Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| GlaxoSmithKline | INDUSTRY |
| Medical University of South Carolina | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
To determine the effectiveness of rotavirus vaccines, active surveillance will be conducted at two sites, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (CCHMC) in Cincinnati, Ohio and the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) in Charleston, South Carolina.
Children born on or after April 1, 2006 presenting to CCHMC as an inpatient or for a short-stay or Emergency Department (ED) visit with acute gastroenteritis (AGE) and/or fever will be approached for enrollment. Children will be eligible if they have vomiting and/or diarrhea less than or equal to 10 days duration. Data including demographic information, illness characteristics and socio-economic status will be collected from each patient. A sample of the patient's stool will be collected within 14 days of the onset of symptoms. Stool specimens will be tested for rotavirus antigen by Rotaclone at CCHMC. All rotavirus positive stool specimens will be typed for common G and P serotypes. Using the children identified with rotavirus as our cases and the children who were rotavirus negative as our controls, we will conduct a case control study to assess the effectiveness of rotavirus vaccines, in particular Rotarix.
A case-control design will be utilized to assess the effectiveness of RV1 in preventing rotavirus-associated hospitalizations and Emergency Department (ED) visits using cases and controls from the 2009-2012 rotavirus seasons. Vaccine exposure among cases will be compared to vaccine exposure among controls. There will be one case group and one control group.
Cases will be obtained from children who are enrolled in active surveillance for acute gastroenteritis being conducted at the two initial surveillance sites. These sites include: Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (2009-2012) and the Medical University of South Carolina (2009-2012). Cases and controls will be identified retrospectively for the 2008-2011 seasons and prospectively through active surveillance for the 2011-2012 season. The active surveillance programs conduct prospective surveillance for hospitalizations and ED visits due to AGE (acute gastroenteritis) in children < 6 years of age. Even though Rotarix was commercially available on January 1, 2008, the actual date that RV1 was initially used varied across sites. The date that Rotarix was initially used will be determined for each site through examination of the data. Children with laboratory-confirmed rotavirus infection (bulk stool sample positive for rotavirus using a rotavirus EIA) will be included as a case if they were born 2 months prior to the initial date of Rotarix availability at each site. The vaccine record for each case will be obtained to determine the vaccine status of the child.
Controls will be children born 2 months prior to the availability of Rotarix at each site who were enrolled in the active surveillance program at either site and who tested negative for rotavirus. Children who have been previously hospitalized for diarrhea, who have a sibling enrolled in the study, or who have recently moved into the study area (and might not have been eligible for the vaccine) will be excluded.
Laboratory Testing
For children enrolled in the active surveillance program bulk stool specimens are obtained within 14 days of the visit for AGE symptoms and are tested using Rotaclone, a commercial enzyme immunoassay (Meridian Bioscience, Inc) at CCHMC. Children with a positive test for rotavirus are eligible to be cases and children with a negative test for rotavirus are eligible for controls. Specimens positive by EIA for rotavirus will have G and P genotyping done at CCHMC.
Retrospective Enrollment of Children Tested for Rotavirus as Part of Routine Care
With the dramatic decline in rotavirus since the introduction of rotavirus vaccines, the number of children enrolled in surveillance has plummeted compared to pre-licensure surveillance. In order to improve our sample size, we will retrospectively invite children who had a rotavirus test done from August 1, 2008 through June 30, 2012 to participate in this study. The laboratory records of rotavirus testing will be reviewed to identify children with a date of birth >August 1, 2008. Once identified, a letter will be sent to the parents/guardians with a brief explanation of the study and we will ask them to notify us within two weeks if they do not wish to be called. Study staff will then contact the parent/guardian to explain the study and to determine whether the child meets eligibility criteria (same as those outlined for enrollment into surveillance). If the child meets eligibility criteria, the parents/guardians will be asked to allow their child to participate, informed consent will be obtained for the child. If agreed, the same data collected on prospectively enrolled children will be collected and permission will be obtained to contact the child's health care provider for the child's immunization records.
Eligibility
The date that Rotarix was initially used will be determined for each site. Children born 2 months prior to the initial date or later will be eligible to be a case or control for this study. If a child is enrolled more than once during the same season, the visit at which the child tested positive for rotavirus will be selected for inclusion; if the child tested negative at all visits, the child's final visit will be selected for inclusion.
Sample Size
Sample size calculations were done for varying degrees of vaccine efficacy and vaccine coverage. With a vaccine uptake of 20%, 68 cases would allow a detection of vaccine effectiveness of 80% assuming a two-sided test with a significance level of 0.05 and 80% power. If the vaccine uptake is 30% only 44 cases would be needed to detect a vaccine effectiveness of 80%.
One must take into consideration that both cases and controls may have incomplete immunization series. If there are a sufficient number of cases, one dose vaccine efficacy will also be examined.
Statistical Analysis
Analyses will be performed using SAS® (Version 9.2 Cary, NC). Demographic and risk factor variables will be examined. Continuous, parametric data will be presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD); continuous, non-parametric data will be presented as median (inter-quartile range). Categorical data will be presented as frequency (percentage) by category. Continuous, parametric data will be analyzed with ANOVA or Student's t-test. Categorical data will be analyzed with chi-square or Fisher's Exact Test as appropriate.
Logistic Regression will be used to estimate Vaccine Effectiveness (VE) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from the adjusted odds ratios (aORs) by using the formula VE = (1-aOR) X 100. Cases and controls will be matched on age, enrollment date, and geographic region. Cases will be compared to matched controls in order to evaluate the effectiveness of full (2 doses) and partial (1 dose) vaccination. Initially, univariate conditional logistic regression analyses will be performed to determine which covariates should be included in the multivariable analysis. The explanatory variable of interest is vaccination status. If sample size permits, vaccine effectiveness will be calculated by serotype. Other possible covariates to be included are: date of birth, age at onset, season, insurance status (public/none versus private) and point of care (hospital or ED). Variables with p-values ≤ 0.20 will selected as candidates for multivariable analysis. Multicollinearity among the covariates will be examined by evaluating variance inflation factors. If collinearity is present, only one of the correlated variables will be entered into the model at a time. Analysis will be rerun choosing alternative correlated variables and the models will be compared. The model with the lowest Akaike information criterion (AIC) will be chosen as the final model. Model selection will include stepwise, forward selection, and backwards elimination. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test will be used to determine goodness of fit.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rotavirus Positive Cases | This group includes all participants who submitted a stool specimen that tested positive for Rotavirus. | ||
| Rotavirus Negative Controls | This group includes all participants who submitted a stool specimen that tested negative for Rotavirus. |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Matched VE Participants in the Minimum Age Model | RV1 Vaccine Effectiveness (VE) was studied using a subset of the active surveillance participants who were at least 52 days of age. The recommend age for the first dose is 42 days, but children are considered vaccinated if they receive that dose within 4 days of the recommended age, which lowers the acceptable minimum age to 38 days. We added 14 days to enable them to mount an immune response to arrive at a minimum age of 52 days. We estimated RV1 VE of 2 doses vs 0 doses and 1 dose vs 0 doses. | 14 days from the date of enrollment |
| Vaccine Effectiveness of RV1 in the Minmum Age Model | RV1 Vaccine Effectiveness (VE) was studied using a subset of the active surveillance participants who were age-eligible to receive at least the first dose of RV1 vaccine. Only valid RV1 vaccinations were considered. We estimated RV1 VE of 2 doses vs 0 doses and 1 dose vs 0 doses. VE was estimated as (1 - exposure odds ratio) x 100. | 14 days from the date of enrollment |
| Matched VE Participants in the Maximum Age Model | RV1 Vaccine Effectiveness (VE) was studied using a subset of the active surveillance participants who were at least 8 months of age, the maximum recommend age for completion of 2 doses of RV1. We estimated RV1 VE of 2 doses vs 0 doses and 1 dose vs 0 doses. | 14 days from the date of enrollment |
| Vaccine Effectiveness of RV1 in the Maximum Age Model | RV1 Vaccine Effectiveness (VE) was studied using a subset of the active surveillance participants who were greater than or equal to 8 months of age, the maximum recommended age for completion of two doses of RV1 vaccine. Only valid RV1 vaccinations were considered. We estimated RV1 VE of 2 doses vs 0 doses and 1 dose vs 0 doses. VE was estimated as (1 - exposure odds ratio) x 100. | 14 days from the date of enrollment |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
the child is < 6 years of age
for the vaccine effectiveness analysis using the Minimum Age Model, the child was included if born on or after 8/10/2008 at MUSC and on or after 12/1/2008 at CCHMC.
for the vaccine effectiveness analysis using the Maximum Age Model, the child was included if >=8 months of age.
the child is being evaluated at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (CCHMC) or the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) as an inpatient, short-stay visit or in the emergency department
the child has acute gastroenteritis defined as
-vomiting (>1 episodes in a 24 hour period)
the child's illness is of <10 days duration
written consent is obtained from the child's parent or legal guardian
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Children who are an inpatient or a patient of the Emergency Department with symptoms of acute gastroenteritis.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Mary A Staat, MD, MPH | Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medical University of South Carolina | Charleston | South Carolina | 29425 | United States |
362 participants were enrolled in the overall study, which is stated in the protocol section. The participant totals in Models One and Two do not equal the overall number enrolled because some participants were included in both models.
Children less than 6 years of age with hospitalizations and emergency department (ED visits due to AGE between 1/1/2008-6/30/2012 were prospectively recruited to participate in the study at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (CCHMC) and the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC).
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Vaccine Effectiveness Study Population - Rotavirus Positive Cases | Patients eligible for active surveillance based on the recruitment details and eligibility criteria who provided a stool specimen to be tested that had a positive stool sample. |
| FG001 | Vaccine Effectiveness Study Population - Rotavirus Negative Controls | Patients eligible for active surveillance based on the recruitment details and eligibility criteria who provided a stool specimen to be tested that had a Negative stool sample. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Participants were included in the parent provided informed consent, if an adequate stool specimen was provided, the child was <6 years of age, had symptoms <10 days duration that were consistent with acute gastroenteritis.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Rotavirus Positive Cases | All stool specimens were tested for rotavirus. Participants with a positive test result are included in this category. |
| BG001 | Rotavirus Negative Controls |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Matched VE Participants in the Minimum Age Model | RV1 Vaccine Effectiveness (VE) was studied using a subset of the active surveillance participants who were at least 52 days of age. The recommend age for the first dose is 42 days, but children are considered vaccinated if they receive that dose within 4 days of the recommended age, which lowers the acceptable minimum age to 38 days. We added 14 days to enable them to mount an immune response to arrive at a minimum age of 52 days. We estimated RV1 VE of 2 doses vs 0 doses and 1 dose vs 0 doses. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 14 days from the date of enrollment |
|
From date of enrollment until sample collection, a maximum of 14 days.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Rotavirus Positive Cases | Cases are those participants who tested positive for rotavirus. |
Not provided
Not provided
Limitations of the study include very low numbers of rotavirus cases and temporary halt in use of Rotarix vaccine due to presence of porcine virus in the vaccine which resulted in several children receiving mixed doses of vaccine and a delayed uptake in Rotarix vaccine.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Mary Allen Staat | Cincinnati Childrens Hospital Medical Center | 513-636-7083 | mary.staat@cchmc.org |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Stool specimen
All stool specimens were tested for rotavirus. Participants with a negative test result are included in this category.
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Median | Full Range | months |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Vaccination Status | Vaccination status: Partially vaccinated equal to single dose. Fully vaccinated equal to two doses. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| OG001 |
| Minimum Age Model - Rotavirus Negative Controls |
All stool samples were tested using Rotaclone, a commercially available immunoassay and this group contain those participants that tested negative for rotavirus. |
|
|
| Primary | Vaccine Effectiveness of RV1 in the Minmum Age Model | RV1 Vaccine Effectiveness (VE) was studied using a subset of the active surveillance participants who were age-eligible to receive at least the first dose of RV1 vaccine. Only valid RV1 vaccinations were considered. We estimated RV1 VE of 2 doses vs 0 doses and 1 dose vs 0 doses. VE was estimated as (1 - exposure odds ratio) x 100. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percent probability | 14 days from the date of enrollment |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Matched VE Participants in the Maximum Age Model | RV1 Vaccine Effectiveness (VE) was studied using a subset of the active surveillance participants who were at least 8 months of age, the maximum recommend age for completion of 2 doses of RV1. We estimated RV1 VE of 2 doses vs 0 doses and 1 dose vs 0 doses. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 14 days from the date of enrollment |
|
|
|
| Primary | Vaccine Effectiveness of RV1 in the Maximum Age Model | RV1 Vaccine Effectiveness (VE) was studied using a subset of the active surveillance participants who were greater than or equal to 8 months of age, the maximum recommended age for completion of two doses of RV1 vaccine. Only valid RV1 vaccinations were considered. We estimated RV1 VE of 2 doses vs 0 doses and 1 dose vs 0 doses. VE was estimated as (1 - exposure odds ratio) x 100. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage probability | 14 days from the date of enrollment |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 49 |
| 0 |
| 49 |
| 0 |
| 49 |
| EG001 | Rotavirus Negative Controls | Controls are those participants who tested negative for rotavirus. | 0 | 313 | 0 | 313 | 0 | 313 |
Not provided
Not provided
| Odds Ratio (OR) |
| 0.41 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| 0.15 |
| 1.13 |
Conditional logistic regression was used for matched analyses. Adjusted VE = (1 - adjusted OR) * 100 |
| Superiority or Other |
| 2 Doses |
|
| Odds Ratio (OR) |
| 0.23 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| 0.06 |
| 0.87 |
Multivariable logistic regression including month and year of birth and month and year of symptom onset as covariates was used for unmatched analyses. Adjusted VE = (1 - adjusted OR) * 100. |
| Superiority or Other |