Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This was a six-way crossover study with six single-dose treatment sessions. The profile of acute effects on abuse potential measures of different almorexant doses was compared to that of placebo and two doses of zolpidem
This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, balanced, placebo and active-controlled, six-way crossover Phase 1 study with six single-dose treatment sessions. The profile of acute effects on pharmacodynamic abuse potential measures of different almorexant doses was compared with that of placebo and two doses of zolpidem.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm 1 | Experimental | Subjects were randomized to receive single, oral doses of study medication in the sequence ABFCED, where, Treatment A was: 200 mg almorexant; Treatment B was 400 mg almorexant; Treatment C was 1000 mg almorexant; Treatment D was 20 mg zolpidem; Treatment E was 40 mg zolpidem; and Treatment F was placebo. The duration of each Treatment Visit was 1 day/2 nights. Study drug was administered on Day 1 of each Treatment Visit. Each treatment was separated by a washout period of at least 10 days. |
|
| Arm 2 | Experimental | Subjects were randomized to receive single, oral doses of study medication in the sequence BCADFE, where, Treatment A was: 200 mg almorexant; Treatment B was 400 mg almorexant; Treatment C was 1000 mg almorexant; Treatment D was 20 mg zolpidem; Treatment E was 40 mg zolpidem; and Treatment F was placebo. The duration of each Treatment Visit was 1 day/2 nights. Study drug was administered on Day 1 of each Treatment Visit. Each treatment was separated by a washout period of at least 10 days. |
|
| Arm 3 | Experimental | Subjects were randomized to receive single, oral doses of study medication in the sequence CDBEAF, where, Treatment A was: 200 mg almorexant; Treatment B was 400 mg almorexant; Treatment C was 1000 mg almorexant; Treatment D was 20 mg zolpidem; Treatment E was 40 mg zolpidem; and Treatment F was placebo. The duration of each Treatment Visit was 1 day/2 nights. Study drug was administered on Day 1 of each Treatment Visit. Each treatment was separated by a washout period of at least 10 days. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 200 mg almorexant | Drug |
| ||
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum effect (Emax) over 24 h post-dose for "At the moment" Drug Liking Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score during each Treatment Visit | Emax was determined on a Drug Liking VAS which assessed positive and negative drug effects (Griffiths 2003, Milovan 2009, Schoedel 2008). VAS items were displayed on two screen images. Using a mouse, the subject positioned the cursor over the small vertical box ("slider") and clicked on it to move it left or right on a scale of 0-100. To register the response, the subject then pressed the "OK" button that appeared below the horizontal line. A score of '0' represented a 'Strong disliking' and a score of '100' represented a 'Strong liking'. | 24 hours |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum Effect (Emin) and Time-weighted mean effect (TWMean) over 24 h post-dose for "At the moment" Drug Liking VAS score during each Treatment Visit | Emin and TWMean were determined on a Drug Liking VAS which assessed positive and negative drug effects (Griffiths 2003, Milovan 2009, Schoedel 2008). VAS items were displayed on two screen images. Using a mouse, the subject positioned the cursor over the small vertical box ("slider") and clicked on it to move it left or right on a scale of 0-100. To register the response, the subject then pressed the "OK" button that appeared below the horizontal line. A score of '0' represented a 'Strong disliking' and a score of '100' represented a 'Strong liking'. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Edward M Sellers, MD, PhD | Kendle Early Stage - Toronto | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C519150 | almorexant |
| D000077334 | Zolpidem |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011725 | Pyridines |
| D006573 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Arm 4 | Experimental | Subjects were randomized to receive single, oral doses of study medication in the sequence DECFBA, where, Treatment A was: 200 mg almorexant; Treatment B was 400 mg almorexant; Treatment C was 1000 mg almorexant; Treatment D was 20 mg zolpidem; Treatment E was 40 mg zolpidem; and Treatment F was placebo. The duration of each Treatment Visit was 1 day/2 nights. Study drug was administered on Day 1 of each Treatment Visit. Each treatment was separated by a washout period of at least 10 days. |
|
| Arm 5 | Experimental | Subjects were randomized to receive single, oral doses of study medication in the sequence EFDACB, where, Treatment A was: 200 mg almorexant; Treatment B was 400 mg almorexant; Treatment C was 1000 mg almorexant; Treatment D was 20 mg zolpidem; Treatment E was 40 mg zolpidem; and Treatment F was placebo. The duration of each Treatment Visit was 1 day/2 nights. Study drug was administered on Day 1 of each Treatment Visit. Each treatment was separated by a washout period of at least 10 days. |
|
| Arm 6 | Experimental | Subjects were randomized to receive single, oral doses of study medication in the sequence FAEBDC, where, Treatment A was: 200 mg almorexant; Treatment B was 400 mg almorexant; Treatment C was 1000 mg almorexant; Treatment D was 20 mg zolpidem; Treatment E was 40 mg zolpidem; and Treatment F was placebo. The duration of each Treatment Visit was 1 day/2 nights. Study drug was administered on Day 1 of each Treatment Visit. Each treatment was separated by a washout period of at least 10 days. |
|
| 400 mg almorexant |
| Drug |
|
| 1000 mg almorexant | Drug |
|
| 20 mg zolpidem | Drug |
|
| 40 mg zolpidem | Drug |
|
| placebo | Drug |
|
| 24 hours |
| Overall Drug Liking VAS score (Emax, Emin, and arithmetic mean effect of 8 h and 24 h post-dose assessments during each Treatment Visit) | Overall drug liking was determined on a Drug Liking VAS which assessed positive and negative drug effects (Griffiths 2003, Milovan 2009, Schoedel 2008). VAS items were displayed on two screen images. Using a mouse, the subject positioned the cursor over the small vertical box ("slider") and clicked on it to move it left or right on a scale of 0-100. To register the response, the subject then pressed the "OK" button that appeared below the horizontal line. A score of '0' represented a 'Strong disliking' and a score of '100' represented a 'Strong liking'. | 24 hours |
| Good/Bad Drug Effects VAS score (Emax, Emin, and TWMean over 24 h post-dose during each Treatment Visit) | Good/Bad Drug Effects were determined on a Drug Liking VAS which assessed positive and negative drug effects (Griffiths 2003, Milovan 2009, Schoedel 2008). VAS items were displayed on two screen images. Using a mouse, the subject positioned the cursor over the small vertical box ("slider") and clicked on it to move it left or right on a scale of 0-100. To register the response, the subject then pressed the "OK" button that appeared below the horizontal line. A score of '0' represented 'I can feel bad effects' and a score of '100' represented 'I can feel good effects'. | 24 hours |
| Take Drug Again VAS score (Emax and arithmetic mean of 8 h and 24 h post-dose assessments during each Treatment Visit) | Take drug again scores were determined on a Drug Liking VAS which assessed positive and negative drug effects (Griffiths 2003, Milovan 2009, Schoedel 2008). VAS items were displayed on two screen images. Using a mouse, the subject positioned the cursor over the small vertical box ("slider") and clicked on it to move it left or right on a scale of 0-100. To register the response, the subject then pressed the "OK" button that appeared below the horizontal line. A score of '0' represented 'Definitely not' and a score of '100' represented 'Definitely so'. | 24 hours |
| Subjective Drug Value (SDV) (Emax and arithmetic mean of 8 h and 24 h post-dose assessment during each Treatment Visit) | The SDV measure involved a series of independent, theoretical forced choices between the drug administered and different monetary values. Subjects were asked to choose between receiving another dose of the same drug to take home or an envelope containing a specified amount of money. However, they did not actually receive either the drug or the money offered in the choices. The monetary value of the drug or the envelope ranged from $0.25 to $50.00. | 24 hours |
| Feeling High VAS score (Emax and TWMean over 24 h post-dose during each Treatment Visit) | Feeling high scores were determined on a Drug Liking VAS which assessed positive and negative drug effects (Griffiths 2003, Milovan 2009, Schoedel 2008). VAS items were displayed on two screen images. Using a mouse, the subject positioned the cursor over the small vertical box ("slider") and clicked on it to move it left or right on a scale of 0-100. To register the response, the subject then pressed the "OK" button that appeared below the horizontal line. A score of '0' represented 'Definitely not' and a score of '100' represented 'Definitely so'. | 24 hours |
| Good Drug Effects VAS score (Emax and TWMean over 24 h post-dose during each Treatment Visit) | Feeling good drug effect scores were determined on a Drug Liking VAS which assessed positive and negative drug effects (Griffiths 2003, Milovan 2009, Schoedel 2008). VAS items were displayed on two screen images. Using a mouse, the subject positioned the cursor over the small vertical box ("slider") and clicked on it to move it left or right on a scale of 0-100. To register the response, the subject then pressed the "OK" button that appeared below the horizontal line. A score of '0' represented 'Definitely not' and a score of '100' represented 'Definitely so'. | 24 hours |
| Addiction Research Center Inventory (ARCI) Morphine Benzedrine Group (MBG) scale (Emax and TWMean over 24 h postdose during each Treatment Visit) | Subjects responded by selecting "False" or "True" with a mouse. One point was given for each response that agreed with the scoring direction on the scale (i.e., true items received a score of 1 if the answer was "True", false items received a score of 1 if the answer was "False"). No points were given when the answer was opposite to the scoring direction. The questions and scoring were part of the 49-item ARCI scale. | 24 hours |
| Bad Drug Effects VAS score (Emax and TWMean over 24 h post-dose during each Treatment Visit) | Feeling bad drug effect scores were determined on a Drug Liking VAS which assessed positive and negative drug effects (Griffiths 2003, Milovan 2009, Schoedel 2008). VAS items were displayed on two screen images. Using a mouse, the subject positioned the cursor over the small vertical box ("slider") and clicked on it to move it left or right on a scale of 0-100. To register the response, the subject then pressed the "OK" button that appeared below the horizontal line. A score of '0' represented 'Definitely not' and a score of '100' represented 'Definitely so'. | 24 hours |
| ARCI Lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) scale (Emax and TWMean over 24 h post-dose during each Treatment Visit | Subjects responded by selecting "False" or "True" with a mouse. One point was given for each response that agreed with the scoring direction on the scale (i.e., true items received a score of 1 if the answer was "True", false items received a score of 1 if the answer was "False"). No points were given when the answer was opposite to the scoring direction. The questions and scoring were part of the 49-item ARCI scale. | 24 hours |
| ARCI Pentobarbital Chlorpromazine Alcohol Group (PCAG) scale (Emax and TWMean over 24 h post-dose during each Treatment Visit) | Subjects responded by selecting "False" or "True" with a mouse. One point was given for each response that agreed with the scoring direction on the scale (i.e., true items received a score of 1 if the answer was "True", false items received a score of 1 if the answer was "False"). No points were given when the answer was opposite to the scoring direction. The questions and scoring were part of the 49-item ARCI scale. | 24 hours |
| Alertness/Drowsiness VAS score (Emin [drowsiness] and TWMean over 24 h post-dose during each Treatment Visit) | Alertness/drowsiness scores were determined on a Drug Liking VAS which assessed positive and negative drug effects (Griffiths 2003, Milovan 2009, Schoedel 2008). VAS items were displayed on two screen images. Using a mouse, the subject positioned the cursor over the small vertical box ("slider") and clicked on it to move it left or right on a scale of 0-100. To register the response, the subject then pressed the "OK" button that appeared below the horizontal line. A score of '0' represented 'Very drowsy' and a score of '100' represented 'Very alert' | 24 hours |
| Bowdle VAS scores (Emax and TWMean over 24 h post-dose during each Treatment Visit) | The Bowdle VAS [Bowdle 1998] consists of 13 items for which the subjects were asked to rate their current feelings. Each VAS was scored from 0 to 100, with 0 reflecting "not at all" and 100 reflecting "extremely". Lower individual and overall scores indicated fewer psychedelic effects. The scale was adapted for computer presentation and took approximately 3 minutes to complete. | 24 hours |
| Any Drug Effects VAS score (Emax and TWMean over 24 h post-dose during each Treatment Visit) | Feeling any drug effects scores were determined on a Drug Liking VAS which assessed positive and negative drug effects (Griffiths 2003, Milovan 2009, Schoedel 2008). VAS items were displayed on two screen images. Using a mouse, the subject positioned the cursor over the small vertical box ("slider") and clicked on it to move it left or right on a scale of 0-100. To register the response, the subject then pressed the "OK" button that appeared below the horizontal line. A score of '0' represented 'Definitely not' and a score of '100' represented 'Definitely so'. | 24 hours |
| Drug Familiarity VAS score (Hour 12 during each Treatment Visit) | Drug familiarity score was determined by asking a general question "How familiar was the effect of the drug you most recently received?" Subjects scored familiarity on a VAS scale from 0-100 where 0 was 'Very unfamiliar' and 100 was 'Very familiar'. | 12 hours |
| Drug Similarity VAS score (Hour 12 during each Treatment Visit) | Drug similarity scores were determined by asking 'How similar is the drug you most recently received to [each of a specific drug from a customized list of drugs to which the subject was familiar]?". Subjects scored similarity for each drug on a VAS scale from 0-100 where 0 was 'Not at all similar' and 100 was 'Very similar'. | 12 hours |