Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A study in ADHD and neuro-typical children to assess EVO game play over 29 days.
A study in children ages 8 to 12 to assess EVO cognitive game play. The study examines two populations, children diagnosed with ADHD (ADHD and not on medication) and neuro-typical children. The investigators plan to evaluate 80 subjects (N = 40 per group) in three site locations over a 29 day study period. The 29 day study period includes 2 in-clinic sessions and 27 days of out-patient game play. During the 27 days of out-patient game play, the subjects will be instructed to play EVO 5 days per week for typically 30 minutes per day
The investigators' hypothesis is that EVO will be playable and interesting to ADHD children and cognitive measures, as captured by EVO, will show a difference between ADHD children and age-matched neuro-typical children.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| EVO Game Play | Experimental | Neuro-typical controls and ADHD will receive EVO game play. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neuro-typical controls and ADHD will receive EVO game play. | Device | EVO mobile video application |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Reaction Time in EVO Gameplay | EVO employs a perceptual discrimination attention/memory task as well as a continuous visuomotor "driving" task. Subjects were instructed to target a pre-specified stimulus, and ignore all other stimuli while navigating a road-like course. Reaction time was measured as the time between the initial presentation of the pre-specified target and when the subject tapped the tablet screen. Longer reaction times indicated a larger deficit in multitasking. | 28 days |
| Number of Participants With Non-Treatment Related Adverse Events | Another objective of this study is to evaluate the safety of EVO game play based on treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) that may occur during this 28-day period of time. | Day 0 through Day 28 of the study |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Time Spent Completing the Intervention | Time spent on completing the intervention is based on the prescribed therapy of 800 total minutes, or 13.3 hours, over the course of 28 days (7 sessions of EVO per day for 5 days per week for 4 weeks with each session lasting approximately 5.7 minutes long). | 28 days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Mean of Differences in TOVA Attention Performance Index (API) at Baseline (Day 0) and at Day 28 | TOVA API is a comparison of the subject's scores based on selected measures that persons with an independent diagnosis of ADHD frequently demonstrated. The API is calculated from variability, response time, and D' (D Prime) using the following formula: API = Response Time Z score (Half 1) + D' Z score (Half 2) + Variability Z score (Total) + 1.80 where Response Time is the average time it takes to respond correctly to a target, d' (D Prime) score is a response discriminability score reflecting the ratio of hits to "false alarms", and Variability is a measure of consistency of speed of responding based on the standard deviation of the mean correct response times. API tells how similar the score is to the ADHD profile. A score of less than -1.8 indicates that the subject had similar performance to a normative ADHD population. A lower score indicates a more severe ADHD profile. The calculation for difference in TOVA API was API at Baseline (Day 0) minus API at Day 28. |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Andrew J Cutler, MD | Florida Clinical Research Center, LLC | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Florida Clinical Research Center, LLC | Bradenton | Florida | 32401 | United States | ||
| Duke University |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29324745 | Derived | Davis NO, Bower J, Kollins SH. Proof-of-concept study of an at-home, engaging, digital intervention for pediatric ADHD. PLoS One. 2018 Jan 11;13(1):e0189749. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189749. eCollection 2018. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Neuro-typical Controls | Non-ADHD neuro-typical children |
| FG001 | ADHD | Children diagnosed with ADHD and not on ADHD medication. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
84 subjects were started, 4 subjects (neurotypical) were excluded from the analysis for non-compliance with the at-home intervention use.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | EVO Game Play | Neuro-typical controls and ADHD will receive EVO game play. Neuro-typical controls and ADHD will receive EVO game play.: EVO mobile video application |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 40 participants were analyzed in both the ADHD and neuro-typical arms. |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Reaction Time in EVO Gameplay | EVO employs a perceptual discrimination attention/memory task as well as a continuous visuomotor "driving" task. Subjects were instructed to target a pre-specified stimulus, and ignore all other stimuli while navigating a road-like course. Reaction time was measured as the time between the initial presentation of the pre-specified target and when the subject tapped the tablet screen. Longer reaction times indicated a larger deficit in multitasking. | All subjects completing 4 weeks of at-home play and returning to the clinic on DAY 28. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Reaction time (ms) | 28 days |
|
8 months
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Neurotypical Controls | Non-ADHD neurotypical children | 0 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acute reflux esophagitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Toothache | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SVP of Medical Devices | Akili Interactive Labs | 617-456-0984 | skellogg@akiliinteractive.com |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001289 | Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019958 | Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders |
| D065886 | Neurodevelopmental Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Day 0 and Day 28 |
| Durham |
| North Carolina |
| 27710 |
| United States |
| Mean |
| Standard Deviation |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Measure Analysis Population Description: 40 participants were analyzed in both the ADHD and neuro-typical arms. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Participants With Non-Treatment Related Adverse Events | Another objective of this study is to evaluate the safety of EVO game play based on treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) that may occur during this 28-day period of time. | All subjects completing 4 weeks of at-home play and returning to the clinic on DAY 28. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Day 0 through Day 28 of the study |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Time Spent Completing the Intervention | Time spent on completing the intervention is based on the prescribed therapy of 800 total minutes, or 13.3 hours, over the course of 28 days (7 sessions of EVO per day for 5 days per week for 4 weeks with each session lasting approximately 5.7 minutes long). | All subjects completing 4 weeks of at-home play and returning to the clinic on DAY 28. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Hours | 28 days |
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Mean of Differences in TOVA Attention Performance Index (API) at Baseline (Day 0) and at Day 28 | TOVA API is a comparison of the subject's scores based on selected measures that persons with an independent diagnosis of ADHD frequently demonstrated. The API is calculated from variability, response time, and D' (D Prime) using the following formula: API = Response Time Z score (Half 1) + D' Z score (Half 2) + Variability Z score (Total) + 1.80 where Response Time is the average time it takes to respond correctly to a target, d' (D Prime) score is a response discriminability score reflecting the ratio of hits to "false alarms", and Variability is a measure of consistency of speed of responding based on the standard deviation of the mean correct response times. API tells how similar the score is to the ADHD profile. A score of less than -1.8 indicates that the subject had similar performance to a normative ADHD population. A lower score indicates a more severe ADHD profile. The calculation for difference in TOVA API was API at Baseline (Day 0) minus API at Day 28. | All subjects completing 4 weeks of at-home play and returning to the clinic on DAY 28. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Cumulative z-score | Day 0 and Day 28 |
|
|
|
| 44 |
| 1 |
| 44 |
| 4 |
| 44 |
| EG001 | ADHD | Children diagnosed with ADHD and no on ADHD medication | 0 | 40 | 0 | 40 | 4 | 40 |
| Headache | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Viral gastroenteritis | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Upper Respiratory Infection | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Foot pain | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Influenza | Infections and infestations | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
|
|