Monolithic Zirconia Full-Mouth Implant Supported Rehabilitation Behavior

Monolithic Zirconia Full-Mouth Implant Supported Rehabilitation Behavior

In patients that did a full mouth implant supported rehabilitation does Cad/Cam Monolithic Zirconia compared to Cad/Cam Zirconia Suprastructure (zirconium oxide (Yttrium - partially stabilized with tetragonal polycrystalline structure) veneered with feldspathic ceramic, has less post-insertion complications after at least 1-Year follow-up ?

Study the behavior of implant supported rehabilitations made from full-zirconium dioxide (monolithic with buccal veneer (MZ) or full contour monolithic (FCMZ) ) and zirconia veneered with feldspathic (PVZ) in full-mouth type of rehabilitations (maxilla and mandible).

In a private clinic we will record the behavior, regarding prosthodontic and biological complications in different groups (MZ vs FCMZ vs PVZ) after at least 1 year in function.

We will make calibration of the investigators for prosthodontic and biological assessement and accepting an inter-observer agreement (Kappa) of 0.9 for each parameter.

Recording will be made without the help of magnifying utilities such as magnifying glasses or optical microscopes.

Inclusion Criteria:

• Maxilla and/or Mandible Implant full-mouth restoration
• Monolithic ceramic or zirconia-feldspathic restoration
• be at least 18 years of age;
• present no systemic or local absolute contraindications for endosseous implant placement;
• at least 1 Year Follow-up

Exclusion Criteria:

• the presence of any systemic disease or condition that could compromise postoperative healing or osseointegration.
• Not full mouth rehabilitation