Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to evaluate Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy(CRT) response in subjects with concordant versus discordant left ventricular (LV) lead position as compared to the site of latest mechanical activation.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Concordant | |||
| Discordant |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percent of patients with the left ventricle (LV) lead implanted at the site of latest mechanical activation | This outcome measure will be assessed after an off-line analysis immediately after implant |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) as defined by percent change in end-systolic volume (ESV) at 6-month follow-up relative to baseline. | 6 months after implant |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Heart failure patients indicated for a Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) device
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Herzzentrum Leipzig GmbH | Leipzig | 04103 | Germany |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006333 | Heart Failure |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided