Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-32 | Other Identifier | AP HM |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) has emerged as a suitable tool for restoring, maintaining and/or enhancing muscular performance. From a practical point of view, NMES can elicit contractions either by direct activation of motor axons (i.e. peripheral mechanism) or by the recruitment of motoneurons in the spinal cord through the depolarization of sensory axons (central mechanism). It is noteworthy that NMES parameters widely affect the balance between transmission along these two pathways. Conventional NMES is usually delivered using short pulse duration (0.05-0.4 ms), low stimulation frequency (15-40 Hz) and high stimulus intensities so that the large antidromic volley in motor axons ensures that the evoked contraction will be driven largely by the direct depolarization of motor axons beneath the stimulation site with no or little involvement of central nervous system. On the contrary, when NMES is delivered using wide pulse widths (1 ms) and high frequency (up to 100 Hz) (WP-HF NMES), a portion of the evoked contraction arises from a central mechanism and the corresponding force (recently referred to as "extra force") is significantly (three times) larger than the conventional NMES-induced force. This extra force is supposed to represent the central contribution from the recruitment of spinal motoneurons by the evoked afferent volley given that no additional force was observed during a complete anesthetic block of the nerve proximal to the stimulation site. Despite the obvious differences in terms of activation of the neuromuscular system between conventional and WP-HF NMES, the functional, metabolic and cortical responses associated to both protocols remain to be determined
The main goal of the project will be to characterize the evoked-force profile during conventional and WP-HF NMES.
The secondary purpose will be to i) investigate the anatomic and metabolic responses of the human calf muscle following both NMES protocols by using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 31-phosphorous magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS-P31), ii) study the cortical responses for both conditions of stimulation by means of functional MRI (f-MRI).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Volunteer healthy | Experimental |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) | Device |
| ||
| 31-phosphorous magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS-P31) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| RMI | Assessment of muscle function or brain | 36 months |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
They will have to follow no chronic treatment and will have to be unhurt of any history of alcoholism or drug addiction.
Exclusion Criteria:
So, will not be included, the subjects:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| michele DAMON | Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Marseille | Marseille | 13354 | France |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Device |
|
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008279 | Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014054 | Tomography |
| D003952 | Diagnostic Imaging |
| D019937 | Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures |
| D003933 | Diagnosis |
Not provided
Not provided