Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-004928-38 | EudraCT Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
GEICAM/2012-07 is a study phase III, prospective, open, randomized, multicenter and national designed to assess patient preference for intravenous (IV) or subcutaneous (SC) of trastuzumab, and within the SC by the administration through the vial or device self-administration in patients with disseminated breast cancer HER2.
Approximately 195 patients will be included to receive subcutaneous trastuzumab a fixed dose of 600 mg every 3 weeks for 4 cycles (2 administered from the injection of a vial with a syringe and 2 with the injection device). Following administration of these four cycles, the patient will decide whether or not to continue with the subcutaneous formulation of trastuzumab every 3 weeks until progression (out of the study). Since the randomization in the study until the start with subcutaneous trastuzumab, patients will receive a treatment cycle of intravenous trastuzumab as usual.
Main objective: Proportion of patients indicate a preference for the use of subcutaneous vs intravenous trastuzumab.
This principal primary objective will be analyzed with the answers to questionnaire of experiences and preferences of the patients (Principal endpoint) The duration of the study has been estimated after 34 months.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm A: T-IV + T-SC vial + T-SC device | Experimental | Trastuzumab intravenous (T-IV) x 1 cycle (usual dose of Trastuzumab), followed by 600mg of Trastuzumab Subcutaneous (T-SC) with vial (Injectable Solution) x 2 cycles, followed by 600mg of T-SC with single injection device (SID) x 2 cycles. |
|
| Arm B: T-IV + T-SC device + T-SC vial | Experimental | Trastuzumab intravenous (T-IV) x 1 cycle (usual dose of Trastuzumab), followed by 600mg of Trastuzumab Subcutaneous (T-SC) with single injection device (SID) x 2 cycles, followed by 600mg of T-SC with vial (Injectable Solution) x 2 cycles. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trastuzumab Injectable Solution | Drug | Subcutaneous injection vial with a fixed dose of trastuzumab (600mg) and recombinant human hyaluronidase (10.000U) identical to that provided by the device. 3 weeks x 2 cycles. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Subcutaneous vs. Intravenous Treatment Preference | The percentage of patients who indicate a preference for the use of the intravenous vs subcutaneous administration of trastuzumab was analyzed with the answer to the questionnaire C2, question number 39 (All things considered, what method of administration do you prefer? Subcutaneous; Intravenous; No preference) of experiences and preferences of the patient. | Up to 12 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Subcutaneous Treatment (Vial vs Device Administration) Preference | The percentage of patients who indicate a preference for the use of SC administration by vial or device was analyzed. This was discussed in the answer to questionaire C3, question number 28 (All things considered, what method of administration do you prefer? Subcutaneous; Intravenous; No preference) of the questionnaire of experiences and preferences of the patient. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Woman, 18 years old or upper.
Patient with advanced breast cancer with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER 2) positive histologically confirmed. The criteria for positivity HER 2 are:
Patient receiving trastuzumab with or without chemotherapy or hormonal therapy for at least 4 months.
No evidence of disease progression (clinical and / or radiological) for at least 4 months before inclusion in the study and with a life expectancy of at least 3 months.
Adequate performance status: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) <2.
Adequate bone marrow function, liver and kidney
Proper cardiac function (LVEF within normal limits the center, measured by echocardiography or MUGA).
The patient must have been informed of the study and must sign and date informed consent document for entry into the trial.
The patient must be willing and able to comply with study procedures and be available to answer the study questionnaires.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Study Director | Hospitales Universitarios Virgen del Rocío | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hospital de Manacor | Manacor | Balearic Islands | 07500 | Spain | ||
| Hospital General Universitario de Granollers |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 32578279 | Result | Ciruelos EM, Montano A, Rodriguez CA, Gonzalez-Flores E, Lluch A, Garrigos L, Quiroga V, Anton A, Malon D, Chacon JI, Velasco M, Gonzalez-Cortijo L, Jolis L, Echarri MJ, Munoz M, Pascual T, Amigo Y, Casas M, Carrasco E, Casas A. Phase III study to evaluate patient's preference of subcutaneous versus intravenous trastuzumab in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients: Results from the ChangHER study (GEICAM/2012-07). Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2020 Jul;29(4):e13253. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13253. Epub 2020 Jun 23. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Sponsor's web | View source |
Not provided
This is not a cross-over study.
Eligible patients, from the randomization and before starting subcutaneous trastuzumab (SC-t), received an additional intravenous (IV-t) cycle. After receiving this cycle, patients started the treatment with the study medication, SC-t at a fixed dose of 600 mg every 3 weeks (+3 days) for 4 cycles (2 administered from the injection of a vial in a syringe and 2 with the single-use injection device [SID]), being randomized 1:1 in two arms of treatment without washout period.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Arm A: T-IV + T-SC Vial + T-SC Device | Trastuzumab intravenous (T-IV) x 1 cycle (usual dose of Trastuzumab), followed by 600mg of Trastuzumab Subcutaneous (T-SC) with vial (Injectable Solution) x 2 cycles, followed by 600mg of T-SC with single injection device (SID) x 2 cycles. |
| FG001 |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Eligible patients, from the randomization and before starting subcutaneous trastuzumab (SC-t), received an additional intravenous (IV-t) cycle. After receiving this cycle, patients started the treatment with the study medication, SC-t at a fixed dose of 600 mg every 3 weeks (+3 days) for 4 cycles (2 administered from the injection of a vial in a syringe and 2 with the single-use injection device [SID]), being randomized 1:1 in two arms of treatment without washout period:
This is not a cross-over study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Trastuzumab Injectable Product | Drug | Single injection device is provided and loaded with the mixture of trastuzumab (600mg) and recombinant human hyaluronidase (10.000U) and is ready for use. 3 weeks x 2 cycles |
|
|
| Trastuzumab Injection | Drug | Powder for concentrate for solution for infusion. 1 cycle |
|
|
| Up to 12 weeks |
| Percentage of Medical Staff With Intravenous vs. Subcutaneous Preference | The medical staff satisfaction was analyzed with the answers to question number 33a (Considering all aspects, with what method of administration were you more satisfied? Between Intravenous vs. Subcutaneous: Intravenous; Subcutaneous; No differences) of the questionnaire of experiences and preferences of the medical staff. Health care professionals were not considered enrolled, but did contribute to this assessment. | Up to 12 weeks |
| Percentage of Medical Staff Subcutaneous Device vs. Vial Preference | The medical staff satisfaction was analyzed with the answers to question number 33b (Considering all aspects, with what method of administration were you more satisfied? Between Vial vs. Device: Preferred device; Preferred vial; No Preference) of the questionnaire of experiences and preferences of the medical staff. Health care professionals were not considered enrolled, but did contribute to this assessment. | Up to 12 weeks |
| Patient Time in Healthcare Unit and Sitting in Chair/Bed | Time spent by patient in the healthcare unit: Time between entrance and exit from the healthcare unit. Time spent by patient sitting in the infusion/treatment chair/bed: Time between sitting and rising from the patient treatment chair/bed The data was collected by qualified observers from site staff that measured the time spent by healthcare professional using a chronometer, and write it down in the paper questionnaires or directly or after in the electronic case report form. | An average of 4 months |
| The Number of Participants Who Experienced Adverse Events (AE) | Safety was assessed by standard clinical and laboratory tests (haematology, serum chemistry). AE grade were defined by the NCI CTCAE (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) version 4.03. | Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks |
| Granollers |
| Barcelona |
| 08402 |
| Spain |
| Hospital de Mataró | Mataró | Barcelona | 08304 | Spain |
| Hospital Sant Joan Despí Moises Broggi | Sant Joan Despí | Barcelona | 08970 | Spain |
| Hospital Virgen del Puerto de Plasencia | Plasencia | Cáceres | 10600 | Spain |
| Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada | Fuenlabrada | Madrid | 28924 | Spain |
| Hospital Universitario Severo Ochoa | Leganés | Madrid | 28911 | Spain |
| Hospital Univesitario Quirón Madrid | Pozuelo de Alarcón | Madrid | 28223 | Spain |
| Hospital Universitario Santa Lucía | Cartagena | Murcia | 30202 | Spain |
| Hospital Costa del Sol | Marbella | Málaga | 29603 | Spain |
| Hospital Universitario San Joan de Reus | Reus | Tarragona | 43201 | Spain |
| Hospital Nuestra Señora de Sonsoles | Ávila | 05004 | Spain |
| Hospital del Mar | Barcelona | 08003 | Spain |
| Hospital Clinic i Provincial | Barcelona | 08036 | Spain |
| Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol | Barcelona | 08916 | Spain |
| Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves | Granada | 18014 | Spain |
| Hospital Universitario Arnau de Vilanova de Lleida | Lleida | 25198 | Spain |
| Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti | Lugo | 27004 | Spain |
| Hospital Universitario La Princesa | Madrid | 28006 | Spain |
| Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón | Madrid | 28007 | Spain |
| Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre | Madrid | 28021 | Spain |
| Hospital Universitario de Salamanca | Salamanca | 37007 | Spain |
| Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Macarena | Seville | 41009 | Spain |
| Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío | Seville | 41013 | Spain |
| Hospital Virgen de la Salud | Toledo | 45004 | Spain |
| Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia | Valencia | 46010 | Spain |
| Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet | Zaragoza | 50009 | Spain |
| Arm B: T-IV + T-SC Device + T-SC Vial |
Trastuzumab intravenous (T-IV) x 1 cycle (usual dose of Trastuzumab), followed by 600mg of Trastuzumab Subcutaneous (T-SC) with single injection device (SID) x 2 cycles, followed by 600mg of T-SC with vial (Injectable Solution) x 2 cycles. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Arm A: T-IV + T-SC Vial + T-SC Device | Trastuzumab intravenous (T-IV) x 1 cycle (usual dose of Trastuzumab), followed by 600mg of Trastuzumab Subcutaneous (T-SC) with vial (Injectable Solution) x 2 cycles, followed by 600mg of T-SC with single injection device (SID) x 2 cycles. |
| BG001 | Arm B: T-IV + T-SC Device + T-SC Vial | Trastuzumab intravenous (T-IV) x 1 cycle (usual dose of Trastuzumab), followed by 600mg of Trastuzumab Subcutaneous (T-SC) with single injection device (SID) x 2 cycles, followed by 600mg of T-SC with vial (Injectable Solution) x 2 cycles. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Median | Full Range | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Menopausal status | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status | Measure Description: ECOG score runs from 0 to 5, with 0 denoting perfect health and 5 death. 0 - Asymptomatic
| Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||
| Estrogen Receptor | A cancer is called hormonal receptor positive if it has receptors for progesterone or estrogen. This suggests that the cancer cells, like normal breast cells, may receive signals from progesterone or estrogen that could promote their growth. If the cancer is hormone-receptor-negative (no receptors are present), then hormonal therapy is unlikely to work. | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||
| Progesterone Receptor | A cancer is called hormonal receptor positive if it has receptors for progesterone or estrogen. This suggests that the cancer cells, like normal breast cells, may receive signals from progesterone or estrogen that could promote their growth. If the cancer is hormone-receptor-negative (no receptors are present), then hormonal therapy is unlikely to work. | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||
| Time with IV trastuzumab for metastasis at registration | Median | Full Range | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Treatment/s combined with IV-trastuzumab at registration | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Other anti Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 (HER-2) therapy at registration | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Administration route at registration | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Metastases 1 at diagnosis | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Visceral metastases at registration | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Bone metastases at registration | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Skin/soft tissue/lymph nodes metastases at registration | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Median of prior treatment lines at registration | The greater number of lines previously received by a patient, the worst prognosis. | Median | Full Range | Treatment lines |
| ||||||||||||||
| Prior treatment lines at registration | The greater number of lines previously received by a patient, the worst prognosis. | Number | participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Participants With Subcutaneous vs. Intravenous Treatment Preference | The percentage of patients who indicate a preference for the use of the intravenous vs subcutaneous administration of trastuzumab was analyzed with the answer to the questionnaire C2, question number 39 (All things considered, what method of administration do you prefer? Subcutaneous; Intravenous; No preference) of experiences and preferences of the patient. | Patients were randomized 1:1 in 2 arms: Arm A: (1 cycle IV-t followed by 2 cycles SC-t with vial followed by 2 cycles SC-t with SID) Arm B: (1 cycle IV-t followed by 2 cycles SC-t with SID followed by 2 cycles SC-t with vial) | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Up to 12 weeks |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Subcutaneous Treatment (Vial vs Device Administration) Preference | The percentage of patients who indicate a preference for the use of SC administration by vial or device was analyzed. This was discussed in the answer to questionaire C3, question number 28 (All things considered, what method of administration do you prefer? Subcutaneous; Intravenous; No preference) of the questionnaire of experiences and preferences of the patient. | Patients were randomized 1:1 in 2 arms: Arm A: (1 cycle IV-t followed by 2 cycles SC-t with vial followed by 2 cycles SC-t with SID) Arm B: (1 cycle IV-t followed by 2 cycles SC-t with SID followed by 2 cycles SC-t with vial) It has been analysed in patients from Intention To Treat (ITT) population which have completed questionnaire nº 3 (Arm A 72 patients and Arm B 80 patients). | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Up to 12 weeks |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Medical Staff With Intravenous vs. Subcutaneous Preference | The medical staff satisfaction was analyzed with the answers to question number 33a (Considering all aspects, with what method of administration were you more satisfied? Between Intravenous vs. Subcutaneous: Intravenous; Subcutaneous; No differences) of the questionnaire of experiences and preferences of the medical staff. Health care professionals were not considered enrolled, but did contribute to this assessment. | Questionnaires were given to the health care professionals of both arms. Information has been analyzed per administration type, not per arm. 39 health care professional satisfaction questionnaires were completed. Health care professionals were not considered enrolled, but did contribute to this assessment. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Up to 12 weeks |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Medical Staff Subcutaneous Device vs. Vial Preference | The medical staff satisfaction was analyzed with the answers to question number 33b (Considering all aspects, with what method of administration were you more satisfied? Between Vial vs. Device: Preferred device; Preferred vial; No Preference) of the questionnaire of experiences and preferences of the medical staff. Health care professionals were not considered enrolled, but did contribute to this assessment. | Questionnaires were given to the health care professionals of both arms. Information has been analyzed per administration type, not per arm. 39 health care professional satisfaction questionnaires were completed. Health care professionals were not considered enrolled, but did contribute to this assessment. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Up to 12 weeks |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Patient Time in Healthcare Unit and Sitting in Chair/Bed | Time spent by patient in the healthcare unit: Time between entrance and exit from the healthcare unit. Time spent by patient sitting in the infusion/treatment chair/bed: Time between sitting and rising from the patient treatment chair/bed The data was collected by qualified observers from site staff that measured the time spent by healthcare professional using a chronometer, and write it down in the paper questionnaires or directly or after in the electronic case report form. | This analysis was considered from 87 patients of the 166 patients included into the study, on who information of observed tasks were collected. 217 observations were made from these patients: 74 about IV-t administration process, 75 about SC-SID administration process, 68 about SC-Vial administration process. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | minutes | An average of 4 months | Observations | Observations |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | The Number of Participants Who Experienced Adverse Events (AE) | Safety was assessed by standard clinical and laboratory tests (haematology, serum chemistry). AE grade were defined by the NCI CTCAE (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) version 4.03. | Safety Population included all patients randomized in the study who received at least one dose of treatment, and they were analyzed according to the actual treatment received (81 patients in arm A and 85 patients in arm B). | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks |
|
|
Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment.
AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Arm A: T-IV + T-SC Vial + T-SC Device | Trastuzumab intravenous (T-IV) x 1 cycle (usual dose of Trastuzumab), followed by 600mg of Trastuzumab Subcutaneous (T-SC) with vial (Injectable Solution) x 2 cycles, followed by 600mg of T-SC with single injection device (SID) x 2 cycles. | 0 | 81 | 2 | 81 | 76 | 81 |
| EG001 | Arm B: T-IV + T-SC Device + T-SC Vial | Trastuzumab intravenous (T-IV) x 1 cycle (usual dose of Trastuzumab), followed by 600mg of Trastuzumab Subcutaneous (T-SC) with single injection device (SID) x 2 cycles, followed by 600mg of T-SC with vial (Injectable Solution) x 2 cycles. | 0 | 85 | 10 | 85 | 84 | 85 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fever | General disorders | NCI-CTCAE 4.03 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Heart failure | Cardiac disorders | NCI-CTCAE 4.03 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hematuria | Renal and urinary disorders | NCI-CTCAE 4.03 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nodule in left breast | Reproductive system and breast disorders | NCI-CTCAE 4.03 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cold | Infections and infestations | NCI-CTCAE 4.03 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nodule in right breast | Reproductive system and breast disorders | NCI-CTCAE 4.03 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lack of strength in left leg | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | NCI-CTCAE 4.03 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Catheter related infection (Bacteriemia) | Infections and infestations | NCI-CTCAE 4.03 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Stroke | Nervous system disorders | NCI-CTCAE 4.03 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Surgery for surgical castration | Reproductive system and breast disorders | NCI-CTCAE 4.03 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastric cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | NCI-CTCAE 4.03 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ostenecrosis produced by biphosphonates | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | NCI-CTCAE 4.03 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Platelet count decreased | Investigations | NCI-CTCAE 4.03 | Systematic Assessment | Grade 4 |
|
| Platelet count decreased | Investigations | NCI-CTCAE 4.03 | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1 |
|
| Creatinine increased | Investigations | NCI-CTCAE 4.03 | Systematic Assessment | Grade 4 |
|
| Creatinine increased | Investigations | NCI-CTCAE 4.03 | Systematic Assessment | Grade 2 |
|
| Creatinine increased | Investigations | NCI-CTCAE 4.03 | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1 |
|
| Alanine aminotransferase increased | Investigations | NCI-CTCAE 4.03 | Systematic Assessment | Grade 3 |
|
| Alanine aminotransferase increased | Investigations | NCI-CTCAE 4.03 | Systematic Assessment | Grade 2 |
|
| Alanine aminotransferase increased | Investigations | NCI-CTCAE 4.03 | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1 |
|
| Aspartate aminotransferase increased | Investigations | NCI-CTCAE 4.03 | Systematic Assessment | Grade 3 |
|
| Aspartate aminotransferase increased | Investigations | NCI-CTCAE 4.03 | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1 |
|
| Fatigue | General disorders | NCI-CTCAE 4.03 | Systematic Assessment | Grade 3 |
|
| Fatigue | General disorders | NCI-CTCAE 4.03 | Systematic Assessment | Grade 2 |
|
| Fatigue | General disorders | NCI-CTCAE 4.03 | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1 |
|
| Heart failure | Cardiac disorders | NCI-CTCAE 4.03 | Systematic Assessment | Grade 3 |
|
| Osteonecrosis of jaw | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | NCI-CTCAE 4.03 | Systematic Assessment | Grade 3 |
|
| Nodule in left breast | Reproductive system and breast disorders | NCI-CTCAE 4.03 | Systematic Assessment | Grade 3 |
|
| Alkaline phosphatase increased | Investigations | NCI-CTCAE 4.03 | Systematic Assessment | Grade 3 |
|
| Alkaline phosphatase increased | Investigations | NCI-CTCAE 4.03 | Systematic Assessment | Grade 2 |
|
| Alkaline phosphatase increased | Investigations | NCI-CTCAE 4.03 | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1 |
|
| Diarrhea | Gastrointestinal disorders | NCI-CTCAE 4.03 | Systematic Assessment | Grade 3 |
|
| Diarrhea | Gastrointestinal disorders | NCI-CTCAE 4.03 | Systematic Assessment | Grade 2 |
|
| Diarrhea | Gastrointestinal disorders | NCI-CTCAE 4.03 | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1 |
|
| Hemoglobin increased | Investigations | NCI-CTCAE 4.03 | Systematic Assessment | Grade 3 |
|
| Neutrophil count decreased | Investigations | NCI-CTCAE 4.03 | Systematic Assessment | Grade 2 |
|
| Neutrophil count decreased | Investigations | NCI-CTCAE 4.03 | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1 |
|
| Neutrophil count decreased | Investigations | NCI-CTCAE 4.03 | Systematic Assessment | Grade 3 |
|
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | NCI-CTCAE 4.03 | Systematic Assessment | Grade 3 |
|
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | NCI-CTCAE 4.03 | Systematic Assessment | Grade 2 |
|
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | NCI-CTCAE 4.03 | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1 |
|
| Voice alteration | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | NCI-CTCAE 4.03 | Systematic Assessment | Grade 3 |
|
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | NCI-CTCAE 4.03 | Systematic Assessment | Grade 3 |
|
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | NCI-CTCAE 4.03 | Systematic Assessment | Grade 2 |
|
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | NCI-CTCAE 4.03 | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1 |
|
| White blood cells decreased | Investigations | NCI-CTCAE 4.03 | Systematic Assessment | Grade 2 |
|
| White blood cells decreased | Investigations | NCI-CTCAE 4.03 | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1 |
|
| Anemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | NCI-CTCAE 4.03 | Systematic Assessment | Grade 2 |
|
| Anemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | NCI-CTCAE 4.03 | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1 |
|
| Injection site reaction | General disorders | NCI-CTCAE 4.03 | Systematic Assessment | Grade 2 |
|
| Injection site reaction | General disorders | NCI-CTCAE 4.03 | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1 |
|
We do not have longterm follow-up data of the SC-t efficacy. Device SC-t SID has not been commercialized. All patients had already been treated with IV-t for at least 4 months without disease progression prior to the study entry.
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scientific Director / Medical Lead / Project Manager | Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group | +34916592870 | geicam@geicam.org |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001943 | Breast Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D001941 | Breast Diseases |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000068878 | Trastuzumab |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D061067 | Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized |
| D000911 | Antibodies, Monoclonal |
| D000906 | Antibodies |
| D007136 | Immunoglobulins |
| D007162 | Immunoproteins |
| D001798 | Blood Proteins |
| D011506 | Proteins |
| D000602 | Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins |
| D012712 | Serum Globulins |
| D005916 | Globulins |
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| Black |
|
| Hispanic |
|
| Arabian |
|
| Postmenopausal |
|
| ECOG 1 |
|
| ECOG 2 |
|
| Negative |
|
| Positive |
|
| Chemotherapy (CT) |
|
| Other anti-cancer therapy |
|
| Other anti-cancer therapy+CT |
|
| Other anti-cancer therapy+HT |
|
| None |
|
| Lapatinib |
|
| None |
|
| Intramuscular |
|
| Subcutaneous |
|
| Oral |
|
| None |
|
| Yes |
|
| No |
|
| No |
|
| No |
|
| 2 Lines |
|
| 3 Lines |
|
| 4 Lines |
|
| 5 Lines |
|
| 6 Lines |
|
| 7 Lines |
|
| None Line |
|
| No preference |
|
|
|
|
|
Patients from both arms (A and B) who received Single injection device |
|
|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|