Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The investigators aimed to compare of the i-gel, supreme and proseal laryngeal mask airways in paralysed patients undergoing gynaecological laparoscopic surgery with oropharyngeal leak pressure. The investigators also studied their relative ease of insertion, time to insertion and complications of use as secondary outcome measures.
A total of 105 patients scheduled for elective gynaecological laparoscopic procedures in our Inonu University Medical Faculty Hospital were recruited.They were equally randomized into three groups: PLMA, supreme and i-gel groups. All three devices were compared with regard to oropharyngeal leak pressure, number and duration of insertion attempts and complications of airway. Oropharyngeal leak pressure will evaluate including to start,trendelenburg and postoperative at period. Fiberoptic evaluation of the LMA's position were performed after successful insertion and determination of the airway pressures. After one hour patients were evaluated by a blinded independent observer for postoperative complications ( sore throat, dysphonia and dysphagia).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| ProSeal LMA | Active Comparator | Supraglottic airway device |
|
| suprema LMA | Active Comparator | Supraglottic airway device |
|
| I-gel LMA | Active Comparator | Supraglottic airway device |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PROSEAL LMA | Device | Size 3,4 or 5 supraglottic device with orogastric drainage tube |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| change of oropharyngeal leak pressure | During intraoperative period, oropharyngeal leak pressure was measured at three times (10min, 30 min, and 45 min after insertion of devices) | 10min, 30 min ,45 min |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| easiness of insertion of the device | During insertion, easiness of the devices were evaluated by a scale | 2 min |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| postoperative complication | At the second hour of postoperative period, patients will visit and will examine about the complications (sore throat, dysphagia, dysphonia) | 2 hour after operation |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| mukadder sanli, MD | Assistant Prof Dr | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inonu University | Malatya | Turkey | 44100 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20640137 | Result | Singh I, Gupta M, Tandon M. Comparison of Clinical Performance of I-Gel with LMA-Proseal in Elective Surgeries. Indian J Anaesth. 2009 Jun;53(3):302-5. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| SUPREMA LMA |
| Device |
Size 3,4 or 5, disposable supraglottic device with orogastric drainage tube |
|
| I-GEL LMA | Device | Size 3,4,5 disposable supraglottic device with noninflatable cuff |
|