Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A proof of concept study to evaluate the feasibility of safe and effective treatment of upper limb spasticity using the Cryo-Touch III Device.
Spasticity, common in neurological disorders, is part of the upper motor neuron syndrome displaying increased tone, clonus, spasms, spastic dystonia and co- contractions. The impact of spasticity on the patient varies from a subtle neurological sign to severe spasticity causing pain and contractures. Upper limb spasticity (ULS) is the rapid contraction or shortening of the muscles in the arm causing abnormal muscle movements in the elbow, wrist and fingers. It has been reported that over 1 million Americans with traumatic injury to the brain or spinal cord, stroke, multiple sclerosis and cerebral palsy experience ULS. Tightly clenched fists, twisted wrist and elbow joints, and fixed arms in flexed positions result in extreme discomfort, pain and spasm. A nonsurgical, minimally invasive, effective approach to pain associated with ULS is desirable.
Myoscience, Inc. (Redwood City, CA) has developed a pain management device - the Cryo-Touch III - for a novel, minimally invasive procedure using focused cold therapy to target sensory nerve tissue and offer long-lasting pain relief through cryoanalgesia. The device operates on the well-established cryobiology principle that localized exposure to controlled, moderately low temperature conditions can alter tissue function. The therapy treats nerves via a probe in the form of an assembly of small diameter needles, creating a highly localized, low temperature treatment zone around the probe. This focused cold therapy creates a conduction block that prevents nerve signaling. Prior studies of the Cryo-Touch, Cryo-Touch II, Cryo-Touch III (a.k.a. PCP 1.0) devices have provided preliminary evidence of effectiveness on motor nerves and have been shown to be safe with no serious device-related adverse events.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment with the Cryo-Touch III Device | Experimental |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment with Cryo-Touch III device | Device |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Decrease in Pain and Symptoms Caused by Hypertonia in the Upper Arm as Measured by an Improvement of 1 Point or Greater on the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) at Day 7 | The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) is 6-point scale designed to assess muscle tone and spasticity through the flexion or extension of a joint. Muscle response is graded on a scale from 0 (no increase in muscle tone) to 4 (affected parts rigid in flexion or extension). This includes a 1+ rating, which further distinguishes the types of increase in muscle tone from those described by a 1 or 2 rating. | Baseline to: post-treatment (Day 0), Day 7, Day 30 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Improvement in Spasticity as Measured by the Tardieu Scale | The Tardieu Scale uses the application of stretch at several velocities to quantify muscle response and assess muscle spasticity. Two specified velocities were assessed (V1 and V2). For each stretch, quality of muscle reaction (X) is recorded on a 6-point scale from 0 (no resistance throughout passive movement) to 5 (immovable joint). | Baseline to: post-treatment (Day 0), Day 7, Day 30 |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kansas City Bone and Joint Clinic | Overland Park | Kansas | 66211 | United States | ||
| Dr. Mitchell Paulin |
Not provided
Enrollment for the study was initiated April 22, 2013 and was completed June 28, 2013 at two investigational sites.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Treatment With the Cryo-Touch III Device | Treatment with Cryo-Touch III device |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Treatment With the Cryo-Touch III Device | Treatment with Cryo-Touch III device |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Decrease in Pain and Symptoms Caused by Hypertonia in the Upper Arm as Measured by an Improvement of 1 Point or Greater on the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) at Day 7 | The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) is 6-point scale designed to assess muscle tone and spasticity through the flexion or extension of a joint. Muscle response is graded on a scale from 0 (no increase in muscle tone) to 4 (affected parts rigid in flexion or extension). This includes a 1+ rating, which further distinguishes the types of increase in muscle tone from those described by a 1 or 2 rating. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | average MAS Score, absolute | Baseline to: post-treatment (Day 0), Day 7, Day 30 |
|
Adverse event data was collected from Day 0-Treatment day to Day 56-EOS.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Treatment With the Cryo-Touch III Device | Treatment with Cryo-Touch III device |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colon cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | Systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soreness at triceps, left elbow | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medical Information | Pacira Bioscience, Inc. | 1-855-793-9729 | MedInfo@Pacira.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Nov 30, 2012 | Mar 31, 2023 | Prot_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Improvement in Spasm Frequency and Severity as Measured by the Penn Spasm Score | The Penn Spasm Score, which is a patient reported score, consists of two sub-scales: the spasm frequency score and the spasm severity scale3. The Penn spasm frequency is assessed on a 5-point scale from 0 (no spasms) to 4 (spasms occurring more than ten times per hour). The spasm severity scale consists of three ratings, which are 1 (mild), 2 (moderate) and 3 (severe). | Baseline to: post-treatment (Day 0), Day 7, Day 30 |
| Improvement in Upper Extremity Motor Recovery as Measured by the Fugl-Meyer Scale (Post Stroke Subjects Only) | The Fugl-Meyer Scale is an assessment consisting of 33 movements, each rated as "0" (cannot perform), "1" (can partially perform) or "2" (can perform fully). A Subject's score is the sum of their ratings on each of these items, where the maximum (best) score is a 66. | Baseline to: post-treatment (Day 0), Day 7, Day 30 |
| Subject Assessed Change in Mean Spasticity Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score | The NRS is an 11-point scale from 0 to 10, where lower scores represent less spasticity. | baseline to: post-treatment (Day 0), Day 7, Day 30 |
| Improvement in Pain as Assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | Visual Analog Scale assesses pain on a 0-10 point range. 0= no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable. Higher score is associated with a worse outcome. | Baseline to: Post-treatment (Day 0), Day 7, Day 30 |
| Duration of Treatment Effect | Subjects were asked to report the duration of treatment effect at Day 7,Day 30, and Day 56. Subjects could designate their results as "effect" "no effect" or "no longer effective". Subjects reporting "effect" at Day 56 were followed to Day 84; those with effect at Day 84 continued to be followed to Day 112. | Day 7, Day 30, Day 56, Day 84, Day 112 |
| Paoli |
| Pennsylvania |
| 19301 |
| United States |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Primary Diagnosis | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Secondary | Improvement in Spasticity as Measured by the Tardieu Scale | The Tardieu Scale uses the application of stretch at several velocities to quantify muscle response and assess muscle spasticity. Two specified velocities were assessed (V1 and V2). For each stretch, quality of muscle reaction (X) is recorded on a 6-point scale from 0 (no resistance throughout passive movement) to 5 (immovable joint). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | average X Score, absolute | Baseline to: post-treatment (Day 0), Day 7, Day 30 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Improvement in Spasm Frequency and Severity as Measured by the Penn Spasm Score | The Penn Spasm Score, which is a patient reported score, consists of two sub-scales: the spasm frequency score and the spasm severity scale3. The Penn spasm frequency is assessed on a 5-point scale from 0 (no spasms) to 4 (spasms occurring more than ten times per hour). The spasm severity scale consists of three ratings, which are 1 (mild), 2 (moderate) and 3 (severe). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Average Penn Spasm Score, absolute | Baseline to: post-treatment (Day 0), Day 7, Day 30 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Improvement in Upper Extremity Motor Recovery as Measured by the Fugl-Meyer Scale (Post Stroke Subjects Only) | The Fugl-Meyer Scale is an assessment consisting of 33 movements, each rated as "0" (cannot perform), "1" (can partially perform) or "2" (can perform fully). A Subject's score is the sum of their ratings on each of these items, where the maximum (best) score is a 66. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | average Fugl-Meyer Sum Score, absolute | Baseline to: post-treatment (Day 0), Day 7, Day 30 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Subject Assessed Change in Mean Spasticity Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score | The NRS is an 11-point scale from 0 to 10, where lower scores represent less spasticity. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | average NRS score, absolute | baseline to: post-treatment (Day 0), Day 7, Day 30 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Improvement in Pain as Assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | Visual Analog Scale assesses pain on a 0-10 point range. 0= no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable. Higher score is associated with a worse outcome. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | average VAS Score, absolute | Baseline to: Post-treatment (Day 0), Day 7, Day 30 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Duration of Treatment Effect | Subjects were asked to report the duration of treatment effect at Day 7,Day 30, and Day 56. Subjects could designate their results as "effect" "no effect" or "no longer effective". Subjects reporting "effect" at Day 56 were followed to Day 84; those with effect at Day 84 continued to be followed to Day 112. | Subjects reporting "effect" at Day 56 were followed to Day 84; those with effect at Day 84 continued to be followed to Day 112. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Day 7, Day 30, Day 56, Day 84, Day 112 |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 19 |
| 2 |
| 19 |
| 1 |
| 19 |
| Cellulitis right side of scrotum and groin | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| temporary increase in spasticity of treated extremity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| seizure | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| edema left clavicular | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Average X Score V1 at Day 30 |
|
| Average X Score V2 at Baseline |
|
| Average X score V2 post-treatment |
|
| Average X Score V2 at Day 7 |
|
| Average X Score V2 at Day 30 |
|
|
| Average Penn Frequency Score Day 30 |
|
| Average Penn Severity Score Baseline |
|
| Average Penn Severity Score Post-treatment |
|
| Average Penn Severity Score Day 7 |
|
| Average Penn Severity Score Day 30 |
|
|
| Average Fugl-Meyer Sum Score Day 30 |
|
|
| Average NRS score Day 30 |
|
|
| Average VAS score Day 30 |
|
|
| Day 56 |
|
|
| Day 84 |
|
|
| Day 112 |
|
|