Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-A01492-39 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
How to determine the decision-making capacity of critically-ill patients remain unclear. The investigator study the differences between standardised evaluation and subjective medical evaluation.
After written information and consent, an independent, specially trained investigator interviews patients with a standardised test.
After written information and consent, an independent, specially trained investigator interviews residents, doctors and nurses in charge of the patient and ask them how they rates patients capacity.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Decision making |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient's capacity | Other |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| correlation between the decision-making capacity and the decision-making capacity assessed by standardized methods | standardized methods (patient has decision-making capacity yes/no) as described by Sessums LL, Zembrzuska H, Jackson JL. Does this patient have medical decision-making capacity? JAMA. 2011;306(4):420-427. doi:10.1001/jama.2011.1023. | at day 1 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| correlation between the global decision-making capacity evaluated by the physician in charge of the patient and the specific decision-making capacity assessed by physician in charge of the patient | Ability to designate a person of confidence, capacity to consent to inclusion in a research protocol, ability to participate in a discussion on the limitation therapy | at day 1 |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Doctors, hospital interns, nurses state of both sexes, aged 18 years or more working in Intensive Care, members of a social security system engaged in a clinic on the day of the assessment
Patients of both sexes, aged 18 years or more hospitalized in Intensive Care, members of a social security system
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
critically-ill patients
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Alexandre LAUTRETTE | University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHU Clermont-Ferrand | Clermont-Ferrand | 63003 | France |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D016638 | Critical Illness |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020969 | Disease Attributes |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| association between burnout in evaluators and consistency of their decision-making capacity assessments | at day 1 |
| Correlation between the decision-making capacity evaluated by the physician in charge of the patient, the nurse in charge of the patient and a physician not in charge of the patient | at day 1 |