Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) | OTHER_GOV |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Dying patients and their families face many challenges near the end-of-life. Not only do patients often experience physical distress, but they also have feelings of loss of dignity, isolation, and uncertainty. Family members also face many challenges. They bear witness to the suffering of loved ones, and they face uncertainty, loss, and at times a mounting sense of helplessness.
The purpose of this study is to introduce and evaluate a new intervention called Dignity Talk, meant to enhance end-of-life experience for both patients and their families. Dignity Talk is based on a set of questions by which terminally ill patients and their family members can engage in meaningful conversations with each other. It is intended to lessen feelings of loss and helplessness and enhance feelings of connectedness by facilitating conversations that tap into a sense of meaning and purpose, sharing of memories, wishes, hopes, and giving guidance to those who will soon be left behind.
In Phase 1, 20 patients and family members will help finalize the method and Dignity Talk question framework (is it easy to understand, do the investigators have the right questions, and is the wording sensitive). In Phase 2 of the study the investigators will ask 100 patient-family pairs for feedback about Dignity Talk: what influence it had on their palliative care experience, whether it works well, and whether this intervention should become a regular part of palliative care. The investigators will also ask for feedback from health-care providers in both phases. We are requesting approval for an amendment to the healthcare provider feedback focus group questions. Will add those documents when they are approved.
Four to six months after the death of their loved one, the investigators will contact the family member to ask their thoughts about Dignity Talk, how it shaped their experience of their grief and bereavement.
The investigators expect that the study will show that Dignity Talk can be an effective, highly accessible palliative care intervention, which will enhance the end-of-life experience for palliative patients and the families who support them.
See above summary
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dignity Talk dyad completers | Experimental | Those dyads where both patient and family member co-participant complete the protocol using the Dignity Talk Communication Topics |
|
| Dignity Talk non-completers | Experimental | Those dyads where patient and family member co-participant either do not complete the protocol or do not use the Dignity Talk Communication Topics (November 2016 - the investigators have not as yet enrolled any participants who have not completed the study without using the Dignity Talk Topics. However some participants have withdrawn from the study without completing. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dignity Talk | Behavioral | Patient and family member participants will be given the Dignity Talk framework questions and asked to use them in conversation with each other. Research nurse will return at day 4-6 to confirm both participants have covered all items they wish to discuss. 4-6 months after the death of patient, family members will be contacted in order to collect data pertaining to their bereavement experiences and distress. Will also be asked to complete evaluative feedback on Dignity Talk. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Family communication connectedness Index | 31 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants with Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability | 31 months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
For Patient:
Patients being cared for:
For Family Member or Close Friend:
For Healthcare Provider:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victoria Hospice | Victoria | British Columbia | Canada | |||
| St. Boniface Hospital |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29130367 | Derived | Guo Q, Chochinov HM, McClement S, Thompson G, Hack T. Development and evaluation of the Dignity Talk question framework for palliative patients and their families: A mixed-methods study. Palliat Med. 2018 Jan;32(1):195-205. doi: 10.1177/0269216317734696. Epub 2017 Nov 13. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| The Dignity Talk Communication Topics | Behavioral | There have not been any non-completers - this arm not being used currently |
|
| Winnipeg |
| Manitoba |
| R3E 0V9 |
| Canada |
| Riverview Health Centre | Winnipeg | Manitoba | R3L 2P4 | Canada |
| Concordia Hospital | Winnipeg | Manitoba | Canada |
| Deer Lodge Centre | Winnipeg | Manitoba | Canada |
| Grace Hospital | Winnipeg | Manitoba | Canada |
| Health Sciences Centre | Winnipeg | Manitoba | Canada |
| Manitoba Renal Program | Winnipeg | Manitoba | Canada |
| Seven Oaks Hospital | Winnipeg | Manitoba | Canada |
| Victoria Hospital | Winnipeg | Manitoba | Canada |
| Winnipeg Regional Health Authority | Winnipeg | Manitoba | Canada |
| WRHA Personal Care Homes | Winnipeg | Manitoba | Canada |
| Dr. Bob Kemp Hospice | Hamilton | Ontario | L9B 1B1 | Canada |