Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of cryolipolysis for non-invasive reduction of submental fat.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fat Reduction | Experimental |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Zeltiq System | Device | Non-invasive cooling is applied to the treatment area with a defined cooling rate and duration. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Device and/or Procedure Related Adverse Events (AEs) and Device-related Serious Adverse Events (SADEs) | An AE was any untoward medical occurrence, unintended disease or injury, or untoward clinical signs (including abnormal laboratory findings) in participants, whether or not considered related to treatment. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE that resulted in death, serious deterioration in health, permanent impairment of a body structure/function, was life-threatening, required hospitalization or medical/surgical intervention, led to fetal distress or death, congenital abnormality, or birth defect. An ADE was any sign, symptom, or disease that was determined by the Investigator to have a causal relationship or possible causal relationship with the investigational device, including any AE resulting from insufficient or inadequate instructions for use, deployment, implantation, installation, or operation, or any malfunction of the device or from use error or intentional misuse of the device. A SADE was an ADE that resulted in any of the consequences characteristic of an SAE. | 8-weeks post treatment |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the Fat Layer of the Treated Area as Measured by Ultrasound | Change in the fat layer thickness will be calculated by comparison of pre-treatment and 8-week post-treatment ultrasound measurements taken in the area treated with the device, and in the adjacent untreated control area. The Sponsor's standardized techniques for obtaining ultrasound imaging will be used. Overall fat layer thickness changes were normalized for each subject by subtracting the change in control (untreated area) from the change in treated area to remove the influence of weight variations. Success is defined as, on average, at least a 1mm or greater reduction in fat layer thickness for the treated region as compared to the untreated control. Results indicate the mean fat layer reduction in mm. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Innovation Research Center | Pleasanton | California | 94588 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Fat Reduction | The Zeltiq System: Non-invasive cooling applied to the treatment area with a defined cooling rate and duration. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Fat Reduction | The Zeltiq System: Non-invasive cooling applied to the treatment area with a defined cooling rate and duration. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Participants With Device and/or Procedure Related Adverse Events (AEs) and Device-related Serious Adverse Events (SADEs) | An AE was any untoward medical occurrence, unintended disease or injury, or untoward clinical signs (including abnormal laboratory findings) in participants, whether or not considered related to treatment. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE that resulted in death, serious deterioration in health, permanent impairment of a body structure/function, was life-threatening, required hospitalization or medical/surgical intervention, led to fetal distress or death, congenital abnormality, or birth defect. An ADE was any sign, symptom, or disease that was determined by the Investigator to have a causal relationship or possible causal relationship with the investigational device, including any AE resulting from insufficient or inadequate instructions for use, deployment, implantation, installation, or operation, or any malfunction of the device or from use error or intentional misuse of the device. A SADE was an ADE that resulted in any of the consequences characteristic of an SAE. | All enrolled subjects (Fat Reduction group) who received treatment. | Posted | Number | participants | 8-weeks post treatment |
Any adverse event information was collected from the time of study enrollment through the 8-week post-treatment follow-up visit, up to 10 weeks.
The Safety Population consisted of all enrolled participants who received at least one study treatment.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Fat Reduction | The Zeltiq System: Non-invasive cooling is applied to the treatment area with a defined cooling rate and duration. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sally Hallas, RN, Director Clinical Development - Body Contouring | Zeltiq Aesthetics | 209-294-5571 | sally.hallas@abbvie.com |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015187 | Lipectomy |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003357 | Cosmetic Techniques |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D050110 | Bariatric Surgery |
| D049088 | Bariatrics |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Baseline, 8-weeks post treatment |
| Number of Pre- and Post-Treatment Photograph Pair Reviews (Correctly Identified by an Internal Reviewer Panel of 4 Reviewers) | Photographs of the treatment areas taken at baseline and 8-weeks after final treatment were assessed for visible changes in contour in the treated areas. Pre- and post-treatment photograph pairs were randomized and reviewed by a blinded reviewer panel of 4 reviewers. | 8-weeks post treatment |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| OG000 | Fat Reduction | The Zeltiq System: Non-invasive cooling is applied to the treatment area with a defined cooling rate and duration. |
|
|
| Secondary | Change in the Fat Layer of the Treated Area as Measured by Ultrasound | Change in the fat layer thickness will be calculated by comparison of pre-treatment and 8-week post-treatment ultrasound measurements taken in the area treated with the device, and in the adjacent untreated control area. The Sponsor's standardized techniques for obtaining ultrasound imaging will be used. Overall fat layer thickness changes were normalized for each subject by subtracting the change in control (untreated area) from the change in treated area to remove the influence of weight variations. Success is defined as, on average, at least a 1mm or greater reduction in fat layer thickness for the treated region as compared to the untreated control. Results indicate the mean fat layer reduction in mm. | Per Protocol population consisted of participants who received treatment and had ultrasound data collected at the 8-weeks post treatment time point. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | mm | Baseline, 8-weeks post treatment |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Pre- and Post-Treatment Photograph Pair Reviews (Correctly Identified by an Internal Reviewer Panel of 4 Reviewers) | Photographs of the treatment areas taken at baseline and 8-weeks after final treatment were assessed for visible changes in contour in the treated areas. Pre- and post-treatment photograph pairs were randomized and reviewed by a blinded reviewer panel of 4 reviewers. | Per Protocol population consisted of participants who received treatment, had a weight change of no more than 10 pounds, and did not become pregnant at the time the 8-week assessments were performed compared to the weight obtained at the first treatment visit. | Posted | Number | Number of correct photo pair reviews | 8-weeks post treatment | Photograph Pair Reviews | Photograph Pair Reviews |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 14 |
| 0 |
| 14 |
| 0 |
| 14 |
Not provided
Not provided
| D000073319 |
| Obesity Management |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
| D019651 | Plastic Surgery Procedures |