Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Arco Foundation | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The proposed study is a multi-center, randomized, double blind (patient and assessor), sham controlled clinical trial using a parallel 2 group design recruiting 220 patients of at least 18 years of age. The investigators will include patients presenting with clinically and radiologically diagnosed knee OA according to the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology, who experienced knee pain lasting for at least six months, and were diagnosed with radiographic severity of ≥ 2 on the Kellgren-Lawrence grading system or had one or more of the following signs and symptoms in the knee; restricted range of motion, pain in motion, crepitations, morning stiffness. Patients will be randomly allocated to receive TENS or sham TENS for 3 weeks.
Background
Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common arthritic condition, which is one of the leading causes of disability in adults. Currently, no treatment can stop or reverse the progressive joint degeneration caused by OA. Most clinical interventions aim to improve pain and physical function. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is widely used in the management of knee OA to relieve osteoarthritic pain and facilitate the performance of therapeutic activities in order to maintain or improve physical function. Although its use is widespread, the available evidence is of questionable quality. An adequately sized and well conducted randomized controlled trial (RCT) investigating the effectiveness and safety of TENS as treatment modality for knee OA is warranted to assist clinicians and policy makers to make decisions that are based on high-quality evidence, ultimately optimizing delivery of health-care in knee OA.
Objective
To determine TENS safety and effectiveness on pain and physical function compared to sham TENS in patients with knee OA.
Methods
Multi-center, randomized, double blind (patient and assessor), sham controlled clinical trial using a parallel 2 group design. Patients will be randomly allocated to receive TENS or sham TENS for 3 weeks. Informed consent of eligible patients will be obtained prior to randomization. Patients will be assigned on a 1:1 basis to the TENS or sham TENS group. Randomization will be centralized using randomization software and an electronic randomization form, generated by the trial coordinating centre (CTU Bern). Patients will be randomized once demographic data and selection criteria are completed by the recruiting physician in an electronic form. Randomization will be stratified according to treatment centre, TENS naivety and clinical severity.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| TENS | Experimental | Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation |
|
| Sham TENS | Sham Comparator | Sham Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TENS | Device | Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation |
| |
| Sham TENS |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| WOMAC pain subscale | End of treatment (at 3 weeks) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| WOMAC global subscale | Baseline, end of treatment (at 3 weeks), 3-month follow-up | |
| WOMAC physical function subscale | Baseline, end of treatment (at 3 weeks), 3-month follow-up | |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Stephan Reichenbach, MD | Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern | Principal Investigator |
| Peter Jüni, Prof. | Applied Health Research Centre (AHRC), Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Department of Medicine and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Canada | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern | Bern | Canton of Bern | 3012 | Switzerland |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 34826572 | Derived | Reichenbach S, Juni P, Hincapie CA, Schneider C, Meli DN, Schurch R, Streit S, Lucas C, Mebes C, Rutjes AWS, da Costa BR. Effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on knee pain and physical function in patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: the ETRELKA randomized clinical trial. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2022 Mar;30(3):426-435. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2021.10.015. Epub 2021 Nov 23. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020370 | Osteoarthritis, Knee |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010003 | Osteoarthritis |
| D001168 | Arthritis |
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004561 | Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004599 | Electric Stimulation Therapy |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D026741 | Physical Therapy Modalities |
| D012046 | Rehabilitation |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Device |
Sham Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation |
|
| Overall pain measured on VAS |
| Baseline, end of treatment (at 3 weeks), 3-month follow-up |
| Hospital anxiety and depression scale | Baseline, end of treatment (at 3 weeks), 3-month follow-up |
| Aberdeen measure of participation | Baseline, end of treatment (at 3 weeks), 3-month follow-up |
| Mean analgesic intake per patient | Baseline, end of treatment (at 3 weeks), 3-month follow-up |
| Number of drop-outs because of adverse events | End of treatment (at 3 weeks), 3-month follow-up |
| Number of patients experiencing local adverse events | End of treatment (at 3 weeks), 3-month follow-up |
| Number of patients experiencing any side effects | End of treatment (at 3 weeks), 3-month follow-up |
| Number of patients experiencing serious side effects | End of treatment (at 3 weeks), 3-month follow-up |
| Number of drop-outs | End of treatment (at 3 weeks), 3-month follow-up |
| WOMAC pain subscale | Baseline, third treatment session, 3-month follow-up |
| D012216 |
| Rheumatic Diseases |
| D000698 |
| Analgesia |
| D000760 | Anesthesia and Analgesia |