Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The objective of this study is to compare two surgical procedure to place implant in severely resorbed posterioir part of the maxilla.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Image-guided surgery | Experimental | Image-guided implant placement |
|
| sinus graft | Sham Comparator | Sinus lift surgery : Patients receive sinus graft before implant placement |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image-guided surgery | Procedure | Placement on residual bone around the implant |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment success | Treatment success is defined as followed : a "yes" must be obtain for the 4 following item.
| 2 years |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy of the image guided system used | Implant placed or not | During surgery |
| Treatment success | 5 years | |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Thomas FORTIN | Hospices Civils de Lyon - Service de Consultations et Traitements Dentaires | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hospices Civils de Lyon - Service de Consultations et Traitements Dentaires | Lyon | 69365 | France |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 32344891 | Result | Almahrous G, David-Tchouda S, Sissoko A, Rancon N, Bosson JL, Fortin T. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) for Two Implant Placement Techniques in Sinus Region (Bone Graft versus Computer-Aided Implant Surgery): A Randomized Prospective Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 25;17(9):2990. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17092990. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009066 | Mouth, Edentulous |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009059 | Mouth Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
| D014076 | Tooth Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D025321 | Surgery, Computer-Assisted |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Sinus lift surgery |
| Procedure |
Allograft bone |
|
| Replacement of missing teeth |
| 4 month after surgery |
| Angulation of implant | 4 month after surgery |
| Cost of treatment | Medical economic aspect | 4 month after surgery |
| Patient pain | Pain is evaluated by the patient using both a analogic visual scale ranging from 0 to 10 and qualitative data (null, moderate, important, severe). Time of pain evaluation: Arm: graft procedure
Arm: image-guided surgery
| 1 week after implant placement procedure |
| Patient satisfaction | Satisfaction is evaluated using qualitative data after surgery (how unconfortable was the surgery: very hard, hard, not hard, no opinion) and 1 year after prosthesis loading (treatment fulfill your expectation: no - not satisfied - satisfied - very satisfied. After surgery (graft procedure and implant placement, the following question is also asked to the patient : would you recommend the surgical procedure to a friend. Time of satisfaction evaluation: Arm : graft procedure
Arm : image-guided surgery
| 1 year after prosthesis loading |