Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Institute on Aging (NIA) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to test the effectiveness of a multi-faceted communication intervention for family members of critically ill patients to reduce the family members' long-term symptoms of depression and anxiety.
One in four elderly Americans die in or shortly after discharge from an intensive care unit. An expanding body of literature documents that physician-family communication and end-of-life care is poor in intensive care units. These deficiencies are associated with high rates of adverse psychological outcomes among surrogates, physician-family conflict, and life support decisions that may be inconsistent with patients' goals and preferences. There is a lack of information on practical, generalizable interventions that effectively improve this important aspect of care for elderly patients and their families.
The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a multifaceted communication intervention as compared to an educational control to improve psychological outcomes among family members of critically ill patients, using a randomized, controlled trial design.
This randomized controlled trial involves adding a Family Support Specialist (FSS) to the clinical team to provide four types of support to the families of patients with advanced critical illness: emotional support, communication support (between the clinical team and the family), decisional support (education about the role of a surrogate decision maker) and anticipatory grief support.
The overall aim of the study is to improve the long-term psychological outcomes for family members of critically ill patients, to improve the quality of communication and decision-making between physicians and families, and to improve the patient-centeredness of care.
What happens in the study?
Patient is randomized to one of two groups:
What do participants need to do?
Family Members: Interact with the Family Support Specialist daily. Family Support Specialist addresses family needs and ensures that their questions are addressed.
Physicians: Collaborate with the Family Support Specialist to determine how best to support the family as well as attending clinician-family meetings.
Sample size: With a sample size of 300 patients (450 surrogates), the study is well powered to detect small and clinically important differences in the primary outcome measure Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score (HADS).The trial's original sample size of 400 patients (600 surrogates) was chosen to maximize the power to detect differences in a secondary outcome measure (costs) that required a substantially larger sample size than the primary outcome (HADS). Since the original power calculations were conducted, new data were published which indicated that cost analysis in this context will require an even larger sample size based one effect modification from whether the patient lived or died. Therefore, the Data and Safety Monitoring Board recommended revising the sample size to power the trial on the primary outcome (HADS), which required 300 patients (450 surrogates).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Family Support Intervention | Experimental | Multifaceted family support intervention as well as ICU educational component. |
|
| Educational Control | Experimental | ICU educational component |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Four Supports Intervention | Behavioral | The Four Supports Intervention is a multi-faceted intervention involving the addition of a trained nurse/social worker interventionist to the patient's care team who delivers four kinds of support: emotional support, communication support, decision support, and anticipatory grief support. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale | Burden of anxiety and depression will be measured in family members 6 months after enrollment using the validated 14-item Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HADS). | participants will be followed six months following the patient's death or discharge from hospital, an expected average of 195 days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Patient and family-centeredness of care | Patient and family-centeredness of care measured using the 12-item Patient-Perceived Patient-Centeredness of Care Scale (PPPC) adapted to use by surrogates. | At 6 months |
| Total Hospital Costs |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Concordance between clinicians and surrogates about patient's prognosis (CSCS) | Prognostic estimates of survival and long-term functional impairment are measured responses by assessing the surrogate decision maker and the physician | Participants are followed at time of enrollment, on day 5 of enrollment, and weekly thereafter for the duration of the hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks |
Patient Inclusion criteria:
Patient Exclusion Criteria:
Surrogate Inclusion criteria:
Surrogate Exclusion Criteria:
Physician Inclusion criteria:
1) Eligible physicians will be the patient's primary attending or his/her designee. If an enrolled patient is cared for by more than one attending physician during their ICU stay, each will be consented.
Physician Exclusion Criteria:
1) Study investigators will be excluded as participants.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Pittsburgh | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | 15216 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 39586017 | Derived | Butler RA, Seaman JB, Felman K, Stonehouse W, San Pedro R, Morse JQ, Chang CH, Lincoln T, Reynolds CF 3rd, Landefeld S, Happ MB, Song MK, Angus DC, Arnold RM, White DB. Randomized Clinical Trial of the Four Supports Intervention for Surrogate Decision-Makers in Intensive Care Units. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2025 Mar;211(3):370-380. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202405-0931OC. | |
| 30088971 | Derived | Seaman JB, Arnold RM, Buddadhumaruk P, Shields AM, Gustafson RM, Felman K, Newdick W, SanPedro R, Mackenzie S, Morse JQ, Chang CH, Happ MB, Song MK, Kahn JM, Reynolds CF 3rd, Angus DC, Landefeld S, White DB. Protocol and Fidelity Monitoring Plan for Four Supports. A Multicenter Trial of an Intervention to Support Surrogate Decision Makers in Intensive Care Units. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2018 Sep;15(9):1083-1091. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201803-157SD. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Educational Control Intervention | Behavioral | In addition to usual care, enrolled surrogates will receive two 15-minute education sessions about critical illness and mechanical ventilation on days 2 and 5, delivered by a research staff coordinator with education in critical care nursing. |
|
he costs are measured using aggregate data form the date of hospital admission through hospital discharge
| Duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks |
| Intensive Care Unit Length of Stay | The Intensive Care Unit length of stay , assessed by abstraction from hospital administrative records | Participants will be followed for duration of ICU stay, an expected average of 21 days |
| Hospital Length of stay | Hospital length of stay length of stay , assessed by abstraction from hospital administrative records | Participants will be followed for duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks |
| Impact of Events scale at 6 months | Symptoms of post traumatic stress in family members assessed using the validated 22 item Impact of Events Scale. | at 6 months |
| Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) | This validated instrument measures personal perceptions of:
| Participants are followed at time of enrollment and on day 5 of enrollment |
| Quality of Communication Scale | Quality of communication in family members is assessed using the validated 19 item Quality of Communication Scale | Day 5 of enrollment |
| Impact of Events Scale | Symptoms of post traumatic stress in family members assessed using the validated 22 item Impact of Events Scale. | at 3 months |
| Inventory of Complicated Grief | This validated instrument consists of 19 first-person statements concerning the immediate bereavement-related thoughts and behaviors of the participant. | At 3 months and at 6 months |
| Utilization of Mental Health Treatment | The utilization of mental health treatment is tracked via participant interview | At 3 months and 6 months |
| Activity of Daily Living | Functional status of the patient is assessed using the validated Katz Activities of Daily Living Scale. | At 6 months |
| Vital Status | Mortality of the patient will be assessed at 6 months using hospital administrative records, and the 6-month follow-up with surrogate decision makers. | At 6 months |
| Discharge Dispensation | The disposition of the patient at time of discharge will be assessed via chart abstraction | Participants will be followed for duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks |
| HADS | Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale | at 3 months |