Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a Single-center prospective pilot trial involving up to 22 subjects. This study will assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) to the anal canal using the FDA cleared HALO Ablation System to eradicate anal HSIL lesions in HIV-negative subjects with intra-anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN). The study intervention will demonstrate that a reasonable proportion of subjects will be histologically cleared of their anal HSIL within the ETZ in a tolerable and relatively safe manner
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| RFA | Experimental | Assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of RF to the anal canal using the HALO Ablation System to eradicate anal HSIL lesions |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) using the HALO Ablation System | Device |
|
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Clearance of Anal HSIL (High Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (HSIL) | Participants with histologic clearance of anal HSIL within the ETZ (eligible treatment zone) at 12 months from first RFA treatment | 12 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Feasibility and Ease of Technique | Technical feasibility of applying RFA to the anal canal. Physician's assessment of ablation as optimal (complete ablation) versus sub-optimal (incomplete ablation)in the affected area in the anal canal. Data not collected and could not be analyzed | 12 months |
| Tolerability |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Age 18-75 years
HRA 2 to 12 weeks prior to the 0 month RFA visit yielding one or more flat, non-condylomatous biopsy-proven HSILs that are
If female of child-bearing age, negative pregnancy test within 8 weeks of the 0 month RFA visit and declared intent to remain on birth control throughout the trial, or, declaration of infertility defined as subject report of status as post-menopausal or surgically sterile (status post hysterectomy or tubal ligation).
HIV negative, ELISA/Western blot test obtained within 12 weeks of the 0 month RFA visit
Exclusion Criteria:
Any biopsy-proven HSIL entirely outside of the ETZ
Any biopsy-proven HSIL partially within the ETZ (for example, an HSIL lesion with extension to the perianal skin)
Any condylomas in the eligible treatment zone > 1/2 cm diameter
• Note: Condylomas in the eligible treatment zone < 1/2 cm in diameter must be excised or cauterized (not treated topically or with IRC) before or during Visit 1 (0 month RFA visit)
Any anal or rectal pathology requiring treatment including ulcer, fistula, fissure, stenosis or proctitis
History of or present anal or rectal cancer
History of pelvic radiation therapy
History of HPV vaccination or plans to initiate HPV vaccination during the trial
History of ablation or resection therapy within the ETZ other than cauterization or excision of condyloma(s)
History of topical therapy (Imiquimod, 5-FU) within 6 months prior to the 0 month RFA visit within the ETZ
Hemorrhoids > grade II
Fecal incontinence (that the investigator feels may impair healing)
Concurrent disease requiring systemic immunosuppression therapy
Concurrent malignancy requiring systemic therapy
Life expectancy < 2 years
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laser Surgery Center | New York | New York | 10011 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | RFA Treatment | Assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of RF to the anal canal using the HALO Ablation System to eradicate anal HSIL lesions Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) using the HALO Ablation System |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Subject tolerability of the RFA procedure as measured by severity. Mild: Awareness of signs and symptoms, but easily tolerated; are of a minor irritant type; causing no loss of time from normal activities; symptoms would not require medication or a medical intervention; asymptomatic lab findings; marginal clinical relevance; signs and symptoms are transient. Moderate: Discomfort severe enough to cause interference with usual activities; minimal intervention. Severe: Incapacitating with inability to do work or usual activities; signs and symptoms may be of systemic nature or require medical evaluation or treatment. |
| 12 months |
| Adverse Events | Any related adverse event occuring in patients enrolled in this study. Event type and relationship to the device or procedure will be measured. | 12 months |
| Progression of HSIL to Cancer | Histologic progression of HSIL to cancer as measured in biopsies read at the central pathology lab. Data not collected and could not be analyzed. | 12 months |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
HIV-negative subjects with AIN containing HSIL located within half of the anorectal circumference, which is defined as no more than two contiguous quadrants and in the study referred to as the eligible treatment zone (ETZ).
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | RFA Treatment | Assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of RF to the anal canal using the HALO Ablation System to eradicate anal HSIL lesions Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) using the HALO Ablation System |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Full Range | years |
| |||||||||||||||||
| Gender | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Clearance of Anal HSIL (High Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (HSIL) | Participants with histologic clearance of anal HSIL within the ETZ (eligible treatment zone) at 12 months from first RFA treatment | Posted | Number | participants w histological clearance | 12 months |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Feasibility and Ease of Technique | Technical feasibility of applying RFA to the anal canal. Physician's assessment of ablation as optimal (complete ablation) versus sub-optimal (incomplete ablation)in the affected area in the anal canal. Data not collected and could not be analyzed | Posted | 12 months |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Tolerability | Subject tolerability of the RFA procedure as measured by severity. Mild: Awareness of signs and symptoms, but easily tolerated; are of a minor irritant type; causing no loss of time from normal activities; symptoms would not require medication or a medical intervention; asymptomatic lab findings; marginal clinical relevance; signs and symptoms are transient. Moderate: Discomfort severe enough to cause interference with usual activities; minimal intervention. Severe: Incapacitating with inability to do work or usual activities; signs and symptoms may be of systemic nature or require medical evaluation or treatment. | Posted | Number | participants | 12 months |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Adverse Events | Any related adverse event occuring in patients enrolled in this study. Event type and relationship to the device or procedure will be measured. | Posted | Number | participants | 12 months |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Progression of HSIL to Cancer | Histologic progression of HSIL to cancer as measured in biopsies read at the central pathology lab. Data not collected and could not be analyzed. | Posted | 12 months |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | RFA Treatment | Assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of RF to the anal canal using the HALO Ablation System to eradicate anal HSIL lesions Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) using the HALO Ablation System | 0 | 21 | 2 | 21 |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anal pocket with purulent discharge | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Fever | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stephen E Goldstone | Laser Surgery Care | 212-242-6500 | segmd@prodigy.net |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000078703 | Radiofrequency Ablation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000078702 | Radiofrequency Therapy |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D055011 | Ablation Techniques |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Title | Denominators | Categories |
|---|
|