Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Lack of Participants
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Tooth loss can be addressed by different rehabilitative strategies. Implant-supported crowns and conventional bridges (fixed dental prostheses [FDPs]) are well established treatment alternatives. Implant therapy is sometimes impossible, however, because of patient-related risk factors or economic issues. In such cases therapy with an FDP requires extensive removal of tooth structure to provide enough space for the restoration and to ensure mechanical retention if the abutment teeth are sound. Alternatives for rehabilitation requiring minor or no preparation of the anchoring teeth are desirable. Resin-bonded bridges meet this demand for minimal invasiveness and have been used clinically successfully. Sometimes, however, patients choose a conventional FDP over a resin-bonded one (RBFDP) for esthetic reasons since the adhesive wings, which are traditionally made of a cobalt-chromium alloy, might be exposed while speaking or smiling or account for a colour change of the abutment teeth. Such patients profit from an all-ceramic RBFDP. Today, the clinical performance of metal-based and all-ceramic RBFDPs has not yet been evaluated under randomized controlled conditions. The aim of this pilot study is to calculate the sample size that allows us to accept the hypothesis that metal- and all-ceramic RBFDPs are similar regarding their clinical performance with adequate statistical power.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| metal-ceramic RBFDP | Active Comparator | Treatment with a metal-ceramic RBFDP |
|
| all-ceramic RBFDP | Experimental | Treatment with an all-ceramic RBFDP |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| metal-ceramic RBFDP | Device | Rehabilitation of tooth loss with a metal-ceramic RBFDP |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Success | restoration/abutment teeth without intervention according to the Fédération dentaire internationale (FDI) World dental federation criteria | 12 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Color change of the abutment teeth | color change measured with a spectrophotometer expressed as ∆E | before tooth preparation, try-in of the framework, 1 week after cementation |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Wolfgang Bömicke, Dr. med. dent. | Department of Prosthodontics, University Hospital Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Department of Prosthodontics, University Hospital Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg | Heidelberg | Baden-Wurttemberg | 69120 | Germany |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| all-ceramic RBFDP | Device | Rehabilitation of tooth loss with an all-ceramic RBFDP |
|