Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This project seeks to elucidate the mechanisms by which antidepressant medications have limited efficacy in Late Life Depression (LLD) in order to develop new treatment interventions for this prevalent and disabling illness. Investigators hypothesize that the presence of executive dysfunction (ED),which is common in depressed adults over 60, impairs the ability to form appropriate expectancies of improvement with antidepressant treatment. Greater expectancy has been shown to improve antidepressant treatment outcome and is hypothesized to be a primary mechanism of placebo effects. Moreover, white matter hyperintensities (WMH) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are more prevalent in patients with LLD compared to healthy controls. It has been argued that WMH contribute to the pathogenesis of LLD with ED and decrease the efficacy of antidepressant medications by disrupting connections between prefrontal cortical (PFC) and subcortical structures. Vascular lesions to white matter tracts may also compromise the pathway by which expectancy-based placebo effects influence depressive symptoms. Expectancies reflect activation in PFC areas that may improve depressive symptoms by modulating the activity of subcortical regions subserving negative affective systems (i.e., amygdala) as well as those important in reward and hedonic capacity (nucleus accumbens and ventral striatum). Thus, LLD patients with ED and WMH may sustain a "double-hit" to their ability to experience placebo effects in antidepressant treatments: ED diminishes the ability to generate appropriate treatment expectancies, while WMH disrupt the physiologic pathways by which expectancies lead to improvement in depressive symptoms.
To determine whether decreased antidepressant medication response in LLD patients with ED and WMH is caused by a loss of expectancy effects, Investigators will evaluate 130 outpatients with LLD at baseline to determine their degree of ED (interference score on Stroop Color-Word Test), WMH burden (severity score on Fazekas modified Coffey Rating Scale derived from anatomical MRI), and white matter tract integrity (using diffusion tensor imaging [DTI]). Building on work from the investigators K23 Award, the investigator will manipulate participants' expectancy of improvement in an 8-week duration antidepressant trial by randomizing patients between open administration of escitalopram (i.e., high expectancy) and placebo-controlled administration of escitalopram (i.e., low expectancy). The difference in antidepressant response observed between open and placebo-controlled medication treatment is a measure of the expectancy contribution to outcome, which is substantial in younger depressed adults but investigators hypothesize this will be diminished in LLD patients with ED and WMH.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Double Blind-Placebo | Placebo Comparator | Blinded treatment with placebo, one pill a day. If after the 4 weeks, the patient has not remitted, they will be increased to 2 pills a day. |
|
| Double Blind-Escitalopram | Active Comparator | Blinded treatment with either escitalopram 10mg, increased to escitalopram 20mg at week 4 if depression has not remitted. |
|
| Open Treatment with Escitalopram | Active Comparator | Open treatment with 10mg of escitalopram, increased to 20mg if depression has not remitted at week 4. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Escitalopram | Drug | Escitalopram is an antidepressant of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) class. It is FDA approved for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) in adults and children over 12 years of age. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) | Our target is depressive symptomatology as measured by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD). The HRSD is a 24-item questionnaire used as an indication of depression and a guide to evaluate recovery. Total scores range from 0-74, not including atypical symptoms sub-scale. A score of 16 or above is typically considered to indicate the presence of depressive symptoms. Higher scores indicate greater severity. | Baseline |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) | Our target is depressive symptomatology as measured by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD). The HRSD is a 24-item questionnaire used as an indication of depression and a guide to evaluate recovery. Total scores range from 0-74, not including atypical symptoms sub-scale. A score of 16 or above is typically considered to indicate the presence of depressive symptoms. Higher scores indicate greater severity. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Bret Rutherford, MD | New York State Psychiatric Institute | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New York State Psychiatric Institute | New York | New York | 10032 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 32919398 | Derived | Wengler K, Ashinoff BK, Pueraro E, Cassidy CM, Horga G, Rutherford BR. Association between neuromelanin-sensitive MRI signal and psychomotor slowing in late-life depression. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2021 Jun;46(7):1233-1239. doi: 10.1038/s41386-020-00860-z. Epub 2020 Sep 12. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Rutherford BR, Roose SP. A Model of Placebo Response in Antidepressant Clinical Trials. Am J Psychiatry. 2013 Jan 15. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12040474. \[Epub ahead of print\] PubMed PMID: 23318413 | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
138 subjects signed consent, 108 were randomized to one of the 3 arms therefore they cannot be classified to any of the below arms.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Double Blind-Placebo Group | Blinded treatment with placebo, one pill a day. If after the 4 weeks, the patient has not remitted, they will be increased to 2 pills a day. |
| FG001 | Double Blind-Escitalopram Group | Blinded treatment with escitalopram 10mg increased to escitalopram 20mg or placebo at week 4 if depression has not remitted Escitalopram: Escitalopram is an antidepressant of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) class. It is FDA approved for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) in adults and children over 12 years of age. |
| FG002 | Open Treatment With Escitalopram | Open treatment with 10mg of escitalopram, increased to 20mg if depression has not remitted at week 4. Escitalopram: Escitalopram is an antidepressant of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) class. It is FDA approved for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) in adults and children over 12 years of age. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Although 138 subjects were enrolled (signed consent), only 108 were randomized and included in analysis.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Placebo | Blinded treatment with placebo. Placebo oral tablet: Inert substance or treatment which is designed to have no therapeutic value but resemble the active medication in this study |
| BG001 | Escitalopram |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Customized | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) | Our target is depressive symptomatology as measured by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD). The HRSD is a 24-item questionnaire used as an indication of depression and a guide to evaluate recovery. Total scores range from 0-74, not including atypical symptoms sub-scale. A score of 16 or above is typically considered to indicate the presence of depressive symptoms. Higher scores indicate greater severity. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline |
|
Adverse events were collected through the 8 week period of the study.
Adverse events were collected during weekly visit with the patients.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Double Blind-Placebo Group | Blinded treatment with placebo, 1 pill a day for 4 weeks. At week 4, if patients have not remitted, they were increased to 2 pills a day. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fall | Nervous system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bret R. Rutherford | New York State Psychiatric Institute | 6467748660 | bret.rutherford@nyspi.columbia.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Aug 22, 2019 | Mar 7, 2020 | Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Feb 5, 2013 | Mar 20, 2020 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003865 | Depressive Disorder, Major |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003866 | Depressive Disorder |
| D019964 | Mood Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000089983 | Escitalopram |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011437 | Propylamines |
| D000588 | Amines |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D009570 | Nitriles |
| D001572 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Placebo oral tablet | Drug | Inert substance or treatment which is designed to have no therapeutic value but resemble the active medication in this study |
|
|
| Week 8 |
| Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms (QIDS-SR) | QIDS-SR is a 16 item scale self-report form that was used to measure depression outcomes. This self-report is valuable in this study, because it is less susceptible to clinician and rater bias. The QIDS-SR has been increasingly used in antidepressant studies due to its equivalent weightings for each symptom item, clearly understandable anchor points, and inclusion of all DSM criteria for depression. The scores range from 0-27 with 27 being worse depressive symptoms. | Baseline |
| Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms (QIDS-SR) | QIDS-SR is a 16 item scale self-report form that was used to measure depression outcomes. This self-report is valuable in this study, because it is less susceptible to clinician and rater bias. The QIDS-SR has been increasingly used in antidepressant studies due to its equivalent weightings for each symptom item, clearly understandable anchor points, and inclusion of all DSM criteria for depression. The scores range from 0-27 with 27 being worse depressive symptoms. | Week 8 |
| Credibility and Expectancy Scale-Better (CES) | CES is an 8 item scale in which subjects rate their impression of the credibility of the treatment and how they estimate their expectation of improvement. The CES is the most widely used measure of expectancy and has demonstrated good psychometric properties in multiple studies. Question 2 ('Better') asks the patient the chances of their depression being completely better at the end of this study, from 1 = very poor to 7 = very good. The higher the number, the higher the expectancy that they will be better. | Pre-Baseline |
| Credibility and Expectancy Scale-Better (CES) | CES is an 8 item scale in which subjects rate their impression of the credibility of the treatment and how they estimate their expectation of improvement. The CES is the most widely used measure of expectancy and has demonstrated good psychometric properties in multiple studies. Question 2 ('Better') asks the patient the chances of their depression being completely better at the end of this study, from 1 = very poor to 7 = very good. The higher the number, the higher the expectancy that they will be better. | Week 0 |
| Credibility and Expectancy Scale-Depression | CES is an 8 item scale in which subjects rate their impression of the credibility of the treatment and how they estimate their expectation of improvement. The CES is the most widely used measure of expectancy and has demonstrated good psychometric properties in multiple studies. CES question 3 ('Depression') asks how the patient's depression will be at the end of the study, compared with now, from 1 = much worse to 7= much better. The higher the number, the higher the expectancy that their depression will be much better. | Pre-baseline |
| Credibility and Expectancy Scale-Depression | CES is an 8 item scale in which subjects rate their impression of the credibility of the treatment and how they estimate their expectation of improvement. The CES is the most widely used measure of expectancy and has demonstrated good psychometric properties in multiple studies. CES question 3 ('Depression') asks how the patient's depression will be at the end of the study, compared with now, from 1 = much worse to 7= much better. The higher the number, the higher the expectancy that their depression will be much better. | Week 0 |
| Quick Inventory of Depression Scale (QIDS-SR): Expectancy | This 16-items assessment is used to rate the 9 criterion symptom domains of a major depressive episode: 4 items are used to rate sleep disturbance (early, middle, and late insomnia plus hypersomnia); 2 items are used to rate psychomotor disturbance (agitation and retardation); 4 items are used to rate appetite/weight disturbance (appetite increase or decrease and weight increase or decrease). Only 1 item is used to rate the remaining 6 domains (depressed mood, decreased interest, decreased energy, worthlessness/guilt, concentration/decision making, and suicidal ideation). Each item is rated 0-3. For symptom domains that require more than 1 item, the highest score of the item relevant for each domain is taken. The total score ranges from 0-27. A lower rating indicates higher expectancy of improvement and lower expectation of depressive symptomatology, and a higher rating indicates lower expectancy of improvement, higher expectation of depression. | Pre-Baseline |
| Quick Inventory of Depression Scale (QIDS-SR): Expectancy | This 16-items assessment is used to rate the 9 criterion symptom domains of a major depressive episode: 4 items are used to rate sleep disturbance (early, middle, and late insomnia plus hypersomnia); 2 items are used to rate psychomotor disturbance (agitation and retardation); 4 items are used to rate appetite/weight disturbance (appetite increase or decrease and weight increase or decrease). Only 1 item is used to rate the remaining 6 domains (depressed mood, decreased interest, decreased energy, worthlessness/guilt, concentration/decision making, and suicidal ideation). Each item is rated 0-3. For symptom domains that require more than 1 item, the highest score of the item relevant for each domain is taken. The total score ranges from 0-27. A lower rating indicates higher expectancy of improvement and lower expectation of depressive symptomatology, and a higher rating indicates lower expectancy of improvement, higher expectation of depression. | Week 0 |
| Executive Dysfunction: Stroop Color Word | Stroop Color Word test asks patients to name the color of a word rather than reading the word. Stroop Color Word is how many colors they can name in 45 sec (higher is better, e.g., less executive dysfunction). | Pre-Baseline |
| Executive Dysfunction: Stroop Interference | The Stroop is a measure of inhibition under distracting conditions that is sensitive to frontal lobe dysfunction. in Stroop Color Word test patients are to name the color of a word rather than reading the word. Stroop Color Word is how many colors they can name in 45 sec (higher is better, e.g., less executive dysfunction). Stroop Interference is this score adjusted for age and education. | Pre-Baseline |
| White Matter Hyperintensity (WMH) Outcome- Total WMH | Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Brain was acquired. We rated the severity of WMH on axial T2 FLAIR images using the Fazekas modified Coffey Rating Scale. Deep WMH are scored as 0 (absent), 1 (punctate foci), 2 (beginning confluence of foci), and 3 (large confluent areas); subcortical gray matter HIs (basal ganglia) are scored as 0 (absent), 1 (punctate), 2 (multipunctate), and 3 (diffuse); periventricular HIs are scored as 0 (absent), 1 (caps), 2 (smooth halo), and 3 (irregular and extending into the deep white matter). Our primary measure of WMH burden will be DWMH score, which has been used to establish the only empirically validated diagnostic criteria for vascular depression, where scores of 0-1 were normal, but 2-3 indicated WHM. | Pre-Baseline |
Blinded treatment with either escitalopram, increased to escitalopram 20mg or placebo at week 4 if depression has not remitted
Escitalopram: Escitalopram is an antidepressant of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) class. It is FDA approved for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) in adults and children over 12 years of age.
| BG002 | Open Treatment With Escitalopram | Open treatment with 10mg of escitalopram, increased to 20mg if depression has not remitted at week 4. Escitalopram: Escitalopram is an antidepressant of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) class. It is FDA approved for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) in adults and children over 12 years of age. |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Number | participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) | Our target is depressive symptomatology as measured by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD). The HRSD is a 24-item questionnaire used as an indication of depression and a guide to evaluate recovery. Total scores range from 0-74, not including atypical symptoms sub-scale. A score of 16 or above is typically considered to indicate the presence of depressive symptoms. Higher scores indicate greater severity. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
Blinded treatment with escitalopram 10mg, increased to escitalopram 20mg at week 4 if depression has not remitted Escitalopram: Escitalopram is an antidepressant of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) class. It is FDA approved for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) in adults and children over 12 years of age. |
| OG002 | Open Treatment With Escitalopram | Open treatment with 10mg of escitalopram, increased to 20mg if depression has not remitted at week 4. Escitalopram: Escitalopram is an antidepressant of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) class. It is FDA approved for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) in adults and children over 12 years of age. |
|
|
| Secondary | Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) | Our target is depressive symptomatology as measured by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD). The HRSD is a 24-item questionnaire used as an indication of depression and a guide to evaluate recovery. Total scores range from 0-74, not including atypical symptoms sub-scale. A score of 16 or above is typically considered to indicate the presence of depressive symptoms. Higher scores indicate greater severity. | Although 138 subjects were enrolled (signed consent) and 108 were randomized, only 99 completed the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) at week 8. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Week 8 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms (QIDS-SR) | QIDS-SR is a 16 item scale self-report form that was used to measure depression outcomes. This self-report is valuable in this study, because it is less susceptible to clinician and rater bias. The QIDS-SR has been increasingly used in antidepressant studies due to its equivalent weightings for each symptom item, clearly understandable anchor points, and inclusion of all DSM criteria for depression. The scores range from 0-27 with 27 being worse depressive symptoms. | 138 subjects were consented, of which 108 were randomized, however only 107 completed baseline Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms (QIDS-SR). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms (QIDS-SR) | QIDS-SR is a 16 item scale self-report form that was used to measure depression outcomes. This self-report is valuable in this study, because it is less susceptible to clinician and rater bias. The QIDS-SR has been increasingly used in antidepressant studies due to its equivalent weightings for each symptom item, clearly understandable anchor points, and inclusion of all DSM criteria for depression. The scores range from 0-27 with 27 being worse depressive symptoms. | 138 subjects were consented, of which 108 were randomized, however only 99 completed week 8 Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms (QIDS-SR). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Week 8 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Credibility and Expectancy Scale-Better (CES) | CES is an 8 item scale in which subjects rate their impression of the credibility of the treatment and how they estimate their expectation of improvement. The CES is the most widely used measure of expectancy and has demonstrated good psychometric properties in multiple studies. Question 2 ('Better') asks the patient the chances of their depression being completely better at the end of this study, from 1 = very poor to 7 = very good. The higher the number, the higher the expectancy that they will be better. | 138 subjects were consented, of which 108 were randomized, however only 101 completed pre-baseline Credibility and Expectancy Scale-Better (CES). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Pre-Baseline |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Credibility and Expectancy Scale-Better (CES) | CES is an 8 item scale in which subjects rate their impression of the credibility of the treatment and how they estimate their expectation of improvement. The CES is the most widely used measure of expectancy and has demonstrated good psychometric properties in multiple studies. Question 2 ('Better') asks the patient the chances of their depression being completely better at the end of this study, from 1 = very poor to 7 = very good. The higher the number, the higher the expectancy that they will be better. | 138 subjects were consented, of which 108 were randomized, however only 106 completed week 0 Credibility and Expectancy Scale-Better (CES). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Week 0 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Credibility and Expectancy Scale-Depression | CES is an 8 item scale in which subjects rate their impression of the credibility of the treatment and how they estimate their expectation of improvement. The CES is the most widely used measure of expectancy and has demonstrated good psychometric properties in multiple studies. CES question 3 ('Depression') asks how the patient's depression will be at the end of the study, compared with now, from 1 = much worse to 7= much better. The higher the number, the higher the expectancy that their depression will be much better. | 138 subjects were consented, of which 108 were randomized, however only 101 completed pre-baseline Credibility and Expectancy Scale-Depression. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Pre-baseline |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Credibility and Expectancy Scale-Depression | CES is an 8 item scale in which subjects rate their impression of the credibility of the treatment and how they estimate their expectation of improvement. The CES is the most widely used measure of expectancy and has demonstrated good psychometric properties in multiple studies. CES question 3 ('Depression') asks how the patient's depression will be at the end of the study, compared with now, from 1 = much worse to 7= much better. The higher the number, the higher the expectancy that their depression will be much better. | 138 subjects were consented, of which 108 were randomized, however only 106 completed week 0 Credibility and Expectancy Scale-Depression. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Week 0 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Quick Inventory of Depression Scale (QIDS-SR): Expectancy | This 16-items assessment is used to rate the 9 criterion symptom domains of a major depressive episode: 4 items are used to rate sleep disturbance (early, middle, and late insomnia plus hypersomnia); 2 items are used to rate psychomotor disturbance (agitation and retardation); 4 items are used to rate appetite/weight disturbance (appetite increase or decrease and weight increase or decrease). Only 1 item is used to rate the remaining 6 domains (depressed mood, decreased interest, decreased energy, worthlessness/guilt, concentration/decision making, and suicidal ideation). Each item is rated 0-3. For symptom domains that require more than 1 item, the highest score of the item relevant for each domain is taken. The total score ranges from 0-27. A lower rating indicates higher expectancy of improvement and lower expectation of depressive symptomatology, and a higher rating indicates lower expectancy of improvement, higher expectation of depression. | 138 subjects were consented, of which 108 were randomized, however only 101 completed pre-baseline Quick Inventory of Depression Scale (QIDS-SR): Expectancy. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Pre-Baseline |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Quick Inventory of Depression Scale (QIDS-SR): Expectancy | This 16-items assessment is used to rate the 9 criterion symptom domains of a major depressive episode: 4 items are used to rate sleep disturbance (early, middle, and late insomnia plus hypersomnia); 2 items are used to rate psychomotor disturbance (agitation and retardation); 4 items are used to rate appetite/weight disturbance (appetite increase or decrease and weight increase or decrease). Only 1 item is used to rate the remaining 6 domains (depressed mood, decreased interest, decreased energy, worthlessness/guilt, concentration/decision making, and suicidal ideation). Each item is rated 0-3. For symptom domains that require more than 1 item, the highest score of the item relevant for each domain is taken. The total score ranges from 0-27. A lower rating indicates higher expectancy of improvement and lower expectation of depressive symptomatology, and a higher rating indicates lower expectancy of improvement, higher expectation of depression. | 138 subjects were consented, of which 108 were randomized, however only 107 completed week 0 Quick Inventory of Depression Scale (QIDS-SR): Expectancy. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Week 0 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Executive Dysfunction: Stroop Color Word | Stroop Color Word test asks patients to name the color of a word rather than reading the word. Stroop Color Word is how many colors they can name in 45 sec (higher is better, e.g., less executive dysfunction). | 138 subjects were consented, of which 108 were randomized, however only 106 completed pre-baseline Executive Dysfunction: Stroop Color Word. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | correct items | Pre-Baseline |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Executive Dysfunction: Stroop Interference | The Stroop is a measure of inhibition under distracting conditions that is sensitive to frontal lobe dysfunction. in Stroop Color Word test patients are to name the color of a word rather than reading the word. Stroop Color Word is how many colors they can name in 45 sec (higher is better, e.g., less executive dysfunction). Stroop Interference is this score adjusted for age and education. | 138 subjects were consented, of which 108 were randomized, however only 105 completed pre-baseline Executive Dysfunction: Stroop Interference. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | correct items | Pre-Baseline |
|
|
|
| Secondary | White Matter Hyperintensity (WMH) Outcome- Total WMH | Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Brain was acquired. We rated the severity of WMH on axial T2 FLAIR images using the Fazekas modified Coffey Rating Scale. Deep WMH are scored as 0 (absent), 1 (punctate foci), 2 (beginning confluence of foci), and 3 (large confluent areas); subcortical gray matter HIs (basal ganglia) are scored as 0 (absent), 1 (punctate), 2 (multipunctate), and 3 (diffuse); periventricular HIs are scored as 0 (absent), 1 (caps), 2 (smooth halo), and 3 (irregular and extending into the deep white matter). Our primary measure of WMH burden will be DWMH score, which has been used to establish the only empirically validated diagnostic criteria for vascular depression, where scores of 0-1 were normal, but 2-3 indicated WHM. | 138 subjects signed consent and 108 were randomized, however not all participants underwent MRI scanning. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Pre-Baseline |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 8 |
| 0 |
| 8 |
| 0 |
| 8 |
| EG001 | Double Blind-Escitalopram Group | Blinded treatment with either escitalopram 10mg, increased to escitalopram 20mg at week 4 if depression has not remitted Escitalopram: Escitalopram is an antidepressant of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) class. It is FDA approved for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) in adults and children over 12 years of age. | 0 | 51 | 2 | 51 | 0 | 51 |
| EG002 | Open Treatment With Escitalopram | Open treatment with 10mg of escitalopram, increased to 20mg if depression has not remitted at week 4. Escitalopram: Escitalopram is an antidepressant of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) class. It is FDA approved for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) in adults and children over 12 years of age. | 0 | 49 | 1 | 49 | 0 | 49 |
| Chest Pain | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Benzofurans |
| D006574 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring |
| D000072471 | Heterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |