Right Ventricular Failure After Implantation of Left Ventricular Assist Devices
Right Ventricular Failure After Implantation of Left Ventricular Assist Devices
The left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is a portable mechanical pump that helps the left side of the heart of patients with severe heart failure that are awaiting heart transplantation or are not transplant candidates. However, while LVAD supports the left side of the heart, the right side must work on its own. Sometimes the right side does not recover, a condition called right ventricular failure (RVF). This complication increases mortality, prolongs hospitalization, requires additional procedures, and increases costs. Several risk factors and scores have been proposed to identify patients at risk for RVF. However, these methods have proven inadequate; one out of three patients is still experiencing right ventricular failure after LVAD surgery.
Echocardiography, an established noninvasive method to see the heart without radiation or risk, has a lot of potential to identify patients at risk for RVF. The questions we will tray to answer with this American Heart Association funded project are:
To answer these questions, we will record images of the heart with echocardiography before LVAD surgery in 120 LVAD recipients at Emory University. We will then follow the patients for 90 days to detect any symptoms and signs of clinical RVF and poor quality of life and record the course of right ventricular function with echocardiography.
Currently, it is estimated that 150,000 to 250,000 patients in US are potential LVAD recipients with 2,000 devices implanted in 2012. LVAD can improve survival and quality of life in suitable patients. However, implantation requires a major surgical procedure with associated risks and considerable resources. Thus, careful patient selection is necessary to minimize risk for patients and maximize benefit for patients and society. Our long-term goal is to use echocardiography as a tool to (1) optimally select patients for LVAD and offer alternatives to patients at increased risk for complications and (2) potentially, inform earlier LVAD implantation in patients with weakening right ventricular function.
Despite (1) improved outcomes and lower rates of right ventricular failure (RVF) with the newer, continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) over pulsatile-flow devices and (2) development of clinical prediction scores to identify patients at risk for RVF post LVAD, RVF still occurs in 20% to 40% of recipients, even with the newer devices.
In 2012, 2000 LVADs were implanted in U.S. and the number is rapidly increasing. Post-LVAD outcomes depend critically on right ventricular (RV) function. RVF can lead to:
True echocardiographic quantification of RV function has only recently been considered in RVF prediction post LVAD; however these studies were retrospective and had inconsistent population and outcome definitions. Also, despite promising results in a retrospective study, preoperative RV mechanics have not been prospectively evaluated as RVF predictors to date.
In this study, we plan to enroll a total of 120 LVAD candidates to evaluate standard and mechanics-based echocardiographic measures of RV function for prediction of (1) RVF within 90 days; (2) QoL at 90 days; and (3) RV recovery at 90 days post LVAD implantation.
Aim 1: We will perform echocardiography within 7 days of planned LVAD surgery to evaluate the association of prespecified RV parameters with (1) RVF within 90 days and (2) QoL at 90 days. Our main hypotheses is an RV echo score will predict RVF within 90 days post LVAD with clinically relevant discrimination (C>0.85) and positive and negative predictive values (>80%). Our secondary hypothesis is that the RV score will predict poor QoL at 90 days with clinically relevant discrimination and predictive values.
Aim 2: We will repeat echocardiograms at 30 and 90 days post LVAD surgery to examine the association of baseline RV function with RV recovery. Our hypothesis is that the RV score will predict RV function recovery post LVAD and that RV mechanics will have incremental value for prediction of these outcomes.
These results may help improve LVAD outcomes and reduce resource utilization by facilitating shared decision-making and selection for LVAD vs. alternatives; provide insights into RV function recovery; and inform reassessment of LVAD timing.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: