Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Obtaining peripheral vascular access in medical patients is a necessary procedure for many healthcare providers. Peripheral vascular access is traditionally performed using palpation or visual inspection to identify appropriate points of entry in the vasculature after which a needle and catheter are threaded through the skin and surround fascia into the vessel of interest. This procedure, one of the most common procedures in the medical field including both artery and vein access, is not 100% successfully attempted. Operator skill heavily influences peripheral vascular cannulation. (Frisch et al. 2013) However, certain patient populations have difficult peripheral vessels to identify by palpation or visual inspection and past operators would be forced to perform the procedure blind based on anatomical landmarks. Recently, to aid vascular identification and increase cannulation success, a number of alternative techniques for peripheral vascular access have been described including ultrasound-guided.
Ultrasound-guided vascular access has been utilized in vascular access with improved success rate. However, even with ultrasound guidance the first attempt success rate of cannulation was only approximately 65%. A proposed failure of ultrasound guided peripheral vascular access is most likely due to failure to advance the catheter into the vessel even the vessel was successfully punctured. The investigators propose a specific technique and the positive "Target Sign" as a means to obtain almost 100% successful peripheral vascular access.
The investigators plan to enroll 100 surgical patients in the above study and study procedures will not differ from what a patient in the operating room under the care of anesthesia faculty would receive. The above study is simply a way to identify the steps regarding a specific technique.
The subjects (patients) will be brought to the Main Operating Room after their time in the Day of Surgery Admissions (DOSA) at the discretion of the attending physicians and surgical team. The patients will not be required to do anything different from standard anesthesia and surgical practice at the hospital. Subjects will come to the operating room suite and the usual monitors (electrocardiogram, non-invasive blood pressure, and oxygen saturation) will be placed.
Prior to the routine induction of anesthesia, peripheral vascular access is usually obtained. In regards to the subject population, peripheral vascular access is predicted to be more difficult due to lack of visualization of the peripheral vessels. The skin will be prepped with chlorhexidine, draped, and all subsequent procedures will be performed in sterile fashion. The attending physician and/or resident will use the L25x Sonosite transducer with the Sonosite Edge® (Washington, US) to identify a peripheral vessel in the upper extremity for cannulation. After identification of the vessel, the operator will line the L25x Sonosite transducer to place the vessel horizontally midline on the Sonosite Edge® screen to give the most available viewing area. A BD Insyte® Autoguard® 16G shielded IV catheter (Becton Dickinson Infusion Therapy Systems Inc., Utah, US) will be advanced toward the vessel at an approximately 10˚ angle. Once the needle tip is identified on the Sonosite Edge® monitor in short axis view, the following steps will ensue:
Advance the needle toward the vessel slowly, adjusting the ultrasound transducer position and angle to continue to keep the needle tip and vessel identified on the Sonosite Edge® monitor.
Puncture the anterior wall of the vessel with the needle tip
Confirm needle tip placement in vessel
Advance the needle within the vessel 5mm under continuous visualization
View and record confirmation of "Target Sign" on ultrasound monitor
Thread the catheter over the needle.
At this point, the catheter could be advanced either with or without a guidewire at the operator's discretion Members of the research team will be available for verbal assistance throughout this procedure.
Number of attempts and time to successful vessel cannulation will be measured, starting from when either the operator's fingers or the ultrasound probe made contact with the patient's skin. Successful vessel cannulation will be defined as a flowing IV bag of saline after connection and confirmation of flow via fluid agitation in vessel identified via ultrasound.
This procedure will be incorporated in the subjects standard of care and will not extend the time of operation.
At this point, patient participation in the study will be over and surgical operation under the discretion of the surgical team. The video recording of the Target Sign will be saved and given to a member of the research team unknowing of the success of the cannulation. The member of the research team will decide, based on the ultrasound video recording of a positive or negative Target Sign, if the cannulation was successful or unsuccessful. The viewer will record his/her answers and compare with the actual result of the cannulation.
Analysis of unsuccessful and successful cannulations will be compared with a Positive or Negative Target Sign. No additional long-term followup will occur.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ultrasound | Ultrasound guided peripheral vascular access |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ultrasound | Device | Using ultrasound as a guide for peripheral venous cannulation in obese patients |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Successful First Attempt Peripheral Venous Cannulation | we will compare the first attempt success rate using proposed ultrasound technique in total of 100 obese (BMI>30) surgical patients with existing published data. Mata-analysis of first attempt success rate using ultrasound for intravenous cannulation is 61.8% We predict 90% (50% improvement) success rate using the proposed ultrasound technique. Based on this prediction, a sample size of 100 patients provided more than 90% power to compare there two groups at the 0.05 significance level with a two-sided Chi square test. | one day |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
1) No target vein by US screening
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study population will be surgical patients requiring peripheral intravenous access.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Kenichi Ueda, MD | University of Iowa | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Iowa Hosptials and Clinics | Iowa City | Iowa | 52242 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27984247 | Derived | Ueda K, Hussey P. Dynamic Ultrasound-Guided Short-Axis Needle Tip Navigation Technique for Facilitating Cannulation of Peripheral Veins in Obese Patients. Anesth Analg. 2017 Mar;124(3):831-833. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001653. |
Not provided
Not provided
we are not planning on sharing the data
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Ultrasound | Ultrasound guided peripheral vascular access Ultrasound: Using ultrasound as a guide for peripheral venous cannulation in obese patients |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Ultrasound | Ultrasound guided peripheral vascular access Ultrasound: Using ultrasound as a guide for peripheral venous cannulation in obese patients |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Successful First Attempt Peripheral Venous Cannulation | we will compare the first attempt success rate using proposed ultrasound technique in total of 100 obese (BMI>30) surgical patients with existing published data. Mata-analysis of first attempt success rate using ultrasound for intravenous cannulation is 61.8% We predict 90% (50% improvement) success rate using the proposed ultrasound technique. Based on this prediction, a sample size of 100 patients provided more than 90% power to compare there two groups at the 0.05 significance level with a two-sided Chi square test. | Posted | Number | participants | one day |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Ultrasound | Ultrasound guided peripheral vascular access Ultrasound: Using ultrasound as a guide for peripheral venous cannulation in obese patients |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IV infiltration | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Kenichi Ueda | University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics | 319-356-2633 | kenichi-ueda@uiowa.edu |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009765 | Obesity |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D050177 | Overweight |
| D044343 | Overnutrition |
| D009748 | Nutrition Disorders |
| D009750 | Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014463 | Ultrasonography |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003952 | Diagnostic Imaging |
| D019937 | Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures |
| D003933 | Diagnosis |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| 0 |
| 100 |
| 1 |
| 100 |
Not provided
Not provided
| D001835 |
| Body Weight |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |