Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a multicentre, randomized, assessor-blind, comparator-controlled evaluation of the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of Duac™Once Daily Gel and clindamycin phosphate gel in the topical treatment of mild to moderate facial acne vulgaris. A total of 1020 subjects will be enrolled, 510 per study arm. The subjects will be males and females between 12 and 45 years of age, inclusive, at the time of consent, who have mild to moderate facial acne vulgaris.
Subjects will use Duac™Once Daily Gel (once daily in the evening) or clindamycin phosphate gel twice daily (once in the morning and once in the evening) for 12 weeks. The subjects will be evaluated for change in lesion counts, investigator's static global assessment (ISGA), subject's global assessment (SGA), local tolerability and AEs/SAEs at Weeks0, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 (or at early withdrawal). In addition, quality of life measures will be performed at every study visit.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Duac™Once Daily Gel | Experimental | Subjects will use Duac™Once Daily Gel (once daily in the evening)for 12 weeks. The subjects will be evaluated for change in lesion counts, ISGA, SGA , local tolerability, and AEs/SAEs at Weeks0, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 (or at early withdrawal). In addition, quality of life measures will be performed at every study visit |
|
| 1% clindamycin phosphate gel | Active Comparator | Subjects will use 1% clinidamycin phosphate gel (twice daily in the morning and evening)for 12 weeks. The subjects will be evaluated for change in lesion counts, ISGA, SGA , local tolerability, and AEs/SAEs at Weeks0, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 (or at early withdrawal). In addition, quality of life measures will be performed at every study visit |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duac™Once Daily Gel | Drug | 1% clindamycin as clindamycin phosphate and 5% benzoyl peroxide |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Absolute Change in Total Lesion Count From Baseline to Week 12 | The assessor performed a count of inflammatory lesions (IL) (papules, pustules, nodules, and cysts), non-inflammatory lesions (NIL) (open and closed comedones) and total lesions (the sum of IL and NIL) at each study visit. Lesion counts were confined to the face. Change from Baseline at Week 12 was calculated as the value at Week 12 minus the value at Baseline. Parameters were estimated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with treatment, center, treatment-by-centre interaction and Baseline lesion count in the model. Missing values were imputed using the last observation carried forward (LOCF), i.e., the last available observation was used to estimate subsequent missing data. | Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12 |
| Number of Participants With an Improvement of 2 Grades in the Investigator Static Global Assessment (ISGA) Score From Baseline to Week 12 | ISGA success is defined as the improvement of 2 grades or more in the participant's acne severity scale at Week 12. Acne severity of the participants' face was assessed by the assessor using the ISGA scale, ranging from 0 to 4: 0=clear skin with no ILs or NILs; 1=almost clear: rare NIL with no more than one small IL; 2=mild, some NILs with no more than a few ILs (papules/pustules only, no nodular lesions [NLs]); 3=moderate, up to many NILs and may have some ILs, but no more than one small NL; 4=severe: up to many NILs and ILs, but no more than a few NLs. Missing values were imputed using the LOCF, i.e., the last available observation was used to estimate subsequent missing data. | Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12 |
| Number of Participants With an Improvement of 2 Grades in the Investigator Static Global Assessment (ISGA) Score From Baseline to Week 12 | ISGA success is defined as the improvement of 2 grades or more in the participant's acne severity scale at Week 12. Acne severity of the participants' face was assessed by the assessor using the ISGA scale, ranging from 0 to 4: 0=clear skin with no ILs or NILs; 1=almost clear: rare NIL with no more than one small IL; 2=mild, some NILs with no more than a few ILs (papules/pustules only, no nodular lesions [NLs]); 3=moderate, up to many NILs and may have some ILs, but no more than one small NL; 4=severe: up to many NILs and ILs, but no more than a few NLs. Missing values were imputed using the LOCF, i.e., the last available observation was used to estimate subsequent missing data . |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Absolute Change in Inflammatory Lesion Counts and Non-inflammatory Lesion Counts From Baseline to Week 12 | The assessor performed a count of ILs (papules, pustules, nodules, and cysts), NILs (open and closed comedones at each study visit. Lesion counts were confined to the face. Change from Baseline at Week 12 was calculated as the value at Week 12 minus the value at Baseline. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model was used with terms for Baseline lesion count, treatment, and center. Missing values were imputed using the LOCF, i.e., the last available observation was used to estimate subsequent missing data. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Male and female subjects between 12 and 45 years of age, inclusive age will be calculated by date of birth, from 0 at birth.
Subjects who have:
i. A minimum of 17 but not more than 60 facial inflammatory lesions (papules plus pustules), and no more than 1 facial nodular lesion, with NO cystic lesions.
and ii. A minimum of 20 but not more than 125 facial noninflammatory lesions (open and closed comedones).
Subjects who have an ISGA score of 2 or 3 at Baseline.
Subjects 18 years of age or older must provide written informed consent (according to any local or national authorization requirements). Subjects under the legal age of consent must provide assent and have written informed consent of both the subject and a parent or the legal guardian (according to any local or national authorization requirements).
Subjects who are willing and able to complete the study, to understand and comply with the requirements of the study, abide by the restrictions, apply the medication as instructed, and return for the required study visits.
Subjects who are in good health and free from any clinically significant disease, other than acne vulgaris, that might interfere with the study evaluations.
Female subjects of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test at baseline. Sexually active females of childbearing potential participating in the study must use a medically acceptable method of contraception for at least 6 consecutive months prior to start of study treatment, and must use a medically acceptable method of contraception while receiving protocol-assigned product. A woman of childbearing potential is defined as one who is biologically capable of becoming pregnant; including perimenopausal women who are less than 2 years from their last menses. Medically acceptable contraceptive methods include the following:
Females who are not currently sexually active must agree to use a medically accepted method of contraception should they become sexually active while participating in the study.
Subjects who have been treated with estrogens, androgens, or anti-androgenic agents used for prevention of pregnancy (and not for control of acne) for at least 6 consecutive months prior to the first dose of investigational product may enrol as long as they do not expect to change dose, drug, or discontinue use during the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| GSK Clinical Trials | GlaxoSmithKline | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSK Investigational Site | Guangzhou | Guangdong | 510010 | China | ||
| GSK Investigational Site |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27075705 | Derived | Xu JH, Lu QJ, Huang JH, Hao F, Sun QN, Fang H, Gu J, Dong XQ, Zheng J, Luo D, Li FQ, Wang G, Gu H, Tian HQ, Yang HL, Xi LY, Li M, Zheng M, Wu Y, Tu YT, He YL, Zhao G, Sheng WX, Li J, Hamedani AG. A multicentre, randomized, single-blind comparison of topical clindamycin 1%/benzoyl peroxide 5% once-daily gel versus clindamycin 1% twice-daily gel in the treatment of mild to moderate acne vulgaris in Chinese patients. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2016 Jul;30(7):1176-82. doi: 10.1111/jdv.13622. Epub 2016 Apr 13. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Duac Once Daily Gel | Participants (Par.) topically applied Duac Once Daily Gel (combination of clindamycin phosphate [equivalent to 1% clindamycin] and 5% benzoyl peroxide) in the evening to facial acne for 12 weeks. |
| FG001 | Dalin Gel |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 1% clindamycin phosphate gel | Drug | 1% clindamycin as clindamycin phosphate |
|
| Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12 |
| Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12 |
| Percent Change in Inflammatory, Non-inflammatory and Total Lesion Counts From Baseline to Week 12 | The assessor performed a count of ILs (papules, pustules, nodules, and cysts), NILs (open and closed comedones) and total lesions (the sum of ILs and NILs)at each study visit. Lesion counts were confined to the face. Change from Baseline at Week 12 was calculated as the value at Week 12 minus the value at Baseline. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model was used with terms for Baseline lesion count, treatment, and center. Missing values were imputed using the LOCF, i.e., the last available observation was used to estimate subsequent missing data. | Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12 |
| Number of Participants Who Had an ISGA Score of 0 or 1 at Week 12 | The assessor evaluated the acne severity of the participants' face using the ISGA scale, ranging from 0 to 4: 0=clear skin with no ILs or NILs; 1=almost clear: rare NIL with no more than one small IL; 2=mild, some NILs with no more than a few ILs (papules/pustules only, no nodular lesions [NLs]); 3=moderate, up to many NILs and may have some ILs, but no more than one small NL; 4=severe: up to many NILs and ILs, but no more than a few NLs. Missing values were imputed using the LOCF, i.e., the last available observation was used to estimate subsequent missing data. | Week 12 |
| Guangzhou |
| Guangdong |
| 510080 |
| China |
| GSK Investigational Site | Guangzhou | Guangdong | 510120 | China |
| GSK Investigational Site | Wuhan | Hebei | 430071 | China |
| GSK Investigational Site | Changsha | Hunan | 410011 | China |
| GSK Investigational Site | Changsha | Hunan | 410013 | China |
| GSK Investigational Site | Nanjing | Jiangsu | 210029 | China |
| GSK Investigational Site | Nanjing | Jiangsu | 210042 | China |
| GSK Investigational Site | Changchun | Jilin | 130041 | China |
| GSK Investigational Site | Jinan | Shandong | 250022 | China |
| GSK Investigational Site | Xian | Shanxi | 710032 | China |
| GSK Investigational Site | Hangzhou | Zhejiang | 310003 | China |
| GSK Investigational Site | Hangzhou | Zhejiang | 310009 | China |
| GSK Investigational Site | Beijing | 100020 | China |
| GSK Investigational Site | Beijing | 100034 | China |
| GSK Investigational Site | Beijing | 100036 | China |
| GSK Investigational Site | Beijing | 100730 | China |
| GSK Investigational Site | Chongqing | 400038 | China |
| GSK Investigational Site | Shanghai | 200025 | China |
| GSK Investigational Site | Shanghai | 200032 | China |
| GSK Investigational Site | Shanghai | 200040 | China |
| GSK Investigational Site | Shanghai | 200092 | China |
| GSK Investigational Site | Shanghai | 200433 | China |
| GSK Investigational Site | Wuhan | 430022 | China |
Participants topically applied Dalin Gel (clindamycin phosphate [equivalent to 1% clindamycin]) twice daily (once in the morning and once in the evening) to facial acne for 12 weeks. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Duac Once Daily Gel | Participants (Par.) topically applied Duac Once Daily Gel (combination of clindamycin phosphate [equivalent to 1% clindamycin] and 5% benzoyl peroxide) in the evening to facial acne for 12 weeks. |
| BG001 | Dalin Gel | Participants topically applied Dalin Gel (clindamycin phosphate [equivalent to 1% clindamycin]) twice daily (once in the morning and once in the evening) to facial acne for 12 weeks. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | Years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Gender | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Number | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Absolute Change in Total Lesion Count From Baseline to Week 12 | The assessor performed a count of inflammatory lesions (IL) (papules, pustules, nodules, and cysts), non-inflammatory lesions (NIL) (open and closed comedones) and total lesions (the sum of IL and NIL) at each study visit. Lesion counts were confined to the face. Change from Baseline at Week 12 was calculated as the value at Week 12 minus the value at Baseline. Parameters were estimated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with treatment, center, treatment-by-centre interaction and Baseline lesion count in the model. Missing values were imputed using the last observation carried forward (LOCF), i.e., the last available observation was used to estimate subsequent missing data. | Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study medication. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Change in lesion count | Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12 |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Absolute Change in Total Lesion Count From Baseline to Week 12 | The assessor performed a count of inflammatory lesions (IL) (papules, pustules, nodules, and cysts), non-inflammatory lesions (NIL) (open and closed comedones) and total lesions (the sum of IL and NIL) at each study visit. Lesion counts were confined to the face. Change from Baseline at Week 12 was calculated as the value at Week 12 minus the value at Baseline. Parameters were estimated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with treatment, center, treatment-by-centre interaction and Baseline lesion count in the model. Missing values were imputed using the last observation carried forward (LOCF), i.e., the last available observation was used to estimate subsequent missing data. | Per-Protocol (PP) Population: all participants included in the ITT Population who did not have a noteworthy protocol deviation that influenced effect. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Change in lesion count | Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Number of Participants With an Improvement of 2 Grades in the Investigator Static Global Assessment (ISGA) Score From Baseline to Week 12 | ISGA success is defined as the improvement of 2 grades or more in the participant's acne severity scale at Week 12. Acne severity of the participants' face was assessed by the assessor using the ISGA scale, ranging from 0 to 4: 0=clear skin with no ILs or NILs; 1=almost clear: rare NIL with no more than one small IL; 2=mild, some NILs with no more than a few ILs (papules/pustules only, no nodular lesions [NLs]); 3=moderate, up to many NILs and may have some ILs, but no more than one small NL; 4=severe: up to many NILs and ILs, but no more than a few NLs. Missing values were imputed using the LOCF, i.e., the last available observation was used to estimate subsequent missing data. | ITT Population | Posted | Number | Participants | Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Number of Participants With an Improvement of 2 Grades in the Investigator Static Global Assessment (ISGA) Score From Baseline to Week 12 | ISGA success is defined as the improvement of 2 grades or more in the participant's acne severity scale at Week 12. Acne severity of the participants' face was assessed by the assessor using the ISGA scale, ranging from 0 to 4: 0=clear skin with no ILs or NILs; 1=almost clear: rare NIL with no more than one small IL; 2=mild, some NILs with no more than a few ILs (papules/pustules only, no nodular lesions [NLs]); 3=moderate, up to many NILs and may have some ILs, but no more than one small NL; 4=severe: up to many NILs and ILs, but no more than a few NLs. Missing values were imputed using the LOCF, i.e., the last available observation was used to estimate subsequent missing data . | PP Population | Posted | Number | Participants | Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Absolute Change in Inflammatory Lesion Counts and Non-inflammatory Lesion Counts From Baseline to Week 12 | The assessor performed a count of ILs (papules, pustules, nodules, and cysts), NILs (open and closed comedones at each study visit. Lesion counts were confined to the face. Change from Baseline at Week 12 was calculated as the value at Week 12 minus the value at Baseline. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model was used with terms for Baseline lesion count, treatment, and center. Missing values were imputed using the LOCF, i.e., the last available observation was used to estimate subsequent missing data. | ITT Population | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Lesions | Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Absolute Change in Inflammatory Lesion Counts and Non-inflammatory Lesion Counts From Baseline to Week 12 | The assessor performed a count of ILs (papules, pustules, nodules, and cysts), NILs (open and closed comedones at each study visit. Lesion counts were confined to the face. Change from Baseline at Week 12 was calculated as the value at Week 12 minus the value at Baseline. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model was used with terms for Baseline lesion count, treatment, and center. Missing values were imputed using the LOCF, i.e., the last available observation was used to estimate subsequent missing data. | PP Population | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Lesions | Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percent Change in Inflammatory, Non-inflammatory and Total Lesion Counts From Baseline to Week 12 | The assessor performed a count of ILs (papules, pustules, nodules, and cysts), NILs (open and closed comedones) and total lesions (the sum of ILs and NILs)at each study visit. Lesion counts were confined to the face. Change from Baseline at Week 12 was calculated as the value at Week 12 minus the value at Baseline. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model was used with terms for Baseline lesion count, treatment, and center. Missing values were imputed using the LOCF, i.e., the last available observation was used to estimate subsequent missing data. | ITT Population | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Percent change in lesions | Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percent Change in Inflammatory, Non-inflammatory and Total Lesion Counts From Baseline to Week 12 | The assessor performed a count of ILs (papules, pustules, nodules, and cysts), NILs (open and closed comedones) and total lesions (the sum of ILs and NILs)at each study visit. Lesion counts were confined to the face. Change from Baseline at Week 12 was calculated as the value at Week 12 minus the value at Baseline. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model was used with terms for Baseline lesion count, treatment, and center. Missing values were imputed using the LOCF, i.e., the last available observation was used to estimate subsequent missing data. | PP Population | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Percent change in lesions | Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants Who Had an ISGA Score of 0 or 1 at Week 12 | The assessor evaluated the acne severity of the participants' face using the ISGA scale, ranging from 0 to 4: 0=clear skin with no ILs or NILs; 1=almost clear: rare NIL with no more than one small IL; 2=mild, some NILs with no more than a few ILs (papules/pustules only, no nodular lesions [NLs]); 3=moderate, up to many NILs and may have some ILs, but no more than one small NL; 4=severe: up to many NILs and ILs, but no more than a few NLs. Missing values were imputed using the LOCF, i.e., the last available observation was used to estimate subsequent missing data. | ITT Population | Posted | Number | Participants | Week 12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants Who Had an ISGA Score of 0 or 1 at Week 12 | The assessor evaluated the acne severity of the participants' face using the ISGA scale, ranging from 0 to 4: 0=clear skin with no ILs or NILs; 1=almost clear: rare NIL with no more than one small IL; 2=mild, some NILs with no more than a few ILs (papules/pustules only, no nodular lesions [NLs]); 3=moderate, up to many NILs and may have some ILs, but no more than one small NL; 4=severe: up to many NILs and ILs, but no more than a few NLs. Missing values were imputed using the LOCF, i.e., the last available observation was used to estimate subsequent missing data. | PP Population | Posted | Number | Participants | Week 12 |
|
|
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the start of study treatment until the end of study treatment (up to Week 12).
SAEs and non-serious AEs are reported for the Intent-to-Treat Population, comprised of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study medication.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Duac Once Daily Gel | Participants (Par.) topically applied Duac Once Daily Gel (combination of clindamycin phosphate [equivalent to 1% clindamycin] and 5% benzoyl peroxide) in the evening to facial acne for 12 weeks. | 1 | 500 | 71 | 500 | ||
| EG001 | Dalin Gel | Participants topically applied Dalin Gel (clindamycin phosphate [equivalent to 1% clindamycin]) twice daily (once in the morning and once in the evening) to facial acne for 12 weeks. | 0 | 516 | 41 | 516 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thermal burn | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment | SAEs and non-serious AEs are reported for the Intent-to-Treat Population, comprised of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study medication. |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application site erythema | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Application site pruritus | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Application site swelling | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Application site erosion | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Application site pain | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Application site dryness | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Application site warmth | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Application site dermatitis | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Application site reaction | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyperhidrosis | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyperpyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastroenteritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Herpes simplex | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bronchitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasal abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Onychomycosis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rash pustular | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rhinitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal discomfort | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dry mouth | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain upper | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cheilitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gingival bleeding | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Haemorrhoids | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Retching | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oropharyngeal pain | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rhinitis allergic | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dermatitis contact | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rash vesicular | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urticaria | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Papule | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Eyelid oedema | Eye disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain in jaw | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dysmenorrhoea | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Eyelid operation | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lymph node pain | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Insomnia | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSK Response Center | GlaxoSmithKline | 866-435-7343 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000152 | Acne Vulgaris |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017486 | Acneiform Eruptions |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D012625 | Sebaceous Gland Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| White |
|
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
|