Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Maccabi Healthcare Services, Israel | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The ideal stimulation protocol for ovarian stimulation is under constant debate, as we gain more pharmacological control over the patient hormonal milieu. Specifically, the debate focuses around the ideal LH levels. The concept of an "LH window" was suggested.
The need for a threshold level of LH is clearly demonstrated in hypogonado-tropic hypogonadism patients, but also in cycling patients receiving high doses of GnRH antagonist. The Ganirelix dose finding study demonstrated very low implantation rates in the high dose groups (1 mg, 2 mg).
The stimulation dynamics in these patients were remarkable for very low E2 and LH levels on the day of hCG. In fact, a functional state of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism is achieved, explaining the poor clinical results (1.5% implantation rate under 2 mg Ganirelix). The same protocol was repeated with added Luveris resulting in excellent pregnancy rates.
The recommended daily dose of GnRH antagonist is 0.25 mg which on the average provides a protection from premature LH surge, with moderate suppression of LH. Therefore, most patients do not need supplemented LH after the antagonist is initiated.
However, there is a subgroup of patients who hyper-respond to the antagonist (in 0.25 mg dose) with a sharp decrease in LH. This explains contradictory findings in the available studies. The basic assumption in the background of this proposal is that there is a wide range of pituitary responses to GnRH antagonist. Obeying a bell-shape curve, most women have an average response, however, some hypo-respond might ovulate prematurely, and others hyper-respond. In the latter cases, pituitary response will behave as if exposed to a higher dose.
How to identify an exposure to a presumed higher dose?
Below is a figure from the original paper. A close look indicates that the immediate response to all Ganirelix doses are similar in terms of LH drop, however, the big difference lies in the pituitary recovery 24 hours post Ganirelix dose.
While small doses allow for a quick recovery to almost pre-treatment LH levels, high doses result in incomplete recovery. Hence, it is reasonable to speculate that the high response to 0.25 mg dose will lead to slow or incomplete recovery of LH levels 24 hours post the initial dose.
It is estimated that about 15% of patients are antagonist hyper-responders. Efforts to individualize patient protocol must target this group as candidates for supplemented LH. This estimate is similar to study findings: Huirne et al Human Reproduction 2005, 20: 359.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| GnRH antagomnist hyper-responders | Experimental | Those defined as hyper-responders will be given recombinant LH. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recombinant LH (Luveris) | Drug | 150 IU recombinant LH daily. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The primary endpoint will be the proportion of patients who, after receiving Cetrotide after 4 or 5 days of Gonal -F stimulation, are severely down-regulated. | If LH drops more than 50% from its baseline (as measured before Cetrotide) the patient is defined as "Cetrotide hyper-responder" | 24 hours after first administration of Cetrotide. |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
1. The patient is eligible for IVF and will be treated according to the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) and routine practice in participating centres.
2. The patient must be willing and able to comply with the protocol for the duration of the study.
3. The patient has given written informed consent with the understanding that the consent may be withdrawn by her at any time without prejudice for her future medical care.
4. Must be hyper-responder to antagonist according definition
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Women Health Center, Maccabi Health Services | Haifa | Israel |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25452708 | Derived | Kol S. Individualized Treatment from Theory to Practice: The Private Case of Adding LH during GnRH Antagonist-based Stimulation Protocol. Clin Med Insights Reprod Health. 2014 Oct 14;8:59-64. doi: 10.4137/CMRH.S17788. eCollection 2014. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007246 | Infertility |
| D007247 | Infertility, Female |
| D007248 | Infertility, Male |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D005831 | Genital Diseases, Female |
| D052776 | Female Urogenital Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D037101 | Luteinizing Hormone, beta Subunit |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007986 | Luteinizing Hormone |
| D006065 | Gonadotropins, Pituitary |
| D006062 | Gonadotropins |
| D036361 | Peptide Hormones |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| D005261 | Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications |
| D005832 | Genital Diseases, Male |
| D052801 | Male Urogenital Diseases |
| D006728 |
| Hormones |
| D006730 | Hormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone Antagonists |
| D010908 | Pituitary Hormones, Anterior |
| D010907 | Pituitary Hormones |
| D010455 | Peptides |
| D000602 | Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins |