Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The protocol, approved by the Medical Research Council, was issued to assess the safety and efficacy of the non-surgical device for applying it to the national scale up of adult male circumcision in Zimbabwe
Models show that to have the highest impact on the HIV epidemic, circumcision of up to 80% of men in high prevalence countries, where MC rates are low, needs to be achieved (UNAIDS 2009; Manicaland HIV/STD Prevention Project, 2008; Bollinger, et al, 2009). Hallett and colleagues in 2008 showed that for Zimbabwe specifically, HIV incidence could be reduced between 25% to 35% if about 50% of men are circumcised. All modelings conducted show that MC programs must be part of a comprehensive HIV prevention package as MC alone will not tip the HIV epidemic into a terminal decline.
The PrePex Device offers hope for rapid scale up of adult male circumcision in resource limited settings.
Once the safety and efficacy have been established, it is important to conduct operations research to determine how best to implement both device and surgical circumcisions in the national program. Thus, the Zimbabwe MOHCW is planning a three phase trial in order to determine the safety of the PrePexTM device, its performance and the ease of use in an implementation roll out.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| PrePex™ device | Experimental | Intervention 'PrePex™ device for adult male circumcision |
|
| Surgical | Active Comparator | Adult male surgical circumcision |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PrePex™ device for adult male circumcision | Device | The PrePex™ device is designed to enable bloodless male circumcision procedure with no anesthesia and no sutures. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Procedure time | To compare the total operative time of the PrePex Device circumcision procedure versus the total operative time of surgical circumcision procedure. | 9 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Expectations of men regarding the procedure | Expectations of men regarding the procedure using questionnaires | 9 weeks |
| Satisfaction rate of the procedure | Satisfaction with procedure using questionnaires and evaluations |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Gerald Gwinji, MBChB, MPH | PS- MoHCW | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Znfpc Spilhaus Center | Harare | Zimbabwe |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 33786810 | Derived | Hohlfeld A, Ebrahim S, Shaik MZ, Kredo T. Circumcision devices versus standard surgical techniques in adolescent and adult male circumcisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 31;3(3):CD012250. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012250.pub2. | |
| 27227679 | Derived | Tshimanga M, Mangwiro T, Mugurungi O, Xaba S, Murwira M, Kasprzyk D, Montano DE, Nyamukapa D, Tambashe B, Chatikobo P, Gundidza P, Gwinji G. A Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Safety, Procedure Time, and Cost of the PrePex Device to Forceps Guided Surgical Circumcision in Zimbabwe. PLoS One. 2016 May 26;11(5):e0156220. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156220. eCollection 2016. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| MRCZ | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Surgical circumcision | Procedure | The penis will be surgically circumcised according to one of the WHO recommended circumcision methods as described in the Manual for Male Circumcision under Local Anaesthesia Version 2.5C January 2008 |
|
| 9 weeks |
| Attitudes towards procedure | Attitudes towards procedure using questionnaires | 9 weeks |
| Sharing information with family and friends | Sharing information with family and friends by evaluating weather subjects would recommend the procedure to others using questionnaires | 9 weeks |
| Perception of norms | Perception of norms using questionnaires | 9 weeks |
| Sexual relations, performance, satisfaction | Sexual relations, performance, satisfaction using questionnaires | 9 weeks |
| Sexual behavior | Sexual behavior using questionnaires. Inquiring of sexual behavior before and after the circumcision, etc. | 9 weeks |
| Sexual partner's attitudes | Sexual partner's attitudes using questionnaires and investigating the partner's behavior change as a result of her partner's circumcision. | 9 weeks |
| Effect on daily activities | Effect on daily activities using questionnaires. Inquiring and finding out if the MC procedure caused any missing of working days. | 9 weeks |
| Costs | Evaluating the cost of PrePex circumcision procedure when taking into account the following parameters: i. PrePex Procedure time and the resulting cost of provider's time ii. Cost of staff time for follow-up visits iii. Cost of equipment and supplies needed for the circumcision procedure | 9 weeks |
| Cost-effectiveness | Cost-effectiveness | 9 weeks |