Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-001213-12 | EudraCT Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| PPD Development, LP | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study is being conducted to compare the safety and efficacy of icatibant with placebo in the treatment for Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor (ACE-I)-Induced Angioedema in Adults.
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-Is) are the class of medications prescribed most frequently for the treatment of hypertension. They are also used post myocardial infarction as well as in patients with heart failure, diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease. Approximately 35 to 40 million patients are on ACE-Is worldwide.
Study HGT-FIR-096 is a multicenter, Phase III, randomized, double-blind, two-armed, placebo-controlled trial. The study population will consist of 118 adult patients, 18 years of age or older, who present with an acute ACE-I-induced angioedema attack. The primary aim of the study is to demonstrate that icatibant is significantly more effective than placebo in resolving attacks of angioedema caused by ACE-I based on the Time to Meeting Discharge Criteria (TMDC). Safety and tolerability, as well as the pharmacokinetics (PK), of icatibant will also be evaluated. Eligible patients will be randomized at a 1:1 ratio to receive a single sub-cutaneous injection of either 30 mg icatibant or placebo.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Icatibant | Experimental | Icatibant at a dose of 30 mg will be administered as a single subcutaneous injection |
|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | Placebo will be administered as a single subcutaneous injection |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Icatibant | Drug | Single dose of 30 mg icatibant administered within 12 hours of the onset of an acute attack of ACE-I-induced angioedema |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Time to Meeting Discharge Criteria (TMDC) | TMDC was based on the investigator-assessed angioedema-associated upper airway symptom assessments. It was calculated from the time of study drug administration to the earliest time point at which the symptoms of difficulty breathing and difficulty swallowing were absent and the symptoms of voice change and tongue swelling were mild or absent and all subsequent assessments continued to satisfy these conditions. These symptoms were evaluated by the investigator using a 5-point grading scale (0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, and 4=very severe). TMDC was analysed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. | Day 0 up to Day 5 |
| Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) | An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. TEAEs were defined as adverse events/serious adverse events that started or worsened after the study drug treatment. | From start of study drug administration (Day 0) up to follow-up (Day 5) |
| Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Injection Site Reaction | Injection site reaction included erythema, swelling, cutaneous pain, burning sensation, itching and warm sensation | Day 0 to Day 5 |
| Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Laboratory Evaluation, Vital Signs, Electrocardiogram (ECG) and Physical Examination | During laboratory evaluation, serum chemistry and hematology blood tests, and urinalysis were performed. Vital signs parameters included evaluation of pulse rate and systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Standard 12-lead ECGs were performed and ECG recordings were read locally at the study site by a cardiologist. Physical examination was performed with examination of major body systems per routine clinical practice. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Time to Onset of Symptom Relief (TOSR) | TOSR was calculated for the individual symptoms with pre-treatment scores of 2 (moderate) or more improved by at least 1 severity grade and the individual symptoms with pretreatment scores of 0 or 1 (absent or mild) were scored again at 0 or 1 and all the subsequent assessments continued to satisfy this condition. Time-to-event data were summarized using Kaplan-Meier estimates. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve (AUC) of Icatibant and Its Metabolites (M1 and M2) | Area under the plasma concentration-time curve of Icatibant and its metabolites (M1 and M2) were analyzed. A population pharmacokinetic analysis approach using sparse pharmacokinetic sampling obtained from a subset of subjects was used to evaluate exposure to icatibant. | 0.75 and 2 hours post-dose |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Patient has a diagnosis of angioedema of other etiology (eg, hereditary or acquired angioedema, allergic angioedema [eg, food, insect bite or sting, evident clinical response to antihistamines and/or corticosteroids], anaphylaxis, trauma, abscess or infection or associated disease, local inflammation, local tumor, post-operative or post-radiogenic edema, salivary gland disorders, other [non-ACE inhibitor] drug-induced angioedema).
Patients with a family history of recurrent angioedema.
Patients who have had a previous episode(s) of angioedema while not on ACE inhibitor therapy.
Patients with acute urticaria (itchy, erythematous wheals).
Patients who have an intervention to support the airway (eg, intubation, tracheotomy, cricothyrotomy) due to the current attack of angioedema.
Patient has any of the following vascular conditions that, in the judgment of the investigator, would be a contraindication to participation in the study.
Patient has a serious or acute condition or illness that, in the judgment of the investigator, would interfere with evaluating the safety and/or efficacy assessments of the study (eg, a condition or illness requiring hemodialysis).
Patient is pregnant or breast feeding.
Patient has participated in another investigational study in the past 30 days.
Patient is unable to understand the nature, scope, and possible consequences of the protocol, or is unlikely or unable to comply with the protocol assessments, or is unlikely to complete the study for any reason.
Patients who are not suitable for the study in the opinion of the investigator.
Patient has experienced hypersensitivity to the active substance of the investigational product or to any of its excipients.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Study Director | Takeda | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of California San Diego Medical Center | La Jolla | California | 92037 | United States | ||
| University of California San Diego |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28552382 | Result | Sinert R, Levy P, Bernstein JA, Body R, Sivilotti MLA, Moellman J, Schranz J, Baptista J, Kimura A, Nothaft W; CAMEO study group. Randomized Trial of Icatibant for Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor-Induced Upper Airway Angioedema. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 Sep-Oct;5(5):1402-1409.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.03.003. Epub 2017 May 25. |
Not provided
Not provided
Overall 121 participants were randomized, of which 118 received the study medication, and 117 completed the study.
The study was conducted at 59 sites in the United States, United Kingdom, Israel and Canada.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Icatibant 30 mg | Participants received a single dose of icatibant 30 milligram (mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection within 12 hours after the onset of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I) induced angioedema attack. |
| FG001 | Placebo |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Placebo | Drug |
|
| Day 0 to Day 5 |
| Day 0 up to Day 5 |
| Number of Participants Experienced Airway Intervention Due to ACE-I-induced Angioedema | Airway Intervention included intubation, tracheotomy, cricothyrotomy. | Day 0 up to Day 5 |
| Number of Participants Admitted to Hospital or Intensive Care Unit (ICU) | Number of participants with and without an occurrence of admission to the hospital (inpatient) or ICU post-treatment due to the ACE-I-induced angioedema attack were described. | Day 0 up to Day 5 |
| Number of Participants Experienced ACE-I-induced Angioedema Attack Following Study Drug Administration | Number of participants with the use of conventional medications (corticosteroids, antihistamines, epinephrine) for the treatment of symptoms of the ACE-I- induced angioedema attack following study drug administration were presented. | Day 0 up to Day 5 |
| Percentage of Participants With Time to Meeting Discharge Criteria (TMDC) at Specified Time Points | TMDC was based on the investigator-assessed angioedema-associated upper airway symptom assessments. It was calculated from the time of study drug administration to the earliest time point at which the symptoms of difficulty breathing and difficulty swallowing were absent and the symptoms of voice change and tongue swelling were mild or absent and all subsequent assessments continued to satisfy these conditions. These symptoms were evaluated by the investigator using a 5-point grading scale (0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, and 4=very severe). TMDC was analysed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. | 4, 6, and 8 hours post treatment |
| La Jolla |
| California |
| 92093 |
| United States |
| Washington Hospital Center | Washington D.C. | District of Columbia | 20010 | United States |
| UF Health Shands Hospital | Gainesville | Florida | 32610 | United States |
| Orlando Health | Orlando | Florida | 32806 | United States |
| Tampa General Hospital | Tampa | Florida | 33606 | United States |
| Federal Health Care Center | Chicago | Illinois | 60064-3048 | United States |
| Cook County Hospital | Chicago | Illinois | 60612 | United States |
| University of Kansas Cancer Center | Kansas City | Kansas | 66160 | United States |
| Ochsner Medical Center | New Orleans | Louisiana | 70121 | United States |
| University of Maryland School of Medicine | Baltimore | Maryland | 21201 | United States |
| Massachusetts General Hospital | Boston | Massachusetts | 02114 | United States |
| Brigham and Womens Hospital | Boston | Massachusetts | 02115 | United States |
| Baystate Medical Center | Springfield | Massachusetts | 01199 | United States |
| Detroit Receiving Hospital and University Health Center | Detroit | Michigan | 48201 | United States |
| Sinai Grace Hospital | Detroit | Michigan | 48201 | United States |
| Henry Ford Health System | Detroit | Michigan | 48202 | United States |
| William Beaumont Hospital | Royal Oak | Michigan | 48073 | United States |
| William Beaumont Hospital | Troy | Michigan | 48085 | United States |
| Hennepin County Medical Center | Minneapolis | Minnesota | 55415 | United States |
| Barnes Jewish Hospital | St Louis | Missouri | 63110 | United States |
| Washington University | St Louis | Missouri | 63141 | United States |
| Inspira Health Network | Vineland | New Jersey | 08360 | United States |
| University of New Mexico | Albuquerque | New Mexico | 87106 | United States |
| Kings County Hospital Center | Brooklyn | New York | 11203 | United States |
| SUNY Downstate Medical Center | Brooklyn | New York | 11203 | United States |
| Weill Medical College of Cornell University | New York | New York | 10021 | United States |
| East Carolina University | Greenville | North Carolina | 27835 | United States |
| University of Cincinnati | Cincinnati | Ohio | 45219 | United States |
| Cleveland Clinic Foundation | Cleveland | Ohio | 44195 | United States |
| Ohio State University Hospital - East | Gahanna | Ohio | 43230 | United States |
| Summit Health | Chambersburg | Pennsylvania | 17201 | United States |
| Hahnemann University Hospital | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19102 | United States |
| Temple University Hospital | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19140 | United States |
| Albert Einstein Medical Center | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19141 | United States |
| Allegheny General Hospital | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | 15143 | United States |
| Rhode Island Hospital | Providence | Rhode Island | 02903 | United States |
| University of South Carolina School of Medicine | Columbia | South Carolina | 29203 | United States |
| Baylor University Medical Center | Dallas | Texas | 75246 | United States |
| John Peter Smith Hospital | Fort Worth | Texas | 76104 | United States |
| University of Texas Medical Branch | Galveston | Texas | 77555-0561 | United States |
| Baylor College of Medicine | Houston | Texas | 77030 | United States |
| University of Virginia | Charlottesville | Virginia | 22903 | United States |
| Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Center | Halifax | Nova Scotia | B3H 3A7 | Canada |
| Kingston General Hospital | Kingston | Ontario | K7L 2V7 | Canada |
| Hotel Dieu Hospital | Kingston | Ontario | K7L 5G2 | Canada |
| Soroka University Medical Center | Beersheba | 84101 | Israel |
| Bnai Zion Medical Center | Haifa | 31048 | Israel |
| Ziv Medical Center | Safed | 13100 | Israel |
| Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center | Tel Aviv | 64239 | Israel |
| Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust | Brighton | BN2 5BE | United Kingdom |
| Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital NHS Trust | Exeter | EX2 5DW | United Kingdom |
| University Hospital Aintree | Liverpool | L9 7AL | United Kingdom |
| Manchester Royal Infirmary | Manchester | M13 9WL | United Kingdom |
| Queen's Medical Centre | Nottingham | NG7 2UH | United Kingdom |
Participants received a single dose of placebo matched to icatibant SC injection within 12 hours after the onset of the ACE-I induced angioedema attack. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Icatibant 30 mg | Participants received a single dose of icatibant 30 mg SC injection within 12 hours after the onset of the ACE-I induced angioedema attack. |
| BG001 | Placebo | Participants received a single dose of placebo matched to icatibant SC injection within 12 hours after the onset of the ACE-I induced angioedema attack. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Age was calculated as the difference between date of birth and date of informed consent, rounded to 1 decimal place. | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| ||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Time to Meeting Discharge Criteria (TMDC) | TMDC was based on the investigator-assessed angioedema-associated upper airway symptom assessments. It was calculated from the time of study drug administration to the earliest time point at which the symptoms of difficulty breathing and difficulty swallowing were absent and the symptoms of voice change and tongue swelling were mild or absent and all subsequent assessments continued to satisfy these conditions. These symptoms were evaluated by the investigator using a 5-point grading scale (0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, and 4=very severe). TMDC was analysed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. | Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants. | Posted | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | days | Day 0 up to Day 5 |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) | An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. TEAEs were defined as adverse events/serious adverse events that started or worsened after the study drug treatment. | Safety population included all participants who received the study drug. | Posted | Number | participants | From start of study drug administration (Day 0) up to follow-up (Day 5) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Injection Site Reaction | Injection site reaction included erythema, swelling, cutaneous pain, burning sensation, itching and warm sensation | Safety population. | Posted | Number | participants | Day 0 to Day 5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Laboratory Evaluation, Vital Signs, Electrocardiogram (ECG) and Physical Examination | During laboratory evaluation, serum chemistry and hematology blood tests, and urinalysis were performed. Vital signs parameters included evaluation of pulse rate and systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Standard 12-lead ECGs were performed and ECG recordings were read locally at the study site by a cardiologist. Physical examination was performed with examination of major body systems per routine clinical practice. | Safety population. | Posted | Number | participants | Day 0 to Day 5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Time to Onset of Symptom Relief (TOSR) | TOSR was calculated for the individual symptoms with pre-treatment scores of 2 (moderate) or more improved by at least 1 severity grade and the individual symptoms with pretreatment scores of 0 or 1 (absent or mild) were scored again at 0 or 1 and all the subsequent assessments continued to satisfy this condition. Time-to-event data were summarized using Kaplan-Meier estimates. | ITT population. | Posted | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | days | Day 0 up to Day 5 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants Experienced Airway Intervention Due to ACE-I-induced Angioedema | Airway Intervention included intubation, tracheotomy, cricothyrotomy. | Modified Intent to treat (mITT) population included all randomized participants who received the study drug. | Posted | Number | participants | Day 0 up to Day 5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants Admitted to Hospital or Intensive Care Unit (ICU) | Number of participants with and without an occurrence of admission to the hospital (inpatient) or ICU post-treatment due to the ACE-I-induced angioedema attack were described. | mITT population. | Posted | Number | participants | Day 0 up to Day 5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants Experienced ACE-I-induced Angioedema Attack Following Study Drug Administration | Number of participants with the use of conventional medications (corticosteroids, antihistamines, epinephrine) for the treatment of symptoms of the ACE-I- induced angioedema attack following study drug administration were presented. | mITT population. | Posted | Number | participants | Day 0 up to Day 5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Time to Meeting Discharge Criteria (TMDC) at Specified Time Points | TMDC was based on the investigator-assessed angioedema-associated upper airway symptom assessments. It was calculated from the time of study drug administration to the earliest time point at which the symptoms of difficulty breathing and difficulty swallowing were absent and the symptoms of voice change and tongue swelling were mild or absent and all subsequent assessments continued to satisfy these conditions. These symptoms were evaluated by the investigator using a 5-point grading scale (0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, and 4=very severe). TMDC was analysed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. | mITT population. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 4, 6, and 8 hours post treatment |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve (AUC) of Icatibant and Its Metabolites (M1 and M2) | Area under the plasma concentration-time curve of Icatibant and its metabolites (M1 and M2) were analyzed. A population pharmacokinetic analysis approach using sparse pharmacokinetic sampling obtained from a subset of subjects was used to evaluate exposure to icatibant. | PK analysis population. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | hours*nanogram per milliliter (h*ng/mL) | 0.75 and 2 hours post-dose |
|
|
From start of study treatment up to Day 5
Injection site reactions were reported separately from general reports of adverse events as they were considered as adverse events of special interest.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Icatibant 30 mg | Participants received a single dose of icatibant 30 mg SC injection within 12 hours after the onset of the ACE-I induced angioedema attack. | 2 | 60 | 14 | 60 | ||
| EG001 | Placebo | Participants received a single dose of placebo matched to icatibant SC injection within 12 hours after the onset of the ACE-I induced angioedema attack. | 1 | 58 | 11 | 58 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hypoxia | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (16.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Laryngeal oedema | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (16.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rash pruritic | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (16.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (16.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (16.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dysphonia | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (16.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyspnoea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (16.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Angioedema | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (16.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
If a multicenter publication is not submitted within twelve (12) months after conclusion, abandonment or termination of the Study at all sites, or after Sponsor confirms there shall be no multicenter Study publication, the Institution and/or such Principal Investigator may publish the results from the Institution site individually.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study Director | Shire | +1 866 842 5335 | ClinicalTransparency@shire.com |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C065679 | icatibant |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
|