Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The prospective study aims:
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular pacing has emerged as a novel treatment for congestive heart failure (CHF) not responsive to optimal drug therapy. CRT is associated with significant improvements in hemodynamics and functional status of patients with CHF. The physiologic effect of CRT is achieved via placing electrical leads in the right and left ventricular walls, and synchronizing ventricular contraction. Over time, this leads to ventricular wall reverse remodeling, and sustained improvements in left ventricular ejection fraction (EF).
Currently, the indications for CRT include end-stage heart failure class II-IV with an EF < 35%, and a QRS duration > 120ms. The QRS duration is used as an indicator of the degree of ventricular electromechanical dyssynchrony, however, a growing number of studies have postulated its inability to predict response to therapy. As a result, other measures of mechanical dyssynchrony are being sought to guide therapy. The vast majority of these studies have examined clinical, cardiac, electrocardiographic, and device-specific indices, however, a widely accepted predictor of response to CRT is lacking.
CRT results in electromechanical synchrony, leading to an improved ejection fraction, exercise tolerance, and reduction of symptoms. Although electrical re-synchronization and intra-procedural hemodynamic improvement are achieved after the device is implanted, the sustained clinical improvement is likely due to ventricular reverse remodeling. A major issue with CRT is that approximately a third of patients receiving devices do not achieve improved clinical or functional status, and fail to undergo changes in ventricular geometry, and ventricular remodeling. It remains unknown whether this is due to abnormalities in the factors involved in lead placement or procedural strategies, geometric remodeling, alterations in cardiac energy metabolism, supply of energy (i.e. coronary blood flow), or inappropriate/inadequate microvascular proliferation.
This study will evaluate a series of biochemical markers implicated in pathophysiology of heart failure, in predicting response to CRT with biventricular pacing.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| CRT patients | Patients undergoing CRT device implantation | ||
| Healthy patients | Healthy controls |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| MACE | death, HF hospitalization, left ventricular assist device, heart transplant | 2 years |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| CRT clinical response | For the definition of a positive response to CRT, patients will be classified according to the HF Clinical Composite Score (CCS). Responders will be defined as those with improved CCS from baseline to 6 month follow-up. Those not meeting this criterion will be considered nonresponders. An outcome panel consisting of two cardiologists will determine the clinical response of each subject based on review of the medical record. If there is disagreement in the assessment of either baseline or follow-up CCS amongst the two cardiologists, a third cardiologist will adjudicate the case. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Study participant with an approved indication for a CRT or CRT-D system.
Study participant receiving optimal medical therapy including ACE inhibitor or Angiotensin Receptor Blocker (ARB), Beta-Blocker, and Diuretic.
Study participants with a history of significant congestive decompensation events within the last 12 months.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Outpatient or inpatient heart failure patients scheduled for CRT implantation
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jagmeet P Singh | Massachussetts General Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Quynh A Truong, MD MPH | Weill Medical College of Cornell University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Massachusetts General Hospital | Boston | Massachusetts | 02114 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25014756 | Result | Truong QA, Januzzi JL, Szymonifka J, Thai WE, Wai B, Lavender Z, Sharma U, Sandoval RM, Grunau ZS, Basnet S, Babatunde A, Ajijola OA, Min JK, Singh JP. Coronary sinus biomarker sampling compared to peripheral venous blood for predicting outcomes in patients with severe heart failure undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy: the BIOCRT study. Heart Rhythm. 2014 Dec;11(12):2167-75. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.07.007. Epub 2014 Jul 8. | |
| 31876927 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006333 | Heart Failure |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Whole Blood
| 6 months |
| Derived |
| Ajijola OA, Chatterjee NA, Gonzales MJ, Gornbein J, Liu K, Li D, Paterson DJ, Shivkumar K, Singh JP, Herring N. Coronary Sinus Neuropeptide Y Levels and Adverse Outcomes in Patients With Stable Chronic Heart Failure. JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Mar 1;5(3):318-325. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.4717. |
| 29699498 | Derived | Bakos Z, Chatterjee NC, Reitan C, Singh JP, Borgquist R. Prediction of clinical outcome in patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy - the role of NT-ProBNP and a combined response score. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018 Apr 24;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0802-8. |