Supplemental TMS vs. Standard Medication Monotherapy for Treating Major Depression: An Exploratory Field Study
Supplemental TMS vs. Standard Medication Monotherapy for Treating Major Depression: An Exploratory Field Study
A. Introduction to the Problem
This field experiment is intended to explore whether supplemental transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is more effective than standard medication mono-therapy for the treatment of major depressive disorder. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is now included in the practice guidelines of the American Psychiatric Association for the treatment of major depression.
B. Importance of the Area of Study
The safety, efficacy and value of TMS treatment has been established through the four-phase FDA approval process. The evidence of TMS safety and efficacy derives from multiple, peer reviewed, double-blind, randomized, control trials (RCT) with sham control as well as strict enrollment and methodological requirements. TMS is now used in actual clinical practice and there is an opportunity to extend laboratory research and typical, highly controlled field settings to applied settings. This study is designed to gather data on safety, efficacy and utility of TMS as it is used in clinical practice.
C. Need for Additional Research
Efficacy and safety of these interventions have been scientifically established and meta-analyses of these studies underscore the efficacy and safety of two treatment interventions to be employed in this study: 1) standard medication monotherapy and 2) standard medication therapy supplemented with TMS. However, many authors conclude that depression can be difficult to treat and there is an ongoing need for additional research. Depression remains a major public health problem.
Fifteen TMS treatment subjects will be selected from a patient population served in a free-standing psychiatric hospital program (i.e., Sheppard Pratt Health System). There are approximately 40 patients currently enrolled in the TMS program and this is the TMS sampling frame of reference. Fifteen standard medication therapy subjects will be selected from a patient population treated in a private, outpatient psychiatric practice in Northern Virginia. There are hundreds of outpatients being treated in this outpatient practice and this is the standard medication therapy sampling frame of reference.
The sample size will be adequate to achieve a 95% level of confidence with an acceptable margin of error. Consistent with stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria, it is anticipated that a fairly homogeneous and comparable study groupings can be identified. Again, due to the limited number of TMS patients eligible for enrollment in the study, a non-random, non-probability assignment or matching method will be used to make sure the study groups, based upon the demographics and clinical characteristics, are similar in the most important respects.
TMS treatments will be administered utilizing the NeuroStar TMS Therapy® Machine manufactured by Neuronetics, Inc. of Malvern, Pennsylvania. Treatment will be fixed at 120% of magnetic field intensity relative to the subject's resting motor threshold at a repetition rate of ten magnetic pulses per second, with a stimulus train duration (i.e., on time) of 4 seconds and an inter train interval (i.e., off time) of 26 seconds. The left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex will be the treatment location and this site will be determined by adjusting the TMS coil 5 cm anterior to the motor threshold location along a left superior oblique plane with a rotation point at about the tip of the patient's nose. Each treatment session will last approximately 37.5 minutes administering 3,000 magnetic pulses over the course of the treatment session. Repetitive TMS will be performed over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Each TMS subject received a minimum of thirty TMS treatments (i.e., ideally five treatments per week for six weeks) of 10 - Hz treatments (1,200 pulses per treatment day) at 90% of motor threshold.
The standard medication treatment group received only standard medication treatment for a period of eight weeks. As described in an earlier table, these medications could include bupropion (Wellbutrin and others), citalopram (Celexa and others), Clomipramine (Ananfranil and others), duloxetine (Cymbalta), escitalopram (Lexapro and others), fluoxetine (Prozac and others), fluvoxamine (Luvox and others), imipramine (Tofranil and others), mirtazapine (Remeron and others), nortriptylatine (Pamelor, Aventyl, and others), paroxetine (Paxil, Pexeva, and others), phenelzine (Nardil), sertraline (Zoloft and others), tranylcypromine (Parnate and others), venlafaxine (Effexor and others).
Consents and base line measures will be obtained. The TMS and standard medication therapy subjects will be selected from a patient population with at one to three less than adequate responses to standard medication therapy. One group (15 patients) will receive TMS as well as standard medication therapy and the other group (15 patients) will continue with their current medication.
The study will include an analysis of pre-treatment and post-treatment psychiatric assessments of depression treatment outcomes using the Antidepressant Treatment Response Questionnaire (ATRQ), Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD) administered by a psychiatrist as well as the patient self-report version of the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS-SR). Satisfaction and utility data will be obtained through the administration of the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ 8)/3 Supplemental Questions and eleven utility questions.
Measures that will be utilized in this study can be divided into two groups. One group is observer rated and the other group is subject rated. The observer-rated instruments include the Antidepressant Treatment Response Questionnaire (ATRQ), Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD 17). Subject-Rated measures include the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Report Version (IDS-SR) and the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ 8).
It has been empirically demonstrated that these widely recognized instruments have significant reliability and internal consistency. Inter - rater reliability will be insured through observation and comparison. One psychiatrist will be the rater for the TMS plus medication group and another psychiatrist will be the rater for the medication group. Both researchers are experienced clinicians and both will subscribe to generally accepted and clearly defined scoring criteria and scoring rules. Additional efforts to maximize inter - rater consistency by providing these raters with the opportunity to discuss previous practical experience as raters utilizing these particular instruments as well as practice rating exercises. Statistically, the degree of consistency between the two psychiatrists will be determined by calculating of a coefficient of correlation or coefficient of inter - scorer reliability.
The study has four measurement points: baseline, four weeks, six weeks and eight weeks during which TMS treatment and standard medication therapy will be provided to one group and only standard medication therapy to the other group. TMS sessions will be scheduled daily in a five day sequence each week, for a minimum of twenty sessions (four weeks) and a maximum of thirty sessions (six weeks). TMS sessions will be administered on a Monday through Friday basis. Even though both TMS and standard medication therapy are FDA approved treatments and all treatments will be delivered in accordance with FDA approval for the TMS medical device and FDA approval for the prescribed medications, subject safety will be assessed at all treatment sites after every treatment session and, if necessary, adverse event reports will be generated and submitted to the IRB.
Again, in this proposed study, the sample size is relatively small, but based upon the results of earlier studies of TMS, effect size is projected to be a value greater than zero in the population under consideration and the greater this "nonzero" value is, the greater the probability that TMS or standard medication therapy is manifesting the effect being hypothesized. This is entirely consistent with the Bayesian design of experiments in which the outcomes of earlier studies influence the design of the proposed clinical trial of TMS and standard medication therapy.
Bayesian experimental design is predicated on the belief that sound decisions and optimal utility can be made and achieved regarding a proposed experimental design despite uncertainty of the future and resource limitations as well as ethical constraints involving human subjects. The goal of experimental design in most circumstances is to maximize the probability of accruing accurate data within criterion such as financial, timing, geographic and cost considerations. It should also be noted that Bayesian techniques cannot only contribute to sound experimental design, but also affords statistical techniques that promote a "Bayesian" approach that emphasizes probabilities rather than frequencies to interpret and summarize data. This has proven to be particularly useful in experimental designs with small sample sizes.
All personal and clinical information will be kept strictly confidential. Only the treating psychiatrists and the principle investigator will have access to identifying information. As soon as practicably possible, subject information will be assigned a number in lieu of subject name to further protect confidentiality. All data that is reported will be in the aggregate, which will further safeguard confidentiality.
The confidentiality of study participants will be maintained by following these established procedures:
All direct identifiers of participants will be removed from the data in order to allow the data to be analyzed without any risk of accidental disclosure of private information. The de-identifying of the data will be accomplished through a combination coding and anonymizing.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: