Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-A00773-42 | Other Identifier | RBC number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The main objective of this study is to compare post partum rates of anal sphincter rupture (that is to say the rate of sutures) diagnosed in women with ≥ 2nd degree vaginal tears between two groups: (1) women who are screened just after delivery by performing a perineal ultrasound versus a similar group of women who did not receive screening. This study was not designed to evaluate ultrasound as a diagnostic test but to compare the rate of perineal surgical procedures in each arm.
The secondary objectives of this study are:
A. Compare the anal incontinence score (measured by the Wexner score, qualitative and quantitative assessment) at 3 months between the two groups.
B. To assess the safety of perineal ultrasound in the group with "ultrasound" using a visual analog scale for discomfort
C. Assess the inter and intra operator consistency of perineal ultrasound snapshot readings
D. Evaluate and compare the rate of infectious complications of perineal sutures between the two groups at 3 months.
E. Evaluate and compare the quality of life (questionnaires PFIQ, PFDI, SF36, Euroqol) between the two groups at 3 months.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| With ultrasound | Experimental | Patients in this group will have perineal ultrasound for the detection of anal sphincter ruptures. Intervention: Perineal ultrasound |
|
| Without ultrasound | No Intervention | Patients in this group will not have perineal ultrasound for the detection of anal sphincter ruptures. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perineal ultrasound | Procedure | Perineal ultrasound will be used after delivery to help detect anal sphincter ruptures. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Presence/absence of an anal sphincter rupture | Day 0 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Wexner score for anal incontinence | Day 0 | |
| Wexner score for anal incontinence | 3 months | |
| Tolerance of perineal ultrasound |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Vincent Letouzey, MD | Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHU de Montpellier - Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve | Montpellier | 34295 | France | |||
| CHU de Nîmes - Hôpital Universitaire Carémeau |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Visual analog scale (0 to 10) used to evaluate discomfort. |
| Day 0 |
| Kappa coefficient for inter-operator ultrasound reading | Day 0 |
| Kappa coefficient for intra-operator ultrasound reading | Day 0 |
| Presence/absence of suture infection | 3 months |
| PFIQ questionnaire | Day 0 |
| PFIQ questionnaire | 3 months |
| PFDI questionnaire | Day 0 |
| PFDI questionnaire | 3 months |
| SF36 questionnaire | Day 0 |
| SF36 questionnaire | 3 months |
| Euroqol questionnaire | Day 0 |
| Euroqol questionnaire | 3 months |
| Nîmes |
| 30029 |
| France |
| CHU de Poitiers | Poitiers | 86021 | France |