An Open-label, Multi-centre, Randomised, Two-period, Crossover Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Utility of 12 Week Day and Night Automated Closed-loop Glucose Control Under Free Living Conditions Compared to Conventional Insulin Pump Therapy Combined With Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes With Sub-optimal Glucose Control
An Open-label, Multi-centre, Randomised, Two-period, Crossover Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Utility of 12 Week Day and Night Automated Closed-loop Glucose Control Under Free Living Conditions Compared to Conventional Insulin Pump Therapy Combined With Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes With Sub-optimal Glucose Control
The main objective of this study is to determine whether day and night closed-loop insulin delivery for 12 weeks under free living conditions is superior to addition of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes and sub-optimal glucose control on insulin pump therapy.
This is an open-label, multi centre, randomised, crossover design study, involving a 6 to 8 week run-in period, during which glucose control will be optimised by a professional pump educator, followed by two 3 months study periods during which glucose levels will be controlled either by an automated closed-loop system or by subjects usual insulin pump therapy augmented with real-time continuous glucose monitoring in random order. A total of up to 42 adults (aiming for 30 completed subjects) aged 18 years and older with T1D on insulin pump therapy will be recruited through diabetes clinics and other established methods in participating centres. Subjects who drop out of the study within the first 6 weeks of the first intervention arm will be replaced.
Subjects will receive appropriate training in the safe use of closed-loop insulin delivery system. Subjects will have regular contact with the study team during the home study phase including 24/7 telephone support. Subjects will be discouraged from international travel during the first two weeks of closed-loop use.
The primary outcome is time spent in target range between 3.9 and 10.0 mmol/L as recorded by CGM (adjusted for potential over-estimation) during home stay. Secondary outcomes are the HbA1c, time spent with glucose levels above and below target, as recorded by CGM, and other CGM-based metrics.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Additional exclusion criteria specific for Austria and Germany
Additional exclusion criteria specific for Germany only
Positive reaction to any of the following tests: hepatitis B surface (HBs) antigen, anti-hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) antibodies, anti-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) 1 antibodies, anti-HIV2 antibodies.
Significantly reduced hypoglycaemia awareness withGold score ≥ 4 according to Geddes J et al, Diabetes Care 2007
Serious macro- and microangiopathy
Serious anomalies of the skin
Serious skin diseases (e.g. psoriasis vulgaris, bacterial skin diseases) located at places of the body, which potentially are possible to be used for localisation of the glucose sensor)
Renal insufficiency
Epilepsy
Eating disorders (like bulimia or anorexia nervosa)
Disorders of the lipid metabolism
Blood transfusion requiring patients
Psychiatric diseases and related conditions
Patients with frequent catheter abscesses having occurred in connection with the pump therapy
Patients with medically documented allergy towards the adhesive (glue) of plasters
Abnormal blood values for:
Patients with the following concomitant medications or misuse of substances:
Patients with a planned intervention under general anaesthesia.
Patients who do shift work