Study of a New Clinical Device for Reducing Body Core Temperature
Study of a New Clinical Device for Reducing Body Core Temperature
This is a descriptive, nonrandomized, noninvasive, single-group, single-center pilot study of a Core Cooling System (CCS) device for reducing core body temperature in ICU patients at University Medical Center Brackenridge (UMCB) and Seton Medical Center Austin (SMCA). The proposed research on human subjects will provide data that will be used to improve a specialized human heat transfer technique/device. By stimulating specialized blood vessels (arteriovenous anastomoses) AVAs in the palm of the hand, it is possible to greatly increase local blood flow and thus greatly increase the potential for effective heat transfer between the environment and body.
The hypothesis of this trial is that the Core Cooling System (CCS) will prove to be a practical, safe, and effective method to raise or lower body temperature in critically ill patients.
Introduction:
The ability to manipulate body core temperatures quickly and effectively would impact a number of fields, with truly transformative potential. By far the best way to effect a change in body temperature is perfusion with cooled or warmed blood because the vasculature of the human body equilibrates magnificently well with the body and especially the body core tissues due to the diffuse microcirculation. This process is quite invasive, however, and noninvasive techniques to date have mostly revolved around various surface heat transfer mechanisms that ultimately rely on relatively inferior conduction heat transfer.
Grahn, et al., at Stanford University have identified a new technique to increase the rate of heat transfer between the skin and the body core by up to a factor of ten by harnessing the convective power of the circulatory system in a completely noninvasive way [1, 2]. Our system is derivative of the Stanford device, but different in many significant ways.
A well-understood and thus modifiable system capable of rapid artificial heat transfer has almost limitless potential applications, including treatment of acute brain trauma (where the single greatest challenge to treatment is inducing immediate hypothermia), athletic performance enhancement, military operations, and enhancement of industries in which workers are subject to extreme thermal stress.
Description of the Technology/Device:
The technology works as a two-step process, consisting of first stimulating the blood flow to the AVAs and second cooling the glabrous skin through which blood is flowing. Accordingly, the device consists of two components: first a blood flow stimulation source, and second a surface heat exchanger to chill the glabrous skin and thereby the blood flowing through it that subsequently flows back to the body core, where it cools those tissues.
Two separate means of stimulation will be tested in the trial:
Cooling will be accomplished by applying water perfusion bladders to the hands and feet. The water will recirculate through the bladders to a holding tank with an internal pump, and a thermoelectric cooler regulates the water temperature. The water temperature will be at 20°C or higher.
Research Incentive:
The AVA structures in glabrous (non-hairy) skin are one component of the body's natural thermoregulatory system. The anatomy and morphology of AVAs have been described to a great extent in the literature, e.g. Sherman [6]. Putative pre-AVA sphincters are thought to be the primary controllers of perfusion through AVAs, regardless of the level of AVA vasodilation. If the AVAs are completely dilated, but the sphincters closed, blood will pool in the dilated AVAs, but the flow of blood, which is essential for heat exchange with the core, will be minimal. In contrast to perfusion of capillaries, which is largely regulated by local conditions, flow through AVAs appears to be mostly centrally mediated, controlled primarily by the vasoconstrictor tone imparted by rich sympathetic innervation [7-10]. The sympathetic vasoconstrictor tone, which appears to oscillate in a characteristic manner over time, is controlled by the central nervous system's homeostatic centers that respond to various centrally located core temperature receptors. The complete inner workings of this control system and its effector mechanisms are not completely understood or quantified, and other factors influence AVA blood flow to some degree, such as local skin temperatures, the presence of vasoactive metabolites, level of exercise, and stimulation of various peripheral thermal sites. Recent work in the Diller lab has indicated the potential inherent in the latter. The lab has identified regions of the skin that may be non-energetically thermally stimulated (heating over a small area so as not to warm a significant volume) to induce AVA vasodilation. We hypothesize these sites contain important thermoafferent sensors that impact the central component (hypothalamic) of the governing controller.
The ability to induce mild hypothermia from a normothermic state represents the application of greatest interest to our research group. If optimally developed, a device capable of inducing only a 2-4°C decrease in body core temperature could have a huge impact in treatment of various medical disease states and/or emergencies, including cardiac arrest, severe brain injury, and stroke. It is well known that tissue death due to traumatic physical injury and/or ischemia can be decreased with therapeutic hypothermia because of the temperature dependence of cellular metabolism and the complex, destructive biochemical processes that occur in damaged tissues [12].
Therapeutic hypothermia has been shown to have a great effect in various animal models; however, translation of these results to the clinical domain has been very difficult. Aside from any possible interspecies physiological differences, researchers are able to produce injury and cool the core of the research animals in a very controlled manner, and most importantly, cooling is induced very soon after injury. From these experiments, it has been suggested that a "window of opportunity" exists of about 90 minutes post injury, after which little to no therapeutic effect occurs from mild hypothermia. Moreover, this 90-minute threshold may itself be a stretch, and cooling within a 60-minute window may be most appropriate. Clinically, cooling within the former and surely the latter windows has almost never been achieved. There are a number of reasons for this: the time between injury and mobilization of the patient, transportation to an emergency care facility, initial assessment of the patient in the hospital setting, and most importantly for physiological science, a lack of fast and effective methods to cool the body core. Due to simple size and geometry, the human body is much more difficult to heat or cool than, for example, the rat model. This is especially true for conductive heat transfer mechanisms (which is what most current noninvasive therapeutic hypothermia implementations are based on) because of the relatively small ratio of surface area to thermal mass volume [3].
We hope that the problem of rapid core temperature manipulation can be drastically improved upon, specifically by utilizing convective heat transfer through AVAs of glabrous skin. In these experiments, we believe an optimized combinatorial protocol utilizing large coverage of glabrous regions (both palms plus soles of the feet), manipulation of mean skin temperature, and especially optimized stimulation of peripheral thermoafferent sensors located in regions of the body such as along the spine, can allow for mild hypothermia induction in spite of the conflict with the thermoregulatory controller. We especially hope that manipulation of important thermoafferents will allow us to "trick" the controller and bypass its effective vasoconstrictive signal.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: