Prospective Randomized Multicenter Study Comparing Immediate Multivessel Revascularization by PCI Versus Culprit Lesion PCI With Staged Non-culprit Lesion Revascularization in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Prospective Randomized Multicenter Study Comparing Immediate Multivessel Revascularization by PCI Versus Culprit Lesion PCI With Staged Non-culprit Lesion Revascularization in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
The study compares the therapies of instant multivessel balloon angioplasty plus stent implantation or the balloon angioplasty plus stent implantation of the infarct artery alone with any possible graduated later treatment of the other vessels in patients with acute myocardial infarction with cardioganic shock.
The main study hypothesis is to explore if culprit vessel only PCI with potentially subsequent staged revascularization in comparison to immediate multivessel revascularization by PCI in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction reduces the incidence of 30- day mortality and/or severe renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy.
Inclusion Criteria:
Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction (STEMI or NSTEMI) with obligatory:
I) Planned early revascularization by PCI II) Multivessel coronary artery disease defined as more than 70% stenosis in at least 2 major vessels (more than 2 mm diameter) with identifiable culprit lesion III)
a) Altered mental status b) Cold, clammy skin and extremities c) Oliguria with urine output less than 30 ml/h d) Serum-lactate more than 2.0 mmol/l VI) Informed consent
Exclusion Criteria: