each. The first group will be given wet-cupping treatment at two acupuncture points of urinary Bladder (BL) meridians among the BL23, BL24 and BL25, 6 times within 2 weeks. The second group will serve as a control group. Usual care, including providing brochures for exercise, general advice for PNSLBP and acetaminophen, will be allowed in both groups. Separate assessors participated in the outcome assessment. Investigators will use the 0 to100 numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain, the McGill Pain questionnaire for pain intensity (PPI) and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ), and to assess acetaminophen use and safety issues.
Expected Results: To provide data on the safety and effectiveness of wet cupping in treating PNSLBP and open the way for integrative medicine in Saudi Arabia
Objectives:
To evaluate the effectiveness of wet cupping in the treatment of NSLBP:
I-To compare Functioning (Oswestry Disability Questionnaire) from the base to the end of the two weeks of wet cupping sessions& two weeks later in the two groups II-To compare NRS from base to two weeks after the end of cupping III-To compare Number of Acetaminophen tables taken at the end of two weeks. IV-To evaluate Safety of wet cupping
SPECIFIC HYPOTHESIS: The hypothesis of this study is that the improvement of Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for Pain at the end of the study will be greater in the Wet Cupping Treatment group than in the Control group
Overall Design: a randomised, waiting-list controlled, open-label, parallel trial.
Case definition parameters:
Study Design:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| wet cupping | Experimental | patient will receive wet cupping |
|
| control | No Intervention | not cupping |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| wet cupping | Procedure | Participants assigned to the treatment group will receive wet-cupping therapy 3 times per week for 2 weeks |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| NRS | Difference in Numeric Rating Score at the base and at the end of two weeks of cupping sessions. | at the end of the two weeks wet cupping sessions. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Scores of the McGill Pain questionnaire for pain intensity (PPI) | Change in the score from base line | at the end of two weeks of cupping sessions and two weeks later |
| the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ), |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
1-Patients who have low back pain due to specific and known etiological causes (infection, tumor, osteoporosis, ankylosing spondylitis, fracture, inflammatory process, radicular syndrome, cauda equinal syndrome).
2-Patients who are inappropriate to the wet cupping treatment.
â—¦AIDS, Active Hepatitis, Tuberculosis, Syphilis. (N.B.)Referring physicians will be advised to exclude patients with the above mentioned diseases.
â—¦Patients who regularly take anticoagulants, antiplatelet drugs
â—¦Anemia, thrombocytopenia
â—¦Hemorrhagic disease like hemophilia
â—¦Diabetes
â—¦Severe cardiovascular disease
â—¦Kidney diseases (renal failure, chronic renal disease)
3-Patients who have experiences of wet cupping treatment during last 3 months. 4-Patients who have had treatment for low back pain during last 2 weeks. 5-Patients who are in pregnancy or have plan to conception. 6-Patients who have vertebra surgery or have plan of surgery.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Abdullah M AlBedah, MD | National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) | Principal Investigator |
| Mohamed K.M. Khalil, MD | National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| King Fahad Specialist Hospital | Jeddah | Jeddah | Saudi Arabia | |||
| King Fahad Hospital |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 31028971 | Derived | Al-Eidi SM, Mohamed AG, Abutalib RA, AlBedah AM, Khalil MKM. Wet Cupping-Traditional Hijamah Technique versus Asian Cupping Technique in Chronic Low Back Pain Patients: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial. J Acupunct Meridian Stud. 2019 Dec;12(6):173-181. doi: 10.1016/j.jams.2019.04.005. Epub 2019 Apr 24. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
change in the score from the base line
| at the end of two weeks of cupping sessions and two weeks later |
| Number of Participants with Serious and Non-Serious Adverse Events | Differences in number of participants with Serious and Non-Serious Adverse Events. | at the last visit, one week after the end of the last sessions |
| Madinah |
| Madinah |
| Saudi Arabia |
| Prince Salman Hospital | Riyadh | Riyadh Region | Saudi Arabia |