Conservative Versus Non-conservative Treatment for Severe Dental Caries in Preschool Children and Its Impact on Oral Health-related Quality of Life, Anthropometric Measures, Space Loss and Anxiety: a Randomized Clinical Trial
Conservative Versus Non-conservative Treatment for Severe Dental Caries in Preschool Children and Its Impact on Oral Health-related Quality of Life, Anthropometric Measures, Space Loss and Anxiety: a Randomized Clinical Trial
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of the conservative (pulpectomy) versus non-conservative treatment (tooth extraction) of primary molars affected with severe dental caries associated to oral health-related quality of life, anthropometric and clinical outcomes.
Treatment: evaluate two interventions for treating severe dental caries in primary molared of preschool children.
SAMPLE: preschool children aged 3 to 5 years with severe dental caries (SDC) in primary molars. SDC will be indicated by the Pufa index. The Pufa index records the presence of severely decayed teeth with visible pulp involvement (p), ulceration of the oral mucosa owing to root fragments (u), fistula (f) and abscess (a). Children with pufa-score > 0 in primary molars will be included in the study. All children aged 3 to 5 years, who sought dental screening at the Dental School, University of São Paulo (USP) in August to October 2013 can be initially eligible.
CLINICAL GROUPS RANDOMLY ASSIGNED:
Group A: Conservative treatment represented by pulpectomies + teeth restoration with composite resin crown.
Group B: Dental extraction
FOLLOW-UP: 4, 8 and 12 months.
OUTCOMES: All outcomes will be assessed by a single person interviewer/examiner blinded to the oral treatments groups.
Oral Health-Related Quality of Life:
Anthropometric measures:
Dental anxiety (Facial Image Scale).
Dental pain (Wong-Baker Scale)
Problems in the developing occlusion: loss of space
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: