| Primary | Percent Change From Baseline to 12 Months in Bone Mineral Density at the Lumbar Spine | Bone mineral density was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). DXA scans were analyzed by a central imaging reader. | Randomized participants who received at least 10 doses of the assigned randomized treatment, never received any dose of incorrect treatment, had no missing baseline values, and had at least 1 postbaseline measurement (primary efficacy subset). | Posted | | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | percent change | | Baseline and 12 months | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received placebo matching to romosozumab administered by subcutaneous injection once a month for 12 months. | | OG001 | Romosozumab 70 mg | Participants received 70 mg romosozumab administered by subcutaneous injection once a month for 12 months. | | OG002 | Romosozumab 140 mg | Participants received 140 mg romosozumab administered by subcutaneous injection once a month for 12 months. | | OG003 | Romosozumab 210 mg | Participants received 210 mg romosozumab administered by subcutaneous injection once a month for 12 months. |
| | Units | Counts |
|---|
| Participants | - OG00059
- OG00155
- OG00262
- OG003
|
| | Title | Denominators | Categories |
|---|
| | | Title | Measurements |
|---|
| - OG0000.9(0.1 to 1.8)
- OG0018.4(7.6 to 9.3)
- OG00213.3(12.1 to 14.5)
- OG003
|
|
| | Group IDs | Group Description | Statistical Method | Statistical Comment | P-Value | P-Value Comment | Parameter Type | Parameter Value | Dispersion Type | Dispersion Value | Confidence Interval Sides | Confidence Interval % | CI Lower Limit | CI Upper Limit | CI Lower Limit Comment | CI Upper Limit Comment | Estimate Comment | Tested Non-Inferiority | Non-Inferiority Type | Non-Inferiority Comment | Other Analysis Description |
|---|
| The primary analysis was based on a repeated measures model with the percent change from baseline at months 6 and 12 in BMD of the lumbar spine as the dependent variable, and baseline BMD, machine type, interaction of baseline BMD and machine type, visit (categorical), treatment (categorical), and interaction of treatment and visit as the independent variables; using an unstructured variance covariance structure. | Repeated Measures Model | | < 0.0001 | P-values were adjusted for multiplicity using a combination of a sequential test procedure and Hochberg's method to control type 1 error for the primary endpoint. | Treatment Difference | 7.5 | | | 1-Sided | 95 | 6.5 | | | | | |
|
| Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline at 6 Months in Bone Mineral Density at the Lumbar Spine | Bone mineral density was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). DXA scans were analyzed by a central imaging reader. | Randomized participants who received at least 10 doses of the assigned randomized treatment, never received any dose of incorrect treatment, had no missing baseline values, and had at least 1 postbaseline measurement. | Posted | | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | percent change | | Baseline and 6 months | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received placebo matching to romosozumab administered by subcutaneous injection once a month for 12 months. | | OG001 | Romosozumab 70 mg | Participants received 70 mg romosozumab administered by subcutaneous injection once a month for 12 months. | | OG002 | Romosozumab 140 mg | Participants received 140 mg romosozumab administered by subcutaneous injection once a month for 12 months. | | OG003 | Romosozumab 210 mg | |
|
| Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline at 6 Months in Bone Mineral Density at the Total Hip | Bone mineral density was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). DXA scans were analyzed by a central imaging reader. | Randomized participants who received at least 10 doses of the assigned randomized treatment, never received any dose of incorrect treatment, had no missing baseline values, and had at least 1 postbaseline measurement. | Posted | | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | percent change | | Baseline and 6 months | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received placebo matching to romosozumab administered by subcutaneous injection once a month for 12 months. | | OG001 | Romosozumab 70 mg | Participants received 70 mg romosozumab administered by subcutaneous injection once a month for 12 months. | | OG002 | Romosozumab 140 mg | Participants received 140 mg romosozumab administered by subcutaneous injection once a month for 12 months. | | OG003 | Romosozumab 210 mg | |
|
| Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline to 12 Months in Bone Mineral Density at the Total Hip | Bone density was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). DXA scans were analyzed by a central imaging reader. | Randomized participants who received at least 10 doses of the assigned randomized treatment, never received any dose of incorrect treatment, had no missing baseline values, and had at least 1 postbaseline measurement. | Posted | | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | percent change | | Baseline and 12 months | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received placebo matching to romosozumab administered by subcutaneous injection once a month for 12 months. | | OG001 | Romosozumab 70 mg | Participants received 70 mg romosozumab administered by subcutaneous injection once a month for 12 months. | | OG002 | Romosozumab 140 mg | Participants received 140 mg romosozumab administered by subcutaneous injection once a month for 12 months. | | OG003 | Romosozumab 210 mg | |
|
| Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline to 6 Months in Bone Mineral Density at the Femoral Neck | Bone mineral density was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). DXA scans were analyzed by a central imaging reader. | Randomized participants who received at least 10 doses of the assigned randomized treatment, never received any dose of incorrect treatment, had no missing baseline values, and had at least 1 postbaseline measurement. | Posted | | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | percent change | | Baseline and 6 months | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received placebo matching to romosozumab administered by subcutaneous injection once a month for 12 months. | | OG001 | Romosozumab 70 mg | Participants received 70 mg romosozumab administered by subcutaneous injection once a month for 12 months. | | OG002 | Romosozumab 140 mg | Participants received 140 mg romosozumab administered by subcutaneous injection once a month for 12 months. | | OG003 | Romosozumab 210 mg | |
|
| Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline to 12 Months in Bone Mineral Density at the Femoral Neck | Bone mineral density was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). DXA scans were analyzed by a central imaging reader. | Randomized participants who received at least 10 doses of the assigned randomized treatment, never received any dose of incorrect treatment, had no missing baseline values, and had at least 1 postbaseline measurement. | Posted | | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | percent change | | Baseline and 12 months | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received placebo matching to romosozumab administered by subcutaneous injection once a month for 12 months. | | OG001 | Romosozumab 70 mg | Participants received 70 mg romosozumab administered by subcutaneous injection once a month for 12 months. | | OG002 | Romosozumab 140 mg | Participants received 140 mg romosozumab administered by subcutaneous injection once a month for 12 months. | | OG003 | Romosozumab 210 mg | |
|
| Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in Procollagen Type 1 N-telopeptide (P1NP) | | Randomized participants who received at least 10 doses of the assigned randomized treatment, never received any dose of incorrect treatment, had no missing baseline values, had at least 1 postbaseline measurement and with available data at each time point. | Posted | | Mean | Standard Deviation | percent change | | Baseline, week 1, and months 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received placebo matching to romosozumab administered by subcutaneous injection once a month for 12 months. | | OG001 | Romosozumab 70 mg | Participants received 70 mg romosozumab administered by subcutaneous injection once a month for 12 months. | | OG002 | Romosozumab 140 mg | Participants received 140 mg romosozumab administered by subcutaneous injection once a month for 12 months. | | OG003 | Romosozumab 210 mg | Participants received 210 mg romosozumab administered by subcutaneous injection once a month for 12 months. |
|
| Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in Type 1 Collagen C-telopeptide (CTX) | | Randomized participants who received at least 10 doses of the assigned randomized treatment, never received any dose of incorrect treatment, had no missing baseline values, had at least 1 postbaseline measurement, and with available data at each time point. | Posted | | Mean | Standard Deviation | percent change | | Baseline, week 1, and months 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received placebo matching to romosozumab administered by subcutaneous injection once a month for 12 months. | | OG001 | Romosozumab 70 mg | Participants received 70 mg romosozumab administered by subcutaneous injection once a month for 12 months. | | OG002 | Romosozumab 140 mg | Participants received 140 mg romosozumab administered by subcutaneous injection once a month for 12 months. | | OG003 | Romosozumab 210 mg | Participants received 210 mg romosozumab administered by subcutaneous injection once a month for 12 months. |
|
| Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in Osteocalcin | | Randomized participants who received at least 10 doses of the assigned randomized treatment, never received any dose of incorrect treatment, had no missing baseline values, had at least 1 postbaseline measurement, and with available data at each time point. | Posted | | Mean | Standard Deviation | percent change | | Baseline, week 1, and months 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received placebo matching to romosozumab administered by subcutaneous injection once a month for 12 months. | | OG001 | Romosozumab 70 mg | Participants received 70 mg romosozumab administered by subcutaneous injection once a month for 12 months. | | OG002 | Romosozumab 140 mg | Participants received 140 mg romosozumab administered by subcutaneous injection once a month for 12 months. | | OG003 | Romosozumab 210 mg | Participants received 210 mg romosozumab administered by subcutaneous injection once a month for 12 months. |
|
| Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP) | | Randomized participants who received at least 10 doses of the assigned randomized treatment, never received any dose of incorrect treatment, had no missing baseline values, had at least 1 postbaseline measurement, and with available data at each time point. | Posted | | Mean | Standard Deviation | percent change | | Baseline, week 1, and months 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received placebo matching to romosozumab administered by subcutaneous injection once a month for 12 months. | | OG001 | Romosozumab 70 mg | Participants received 70 mg romosozumab administered by subcutaneous injection once a month for 12 months. | | OG002 | Romosozumab 140 mg | Participants received 140 mg romosozumab administered by subcutaneous injection once a month for 12 months. | | OG003 | Romosozumab 210 mg | Participants received 210 mg romosozumab administered by subcutaneous injection once a month for 12 months. |
|
| Secondary | Area Under the Curve Through Month 12 of P1NP | | Randomized participants who received at least 10 doses of the assigned randomized treatment, had never received any dose of incorrect treatment, and had no missing P1NP measurements. | Posted | | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | ug*month/L | | Baseline, week 1 and months 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12. | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received placebo matching to romosozumab administered by subcutaneous injection once a month for 12 months. | | OG001 | Romosozumab 70 mg | Participants received 70 mg romosozumab administered by subcutaneous injection once a month for 12 months. | | OG002 | Romosozumab 140 mg | Participants received 140 mg romosozumab administered by subcutaneous injection once a month for 12 months. | | OG003 | Romosozumab 210 mg | Participants received 210 mg romosozumab administered by subcutaneous injection once a month for 12 months. |
| |