Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Slower than expected tooth decay in placebo group and insufficient recruitment.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a three year single site clinical evaluation of a FDA approved (510(k):K100062) lesion penetrating resin used to infiltrate and hamper progression of proximal carious lesions. The purpose of this study is to compare lesion progression infiltrated with (Icon, Hamburg, Germany) to a similar sized lesion in the same patient treated with a placebo. The study is designed as a randomized, controlled, prospective clinical trial with a three year follow-up evaluation period.
The clinical site will enroll 150 subjects (in the age range of 19 years or older) with 2 study lesions. The patients will be evaluated at six time points over a period of 3 years. Lesion status and caries risk will be monitored at 6-month intervals, while radiographic evaluation will be conducted at 12-month intervals at 1-, 2- and 3-year recall visits.
Introduction Dental caries is the most widespread of all diseases. It causes destruction of tooth structure by dissolving the enamel on the outside of the tooth first and then progressing into the inside of the tooth. While it is possible to use traditional dental fillings to replace diseased tooth structure, it is far better to slow down or reverse the disease process so that no fillings are needed. One of the most difficult places to use preventive or non-surgical treatment is the contact area between teeth. Recently there is evolving interest in using composites to infiltrate enamel and dentin areas that have just begun to be destroyed by caries. The infiltration technique arrests the lesion progression by sealing the porous surface and restores the damage avoiding ongoing acidic damage of tooth structure.
Objective Assess the clinical efficacy s of using Icon to infiltrate initial lesions below the tooth surfaces that exist on the contact surfaces between posterior teeth as a means of stabilizing diseased tooth structure and arresting further lesion development.
Materials and Methods One hundred fifty volunteers (19+ years) with two early lesions in posterior teeth will be enrolled into a clinical trial to evaluate the clinical efficacy of infiltrating the lesions as compared to current watch-and-wait approaches that are combined with good oral hygiene and fluoride application. Each subject will have a treated lesion and a control lesion. Only small early lesions without clinical signs of surface cavitation will be selected. The control lesions will be stabilized through a normal preventive regimen, while the treatment lesions will be infiltrated with a resin. Lesion status will be monitored every six months by clinical examination and as well using annual radiographs.
Clinical Significance Infiltrating a caries lesion is a potential effective strategy to strengthen damaged tooth structure and to reduce caries progression without any surgical intervention.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Resin infiltration | Experimental | One proximal caries lesion (split mouth design) per patient will be treated using the resin infiltrant "Icon" (DMG, Hamburg, Germany) according to manufactures´ instructions. |
|
| Mock treatment | Sham Comparator | A second proximal caries lesion of each patient (split mouth design) will receive a placebo treatment to mimic "resin infiltration". |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resin infiltration | Device | The study is a split-mouth design. One tooth with a proximal caries lesion will randomly receive the infiltrating resin (Icon) while the other will receive a placebo, according to the manufactures´ instruction for Icon. In short, teeth will be isolated with a rubber dam and the tooth surface cleaned with non-fluoride prophylactic paste and pumice. The Icon material will be applied following the manufacturer's instructions and light cured, followed by polished using interproximal finishing/polishing strips (Sof Lex, 3M ESPE, St Paul, MN). Subjects will be given a letter to take to their local dentist asking them not to treat the selected lesions without informing the investigator first. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Invasive Interventions (Fillings) | Cumulative number of study lesions that have progressed to a state were an invasive intervention (filling) has been required to restore the teeth as determined via an dental examination (baseline versus 3 year follow up). | 3 years |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Lesions That Changed in Size (E1->E2->D1->D2-> Filling) | Change in categorical lesion depth (progression to next depth category lesion; E1->E2->D1->D2->filling) as measured by pairwise comparison of radiographs (baseline versus follow up time point). E1 (lesion within the outer half of enamel), E2 (inner half of enamel), D1 (outer third of dentin), D2 (middle third of dentin). Reference: Anusavice K. Present and future approaches for the control of caries. J Dent Educ. 2005;69(5):538-854. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Lesions With Sensitivity to Percussion, Papillary Bleeding, Cold Response | Teeth included in the study were clincially assed for sensitivity to percussion, papillary bleeding, cold response. | 6 months and 12 months |
Inclusion Criteria:
Be age 19 years and older
Have at least two vital carious teeth with caries ranging from enamel to just into dentin.
Be a regular dental attendee able to return for assessments
Be in good medical health and able to tolerate the dental procedure
Have no chronic periodontitis which could compromise tooth retention.
Have normal salivary function.
Have normal bone levels
No lingering cold sensitivity
No periapical sensitivity
No sensitivity to percussion
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Nate O. Lawson | Birmingham, Alabama 35294; US | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Alabama | Birmingham | Alabama | 35294 | United States |
Within-person study (split-mouth design): Per participant at least one lesion pair (two lesions on seperate teeth) were included. These two lesions were randomly allocated to either treatment (resin infiltration) or control (mock treatment) group resulting in paired lesions within the participants. For some participants more than one lesion pair was included.
Subjects were recruited from patients seeking treatment at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, School of Dentistry, USA, and through advertisements. The first participant was enrolled in August 2015 and the last was enrolled in August 2017.
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Resin Infiltration / Mock Treatment (Split-mouth; Participants With Paired Lesions) | Within-person study (split-mouth design): For each participant at least one pair of lesions has been included, with one lesion per pair having been randomized to the treatment group (resin infiltration) and the other to the control group (mock treatment). Resin infiltration or Mock treatment was performed at baseline (study start) according to manufacturers' instructions for the respective study lesion; in addition to general caries preventive measures (standard-oral care hygiene treatment, diet counselling and fluoride regimen). |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Resin Infiltration / Mock Treatment (Split-mouth; Participants With Paired Lesions) | Within-person study (split-mouth design): For each participant at least one pair of lesions has been included, whereas one lesion per pair was randomized to the treatment group (resin infiltration) and the other to the control group (mock treatment). Resin infiltration or Mock treatment was performed at baseline (study start) according to manufacturers' instructions for the respective study lesion; in addition to general caries preventive measures (standard-oral care hygiene treatment, diet counselling and fluoride regimen). |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Invasive Interventions (Fillings) | Cumulative number of study lesions that have progressed to a state were an invasive intervention (filling) has been required to restore the teeth as determined via an dental examination (baseline versus 3 year follow up). | This study was terminated. The 3 year follow up was not reached for any enrolled participant at the time of termination. | Posted | 3 years | Lesions | Lesions |
|
Baseline through 12 months.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Resin Infiltration | Resin infiltration of lesion according to manufacturers instruction in addition to preventive measures (standard-oral care hygiene treatment, diet counselling and fluoride regimen). |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manager Clinical Research | DMG Dental Material Gesellschaft mbH | 04084006 | 232 | clinicalresearch@mtcompanies.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Dec 21, 2016 | Apr 26, 2022 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003807 | Dentin Sensitivity |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014076 | Tooth Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Split-mouth design
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| Mock treatment | Other | For the mock treatment the procedure will be identical to the "Resin Infiltration" intervention, with the exception that a placebo will be used. Essentially, syringes identical to the Icon materials will be supplied by DMG for the placebo procedure. The syringes will be filled with solutions having the same consistency and color as the Icon material. |
|
| 6 months and 12 months |
| Lesions |
|
| Participants |
| Participants |
|
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Full Range | years | Participants |
|
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants | Participants |
|
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants | Participants |
|
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants | Participants |
|
|
| Caries Risk (CR) | Caries risk (CR) was determined based on Bratthall/Petersson: Cariogram-a multifactorial risk assessment model for a multifactorial disease. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2005 Aug: 33 (4): 256-64. The scale reaches from 0% (no risk) to 100% (high risk). | Count of Participants | Participants | Participants |
|
|
| Lesion size | Categorical lesion depth as measured by radiographs. E1 (lesion within the outer half of enamel), E2 (inner half of enamel), D1 (outer third of dentin), D2 (middle third of dentin). Reference: Anusavice K. Present and future approaches for the control of caries. J Dent Educ. 2005;69(5):538-854. | In this within-person study (split-mouth design), at least one pair of lesions has been included per participant, with one lesion per pair being allocated to the treatment group (resin infiltration) and the other to the control group (mock treatment). Consequently, half of all study lesions belong to the treatment group and half to control group. | Count of Units | Lesions | Lesions |
|
|
Mock treatment of lesion in addition to preventive measures (standard-oral care hygiene treatment, diet counselling and fluoride regimen).
|
| Secondary | Number of Lesions That Changed in Size (E1->E2->D1->D2-> Filling) | Change in categorical lesion depth (progression to next depth category lesion; E1->E2->D1->D2->filling) as measured by pairwise comparison of radiographs (baseline versus follow up time point). E1 (lesion within the outer half of enamel), E2 (inner half of enamel), D1 (outer third of dentin), D2 (middle third of dentin). Reference: Anusavice K. Present and future approaches for the control of caries. J Dent Educ. 2005;69(5):538-854. | The intended follow up time frame was 6, 12, 24 and 36 months. However, due to the termination of the study, only the 6 and 12 month follow ups were completed for the enrolled participants. | Posted | Count of Units | Lesions | 6 months and 12 months | Lesions | Lesions |
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Number of Lesions With Sensitivity to Percussion, Papillary Bleeding, Cold Response | Teeth included in the study were clincially assed for sensitivity to percussion, papillary bleeding, cold response. | The intended follow up time frame was 6, 12, 24 and 36 months. However, due to the termination of the study, only the 6 and 12 month follow ups were completed for the enrolled participants. | Posted | Count of Units | Lesions | 6 months and 12 months | Lesions | Lesions |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 56 |
| 0 |
| 56 |
| 0 |
| 56 |
| EG001 | Mock Treatment | Mock treatment of lesion according to manufacturers instruction in addition to preventive measures (standard-oral care hygiene treatment, diet counselling and fluoride regimen). | 0 | 56 | 0 | 56 | 0 | 56 |
Not provided
Not provided
| Two ethnicities (Asian and Hispanic) |
|
| D2 |
|
| Mock treatment group |
|
| Cold response at 6 months |
|
| Cold response at 12 months |
|
| Sensitivity to percussion at 6 months |
|
| Sensitivity to percussion at 12 months |
|