Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Split-thickness skin grafting remains fundamental treatment of patients with deep burns and other traumatic injuries. However, the split-thickness skin graft (STSG) donor site dressing has been controversial until now. Our study here aimed to assess patient comfort and wound-healing efficacy with the application of thin split-thickness grafting on STSG donor sites.
Background:Split-thickness skin grafting remains fundamental treatment of patients with deep burns and other traumatic injuries. However, the split-thickness skin graft (STSG) donor site dressing has been controversial until now. Our study here aimed to assess patient comfort and wound-healing efficacy with the application of thin split-thickness grafting on STSG donor sites.
Methods: 192 consecutive patients undergoing split-thickness skin grafting were included in the study and the participants were randomly divided into three groups: Group A was regrafted with thin STSG, while, Group B and Group C were covered with the occlusive hydrocellular dressing and paraffin gauze, respectively. The three groups were compared regarding to the time of epithelialization, pain sensed by the patients and the scar formation.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| the treatment group A | The people in treatment group were regrafted with thin split-thickness skin graft |
| |
| the control group B | The group B covered with the occlusive hydrocellular dressing (Allevyn Adhesive, Smith & Nephew) |
| |
| the control group C | Group C were covered with paraffin gauze |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| regrafted with thin split-thickness skin graft | Procedure | Group A (the treatment group) were regrafted with thin split-thickness skin graft |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The time of epithelialization | The time of epithelialization was observed every 3 days | up to 4 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Pain sensed by the patients | Pain sensed by the patients was assessed by Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale on day 2 and 5 after surgery | up to 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Scar formation of skin donor site | Scar formation of skin donor sites was evaluated by Vancouver scar scale in terms of colour, vascular distribution, thickness and scratchability 6-12 months after surgery | 1 year |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
The study cohort included 192 participants, who were randomly selected from patients who continuously received an STSG from January 2002 to December 2010 in Department of Burn and Plastic Surgery, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Yongqian Bian, doctor | specify Unaffiliated | Study Director |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| covered with the occlusive hydrocellular dressing | Procedure | group B covered with the occlusive hydrocellular dressing (Allevyn Adhesive, Smith & Nephew) |
|
| covered with paraffin gauze | Procedure | Group C covered with paraffin gauze |
|