Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Profil Institut für Stoffwechselforschung GmbH | INDUSTRY |
| Medical University of Graz | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The main objective of this study is to determine whether day and night closed-loop insulin delivery for 12 weeks under free living conditions is superior to addition of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes and sub-optimal glucose control on insulin pump therapy.
This is an open-label, multi centre, randomised, crossover design study, involving a 6 to 8 week run-in period, during which glucose control will be optimised by a professional pump educator, followed by two 3 months study periods during which glucose levels will be controlled either by an automated closed-loop system or by subjects usual insulin pump therapy augmented with real-time continuous glucose monitoring in random order. A total of up to 42 adults (aiming for 30 completed subjects) aged 18 years and older with T1D on insulin pump therapy will be recruited through diabetes clinics and other established methods in participating centres. Subjects who drop out of the study within the first 6 weeks of the first intervention arm will be replaced.
Subjects will receive appropriate training in the safe use of closed-loop insulin delivery system. Subjects will have regular contact with the study team during the home study phase including 24/7 telephone support. Subjects will be discouraged from international travel during the first two weeks of closed-loop use.
The primary outcome is time spent in target range between 3.9 and 10.0 mmol/L as recorded by CGM (adjusted for potential over-estimation) during home stay. Secondary outcomes are the HbA1c, time spent with glucose levels above and below target, as recorded by CGM, and other CGM-based metrics.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Florence D2A Closed Loop Glucose control | Experimental | Subjects glucose levels are controlled by Florence D2A or similar closed loop insulin delivery system |
|
| CSII with real-time CGM | Active Comparator | Subject glucose level controlled by usual insulin pump therapy in conjunction with real time continuous glucose monitoring (FreeStyle Navigator CGM) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Florence D2A or similar closed loop glucose control system | Device | Subject's glucose level will be controlled by the Florence D2A or similar automated closed loop glucose control system. The system comprises of FreeStyle Navigator 2 ® Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) System (Abbott Diabetes Care, Alameda, CA, USA), Dana R Diabecare subcutaneous insulin infusion pump (Sooil Corp. Seoul, South Korea)or similar insulin pump, and MPC-based glucose control algorithm running on a smartphone |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Time spent in the target glucose range from 3.9 to 10.0 mmol/l based on subcutaneous glucose monitoring | Time spent in the target glucose range from 3.9 to 10.0 mmol/l based on subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGM) during the 90 days of home stay. Intention to treat basis. | 90 days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| HbA1c | Measure of average glycaemic control during study period | 90 days |
| Insulin dose | Total, basal and bolus insulin dose during 90 days of home periods |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy of CGM | CGM accuracy during 3 months home period; Capillary glucose vs. CGM will be evaluated using standard measures of numerical and clinical accuracy including absolute relative deviation and error grid analysis | 90 days |
| Per Protocol Analysis |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Additional exclusion criteria specific for Austria and Germany
Additional exclusion criteria specific for Germany only
Positive reaction to any of the following tests: hepatitis B surface (HBs) antigen, anti-hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) antibodies, anti-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) 1 antibodies, anti-HIV2 antibodies.
Significantly reduced hypoglycaemia awareness withGold score ≥ 4 according to Geddes J et al, Diabetes Care 2007
Serious macro- and microangiopathy
Serious anomalies of the skin
Serious skin diseases (e.g. psoriasis vulgaris, bacterial skin diseases) located at places of the body, which potentially are possible to be used for localisation of the glucose sensor)
Renal insufficiency
Epilepsy
Eating disorders (like bulimia or anorexia nervosa)
Disorders of the lipid metabolism
Blood transfusion requiring patients
Psychiatric diseases and related conditions
Patients with frequent catheter abscesses having occurred in connection with the pump therapy
Patients with medically documented allergy towards the adhesive (glue) of plasters
Abnormal blood values for:
Patients with the following concomitant medications or misuse of substances:
Patients with a planned intervention under general anaesthesia.
Patients who do shift work
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Roman Hovorka, PhD | University of Cambridge | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medical University of Graz | Graz | A8036 | Austria | |||
| Profil Institut für Stoffwechselforschung GmbH |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20138357 | Background | Hovorka R, Allen JM, Elleri D, Chassin LJ, Harris J, Xing D, Kollman C, Hovorka T, Larsen AM, Nodale M, De Palma A, Wilinska ME, Acerini CL, Dunger DB. Manual closed-loop insulin delivery in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a phase 2 randomised crossover trial. Lancet. 2010 Feb 27;375(9716):743-51. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61998-X. Epub 2010 Feb 4. | |
| 21493665 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003922 | Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003920 | Diabetes Mellitus |
| D044882 | Glucose Metabolism Disorders |
| D008659 | Metabolic Diseases |
| D009750 | Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| CSII with real-time CGM | Device | Subject glucose level controlled by usual insulin pump therapy in conjunction with real time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) |
|
| 90 days |
| Adverse Events | Safety evaluation will comprise the number of episodes of hypoglycaemia, significant ketonemia (> 3.0mmol/l)as well as nature and severity of any other adverse events | 10 months |
| Utility Evaluation | Utility evaluation is the frequency and duration of use of the closed-loop system at home and time between failures of closed-loop system components. | 90 days |
| Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGM) based outcome | Time spent above and below the target glucose 3.9 to 10.0 mmol/l, during the 90 days of home periods | 90 days |
| Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGM) based outcome | Average,standard deviation and coefficient of variation of glucose levels during 90 days of home periods | 90 days |
| Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGM) based outcome | The time with glucose levels < 3.5 mmol/l and <2.8 mmol/l during 90 days of home periods | 90 days |
| Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGM) based outcome | The time with glucose levels in the significant hyperglycaemia,(glucose levels > 16.7 mmol/l during 90 days of home periods | 90 days |
| Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGM) based outcome | Low Blood Glucose Index during 90 days of home periods | 90 days |
| Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGM) based outcome | Duration of periods when sensor glucose values was below 3.5mmol/l for at least 20 minutes | 90 days |
| Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGM) based outcome | The "Area Under the Curve" below 3.5 mmol/l during 90 days home periods | 90 days |
| Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGM) based outcome | Between 24 hour period variability: Coefficient of variation of CGM glucose between 24 hour periods (midnight to midnight) | 90 days |
| Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGM) based outcome | Glucose concentration in the target range (3.9-10.0mmol/L), and above and below target range based on adjusted CGM. Adjustment described in Hovorka R et. al.; Diabetes Technol Ther 14:1-9, 2012 | 90 days |
| Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGM) based outcome during overnight period between 23:00 and 08:00 | Time spent with CGM glucose concentration in the target range (3.9-8.0mmol/L), Mean CGM glucose levels, The AUC below 3.5mmol/l, CV of CGM glucose levels, Coefficient of variation of CGM glucose between nights and Total insulin dose during overnight period between 23:00 and 08:00 | 90 days |
| Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGM) based outcome during day period between 08:00 to 23:00 | Time spent with CGM glucose concentration in the target range (3.9-10.0mmol/L), Mean CGM glucose levels, The AUC below 3.5mmol/l, CV of CGM glucose levels, Coefficient of variation of CGM glucose between days and Total insulin dose during day period between 08:00 to 23:00 | 90 days |
Per protocol analysis will be conducted to explore the relationship between usage of study treatments and study outcomes.
| 90 days |
| Effect of study intervention based on pre-study glycaemic control | Following outcomes will be calculated separately for participants with baseline HbA1c <8.5% vs. ≥ 8.5% Time spent with CGM glucose concentration in the target range (3.9-10.0mmol/L), Time spent with CGM glucose levels in hypoglycaemic range (< 3.9 mmol/L), Time spent with CGM glucose levels in hyperglycaemic range (> 10.0 mmol/L), Mean CGM glucose levels and the AUC below 3.5mmol/l based on continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring | 90 days |
| Neuss |
| D41460 |
| Germany |
| University of Cambridge | Cambridge | CB2 0QQ | United Kingdom |
| Hovorka R, Kumareswaran K, Harris J, Allen JM, Elleri D, Xing D, Kollman C, Nodale M, Murphy HR, Dunger DB, Amiel SA, Heller SR, Wilinska ME, Evans ML. Overnight closed loop insulin delivery (artificial pancreas) in adults with type 1 diabetes: crossover randomised controlled studies. BMJ. 2011 Apr 13;342:d1855. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d1855. |
| 21343892 | Background | Hovorka R. Closed-loop insulin delivery: from bench to clinical practice. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2011 Feb 22;7(7):385-95. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2011.32. |
| 26379095 | Derived | Thabit H, Tauschmann M, Allen JM, Leelarathna L, Hartnell S, Wilinska ME, Acerini CL, Dellweg S, Benesch C, Heinemann L, Mader JK, Holzer M, Kojzar H, Exall J, Yong J, Pichierri J, Barnard KD, Kollman C, Cheng P, Hindmarsh PC, Campbell FM, Arnolds S, Pieber TR, Evans ML, Dunger DB, Hovorka R; New Collective Author. Home Use of an Artificial Beta Cell in Type 1 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 26;373(22):2129-2140. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1509351. Epub 2015 Sep 17. |
| 25186158 | Derived | Leelarathna L, Dellweg S, Mader JK, Barnard K, Benesch C, Ellmerer M, Heinemann L, Kojzar H, Thabit H, Wilinska ME, Wysocki T, Pieber TR, Arnolds S, Evans ML, Hovorka R; AP@home consortium. Assessing the effectiveness of 3 months day and night home closed-loop insulin delivery in adults with suboptimally controlled type 1 diabetes: a randomised crossover study protocol. BMJ Open. 2014 Sep 3;4(9):e006075. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006075. |
| D004700 | Endocrine System Diseases |
| D001327 | Autoimmune Diseases |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |